pitti | Good morning | 03:30 |
---|---|---|
larsu | pitti: good morning :) How are you? | 03:33 |
pitti | hey larsu! prima, danke, und Dir? | 03:37 |
pitti | larsu: are you still at Ryan's? | 03:37 |
larsu | pitti: auch sehr gut! Hacking away on a balcony in Toronto :) | 03:37 |
larsu | I'm in Toronto, but not at Ryan's place | 03:38 |
pitti | sweet | 03:38 |
larsu | ya, it's an awesome night here. And I have a very good view of the cn tower | 03:40 |
larsu | it changes its lights in hypnotizing ways... | 03:41 |
pitti | and you can still work on code with that? :-) | 03:42 |
larsu | I admit that it distracts me for a couple of minutes every now and then :D | 03:43 |
pitti | larsu: well, so do IRC, G+, youtube, etc. :) | 03:57 |
larsu | hehe, true! | 03:58 |
Mirv | hello | 04:28 |
didrocks | good morning | 06:00 |
didrocks | good morning Mirv ;) | 06:04 |
Mirv | morning didrocks! | 06:17 |
didrocks | Mirv: how are you? | 06:17 |
Mirv | didrocks: sad that sdk still didn't build, there was a python script added yesterday to the trunk without python dependency.. otherwise fine :) | 06:19 |
didrocks | Mirv: remind them to ask whenever they think there is a package change needed :) | 06:19 |
didrocks | Mirv: should I retrigger the build now? | 06:19 |
Mirv | didrocks: not yet | 06:21 |
didrocks | Mirv: ok, keep me posted, I want to have next ready today :) | 06:22 |
Mirv | ok, will do | 06:22 |
jibel | good morning | 06:52 |
Mirv | didrocks: can we start the Qt uploads now? | 06:53 |
didrocks | salut jibel! Il y a enfin du soleil ici! et toi? :) | 06:54 |
didrocks | Mirv: doing | 06:54 |
jibel | didrocks, salut! oui enfin, c'est l'heure d'aller à la plage :) | 06:55 |
didrocks | et de manger une glace! :) | 06:55 |
Sweetsha1k | xnox: awesome thanks! | 07:03 |
Sweetsha1k | Moin a tous btw! | 07:03 |
=== Sweetsha1k is now known as Sweetshark | ||
didrocks | Mirv: fail :p | 07:06 |
didrocks | Sweetshark: bonjour bonjour :) | 07:06 |
Mirv | didrocks: :( | 07:07 |
didrocks | Mirv: do you need a hand? | 07:07 |
didrocks | Mirv: I didn't look at the content, just got email spam :) | 07:07 |
Mirv | didrocks: I wonder if I haven't subscribed to something.. | 07:09 |
didrocks | Mirv: you should get the FTBFS from ~ubuntu-unity ppas? | 07:09 |
didrocks | as you are part of the team | 07:09 |
Mirv | didrocks: hmm, which fail you are talking about actually, apparently not related to Qt 5.0.2 packages? | 07:13 |
Mirv | didrocks: ah, yes, ui-toolkit. I meant to ask about saucy Qt uploads :) | 07:14 |
didrocks | Mirv: I'm getting <xxx> build of ubuntu-ui-toolkit <version> build failure emails | 07:14 |
didrocks | Mirv: you do get those emails, right? | 07:14 |
Mirv | I'm still looking at the ui-toolkit, there's more than just the dependency error | 07:14 |
Mirv | didrocks: yes, I get those | 07:14 |
didrocks | Mirv: ok, let's get that done, rebuild and then, moving to Qt, ok? | 07:14 |
Mirv | didrocks: sure | 07:15 |
didrocks | keep me posted or ask me if you have any question :) | 07:15 |
Mirv | I'm just multi-tasking a bit while I've pbuilder runs going on | 07:16 |
Mirv | ok | 07:16 |
=== Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk | ||
=== Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha | ||
Laney | morning | 07:57 |
didrocks | hey Laney! | 07:57 |
Laney | didier! | 07:58 |
seb128 | hey desktopers | 07:58 |
seb128 | hey Laney didrocks | 07:58 |
Laney | seb! | 07:58 |
seb128 | how are you? | 07:58 |
didrocks | salut seb128! | 07:58 |
didrocks | good good, yourself? | 07:58 |
seb128 | I'm good | 07:58 |
seb128 | in this rainy tuesday :p | 07:58 |
didrocks | someone stole my sun! | 07:58 |
didrocks | it was around this morning, I saw it | 07:58 |
seb128 | not me | 07:58 |
didrocks | where is it now? :p | 07:58 |
seb128 | doh, it's already tuesday, it feels like the week just started ... I will miss the short work weeks and log weekends | 07:59 |
didrocks | seb128: it's even thursday, not tuesday :p | 07:59 |
seb128 | the national holidays fun is mostly over for a while now | 07:59 |
seb128 | didrocks, double doh :p | 07:59 |
Laney | nah, if you move to the UK you get one on Monday :P | 07:59 |
didrocks | seb128: hem, we can create some :p | 07:59 |
seb128 | Laney, ;-) | 08:00 |
didrocks | seb128: did you hear about the national rain day? :) | 08:00 |
didrocks | I heard it's off :p | 08:00 |
seb128 | Laney, can I get non-rainy weather as well with it? | 08:00 |
seb128 | didrocks, seems like every day until end of the month? | 08:00 |
seb128 | ;-) | 08:00 |
Laney | http://www.bbc.co.uk/weather/2641170 says no :( | 08:00 |
didrocks | seb128: yeah, I read the same, should be true then! | 08:00 |
* didrocks opens canonicaladmin | 08:00 | |
* seb128 shakes fist at the weather | 08:00 | |
didrocks | :) | 08:01 |
didrocks | Mirv: sdk fix is found and merging? If so, we can maybe starts the Qt part together | 08:03 |
Mirv | didrocks: it's merging yes now | 08:05 |
Mirv | didrocks: yes we can | 08:05 |
=== alan_g|life is now known as alan_g | ||
didrocks | Mirv: ok, so, I open https://docs.google.com/a/canonical.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AjuCdq68GSyVdFI4QzNQdWpfME5aMEV2VXo0cUpOMkE#gid=4 | 08:06 |
Mirv | first part would be from qtbase to qtdeclarative. I'm looking at qtscript a bit since it's in Debian NEW queue and apparently I can't fetch the orig tarball directly from there | 08:07 |
didrocks | Mirv: do you mind giving me edit rights? that will enable me to copy/paste only the branch url :) | 08:07 |
Mirv | and first part of the first part would be checking and uploading qtbase | 08:07 |
didrocks | Mirv: ok :) | 08:07 |
Mirv | didrocks: added | 08:08 |
didrocks | Mirv: thanks :) | 08:08 |
didrocks | Mirv: nice document btw, really helpfull | 08:08 |
=== achiang` is now known as achiang | ||
Mirv | thanks, it was really needed to keep things in order | 08:08 |
didrocks | Mirv: ok, qt-default to be arch: any is a debian thing? they do want it? | 08:16 |
didrocks | qt5-default* | 08:17 |
Mirv | didrocks: yes, they now ship configuration files in multi-arch triplet dirs | 08:21 |
didrocks | ok | 08:23 |
didrocks | that's what I saw | 08:23 |
didrocks | Mirv: just an advice: you should name upstream patch git_… | 08:24 |
didrocks | Mirv: that's easier then to see if it doesn't apply that we should just remove it | 08:24 |
didrocks | speaking of debian/patches/rename_qabs_function_for_timeval.patch | 08:25 |
didrocks | and some others :) | 08:25 |
Mirv | right, thanks.. I'll try to remember that | 08:26 |
seb128 | Mirv, btw, I just upgrade with the qt5-beta-proper/saucy ppa, things work fine and my menus are back in the panel as they should | 08:26 |
seb128 | just upgraded* | 08:26 |
Mirv | seb128: thanks, I also tested, seems normal | 08:26 |
=== Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk | ||
ritz_ | seb128 bonjour , https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vino/+bug/1027086/comments/26 | 08:30 |
