[03:30] Good morning [03:33] pitti: good morning :) How are you? [03:37] hey larsu! prima, danke, und Dir? [03:37] larsu: are you still at Ryan's? [03:37] pitti: auch sehr gut! Hacking away on a balcony in Toronto :) [03:38] I'm in Toronto, but not at Ryan's place [03:38] sweet [03:40] ya, it's an awesome night here. And I have a very good view of the cn tower [03:41] it changes its lights in hypnotizing ways... [03:42] and you can still work on code with that? :-) [03:43] I admit that it distracts me for a couple of minutes every now and then :D [03:57] larsu: well, so do IRC, G+, youtube, etc. :) [03:58] hehe, true! [04:28] hello [06:00] good morning [06:04] good morning Mirv ;) [06:17] morning didrocks! [06:17] Mirv: how are you? [06:19] didrocks: sad that sdk still didn't build, there was a python script added yesterday to the trunk without python dependency.. otherwise fine :) [06:19] Mirv: remind them to ask whenever they think there is a package change needed :) [06:19] Mirv: should I retrigger the build now? [06:21] didrocks: not yet [06:22] Mirv: ok, keep me posted, I want to have next ready today :) [06:22] ok, will do [06:52] good morning [06:53] didrocks: can we start the Qt uploads now? [06:54] salut jibel! Il y a enfin du soleil ici! et toi? :) [06:54] Mirv: doing [06:55] didrocks, salut! oui enfin, c'est l'heure d'aller à la plage :) [06:55] et de manger une glace! :) [07:03] xnox: awesome thanks! [07:03] Moin a tous btw! === Sweetsha1k is now known as Sweetshark [07:06] Mirv: fail :p [07:06] Sweetshark: bonjour bonjour :) [07:07] didrocks: :( [07:07] Mirv: do you need a hand? [07:07] Mirv: I didn't look at the content, just got email spam :) [07:09] didrocks: I wonder if I haven't subscribed to something.. [07:09] Mirv: you should get the FTBFS from ~ubuntu-unity ppas? [07:09] as you are part of the team [07:13] didrocks: hmm, which fail you are talking about actually, apparently not related to Qt 5.0.2 packages? [07:14] didrocks: ah, yes, ui-toolkit. I meant to ask about saucy Qt uploads :) [07:14] Mirv: I'm getting build of ubuntu-ui-toolkit build failure emails [07:14] Mirv: you do get those emails, right? [07:14] I'm still looking at the ui-toolkit, there's more than just the dependency error [07:14] didrocks: yes, I get those [07:14] Mirv: ok, let's get that done, rebuild and then, moving to Qt, ok? [07:15] didrocks: sure [07:15] keep me posted or ask me if you have any question :) [07:16] I'm just multi-tasking a bit while I've pbuilder runs going on [07:16] ok === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha [07:57] morning [07:57] hey Laney! [07:58] didier! [07:58] hey desktopers [07:58] hey Laney didrocks [07:58] seb! [07:58] how are you? [07:58] salut seb128! [07:58] good good, yourself? [07:58] I'm good [07:58] in this rainy tuesday :p [07:58] someone stole my sun! [07:58] it was around this morning, I saw it [07:58] not me [07:58] where is it now? :p [07:59] doh, it's already tuesday, it feels like the week just started ... I will miss the short work weeks and log weekends [07:59] seb128: it's even thursday, not tuesday :p [07:59] the national holidays fun is mostly over for a while now [07:59] didrocks, double doh :p [07:59] nah, if you move to the UK you get one on Monday :P [07:59] seb128: hem, we can create some :p [08:00] Laney, ;-) [08:00] seb128: did you hear about the national rain day? :) [08:00] I heard it's off :p [08:00] Laney, can I get non-rainy weather as well with it? [08:00] didrocks, seems like every day until end of the month? [08:00] ;-) [08:00] http://www.bbc.co.uk/weather/2641170 says no :( [08:00] seb128: yeah, I read the same, should be true then! [08:00] * didrocks opens canonicaladmin [08:00] * seb128 shakes fist at the weather [08:01] :) [08:03] Mirv: sdk fix is found and merging? If so, we can maybe starts the Qt part together [08:05] didrocks: it's merging yes now [08:05] didrocks: yes we can === alan_g|life is now known as alan_g [08:06] Mirv: ok, so, I open https://docs.google.com/a/canonical.