[00:22] <IdleOne> bkerensa: yup, all is fine. Thanks for asking :)
[05:32] <elfy> well I for one really like the way that the ubuntu.com site looks
[12:47] <SergioMeneses> hi everybody!
[12:48] <elfy> o/
[17:12] <popey> *sigh* http://www.linuxadvocates.com/2013/06/the-ubuntu-foss-community-merely-chumps.html
[17:14]  * pleia2 eyeroll
[17:15] <pleia2> too many insults and misconceptions in that article for me to take it seriously
[17:16] <popey> he's written half a dozen similarly clueless posts over the last week
[17:18] <pleia2> and the idealist in me really thought the "Ubuntu was ruined by Unity" once they realized Gnome2 was even abandoned by its authors and Gnome3 is a bit wonky too
[17:18] <pleia2> +would stop
[17:28] <jcastro> man that's an awesome article
[17:29] <pleia2> lol
[17:30] <pleia2> jcastro: that's because you work at canonical and are happy to see someone is finally breaking it to the community how things really are, you don't have to hide your evil anymore!
[17:30] <jcastro> I love it how he just makes things up without any references or evidence
[17:31] <jcastro> he must be like hanging out with boycott novell guy or something
[17:31] <pleia2> hahah
[17:40] <popey> even the boycott novell guy wont write for that site
[17:40] <popey> he wrote one article and then realised it was a bad idea and backed out
[17:40] <popey> http://lxer.com/module/forums/t/34616/
[17:41] <popey> " Dietrich, unlike Katherine, admits it's a kind of experiment to see who passes his "advocacy" test (I can find you the direct quote); he already used to site to attack -- in public -- some longterm advocates."
[18:14] <mhall119> I particularly like his "For evidence of why I'm right, see my previous posts stating that I am right"
[18:18] <mhall119> my god this article is so full of it, I can't even finish it