ubot2 | Ubuntu bug 1027086 in vino (Ubuntu Precise) "incorrect schema setting used for authentication-methods in vino server" [Medium,In progress] | 08:30 |
seb128 | ritz_, hey | 08:30 |
ritz_ | hi :) | 08:30 |
seb128 | ritz_, I'm still not really happy with the hack there, did anyone confirm that it's the solution wanted? | 08:31 |
ritz_ | seb128 , as per upstream, this is the way to go. | 08:32 |
ritz_ | removing the choice listing form schema | 08:32 |
seb128 | ritz_, ok, fine enough, you should subscribe ubuntu-sponsors to the bug so it's in the sponsoring queue | 08:32 |
=== Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha | ||
didrocks | Mirv: my new saucy pbuilder just starting to build qtbase :) | 08:36 |
sil2100 | didrocks: hi! I have a question related to the generic AP jobs - where does the /tmp/autopilot.head.*.skip file come from? | 08:37 |
sil2100 | didrocks: when is it created and what triggers it? | 08:37 |
Mirv | didrocks: ok! | 08:37 |
didrocks | sil2100: it's created when there is no tests to run for that stack | 08:41 |
didrocks | sil2100: that avoids UTAH to provision for nothing | 08:41 |
didrocks | so the -prepare and -check jobs create it if needed | 08:41 |
didrocks | sil2100: hum, did you rerun the HUD? | 08:42 |
sil2100 | didrocks: yes, just the tests | 08:43 |
didrocks | sil2100: you didn't check "with whole ppa", did you? | 08:43 |
sil2100 | didrocks: so hm, why is the OIF stack creating that file even though there is one test to be run? | 08:44 |
didrocks | sil2100: it won't take latest unity autopilot tests then | 08:44 |
sil2100 | didrocks: no, I just built with foo | 08:44 |
sil2100 | I just want to re-run | 08:44 |
sil2100 | To see if the 2 failures we have are reproducible | 08:44 |
didrocks | sil2100: ok, so not with unity-autopilot changes you did, right? | 08:44 |
sil2100 | Since HUD seems to have a strange regression | 08:44 |
sil2100 | didrocks: those got merged yesterday, right? | 08:45 |
sil2100 | So they're in already | 08:45 |
sil2100 | And they have been used | 08:45 |
didrocks | sil2100: "No new source uploaded to PPA and CHECK_WITH_WHOLE_PPA is not set. Skipping check! | 08:45 |
didrocks | " | 08:45 |
didrocks | so no need to run tests | 08:45 |
didrocks | for oif | 08:45 |
didrocks | sil2100: hum, really? | 08:45 |
didrocks | sil2100: ah, maybe unity is in next? | 08:45 |
didrocks | sil2100: because normally, they shouldn't be installed or veebers has an issue in his script… | 08:46 |
didrocks | sil2100: do you have the run that shows that latest unity is used, even built without --check-with-whole-ppa? | 08:46 |
sil2100 | didrocks: I'll double check, but the test results seem to show that my and Francis branch are in | 08:46 |
sil2100 | One moment | 08:46 |
didrocks | sil2100: weird weird weird ;) | 08:47 |
sil2100 | didrocks: so, it's using 7.0.0daily13.05.22.1ubuntu.unity.next-0ubuntu1, which is based on revision 3338, so with our two fixes included already | 08:52 |
sil2100 | didrocks: that's the one from yesterday's re-build it seems, 16 hours ago? | 08:52 |
didrocks | sil2100: ok, we need to ping veebers, seems the preseed regressed… | 08:55 |
sil2100 | didrocks: my understanding was that it is currently using the packages available in the daily-build-next PPA | 08:57 |
didrocks | sil2100: yeah, and that's wrong, we should only use the set | 08:59 |
didrocks | sil2100: I think his refactoring broke it | 08:59 |
sil2100 | didrocks: might be, as I remember he was doing some fixes there, so maybe the original idea got lost somewhere | 09:00 |
didrocks | yeah | 09:02 |
didrocks | sil2100: ok, let's try to get everything green today and in -next? | 09:02 |
sil2100 | attente: once you're up, give me a ping | 09:02 |
didrocks | sil2100: I think we are really close :) | 09:02 |
sil2100 | didrocks: yea, let's do that - I think we are, I re-built all the packages that failed for unity, the problems being the one unit test in libunity that likes to time out (Paweł is trying to fix it now) | 09:03 |
sil2100 | didrocks: since the home scope and libunity failed for powerpc, home scope because of missing libunity | 09:03 |
sil2100 | didrocks: if this test won't get fixed quickly, I would recommend disabling it temporarily, as it's slowing down the release process due to it's flackyness | 09:04 |
didrocks | sil2100: right, we need to give that to upstream as a TODO to get things fixed first | 09:05 |
didrocks | sil2100: hud finished | 09:08 |
sil2100 | One failure, hm | 09:09 |
sil2100 | Yes, this one I think is an actual regression, as I noticed it sometimes as well | 09:10 |
didrocks | Mirv: what do you mean by "(Synced but pkg transition)" ? | 09:10 |
sil2100 | i.e. no results returned | 09:10 |
didrocks | sil2100: is there anyone in the HUD circles to be able to fix this? | 09:10 |
sil2100 | didrocks: I could ask Pete and maybe someone from the unity-frontend team to take a look | 09:11 |
sil2100 | Normally I would ask Ted, but he's on holiday this week | 09:11 |
didrocks | sil2100: right, do you think we should manually publish for now? | 09:12 |
sil2100 | didrocks: let's do that, doesn't make sense to block on this issue | 09:13 |
didrocks | sil2100: you will handle it? | 09:14 |
didrocks | sil2100: maybe we can put the threshold to 1 as well for now? | 09:14 |
sil2100 | hmmm | 09:15 |
sil2100 | didrocks: ok, would make sense maybe, since anyway sometimes the fuzzy tests might fail because of invalid guessing | 09:16 |
didrocks | jibel: (as we don't have write access, isn't it?) ^ head/hud, triggers 1/1 for failure, regressions please :) | 09:16 |
sil2100 | didrocks: it's always sad to have a threshold set, but still better than having to manually publish every time | 09:16 |
didrocks | sil2100: right | 09:16 |
didrocks | sil2100: please do a manual publishing meanwhile :) | 09:16 |
sil2100 | didrocks: should I check the 'force' checkbox ;p? I forgot what it was for ;p | 09:18 |
didrocks | sil2100: not the first time | 09:19 |
didrocks | sil2100: it's to force is upstream stacks failing but we know we want to publish | 09:19 |
didrocks | sil2100: or if there are packaging changes and we ack them | 09:19 |
didrocks | Mirv: qtbase sponsored | 09:22 |
didrocks | Mirv: doing sync now | 09:22 |
didrocks | Mirv: waiting for your answer on synced but pkg transitions :p | 09:22 |
sil2100 | didrocks: the publish is yellow, since QA has failed to publish - is that ok? | 09:25 |
jibel | didrocks, I added ACLs for the desktop-team and you should have write access now. Coul dyou try? | 09:26 |
didrocks | jibel: sure | 09:27 |
didrocks | sil2100: well, you know that the QA stack can't interfere with runtime for the HUD | 09:28 |
didrocks | sil2100: so you can force the publication :) | 09:28 |
sil2100 | Checking force \o/ | 09:28 |
didrocks | jibel: worked perfectly :) | 09:28 |
Laney | where do I get unity-gtk-module from? daily-build-next? | 09:33 |
didrocks | sil2100: ^ | 09:33 |
Laney | maybe I'll just build the package :P | 09:34 |
sil2100 | Laney: yes ;) | 09:34 |
Laney | ty | 09:35 |
seb128 | Laney, do you need it for something or just trying it? | 09:39 |