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AjuCdq68GSyVdFI4QzNQdWpfME5aMEV2VXo0cUpOMkE#gid=4 [08:07] first part would be from qtbase to qtdeclarative. I'm looking at qtscript a bit since it's in Debian NEW queue and apparently I can't fetch the orig tarball directly from there [08:07] Mirv: do you mind giving me edit rights? that will enable me to copy/paste only the branch url :) [08:07] and first part of the first part would be checking and uploading qtbase [08:07] Mirv: ok :) [08:08] didrocks: added [08:08] Mirv: thanks :) [08:08] Mirv: nice document btw, really helpfull === achiang` is now known as achiang [08:08] thanks, it was really needed to keep things in order [08:16] Mirv: ok, qt-default to be arch: any is a debian thing? they do want it? [08:17] qt5-default* [08:21] didrocks: yes, they now ship configuration files in multi-arch triplet dirs [08:23] ok [08:23] that's what I saw [08:24] Mirv: just an advice: you should name upstream patch git_… [08:24] Mirv: that's easier then to see if it doesn't apply that we should just remove it [08:25] speaking of debian/patches/rename_qabs_function_for_timeval.patch [08:25] and some others :) [08:26] right, thanks.. I'll try to remember that [08:26] Mirv, btw, I just upgrade with the qt5-beta-proper/saucy ppa, things work fine and my menus are back in the panel as they should [08:26] just upgraded* [08:26] seb128: thanks, I also tested, seems normal === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk [08:30] seb128 bonjour , https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vino/+bug/1027086/comments/26 [08:30] Ubuntu bug 1027086 in vino (Ubuntu Precise) "incorrect schema setting used for authentication-methods in vino server" [Medium,In progress] [08:30] ritz_, hey [08:30] hi :) [08:31] ritz_, I'm still not really happy with the hack there, did anyone confirm that it's the solution wanted? [08:32] seb128 , as per upstream, this is the way to go. [08:32] removing the choice listing form schema [08:32] ritz_, ok, fine enough, you should subscribe ubuntu-sponsors to the bug so it's in the sponsoring queue === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha [08:36] Mirv: my new saucy pbuilder just starting to build qtbase :) [08:37] didrocks: hi! I have a question related to the generic AP jobs - where does the /tmp/autopilot.head.*.skip file come from? [08:37] didrocks: when is it created and what triggers it? [08:37] didrocks: ok! [08:41] sil2100: it's created when there is no tests to run for that stack [08:41] sil2100: that avoids UTAH to provision for nothing [08:41] so the -prepare and -check jobs create it if needed [08:42] sil2100: hum, did you rerun the HUD? [08:43] didrocks: yes, just the tests [08:43] sil2100: you didn't check "with whole ppa", did you? [08:44] didrocks: so hm, why is the OIF stack creating that file even though there is one test to be run? [08:44] sil2100: it won't take latest unity autopilot tests then [08:44] didrocks: no, I just built with foo [08:44] I just want to re-run [08:44] To see if the 2 failures we have are reproducible [08:44] sil2100: ok, so not with unity-autopilot changes you did, right? [08:44] Since HUD seems to have a strange regression [08:45] didrocks: those got merged yesterday, right? [08:45] So they're in already [08:45] And they have been used [08:45] sil2100: "No new source uploaded to PPA and CHECK_WITH_WHOLE_PPA is not set. Skipping check! [08:45] " [08:45] so no need to run tests [08:45] for oif [08:45] sil2100: hum, really? [08:45] sil2100: ah, maybe unity is in next? [08:46] sil2100: because normally, they shouldn't be installed or veebers has an issue in his script… [08:46] sil2100: do you have the run that shows that latest unity is used, even built without --check-with-whole-ppa? [08:46] didrocks: I'll double check, but the test results seem to show that my and Francis branch are in [08:46] One moment [08:47] sil2100: weird weird weird ;) [08:52] didrocks: so, it's using 7.0.0daily13.05.22.1ubuntu.unity.next-0ubuntu1, which is based on revision 3338, so with our two fixes included already [08:52] didrocks: that's the one from yesterday's re-build it seems, 16 hours ago? [08:55] sil2100: ok, we need to ping veebers, seems the preseed regressed… [08:57] didrocks: my understanding was that it is currently using the packages available in the daily-build-next PPA [08:59] sil2100: yeah, and that's wrong, we should only use the set [08:59] sil2100: I think his refactoring broke it [09:00] didrocks: might be, as I remember he was doing some fixes there, so maybe the original idea got lost somewhere [09:02] yeah [09:02] sil2100: ok, let's try to get everything green today and in -next? [09:02] attente: once you're up, give me a ping [09:02] sil2100: I think we are really close :) [09:03] didrocks: yea, let's do that - I think we are, I re-built all the packages that failed for unity, the problems being the one unit test in libunity that likes to time out (Paweł is trying to fix it now) [09:03] didrocks: since the home scope and libunity failed for powerpc, home scope because of missing libunity [09:04] didrocks: if this test won't get fixed quickly, I would recommend disabling it temporarily, as it's slowing down the release process due to it's flackyness [09:05] sil2100: right, we need to give that to upstream as a TODO to get things fixed first [09:08] sil2100: hud finished [09:09] One failure, hm [09:10] Yes, this one I think is an actual regression, as I noticed it sometimes as well [09:10] Mirv: what do you mean by "(Synced but pkg transition)" ? [09:10] i.e. no results returned [09:10] sil2100: is there anyone in the HUD circles to be able to fix this? [09:11] didrocks: I could ask Pete and maybe someone from the unity-frontend team to take a look [09:11] Normally I would ask Ted, but he's on holiday this week [09:12] sil2100: right, do you think we should manually publish for now? [09:13] didrocks: let's do that, doesn't make sense to block on this issue [09:14] sil2100: you will handle it? [09:14] sil2100: maybe we can put the threshold to 1 as well for now? [09:15] hmmm [09:16] didrocks: ok, would make sense maybe, since anyway sometimes the fuzzy tests might fail because of invalid guessing [09:16] jibel: (as we don't have write access, isn't it?) ^ head/hud, triggers 1/1 for failure, regressions please :) [09:16] didrocks: it's always sad to have a threshold set, but still better than having to manually publish every time [09:16] sil2100: right [09:16] sil2100: please do a manual publishing meanwhile :) [09:18] didrocks: should I check the 'force' checkbox ;p? I forgot what it was for ;p [09:19] sil2100: not the first time [09:19] sil2100: it's to force is upstream stacks failing but we know we want to publish [09:19] sil2100: or if there are packaging changes and we ack them [09:22] Mirv: qtbase sponsored [09:22] Mirv: doing sync now [09:22] Mirv: waiting for your answer on synced but pkg transitions :p [09:25] didrocks: the publish is yellow, since QA has failed to publish - is that ok? [09:26] didrocks, I added ACLs for the desktop-team and you should have write access now. Coul dyou try? [09:27] jibel: sure [09:28] sil2100: well, you know that the QA stack can't interfere with runtime for the HUD [09:28] sil2100: so you can force the publication :) [09:28] Checking force \o/ [09:28] jibel: worked perfectly :) [09:33] where do I get unity-gtk-module from? daily-build-next? [09:33] sil2100: ^ [09:34] maybe I'll just build the package :P [09:34] Laney: yes ;) [09:35] ty [09:39] Laney, do you need it for something or just trying it? [09:40] updating gnome-terminal and it had menus in the app, thought that might fix it [09:41] didrocks: thanks, was on luch.. it means that "in sync with Debian in practice, but Ubuntu has additional package name transitions" (ie. replaces: etc) [09:41] Mirv: ok [09:41] (it does not) [09:42] didrocks: so those need to be still uploaded with Ubuntu specific changes, compared to those that can be actually synced directly like qtjsbackend, qtxmlpatterns, qtsvg [09:43] Laney, to test you need to uninstall UBUNTU_MENUPROXY and you need indicator-appmenu trunk [09:43] Mirv: right :) [09:43] unset [09:43] or uninstall appmenu-gtk3 [09:43] yeah it installs an Xsession.d file which does that [09:43] the UBUNTU_MENUPROXY thing [09:43] trunk> ok, getting [09:46] I wonder why the "alternate scrolling" patch never went upstream [09:46] seb128: do you know? [09:46] Mirv: do you mind providing a diff with debian for all the stuff we only have diff with replaces, conflicts and so on? [09:47] that will speed it up for me :) [09:51] Sweetsha1k: my source package is $ dget http://people.canonical.com/~xnox/repo/libreoffice_4.0.2-0ubuntu2.dsc [09:51] the original tarballs should be as in the archive atm. [09:51] Mirv: some copyright are not good on qtpim :/ [09:52] seb128, hi [09:52] did you ever get a change to look over my external panels for g-c-c patch? [09:52] Sweetsha1k: libhsqldb-java got bumped higher in saucy-proposed, yet there is build-conflicts on the higher version in the libreoffice package. === alan_g is now known as alan_g|tea [09:53] Sweetsha1k: when building just on "saucy" without "saucy-proposed" i get one test failure. [09:53] nope, still no menus even with trunk [09:53] maybe something for attente to look at ;-) [09:53] Mirv: and no COPYING file in tarball, I think we need to fix that one with the exception [09:54] the styling is kind of weird too for me [09:54] like they don't get the orange background on hover [09:56] Mirv: shouldn't we have separated qt5 and qtdeclarative packages for the qml part? [09:56] Laney, which scrolling patch? [09:56] darkxst, hey, no, I'm still trying to get the new gtk in first to unblock other things [09:57] seb128: 20_add_alt_screen_toggle_ui.patch [09:57] then I will look at the rdepends [09:57] "Author: ?" is amusing :P [09:57] Laney, where is that? gtk? [09:57] gnome-terminal [09:57] oh [09:57] no idea about that then [09:57] it's for letting you scroll with the mousewheel in the pager (like manpages) [09:58] I guess I can port it to the new gsettings stuff and forward it [09:58] right [09:58] but I wonder if that update is worth it [09:58] seems non trivial [09:59] but we need to get ride of gconf at some point [09:59] right [10:00] I don't think it'll be too hard to fix it up anyway [10:00] of course the other option is to either get rid of the patch or force the config to always be on ... [10:01] didrocks: ok, I can provide the diff:s. looking at qtpim after that, it hasn't been in archives yet. [10:03] Mirv: yeah, that's why I'm doing a full review [10:03] yeah, qt 5.0.2 in the archive [10:03] didrocks, Mirv: well done ;-) [10:04] \o/ [10:04] sil2100: do you mind running the unity stack if all the FTBFS are fixed? [10:05] didrocks: without rebuilding, yes? I think the FTBFS are all fixed in the PPA by now [10:05] sil2100: yeah, so with "foo" : === alan_g|tea is now known as alan_g [10:05] :) [10:05] and qtsensors sponsored [10:05] didrocks: just did that ;) Let's see how the check job goes *keeps his fingers crossed* [10:06] :) [10:09] * didrocks starts building qtwebkit [10:11] didrocks: I pinged Riddell about that one the other day - perhaps check he's not looking at it too [10:11] (assuming you mean the sponsor request) [10:11] (it was because he had a version stuck in proposed) [10:11] Laney: yeah, well, I started to build with qt 5.0.2, so we need to update for everything now, will ping him [10:11] sure [10:11] Laney: in proposed? [10:11] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qtwebkit-source/2.3.0-0ubuntu3 [10:11] if you mean this source [10:12] Laney: ah, I mean qtwebkit-opensource-src [10:12] which is the Qt5 version :) [10:12] aha [10:12] carry on :P [10:12] ;-) [10:13] qtsvg synced [10:14] Laney, did you handle the clutter MRs yesterday through your sync? they are still in the sponsoring queue [10:14] as well as qtimageformats, qttranslations was already in proposed [10:14] seb128: let's see ... [10:14] Mirv: don't forget qtdeclarative for the diff at the top! [10:17] didrocks: yes, just added after assuming you want that too :) [10:17] Mirv: perfect! looking at those while qtwebkit is building [10:17] Mirv: qtquick1 is fine, I'm just waiting to build the other to have all build-deps :) [10:18] seb128, ok, yes we need gtk, just a little bit! ;) [10:18] not sure what to do with the MP for an uploaded SRU [10:18] darkxst: https://code.launchpad.net/~darkxst/ubuntu/raring/clutter-1.0/lp963925/+merge/164832 can you mark it merged maybe? [10:19] to get it off the sponsoring list as it's in the upload queue now [10:19] Laney, done [10:19] ty [10:20] darkxst, do you know if anyone looked at the software-center issue? [10:20] Mirv: hum, as 5.0.2-2 is not released [10:20] seb128, the crash [10:20] yes [10:20] ? [10:20] Mirv: in debian, I won't call ours 5.0.2-2ubuntu1 [10:21] I have never been able to reproduce it [10:21] Mirv: I'll remove the debian/changelog and add the cherry-pick as 5.0.2-1ubuntu1 [10:21] darkxst, the last issue listed on https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/desktop-gnome-3-8 [10:21] it seems the only remaining blocker [10:21] or maybe we should just upload... [10:22] the screenshot/cheese thing is fixed? [10:22] screenshot is since 3.8.1 [10:22] (just edited the whiteboard) [10:22] what is the cheese issue? [10:22] didrocks: that's correct, thanks. there are some newer updates in Debian, though, but at the time of that sync the -2 was not yet uploaded [10:22] I don't use cheese [10:22] but I can test... [10:22] same thing [10:22] flashes the screen [10:22] ok, so yeah, it's fixed [10:22] Mirv: let's use that one ;) (pushed for qtdeclarative) [10:23] didrocks: thanks [10:23] right, good - none of the bugs or the BP have any indication of that [10:23] I've updated the BP [10:23] upstream ignored the bug mterry opened but fixed following an IRC ping [10:24] fair enough, probably can close that one then [10:24] yep [10:24] I don't have issues with s-c either [10:24] seb128, I would say go ahead with the upload, there really hasnt been much noise about the software-center crash [10:24] does anyone is running gtk 3.8 and has? [10:25] we can do the trick of blocking it in proposed and watching jenkins for regressions too maybe [10:25] darkxst, well "noise", quite some users seem affected [10:26] Laney, let's do that, can you put the block? [10:26] yes [10:26] thanks [10:26] seb128, there was a real crash earlier on [10:26] darkxst, ok, maybe it has been fixed ;-) [10:27] blocked [10:28] Laney, thanks, I'm doing a test build on current saucy to make sure everything is still alright (like if it builds with the new glib) and I will upload to saucy after lunch [10:29] excellent [10:29] I'm leaning to porting this gnome-terminal patch without the UI bits [10:29] defaulting to on [10:29] wfm [10:29] the text didn't make sense anyway [10:29] who knows what "alternate scrolling" is?! [10:30] seems like an old geeky option ;-) [10:30] it's some technical term from within vte [10:30] * Laney shrugs [10:32] mmm, gvim's gotten its menus back in the window too [10:35] Laney, I think that gnome-terminal patch, breaks the scroll back when not using overlay scrollbars [10:38] yeah? [10:38] that would be weird [10:38] Laney, well like when you scroll back to pause the output [10:38] it doesnt work, with alternate scrolling enabled [10:38] it will just keep scrolling [10:38] right, I can understand effects like that [10:39] but having an interaction with overlay scrollbars [10:39] well I don't use the overlay scrollbars, but I am sure it did work with them and not without [10:41] ok, well I'll PPA it when done and we can see [10:41] ok [10:53] Mirv: ok, sponsored everything I can but qtwebkit that is still building, I let the rest on your hands :) [10:53] Mirv: on the sdk side, is it ok to rerun the stack? [10:53] * didrocks wants to have everything published today [10:54] Mirv: also, file a bug for the binary packages we need to remove [10:54] andrewebdev: ello :0 [10:54] hi [10:55] morning all. Am in a spot of trouble here: http://askubuntu.com/questions/298881/13-04-unity-graphics-suddenly-broken-for-no-reason [10:55] didrocks: qtpim updated with copyright info and license files which I also submitted to upstream [10:55] ok, nice :) [10:55] Mirv: did you see my question about separate packages? [10:56] ok to run sdk stack [10:56] doing [10:56] didrocks: ok, going to file the bugs [10:56] didrocks: right, what did you mean with the qt5 <-> qml separation again? [10:56] how do i get pass the Ubuntu 13.04 installer it hangs after clicking 3rd party and download updates. and sometimes i get a black screen with text [10:56] Since my /home/ folder is on a separate partition, I was wondering if some faulty unity setting is stored in my home folder. Is there anyway I can delete all unity settings safely? [10:56] didrocks: morning do you know best andrewebdev could ask for him with his question on AU ? [10:56] Mirv: IIRC, the qmldir packages were separated in -plugin package [10:57] czajkowski: andrewebdev: I would say go on #ubuntu-unity and ask here, upstreams unity are there [10:57] :) [10:57] ok [10:57] but seeing the corruptions, it can be as well something for mlankhorst ^ [10:58] and tjaalton :) [10:58] didrocks: thanks [10:58] yw ;) [10:58] we didn't touch raring in any way yet [10:58] so I would guess kernel [10:58] andrewebdev: #ubuntu-kernel then [10:59] didrocks: ah, for qtpim, probably that yes still [11:00] Mirv: ok :) [11:00] didrocks: qttools resynced with Debian [11:00] pitti: can autopkgtest descend subdirectories too? [11:00] Mirv: ok, will have a look after running outside (finishing an upload first) [11:01] Mirv: qtmultimedia-opensource-src FTBFS here [11:01] mlankhorst: how do you mean? [11:01] Mirv: the symbols are not up to date [11:01] mlankhorst: oh, you mean tests in debian/tests/subdir? I'm not actually sure [11:01] mlankhorst: if you specify them that way in debian/tests/control it might work, but we never had such a case so far [11:02] didrocks: right, Debian seems to have done the updates after uploads, collecting from builders or something like that [11:02] (symbol updates) [11:03] pitti: can I test the Tests-Directory to some system path? right now I'm installing a bunch of tests to /usr/lib/xorg-integration-tests/SUBDIR/testname, so if I could set the Tests-Directory: to /usr/lib/xorg-integration-tests I could just specify the tests to run directly :) [11:03] but have not done that for qtmultimedia yet [11:04] Mirv: ok, waiting for this one :) [11:05] looking at the symbols after qtpim [11:05] hm I guess not === MacSlow is now known as MacSlow|lunch [11:10] ah well, I'll write a script to invoke it for me then. :) [11:10] mlankhorst: no, you'll need symlinks for that; they must be in debian/tests/ [11:10] or a wrapper script which iterates over them, right [11:17] hm, what the heck is wrong with gstreamer apps in saucy? totem and rhythmbox take like 30 seconds to start [11:20] pitti, wfm [11:20] pitti, but rb segfaults on track changes on g-i code [11:21] not sure if that's buggy code on the rb side or something wrong in the g-i stack though [11:22] ok, gtk 3.8 on its way to saucy-proposed, let's see how that goes [11:23] pitti, do you get any error during those 30s? can you get a gdb stacktrace to see where it's hanging? [11:25]