[04:25] <Omnifrog> there is a chainsaw with my name on it waiting for me in the morning
[04:25] <Omnifrog> night
[05:33] <Unit193> Omnifrog|pond: ...For you to use, not have it used on you, right?
[06:09]  * cyberanger hopes Omnifrog|pond didn't croak out due to a chainsaw
[09:06] <netritious> so so tired...anyone around?
[10:19] <wrst> morning netritious
[10:23] <netritious> morning wrst
[10:23] <netritious> How was your weekend?
[10:24] <wrst> it was good until this morning hit, how about you netritious?
[10:25] <netritious> no difference between yesterday and today unfortunately.... working :/
[10:25] <netritious> 16-18 hour days for the past two weeks solid, minus a day I chatted in here a bit :)
[10:26] <wrst> oh me sounds like you are up against deadlines?
[10:26] <netritious> yessir
[10:26] <wrst> the one good thing about working for "the man" days off :)
[10:27] <netritious> wife went into the hospital for a couple of weeks right in the middle of the project...she's better now :)
[10:27] <wrst> oh goodness, glad she is better
[10:30] <netritious> thanks wrst...we were worried for a second. They thought she might have MS, but all tests came back negative. So, she's still not feeling 100% (more like 60% she says) but at least back at home.
[10:32] <wrst> whew that is scary
[10:32] <wrst> glad that was not the case
[10:36] <netritious> I wasn't to worried...I was a little, but until the tests come back you just /won't/can't/ know, and even then doc's don't give guarantees.
[10:37] <wrst> oh yeah but hard not to worry some but glad all is well
[10:38] <wrst> and they seem to always take their time a lot of times with those results
[10:38] <netritious> true
[11:47] <wrst> wb netritious :)
[11:48] <netritious> ty wrst
[11:49] <netritious> opendns doesn't seem to pick up nameserver records as quickly as my isp
[11:50] <netritious> domain change was instant on comcast and google, but not opendns :/
[11:50] <wrst> I have noticed that when using opendns also
[11:51] <wrst> but I remember "back in the day" when you had to wait days
[11:51] <wrst> or a day at least
[11:51] <netritious> me too
[11:51] <wrst> now if it takes 10 minutes I gripe :)
[11:51] <wrst> well actually I'm always griping
[11:52] <netritious> well, I'm not naïve to think it /could never/ take 48 hours to update,
[11:53] <wrst> but I do like opendns easiest filter to set up in my book at least
[11:53] <netritious> easiest yes, but not the best. I really like Dans Guardian
[11:54] <netritious> well mostly
[11:54] <wrst> oh no not the best but its quick and dirty
[11:54] <wrst> well.. hmm quick and dirty maybe not a good phrase to use for web filtering ;)
[11:54] <netritious> lol
[11:54] <wrst> does pfsense have some form of fitlering?
[11:55] <netritious> yep, lots
[11:55] <netritious> pf, dg, snort, in-line clamav file/content scanner, etc
[11:56] <netritious> oh and pfBlocker is good...allows address lists and wheter to block, allow, in/out/both, which interfaces, etc.
[11:57] <netritious> can be configured as a filter bridge, which I really like.
[11:57] <wrst> oh wow I need to build one
[11:57] <netritious> package quality seems to be getting better
[11:58] <wrst> after using freenas I can see these bsd based devices being addictive
[11:58] <netritious> bsd w/o the gui can be addictive too
[11:59] <wrst> ha ha yes I have played with freebsd just a bit
[11:59] <netritious> I mean, if you want to get uber paranoid, just d/l openbsd and spend a few weeks reading man pages and search for "hardening"....
[11:59] <wrst> not really enough to get my feet wet
[11:59] <netritious> THEN go and audit it all lol
[11:59] <wrst> a "few weeks" :)
[12:00] <netritious> yeah exactly
[12:00] <wrst> sounds to me like bsd would be the way to go for lots of network related task
[12:01] <netritious> there are all sorts of security features in the *BSD family which is what really attracted me to it in the first place, well FreeBSD anyways.
[12:03] <netritious> I can say with a good amount of certainty that my freebsd 5 dns servers  were never compromised, but the net wasn't exactly wild wild west like it is now either, and there is now way to be 100% certain anyway.
[12:03] <netritious> *no way to be
[12:04] <netritious> "back in the day" freebsd jails (chroot really) were the bomb
[12:04] <netritious> until someone figured out how to break out lol
[12:05] <netritious> anyway afk for a bit...got to get this work done
[12:06] <wrst> later netritious
[12:06] <wrst> I need to work also, that is why I'm here :)
[12:07] <netritious> hehe later wrst
[14:54] <wrst> morning Omnifrog
[17:09] <smartguyz> requesting help loading wifi drivers for EDIMAX AC122 on ASUS SABERTOOTH Z77
[17:13] <wrst> hi smartguyz
[17:13] <wrst> smartguyz: running ubuntu?