Laney | updating gnome-terminal and it had menus in the app, thought that might fix it | 09:40 |
Mirv | didrocks: thanks, was on luch.. it means that "in sync with Debian in practice, but Ubuntu has additional package name transitions" (ie. replaces: etc) | 09:41 |
didrocks | Mirv: ok | 09:41 |
Laney | (it does not) | 09:41 |
Mirv | didrocks: so those need to be still uploaded with Ubuntu specific changes, compared to those that can be actually synced directly like qtjsbackend, qtxmlpatterns, qtsvg | 09:42 |
seb128 | Laney, to test you need to uninstall UBUNTU_MENUPROXY and you need indicator-appmenu trunk | 09:43 |
didrocks | Mirv: right :) | 09:43 |
seb128 | unset | 09:43 |
seb128 | or uninstall appmenu-gtk3 | 09:43 |
Laney | yeah it installs an Xsession.d file which does that | 09:43 |
Laney | the UBUNTU_MENUPROXY thing | 09:43 |
Laney | trunk> ok, getting | 09:43 |
Laney | I wonder why the "alternate scrolling" patch never went upstream | 09:46 |
Laney | seb128: do you know? | 09:46 |
didrocks | Mirv: do you mind providing a diff with debian for all the stuff we only have diff with replaces, conflicts and so on? | 09:46 |
didrocks | that will speed it up for me :) | 09:47 |
xnox | Sweetsha1k: my source package is $ dget http://people.canonical.com/~xnox/repo/libreoffice_4.0.2-0ubuntu2.dsc | 09:51 |
xnox | the original tarballs should be as in the archive atm. | 09:51 |
didrocks | Mirv: some copyright are not good on qtpim :/ | 09:51 |
darkxst | seb128, hi | 09:52 |
darkxst | did you ever get a change to look over my external panels for g-c-c patch? | 09:52 |
xnox | Sweetsha1k: libhsqldb-java got bumped higher in saucy-proposed, yet there is build-conflicts on the higher version in the libreoffice package. | 09:52 |
=== alan_g is now known as alan_g|tea | ||
xnox | Sweetsha1k: when building just on "saucy" without "saucy-proposed" i get one test failure. | 09:53 |
Laney | nope, still no menus even with trunk | 09:53 |
Laney | maybe something for attente to look at ;-) | 09:53 |
didrocks | Mirv: and no COPYING file in tarball, I think we need to fix that one with the exception | 09:53 |
Laney | the styling is kind of weird too for me | 09:54 |
Laney | like they don't get the orange background on hover | 09:54 |
didrocks | Mirv: shouldn't we have separated qt5 and qtdeclarative packages for the qml part? | 09:56 |
seb128 | Laney, which scrolling patch? | 09:56 |
seb128 | darkxst, hey, no, I'm still trying to get the new gtk in first to unblock other things | 09:56 |
Laney | seb128: 20_add_alt_screen_toggle_ui.patch | 09:57 |
seb128 | then I will look at the rdepends | 09:57 |
Laney | "Author: ?" is amusing :P | 09:57 |
seb128 | Laney, where is that? gtk? | 09:57 |
Laney | gnome-terminal | 09:57 |
seb128 | oh | 09:57 |
seb128 | no idea about that then | 09:57 |
Laney | it's for letting you scroll with the mousewheel in the pager (like manpages) | 09:57 |
Laney | I guess I can port it to the new gsettings stuff and forward it | 09:58 |
seb128 | right | 09:58 |
seb128 | but I wonder if that update is worth it | 09:58 |
seb128 | seems non trivial | 09:58 |
seb128 | but we need to get ride of gconf at some point | 09:59 |
Laney | right | 09:59 |
Laney | I don't think it'll be too hard to fix it up anyway | 10:00 |
Laney | of course the other option is to either get rid of the patch or force the config to always be on ... | 10:00 |
Mirv | didrocks: ok, I can provide the diff:s. looking at qtpim after that, it hasn't been in archives yet. | 10:01 |
didrocks | Mirv: yeah, that's why I'm doing a full review | 10:03 |
seb128 | yeah, qt 5.0.2 in the archive | 10:03 |
seb128 | didrocks, Mirv: well done ;-) | 10:03 |
sil2100 | \o/ | 10:04 |
didrocks | sil2100: do you mind running the unity stack if all the FTBFS are fixed? | 10:04 |
sil2100 | didrocks: without rebuilding, yes? I think the FTBFS are all fixed in the PPA by now | 10:05 |
didrocks | sil2100: yeah, so with "foo" : | 10:05 |
=== alan_g|tea is now known as alan_g | ||
didrocks | :) | 10:05 |
didrocks | and qtsensors sponsored | 10:05 |
sil2100 | didrocks: just did that ;) Let's see how the check job goes *keeps his fingers crossed* | 10:05 |
didrocks | :) | 10:06 |
* didrocks starts building qtwebkit | 10:09 | |
Laney | didrocks: I pinged Riddell about that one the other day - perhaps check he's not looking at it too | 10:11 |
Laney | (assuming you mean the sponsor request) | 10:11 |
Laney | (it was because he had a version stuck in proposed) | 10:11 |
didrocks | Laney: yeah, well, I started to build with qt 5.0.2, so we need to update for everything now, will ping him | 10:11 |
Laney | sure | 10:11 |
didrocks | Laney: in proposed? | 10:11 |
Laney | https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qtwebkit-source/2.3.0-0ubuntu3 | 10:11 |
Laney | if you mean this source | 10:11 |
didrocks | Laney: ah, I mean qtwebkit-opensource-src | 10:12 |
didrocks | which is the Qt5 version :) | 10:12 |
Laney | aha | 10:12 |
Laney | carry on :P | 10:12 |
didrocks | ;-) | 10:12 |
didrocks | qtsvg synced | 10:13 |
seb128 | Laney, did you handle the clutter MRs yesterday through your sync? they are still in the sponsoring queue | 10:14 |
didrocks | as well as qtimageformats, qttranslations was already in proposed | 10:14 |
Laney | seb128: let's see ... | 10:14 |
didrocks | Mirv: don't forget qtdeclarative for the diff at the top! | 10:14 |
Mirv | didrocks: yes, just added after assuming you want that too :) | 10:17 |
didrocks | Mirv: perfect! looking at those while qtwebkit is building | 10:17 |
didrocks | Mirv: qtquick1 is fine, I'm just waiting to build the other to have all build-deps :) | 10:17 |
darkxst | seb128, ok, yes we need gtk, just a little bit! ;) | 10:18 |
Laney | not sure what to do with the MP for an uploaded SRU | 10:18 |
Laney | darkxst: https://code.launchpad.net/~darkxst/ubuntu/raring/clutter-1.0/lp963925/+merge/164832 can you mark it merged maybe? | 10:18 |
Laney | to get it off the sponsoring list as it's in the upload queue now | 10:19 |
darkxst | Laney, done | 10:19 |
Laney | ty | 10:19 |
seb128 | darkxst, do you know if anyone looked at the software-center issue? | 10:20 |
didrocks | Mirv: hum, as 5.0.2-2 is not released | 10:20 |
darkxst | seb128, the crash | 10:20 |
seb128 | yes | 10:20 |
darkxst | ? | 10:20 |
didrocks | Mirv: in debian, I won't call ours 5.0.2-2ubuntu1 | 10:20 |
darkxst | I have never been able to reproduce it | 10:21 |
didrocks | Mirv: I'll remove the debian/changelog and add the cherry-pick as 5.0.2-1ubuntu1 | 10:21 |
seb128 | darkxst, the last issue listed on https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/desktop-gnome-3-8 | 10:21 |
seb128 | it seems the only remaining blocker | 10:21 |
seb128 | or maybe we should just upload... | 10:21 |
Laney | the screenshot/cheese thing is fixed? | 10:22 |
seb128 | screenshot is since 3.8.1 | 10:22 |
seb128 | (just edited the whiteboard) | 10:22 |
seb128 | what is the cheese issue? | 10:22 |
Mirv | didrocks: that's correct, thanks. there are some newer updates in Debian, though, but at the time of that sync the -2 was not yet uploaded | 10:22 |
seb128 | I don't use cheese | 10:22 |
seb128 | but I can test... | 10:22 |
Laney | same thing | 10:22 |
Laney | flashes the screen | 10:22 |
seb128 | ok, so yeah, it's fixed | 10:22 |
didrocks | Mirv: let's use that one ;) (pushed for qtdeclarative) | 10:22 |
Mirv | didrocks: thanks | 10:23 |
Laney | right, good - none of the bugs or the BP have any indication of that | 10:23 |
seb128 | I've updated the BP | 10:23 |
seb128 | upstream ignored the bug mterry opened but fixed following an IRC ping | 10:23 |
Laney | fair enough, probably can close that one then | 10:24 |
seb128 | yep | 10:24 |
seb128 | I don't have issues with s-c either | 10:24 |
darkxst | seb128, I would say go ahead with the upload, there really hasnt been much noise about the software-center crash | 10:24 |
seb128 | does anyone is running gtk 3.8 and has? | 10:24 |
Laney | we can do the trick of blocking it in proposed and watching jenkins for regressions too maybe | 10:25 |
seb128 | darkxst, well "noise", quite some users seem affected | 10:25 |
seb128 | Laney, let's do that, can you put the block? | 10:26 |
Laney | yes | 10:26 |
seb128 | thanks | 10:26 |
darkxst | seb128, there was a real crash earlier on | 10:26 |
seb128 | darkxst, ok, maybe it has been fixed ;-) | 10:26 |
Laney | blocked | 10:27 |
seb128 | Laney, thanks, I'm doing a test build on current saucy to make sure everything is still alright (like if it builds with the new glib) and I will upload to saucy after lunch | 10:28 |
Laney | excellent | 10:29 |
Laney | I'm leaning to porting this gnome-terminal patch without the UI bits | 10:29 |
Laney | defaulting to on | 10:29 |
seb128 | wfm | 10:29 |
Laney | the text didn't make sense anyway | 10:29 |
Laney | who knows what "alternate scrolling" is?! | 10:29 |
seb128 | seems like an old geeky option ;-) | 10:30 |
Laney | it's some technical term from within vte | 10:30 |
* Laney shrugs | 10:30 | |
Laney | mmm, gvim's gotten its menus back in the window too | 10:32 |
darkxst | Laney, I think that gnome-terminal patch, breaks the scroll back when not using overlay scrollbars | 10:35 |
Laney | yeah? | 10:38 |
Laney | that would be weird | 10:38 |
darkxst | Laney, well like when you scroll back to pause the output | 10:38 |
darkxst | it doesnt work, with alternate scrolling enabled | 10:38 |
darkxst | it will just keep scrolling | 10:38 |
Laney | right, I can understand effects like that | 10:38 |
Laney | but having an interaction with overlay scrollbars | 10:39 |
darkxst | well I don't use the overlay scrollbars, but I am sure it did work with them and not without | 10:39 |
Laney | ok, well I'll PPA it when done and we can see | 10:41 |
darkxst | ok | 10:41 |
didrocks | Mirv: ok, sponsored everything I can but qtwebkit that is still building, I let the rest on your hands :) | 10:53 |
didrocks | Mirv: on the sdk side, is it ok to rerun the stack? | 10:53 |
* didrocks wants to have everything published today | 10:53 | |
didrocks | Mirv: also, file a bug for the binary packages we need to remove | 10:54 |
czajkowski | andrewebdev: ello :0 | 10:54 |
andrewebdev | hi | 10:54 |
andrewebdev | morning all. Am in a spot of trouble here: http://askubuntu.com/questions/298881/13-04-unity-graphics-suddenly-broken-for-no-reason | 10:55 |
Mirv | didrocks: qtpim updated with copyright info and license files which I also submitted to upstream | 10:55 |
didrocks | ok, nice :) | 10:55 |
didrocks | Mirv: did you see my question about separate packages? | 10:55 |
Mirv | ok to run sdk stack | 10:56 |
didrocks | doing | 10:56 |
Mirv | didrocks: ok, going to file the bugs | 10:56 |
Mirv | didrocks: right, what did you mean with the qt5 <-> qml separation again? | 10:56 |
joetacos | how do i get pass the Ubuntu 13.04 installer it hangs after clicking 3rd party and download updates. and sometimes i get a black screen with text | 10:56 |
andrewebdev | Since my /home/ folder is on a separate partition, I was wondering if some faulty unity setting is stored in my home folder. Is there anyway I can delete all unity settings safely? | 10:56 |
czajkowski | didrocks: morning do you know best andrewebdev could ask for him with his question on AU ? | 10:56 |
didrocks | Mirv: IIRC, the qmldir packages were separated in <something>-plugin package | 10:56 |
didrocks | czajkowski: andrewebdev: I would say go on #ubuntu-unity and ask here, upstreams unity are there | 10:57 |
andrewebdev | :) | 10:57 |
andrewebdev | ok | 10:57 |
didrocks | but seeing the corruptions, it can be as well something for mlankhorst ^ | 10:57 |
didrocks | and tjaalton :) | 10:58 |
czajkowski | didrocks: thanks | 10:58 |
didrocks | yw ;) | 10:58 |
mlankhorst | we didn't touch raring in any way yet | 10:58 |
mlankhorst | so I would guess kernel | 10:58 |
didrocks | andrewebdev: #ubuntu-kernel then | 10:58 |
Mirv | didrocks: ah, for qtpim, probably that yes still | 10:59 |
didrocks | Mirv: ok :) | 11:00 |
Mirv | didrocks: qttools resynced with Debian | 11:00 |
mlankhorst | pitti: can autopkgtest descend subdirectories too? | 11:00 |
didrocks | Mirv: ok, will have a look after running outside (finishing an upload first) | 11:00 |
didrocks | Mirv: qtmultimedia-opensource-src FTBFS here | 11:01 |
pitti | mlankhorst: how do you mean? | 11:01 |
didrocks | Mirv: the symbols are not up to date | 11:01 |
pitti | mlankhorst: oh, you mean tests in debian/tests/subdir? I'm not actually sure | 11:01 |
pitti | mlankhorst: if you specify them that way in debian/tests/control it might work, but we never had such a case so far | 11:01 |
Mirv | didrocks: right, Debian seems to have done the updates after uploads, collecting from builders or something like that | 11:02 |
Mirv | (symbol updates) | 11:02 |
mlankhorst | pitti: can I test the Tests-Directory to some system path? right now I'm installing a bunch of tests to /usr/lib/xorg-integration-tests/SUBDIR/testname, so if I could set the Tests-Directory: to /usr/lib/xorg-integration-tests I could just specify the tests to run directly :) | 11:03 |
Mirv | but have not done that for qtmultimedia yet | 11:03 |
didrocks | Mirv: ok, waiting for this one :) | 11:04 |
Mirv | looking at the symbols after qtpim | 11:05 |
mlankhorst | hm I guess not | 11:05 |
=== MacSlow is now known as MacSlow|lunch | ||
mlankhorst | ah well, I'll write a script to invoke it for me then. :) | 11:10 |
pitti | mlankhorst: no, you'll need symlinks for that; they must be in debian/tests/ | 11:10 |
pitti | or a wrapper script which iterates over them, right | 11:10 |
pitti | hm, what the heck is wrong with gstreamer apps in saucy? totem and rhythmbox take like 30 seconds to start | 11:17 |
seb128 | pitti, wfm | 11:20 |
seb128 | pitti, but rb segfaults on track changes on g-i code | 11:20 |
seb128 | not sure if that's buggy code on the rb side or something wrong in the g-i stack though | 11:21 |
seb128 | ok, gtk 3.8 on its way to saucy-proposed, let's see how that goes | 11:22 |