[17:17] <smartguyz> running ubuntu 13.04 system
[17:17] <wrst> is that a usb wifi adapter?
[17:17] <smartguyz> will run all other OS's in virtualbox
[17:18] <smartguyz> EDIMAX AC1200 is a wifi USB adapter
[17:19] <wrst> ok could you open up a terminal and run lsusb and copy/paste the details on your wifi adapter?
[17:19] <smartguyz> tried to add via software update not working
[17:20] <wrst> yeah, lets find out what type of chip it is then we should be able to go from there
[17:20] <smartguyz> what is the terminal command I can cut and paste here if you like?
[17:20] <wrst> lsusb
[17:21] <wrst> and yes you can paste that one line please don't paste all of it in here, if you need to might want to use pastebin
[17:21] <smartguyz> smartguyz@MAGT:~$ lsusb
[17:21] <smartguyz> Bus 001 Device 002: ID 8087:0024 Intel Corp. Integrated Rate Matching Hub
[17:21] <smartguyz> Bus 002 Device 002: ID 8087:0024 Intel Corp. Integrated Rate Matching Hub
[17:21] <smartguyz> Bus 005 Device 002: ID 7392:a822 Edimax Technology Co., Ltd
[17:21] <smartguyz> Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
[17:21] <smartguyz> Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
[17:21] <smartguyz> Bus 003 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
[17:21] <smartguyz> Bus 004 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0003 Linux Foundation 3.0 root hub
[17:21] <smartguyz> Bus 005 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
[17:21] <smartguyz> Bus 006 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0003 Linux Foundation 3.0 root hub
[17:22] <smartguyz> Bus 002 Device 003: ID 1415:2000 Nam Tai E&E Products Ltd. or OmniVision Technologies, Inc. Sony Playstation Eye
[17:22] <smartguyz> Bus 002 Device 004: ID 413c:3012 Dell Computer Corp. Optical Wheel Mouse
[17:22] <smartguyz> Bus 002 Device 005: ID 0b38:0010 Gear Head 107-Key Keyboard
[17:22] <smartguyz> smartguyz@MAGT:~$
[17:24] <wrst> well that doesn't help a lot :) let me look a little
[17:25] <wrst> smartguyz: is this it? http://dinagreenbestreview.wordpress.com/201304111529-2/50d8d-edimax-ew-7822uac-wireless-ac1200-adapter-cheap/
[17:26] <smartguyz> yes
[17:27] <wrst> that looks like a pretty new one, I'm guessing there is no open source support yet
[17:28] <wrst> and looks like no Linux driver yet on the mfg page
[17:28] <smartguyz> also have the USB ASUS 53 dual band
[17:29] <smartguyz> ubuntu did not see it in lsusb
[17:30] <wrst> my guess is that it will take a while for that to get support
[17:30] <wrst> I have 0 experience with AC
[17:30] <wrst> so I'm not really for sure where to go with that
[17:31] <smartguyz> is there any standard USB  reliable wifi cards
[17:32] <wrst> yes lots of them, the key is to get one with the correct chipset, brand doesn't matter
[17:32] <wrst> intel wireless almost always work, ralink is usually pretty decent
[17:32] <smartguyz> am I looking for the bradcom chipset
[17:33] <wrst> no I would not suggest broadcom, support for broadcom is better but still not near what intel offers
[17:33] <smartguyz> intel ?
[17:34] <wrst> yes intel
[17:34] <smartguyz> usb wifi ?
[17:34] <wrst> intel, aetheros, and ralink would be how I would rank them
[17:34] <wrst> yes
[17:34] <smartguyz> any recommendations
[17:34] <wrst> looking now
[17:36] <wrst> or realtek they are usually pretty good also
[17:37] <wrst> smartguyz: here is a decent looking realtek chip http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16833210002
[17:37] <wrst> I generally go to newegg and search the comments for ubuntu and find one that is working well for folks
[17:39] <wrst> its usually possible to make any of them work, and likely you can the one you have maybe using ndiswrapper but not for sure if you can or not
[17:42] <smartguyz> I was thinking that I may be able to do that to
[17:42] <smartguyz> but do not know how
[17:43] <wrst> I'm not positive on that, been years since I have needed to
[17:43] <wrst> or actually if its still even a supported way most chips will work now
[17:43] <wrst> just the very new ones can be an issue
[17:44] <wrst> if i'm not mistaken ndiswrapper handles the driver but not the firmware, since some chips need the firmware loaded on them also
[17:49] <wrst> smartguyz: let me see if I can summons some help :)
[17:49] <wrst> Unit193: you around???
[17:50] <smartguyz> I am here
[17:50] <smartguyz> thank you for your help
[17:50] <smartguyz> I am still looking...
[17:52] <smartguyz> looking at ndiswrapper
[21:41] <Unit193> wrst: More or less.