seb128 | pitti, do you get any error during those 30s? can you get a gdb stacktrace to see where it's hanging? | 11:23 |
pitti | seb128: hm, I'll try after lunch | 11:25 |
pitti | seb128: no, when I start them from a terminal there is no output at all (nor an apport .crash) | 11:26 |
seb128 | weird | 11:26 |
pitti | [pid 4734] poll([{fd=10, events=POLLIN}], 1, 25000 | 11:26 |
pitti | strace is just sitting there | 11:26 |
seb128 | what about gdb? | 11:26 |
pitti | g_main_context_poll() | 11:27 |
seb128 | weird... | 11:27 |
pitti | ah, further down is g_dbus_connection_send_message_with_reply_sync() | 11:27 |
pitti | i. e. it's a temp main loop from gdbus sync (waiting for reply) | 11:27 |
pitti | ooh, hang on | 11:28 |
pitti | sorry, PEBCAK | 11:28 |
pitti | it was talking to gvfs-udisks2-volume-monitor, which was in STOPped state | 11:28 |
pitti | (fallout from me running udisks2 tests this morning) | 11:28 |
* pitti grabs brown paperbag | 11:28 | |
seb128 | pitti, k ;-) | 11:29 |
seb128 | still annoying that we have sync calls in there | 11:29 |
seb128 | the multimedia players shouldn't block on gvfs to start | 11:30 |
=== Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk | ||
=== Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha | ||
mlankhorst | pitti: hm server/server SKIP Test breaks testbed but testbed does not advertise revert-full-system | 11:39 |
mlankhorst | is breaks-testbed needed if temporary virtual input devices will be added, that can mess up if you are using the system for something else at the moment? | 11:40 |
=== alan_g is now known as alan_g|lunch | ||
Mirv | didrocks: qtpim updated again, same for qttools. interestingly qtmultimedia does not complain about symbols when I build it in pbuilder, only when I build it locally | 12:00 |
Mirv | didrocks: oh, but, I'm using raring. creating a saucy pbuilder. | 12:01 |
attente | sil2100, hey | 12:02 |
attente | Laney, are your gnome-terminal menus still broken? | 12:03 |
Laney | attente: this is with 3.8 that I'm preparing, and yes | 12:03 |
sil2100 | attente: hello! Again about u-g-m | 12:03 |
sil2100 | attente: I have been wondering... what would need to be done to be able to use unity-gtk3-module when appmenu-gtk3 is still installed? Will some patch have to be dropped from somewhere? | 12:04 |
attente | Laney, it's just gnome-terminal? everything else is ok? | 12:06 |
sil2100 | attente: I'm asking because hm, I prepared the packaging changes for u-g-m to replace appmenu-gtk, but since u-g-m is part of the unity stack, it's installation would remove appmenu-gtk and even the unity tests would currently run on u-g-m | 12:07 |
Laney | attente: gvim too | 12:07 |
attente | sil2100, are you asking about having both installed and being able to switch on-demand? | 12:07 |
sil2100 | attente: yes, for instance | 12:07 |
sil2100 | attente: since currently, I think we would prefer to test unity in the standard environment (i.e. with appmenu-gtk), and only unity-gtk-module-autopilot tests with the unity-gtk-module instead | 12:08 |
sil2100 | Not all of them with u-g-m, at least not yet until we won't make the official switch | 12:08 |
Laney | gvim gives some criticals: ** (gvim:1430): CRITICAL **: gtk_widget_shell_shows_menubar: assertion `G_IS_PARAM_SPEC (pspec)' failed | 12:09 |
seb128 | sil2100, we will do the change once you manage to land that package in saucy | 12:10 |
attente | sil2100: the difficulty is that appmenu-gtk depends on the gtk patch and u-g-m depends on not having the patch | 12:10 |
seb128 | sil2100, it's easy enough, don't plan for the overlap period there | 12:10 |
seb128 | just land the thing so we can drop the gtk patches and everyone will be happy | 12:10 |
sil2100 | Ok then ;) | 12:10 |
=== MacSlow|lunch is now known as MacSlow | ||
desrt | good morning, all | 12:15 |
sil2100 | Morning! | 12:15 |
mlankhorst | g'day! | 12:17 |
seb128 | hey Canada ;-) | 12:19 |
didrocks | urgh sun… | 12:20 |
seb128 | didrocks, time for exercice? | 12:20 |
* didrocks went for running and enjoyed the only 30 minutes with rain of the day it seems… | 12:21 | |
didrocks | and not a small one | 12:21 |
seb128 | oh, you did already :/ | 12:21 |
* didrocks needs a shower | 12:21 | |
didrocks | yeah, wrong decision it seems! | 12:21 |
seb128 | didn't you just had one outside? :p | 12:21 |
didrocks | seb128: tssss :p | 12:21 |
seb128 | ;-) | 12:21 |
didrocks | seb128: when I was cycling, no issue | 12:21 |
didrocks | just when I arrived at the park | 12:21 |
didrocks | and for the full run in the park | 12:21 |
seb128 | k | 12:21 |
seb128 | you better take a warm shower now | 12:22 |
seb128 | or you will get a cold | 12:22 |
didrocks | then, back on the bike, I had some time to just catch a cold :p | 12:22 |
didrocks | seb128: yeah, I'm just starting some pbuilder | 12:22 |
didrocks | and then, shower :) | 12:22 |
mlankhorst | it's still bad here | 12:22 |
mlankhorst | http://buienradar.nl/ | 12:22 |
didrocks | mlankhorst: almost blue sky, I really regret :p | 12:22 |
seb128 | we have some sun showing as well, weird | 12:23 |
Laney | attente: you can grab gnome-terminal from http://people.canonical.com/~laney/package-junkyard/ if you want to try it out for yourself | 12:23 |
Laney | I noticed that I don't get overlay scrollbars at all on it ... | 12:23 |
didrocks | seb128: it's like "what's this?" :p | 12:23 |
mlankhorst | it doesn't look like we get this thing called 'sun' today | 12:23 |
seb128 | didrocks, exactly ;-) | 12:24 |
Mirv | didrocks: ok, updated qtmultimedia's libqgsttools symbols for saucy | 12:34 |
didrocks | Mirv: thanks, continuing sponsoring the small components :) | 12:36 |
Sweetsha1k | hmm, "28 affected users, bug heat 130" in one day for a package in a PPA --- is that a new record? | 12:37 |
mlankhorst | is it about libreoffice? | 12:38 |
Mirv | didrocks: btw sdk stack now would have published successfully, but qa stack has failed again so it did not | 12:38 |
didrocks | Mirv: so manual publish? | 12:38 |
Mirv | didrocks: yes, hmm | 12:39 |
Mirv | -, hmm | 12:39 |
Mirv | the ticket for access rights is still ongoing | 12:39 |
didrocks | Mirv: yeah, you did receive an email when I opened it, right? | 12:39 |
Mirv | didrocks: yes, and I was asked whether I want the access rights to the existing account (yes), waiting for next message | 12:41 |
didrocks | ok :) | 12:41 |
didrocks | Mirv: you can directly ping retoaded on IRC to speed things up | 12:41 |
didrocks | (he's in the US time) | 12:41 |
didrocks | Mirv: meanwhile, published for you | 12:41 |
Mirv | didrocks: ok. thanks. | 12:42 |
Sweetsha1k | mlankhorst: yes, bug 1182082 | 12:42 |
ubot2 | Launchpad bug 1182082 in LibreOffice Productivity Suite "libreoffice menu not working" [Medium,Won't fix] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1182082 | 12:42 |
didrocks | yw :) | 12:42 |
=== alan_g|lunch is now known as alan_g | ||
didrocks | Mirv: doc/src/snippets/legal/CatharonLicense.txt is mentionning Catharon Productions, Inc. | 13:08 |
didrocks | in qtpim | 13:08 |
Mirv | didrocks: it's mentioning it, but I didn't find a file that would be covered by it (it's the license itself) | 13:08 |
Mirv | no files mention [C/c]atharon in any other way | 13:09 |
didrocks | Mirv: you should open a bug upstream | 13:09 |
didrocks | Mirv: otherwise, fine with me :) | 13:09 |
Mirv | didrocks: yes, ok | 13:09 |
didrocks | Mirv: for the -plugin package, do you know of anyone installing the pim package already? | 13:11 |
didrocks | Mirv: as you didn't provide any Replaces: for the transition? | 13:12 |
didrocks | Mirv: also, priority should be optional | 13:12 |
didrocks | and also, the -plugin should maybe dep on there binary package which contains the .so files? | 13:13 |
didrocks | Mirv: on Qttools, I have a FTBFS on symbols | 13:14 |
Mirv | didrocks: no, AFAIK the QML modules have been actually broken before Renato's patch that is in the upstream codereview | 13:14 |
Mirv | broken as in functionality | 13:14 |
didrocks | Mirv: ok, so no need for replaces: if nobody installed the package | 13:14 |
didrocks | Mirv: mind doing the other changes? | 13:15 |
Mirv | didrocks: pushed the priority change | 13:15 |
Mirv | didrocks: I'm working on qttools, just got the symbols complains in my saucy pbuilder as well | 13:15 |
didrocks | Mirv: did you see my question on the dep to finish qtpim? | 13:15 |
didrocks | qtdeclarative5-qtcontacts-plugin shold dep on libqt5contacts5? | 13:16 |
didrocks | (and same for the other -plugin one) | 13:16 |
Mirv | didrocks: oh, that I missed. pushed. | 13:17 |
Mirv | opened also upstream QTBUG-31315 to ask for removal / doing something about the Catharon license | 13:17 |
didrocks | Mirv: got it, sponsoring qtpim then :) | 13:17 |
didrocks | perfect | 13:17 |
didrocks | seb128: qtpim in source NEW (at next publish round), mind having a look? there is also qtgraphicaleffects-opensource-src in bin NEW. | 13:19 |
seb128 | didrocks, ok | 13:19 |
didrocks | thanks :) | 13:19 |
seb128 | yw | 13:19 |
didrocks | hey kenvandine, around? | 13:48 |
kenvandine | didrocks, hey, what's up? | 13:49 |
didrocks | kenvandine: I think you already saw that you have a lot of stack in manual publishing mode, can you handle them quickly so that we can have everything in next today? :) | 13:50 |
didrocks | kenvandine: I rebuilt some for you due to UTAH | 13:50 |
didrocks | you just need to review the manual publishing :) | 13:50 |
didrocks | (media, settings, webapp, webcred) | 13:50 |
kenvandine | sure, i was too excited about having gmail this morning... so i started customizing :) | 13:52 |
* kenvandine does the happy dance | 13:52 | |
kenvandine | i'll go look over the stacks now | 13:52 |
jbicha | seb128: does the gnome-icon-theme/-full split still make sense? | 13:53 |
seb128 | jbicha, I guess it does yes, no reason to waste disk space | 13:54 |
didrocks | kenvandine: thanks :) | 13:54 |
=== Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk | ||
kenvandine | didrocks, so did webcred not publish because QA failed? | 13:56 |
* didrocks looks | 13:56 | |
kenvandine | that's what it looks like to me | 13:56 |
didrocks | kenvandine: right | 13:56 |
kenvandine | ok | 13:56 |
didrocks | kenvandine: I wonder if I shouldn't just declare QA as a safe stack to ignore the status | 13:57 |
kenvandine | probably | 13:57 |
didrocks | as if tests passed… :) | 13:57 |
didrocks | the others deps shouldn't | 13:57 |
didrocks | but QA… | 13:57 |
kenvandine | media failed because of hud and qa | 13:59 |
kenvandine | so maybe that one shouldn't get published | 13:59 |
didrocks | kenvandine: ask cyphermox, but I think there is no issue with the HUD that is preventing us to publish | 14:00 |
didrocks | or sil2100 | 14:00 |
didrocks | from what I know, the hud tests failing are false positives | 14:00 |
=== Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha | ||
kenvandine | cyphermox, sil2100: can you confirm ^^ | 14:03 |
kenvandine | didrocks, i checked webapp and webcred, both looked good and i published | 14:03 |
kenvandine | settings view isn't setup yet | 14:03 |
didrocks | kenvandine: great! :-) | 14:03 |
kenvandine | i filed an rt ticket for that | 14:04 |
didrocks | kenvandine: so hopefully, tomorrow, we won't have all that spam on the webapps* land :p | 14:04 |
kenvandine | :-D | 14:04 |
didrocks | kenvandine: http://10.97.0.1:8080/job/cu2d-settings-head-3.0publish/ for the publish | 14:04 |
* kenvandine is glad webapps stack is robru's :) | 14:04 | |
didrocks | ahah :) | 14:04 |
kenvandine | oh... so we can still find it :) | 14:04 |
didrocks | right, in the head view | 14:04 |
didrocks | click on all | 14:04 |
didrocks | you will see all "heads" job | 14:05 |
didrocks | then, clicking on it, you can see the workflow :) | 14:05 |
kenvandine | ugh | 14:05 |
kenvandine | http://10.97.0.1:8080/job/cu2d-settings-head-3.0publish/3/console | 14:05 |
kenvandine | oh wait... | 14:06 |
kenvandine | we didn't want to publish settings anyway :) | 14:06 |
* kenvandine is glad it failed | 14:06 | |
didrocks | kenvandine: well, even if it succeeded, you put it to manual publishing :) | 14:07 |
didrocks | kenvandine: see http://10.97.0.1:8080/job/cu2d-settings-head-3.0publish/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/publisher.xml | 14:07 |
kenvandine | ah, so forcing publishing would still not publish right? | 14:07 |
didrocks | kenvandine: ah it would :) | 14:07 |
kenvandine | yeah... so glad my force didn't work :) | 14:07 |
didrocks | oh, you rerun it :p | 14:07 |
* kenvandine needs more coffee | 14:07 | |
didrocks | bzr: ERROR: exceptions.Exception: UserNotBranchReviewer | 14:08 |
didrocks | what's this? :/ | 14:08 |
kenvandine | no idea! | 14:08 |
kenvandine | oh... maybe we need to add one of the ps teams to it? | 14:08 |
didrocks | kenvandine: well, it's just a lp-propose, it shouldn't need to be on the team… | 14:08 |
didrocks | vila: any idea? ^ | 14:09 |
didrocks | vila: basically a bot is pushing a branch to a project (under his namespace), and then doing bzr lp-propose to trunk | 14:09 |
didrocks | and we get: https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/cu2d-settings-head-3.0publish/3/console | 14:10 |
didrocks | kenvandine: the copy went through next though | 14:10 |
didrocks | kenvandine: you need to remove it if you don't want the package | 14:10 |
kenvandine | whoops :) | 14:10 |
didrocks | ah, or maybe not, let me check the code :) | 14:10 |
kenvandine | it would end up in NEW for saucy | 14:11 |
vila | didrocks: out of the blue, I'd say it comes from the plugin implementing lp-propose, bzr itself has no idea what a branch reviewer is | 14:11 |
didrocks | kenvandine: ah? it's not for next, right, so no worry, the xml wasn't generated :) | 14:11 |
didrocks | vila: do you know who we should poke for lp-propose? | 14:11 |
vila | didrocks: does that use to work or is it the first time you try to lp-propose from a bot ? | 14:11 |
kenvandine | didrocks, right | 14:11 |
vila | didrocks: abentley is the author IIRC | 14:12 |
didrocks | vila: we used lp-propose thousands of times from a bot, but this is a new project | 14:12 |
didrocks | vila: so I would bet for a configuration issue on the project | 14:12 |
vila | didrocks: ha, then may be the teams aren't set up properly ? | 14:12 |
* vila nods | 14:12 | |
didrocks | yeah :) | 14:12 |
didrocks | thanks vila, I'll hunt for him :) | 14:12 |
didrocks | oh yeah, configuration error! | 14:13 |
didrocks | kenvandine: we need the bot to be in the team | 14:13 |
didrocks | kenvandine: it's self-approving the branch :) | 14:13 |
kenvandine | i figured | 14:13 |
kenvandine | what is the bot's id? | 14:13 |
didrocks | ps-jenkins | 14:14 |
didrocks | (I didn't create yet-another-bot) | 14:14 |
kenvandine | didrocks, done | 14:14 |
didrocks | thanks! | 14:14 |
kenvandine | do ' | 14:14 |
kenvandine | so we'll be good when we really want to publish :) | 14:15 |
didrocks | right :) | 14:15 |
didrocks | kenvandine: I wonder, you didn't setup upstream merger though? | 14:15 |
didrocks | kenvandine: because you would have the issue way before :) | 14:15 |
kenvandine | that's on my todo list for today | 14:15 |
kenvandine | :) | 14:15 |
didrocks | ahah, ok :) | 14:16 |
didrocks | so at least, that step: done :p | 14:16 |
didrocks | kenvandine: I checked for media, go for it :) | 14:16 |
kenvandine | we had our first branch merged to trunk yesterday | 14:16 |
didrocks | (hud just failed because of the tests and that's what we are fixing) | 14:16 |
kenvandine | which is when i noticed the merger wasn't setup | 14:16 |
didrocks | \o/ | 14:16 |
kenvandine | ok, /me publishes | 14:16 |
didrocks | thanks! | 14:16 |
* kenvandine goes to get more coffee | 14:16 | |
didrocks | kenvandine: hehe, will do the same here :) | 14:17 |
didrocks | ok, so once Unity built and tests pass | 14:17 |
didrocks | we can redo QA | 14:17 |
didrocks | and HUD | 14:17 |
didrocks | and live in a wonderful life, with everything for touch in next! | 14:17 |
=== Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk | ||
=== Sweetsha1k is now known as Sweetshark | ||
=== Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha | ||
Laney | ricotz: darkxst: How's empathy 3.8.2? | 14:43 |
ricotz | Laney, works here, but i only use it with jabber | 14:53 |
Laney | k | 14:53 |
ricotz | Laney, i needs folks 0.9 first of course | 14:53 |
ricotz | it | 14:53 |
=== alan_g is now known as alan_g|tea | ||
ricotz | which can be synced from debian | 14:54 |
ricotz | irc 0.9.1-2 | 14:54 |
Laney | right, need to check if that can be synced | 14:54 |
Laney | unless you want to | 14:54 |
ricotz | the version is gnome3-staging ppa is already a sync | 14:55 |
cyphermox | kenvandine: yeah, hud is fine to publish, I can do it... | 14:56 |
kenvandine | cyphermox, thx | 15:02 |
attente | Laney: are you able to run gedit through your gnome-terminal? | 15:16 |
cyphermox | kenvandine: fwiw I can't get any search results out of hud... :/ | 15:19 |
cyphermox | scratch that, it's just really slow | 15:19 |
kenvandine | on the device or desktop? | 15:19 |
cyphermox | on desktop | 15:19 |
=== alan_g|tea is now known as alan_g | ||
Laney | attente: huh, apparently not | 15:20 |
Laney | attente: what's going on there then? | 15:24 |
attente | i'm not sure about the gnome-terminal problem, but the gvim problem is just because of a missing GtkSetting in gtk 2 | 15:25 |
Sweetshark | jibel: ping? | 15:36 |
Sweetshark | jibel: http://people.canonical.com/~j-lallement/libreoffice/binrepo/ <- shows 08-May-2013 as date, any hint why it isnt updated since then? | 15:37 |
jibel | Sweetshark, hm, looking | 15:37 |
Laney | haha! | 15:38 |
Laney | attente: | 15:39 |
Laney | /* Set some env vars to disable ubuntu crap. They'll certainly patch this | 15:39 |
Laney | * out in their package, but anyone running from git will get the right | 15:39 |
Laney | * behaviour. | 15:39 |
Laney | */ | 15:39 |
Laney | g_setenv ("LIBOVERLAY_SCROLLBAR", "0", TRUE); | 15:39 |
Sweetshark | Laney: lol! | 15:39 |
Laney | g_setenv ("UBUNTU_MENUPROXY", "0", TRUE); | 15:39 |
Laney | g_setenv ("NO_UNITY_GTK_MODULE", "1", TRUE); | 15:39 |
* Laney coughs | 15:39 | |
Laney | UBUNTU ♥ GNOME | 15:39 |
Laney | attente: so yeah, that made menus work ... don't know what's up with gedit though | 15:43 |
mlankhorst | how evil | 15:43 |
kenvandine | oh my! | 15:45 |
mlankhorst | https://git.gnome.org/browse/gnome-terminal/commit/?id=564d75080206c9d1e1d750bf45a7c35999cd511e | 15:45 |
Laney | oh well | 15:46 |
kenvandine | no love! | 15:46 |
jibel | Sweetshark, configure: error: unrecognized options: --disable-mozilla, --disable-binfilter introduced by commit df4fd344b7b5d5dfb7cbf2f7a91ed6e86a2aaef8 which make them fatal | 15:52 |
jibel | Sweetshark, I'll fix configure and figure out why the job thinks its a good build | 15:53 |
attente | Laney, fun stuff.. | 15:54 |
Sweetshark | jibel: ah yeah, those are obsolete now ;) | 15:54 |
Sweetshark | .oO(good riddance) | 15:54 |
jibel | Sweetshark, done. The failed builds will be retried tomorrow | 15:59 |
Sweetshark | jibel: awesome, thanks! | 16:00 |
Sweetshark | jibel: I gave you kudos on the libreoffice list already. ;) | 16:00 |
Sweetshark | .oO(cheerleading is my second best talent) | 16:00 |
jibel | Sweetshark, heh, thanks! | 16:03 |
Laney | yum upgrade to rawhide takes ages to calculate | 16:10 |
seb128 | didrocks, hey, is there any chance you guys could run all your tests again the new gtk in saucy-proposed to see if it creates any issue (Laney blocked the migration to saucy to let us run tests and stuff before it goes there) | 16:12 |
didrocks | seb128: everything is running in raring, do you have a raring ppa? | 16:12 |
didrocks | seb128: that would help | 16:12 |
seb128 | didrocks, ubuntu-desktop ppa has it for raring | 16:12 |
didrocks | seb128: will do that tomorrow | 16:12 |
seb128 | didrocks, thanks | 16:12 |
Laney | did the jenkins autopkgtests kick off against it yet? | 16:12 |
seb128 | Laney, is that autohappening by magic? | 16:13 |
Laney | yeah | 16:13 |
Laney | for rdeps afaik | 16:13 |
didrocks | you mean for unity? | 16:13 |
didrocks | or the rest? | 16:13 |
Laney | not the same as the daily landing integration tests of course | 16:14 |
Laney | archive autopkgtests | 16:14 |
didrocks | we don't have any for unity, but I guess, the rest is in jibel's capable hands for the rest of the archive :) | 16:15 |
Laney | yeah, that stuff - it works | 16:15 |
didrocks | Laney: seb128: mind just poking me about it (the autopilot tests) tomorrow? | 16:15 |
Laney | https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/view/Saucy/view/AutoPkgTest/ but doesn't look like it's been triggered yet (looking at "latest builds") | 16:15 |
didrocks | Laney: you don't have dynamic view on this jenkins | 16:17 |
Laney | oh, I see | 16:18 |
Laney | I can never remember how to get to the other one | 16:18 |
didrocks | I don't know what jenkins it is for autopkgtests | 16:18 |
Laney | plus it's not so good for talking in this channel :-) | 16:18 |
Laney | http://10.98.0.1:8080/view/Saucy/view/AutoPkgTest/ anyway (for those not blessed with access, it shows that the jobs haven't started yet) | 16:20 |
seb128 | Laney, do we know when they will start, what trigger them? | 16:22 |
Laney | A job which jibel runs on lillypilly | 16:23 |
Laney | was just looking for the data but I can't remember where it is | 16:23 |
seb128 | ok | 16:23 |
seb128 | it's good that we are doing testing and stuff, but it's still not really obvious what is tested, how and when (at least to me) | 16:24 |
Laney | well, the proper plan for autopkgtest is to have it integrated with britney to stop migration | 16:24 |
Laney | for that you'll have to have an interface better than jenkins (probably not a difficult task ...) | 16:25 |
jibel | seb128, tests will start when a new binary or a new binary dependency on a Source package with an XS-Testsuite header with the value of autopkgtest is available in the archive. | 16:26 |
seb128 | jibel, where archive is -proposed or archive proper? | 16:27 |
Laney | seb128: ah, I found the list - on lillypilly, do: grep -h gtk+3.0 ~j-lallement/QA/adt-data/adt/saucy-proposed/amd64/archive/2013/05/23/* | 16:27 |
jibel | seb128, -proposed | 16:27 |
seb128 | jibel, thanks | 16:28 |
seb128 | Laney, seems like it worked, like ubiquity got a run after the upload: http://10.98.0.1:8080/view/Saucy/view/AutoPkgTest/job/saucy-adt-ubiquity/ | 16:29 |
seb128 | same for apport | 16:29 |
jibel | seb128, there is some details here http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~auto-package-testing-dev/auto-package-testing/trunk/files/head:/doc/ | 16:30 |
Laney | I wonder if there has ever been a time that I've not had to reconnect to the VPN before using it | 16:30 |
seb128 | jibel, cool | 16:31 |
Laney | oh yes indeed, they have been run | 16:31 |
Laney | I was looking for ones which started later | 16:31 |
seb128 | Laney, ok, looking at "latest rebuilds", they are all green, or were red before | 16:31 |
Laney | so green is good ... | 16:31 |
seb128 | no test that started failing in that run | 16:31 |
seb128 | so let's wait for the unity tests tomorrow and unblock it if that's ok? | 16:31 |
Laney | sgtm | 16:32 |
* Laney pushes gnome-terminal to bzr but this gedit problem is really weird | 16:32 | |
Laney | why wouldn't it run from a terminal?! | 16:32 |
desrt | seb128: let's step up our game | 16:35 |
desrt | Laney: i have an idea | 16:35 |
desrt | let's modify our gtk patches to check if the executable name is "gnome-terminal" | 16:35 |
desrt | and if so, ignore all environment variables | 16:35 |
attente | doesn't that just make it even more broken for us? | 16:36 |
desrt | in order to ensure that users of unpatched git versions of gnome-terminal 'will get the right behaviour' :) | 16:37 |
Laney | Ignore profiles, force username to chpe | 16:38 |
desrt | i suspect we will never find someone with the username 'chpe' on an ubuntu system :) | 16:38 |
didrocks | you are evil guys :) | 16:40 |
desrt | meh | 16:42 |
desrt | if someone starts to play a game then you should probably make a countermove :) | 16:42 |
desrt | ignoring them would just be rude | 16:42 |
didrocks | heh | 16:42 |
tvoss | desrt, ping | 16:51 |
desrt | hey | 16:51 |
desrt | round 2? | 16:51 |
tvoss | desrt, hey, I'm actually waiting for ricmm to reply to my ping. It's more important that you guys talk :) | 16:52 |
sarnold | modify git to remove that code on clone? | 16:52 |
tvoss | desrt, might be a good idea to join #ubuntu-touch, too | 16:52 |
desrt | too many channels :p | 16:52 |
tvoss | desrt, likewise, but a lot of the lifecycle and app model discussions are happening there | 16:53 |
jbicha | Laney: were you aware that gnome-terminal was packaged in the gnome3-staging ppa? | 16:55 |
Laney | jbicha: I wasn't, then I was, but it wasn't bad anyway | 16:56 |
Laney | do you see the gedit weirdness under shell? | 16:56 |
jbicha | Laney: uh I haven't had problems with gedit yet except for bug 1182849 | 16:58 |
ubot2 | Launchpad bug 1182849 in Ubuntu GNOME "Some plugins hang gedit" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1182849 | 16:58 |
Laney | the bug here is that you can't launch it from gnome-terminal 3.8 - it hangs | 16:58 |
jbicha | it works here but I did have a hang problem until I ran gsettings reset-recursively org.gnome.gedit | 17:00 |
jbicha | Laney: also bug 1181393 | 17:02 |
ubot2 | Launchpad bug 1181393 in vte3 (Ubuntu) "Please upgrade to 0.34.5" [Wishlist,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1181393 | 17:02 |
* didrocks waves good evening | 17:02 | |
Laney | night did | 17:02 |
Laney | speedy! | 17:02 |
Laney | jbicha: yeah that's on my list for tomorrow | 17:02 |
Laney | I don't really have a handle on how to fix bash/zsh to source it though | 17:03 |
=== alan_g is now known as alan_g|life | ||
Laney | not necessarily a blocker of course | 17:06 |
=== m_conley_away is now known as m_conley | ||
jbicha | well it's an annoying regression and nothing really *needs* gnome-terminal 3.8 | 17:09 |
Laney | sure | 17:09 |
Laney | I mean that it's not a blocker for gnome-terminal if the fix is in the shells | 17:10 |
jbicha | on the other hand if we want it in 13.10 it's probably better to land it soonish because of the potential for other regressions with the gsettings conversion | 17:11 |
jbicha | although I've not really bumped into anything serious | 17:11 |
Laney | this gedit thing is disturbing | 17:12 |
Laney | ah, 3.8 fixes it | 17:13 |
Laney | we have a gtksourceview transition too | 17:20 |
seb128 | Laney, right, jbicha started that one, I hope it deals with the rdepends as well ;-) | 17:23 |
seb128 | jbicha, btw please don't start a transition without having the rebuilds ready to follow | 17:24 |
Laney | it might have been better to wait until gtk was definitely ready | 17:24 |
seb128 | yes :/ | 17:24 |
Laney | oh well | 17:24 |
jbicha | I didn't notice that it was a transition :( | 17:26 |
Laney | it's not exactly huge | 17:27 |
Laney | should be fine | 17:27 |
desrt | Laney: http://paste.fedoraproject.org/14052/69329903/ | 17:28 |
desrt | Laney: chpe conditionalised his setenving | 17:28 |
Laney | haha | 17:28 |
desrt | you can just ./configure --enable-distro-packaging to disable it now | 17:28 |
Laney | that's funny, thanks for poking | 17:28 |
desrt | it also no longer pointlessly sets those vars on non-ubuntu systems | 17:29 |
Laney | good grief, how can fedora still be calculating this upgrade? | 17:29 |
Laney | can yum get stuck in a loop? | 17:29 |
desrt | lol | 17:29 |
desrt | never underestimate just how bad yum is | 17:29 |
Laney | I figured out the problem so don't need to check on rawhide anyway, but now I'm curious as to whether it will finish ... | 17:30 |
* Laney leaves it on for a bit and goes off to mow the lawn | 17:32 | |
Laney | tata | 17:32 |
chrisccoulson | Laney, just been out to stirchley wines to get some beer ;) | 18:38 |
=== racarr is now known as racarr|lunch | ||
=== racarr|lunch is now known as racarr | ||
=== m_conley is now known as m_conley_away |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!