| === Guest24881 is now known as Logan_ | ||
| === Logan_ is now known as Guest5998 | ||
| === Guest5998 is now known as Logan_ | ||
| === Logan_ is now known as Guest36164 | ||
| === Guest36164 is now known as Logan_ | ||
| === Logan_ is now known as Guest23811 | ||
| === Jikan is now known as Jikai | ||
| === Jikai is now known as Jikan | ||
| === Jikan is now known as Jikai | ||
| === Jikai is now known as Jikan | ||
| === Jikan is now known as Jikai | ||
| BluesKaj | Hiyas all | 12:52 |
|---|---|---|
| === Jikai is now known as Jikan | ||
| johnjohn101 | what is the diff between partial upgrade and updates? | 15:38 |
| IdleOne | partial upgrade is when not all of the available updates can be installed for one reason or another. it is best to avoid partial upgrades when running +1, chances are it will break your install. I don't recall ever seeing a partial upgrade in a released version of ubuntu | 16:19 |
| johnjohn101 | well, all this did was to remove a package. So wait until it doesn't say partial upgrade? | 16:29 |
| [Saint] | I assume this place caters for 13.10 as well, even though that's technically +2? | 17:49 |
| lordievader | [Saint]: No, 13.10 is +1, 13.04 is released after all. | 17:50 |
| [Saint] | AH. Well...I'm behind the times. | 17:50 |
| lordievader | [Saint]: ;) | 17:50 |
| Pici | [Saint]: Ubuntu release numbers are the YEAR.MONTH of release. | 17:51 |
| [Saint] | That implies having a constant knowledge of the current year and month, that's a hard ask... ;) | 17:51 |
| Pici | If only there was some sort of electronic device that could do that for you ;) | 17:52 |
| IdleOne | heh | 17:52 |
| [Saint] | Anyhoo: The annoying nag I'm getting currently "The update information is outdated. This may be caused by network problems...etc.", currently expected, or, I blew something up? | 17:53 |
| IdleOne | [Saint]: could be the mirror you are using is out of sync | 17:53 |
| IdleOne | try switching mirror and running apt-get update | 17:54 |
| [Saint] | Would having Err http://extras.ubuntu.com saucy Release in the sources trigger this I wonder? | 17:57 |
| [Saint] | whoops. -Err, obviously. Wrong pastebuffer. | 17:57 |
| IdleOne | it shouldn't | 17:58 |
| [Saint] | apt-get is perfectly happy aside from the miss of that source, which I understand is expected. | 17:58 |
| [Saint] | yet a small red triangle with an exclamation mark plagues me. | 17:58 |
| FernandoMiguel | is python breaking apps for anyone? | 18:09 |
| BluesKaj | FernandoMiguel, which apps? | 18:14 |
| FernandoMiguel | BluesKaj: 3rd party | 18:15 |
| FernandoMiguel | depends on libgdk_pixbuf | 18:15 |
| FernandoMiguel | $ apt-cache policy libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0 Installed: 2.28.1-1ubuntu2 | 18:15 |
| FernandoMiguel | BluesKaj or anyone, mind trying | 18:20 |
| FernandoMiguel | ldd /usr/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 | 18:20 |
| FernandoMiguel | ls /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgdk_pixbuf* | 18:21 |
| FernandoMiguel | pretty please? | 18:27 |
| BluesKaj | for ldd /usr/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 ...No such file or directory | 18:37 |
| FernandoMiguel | so package is broken.... fuuu | 18:39 |
| BluesKaj | FernandoMiguel, for, ls /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgdk_pixbuf* , http://pastebin.com/g1sqD4YY | 18:40 |
| FernandoMiguel | BluesKaj: thank you | 18:41 |
| BluesKaj | FernandoMiguel, np | 18:41 |
| === jimerickson is now known as jje | ||
| === jje is now known as jimerickson | ||
| bjsnider | FernandoMiguel, the file you had him ldd is in the udeb, and he wouldn't have that installed | 19:58 |
| FernandoMiguel | bjsnider: ? | 19:58 |
| bjsnider | you can see the buildlog here: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/140942008/buildlog_ubuntu-saucy-amd64.gdk-pixbuf_2.28.1-1ubuntu2_UPLOADING.txt.gz | 19:58 |
| FernandoMiguel | bjsnider: I failed to understand | 19:58 |
| bjsnider | and if you search for /usr/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 | 19:59 |
| FernandoMiguel | dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: package could avoid a useless dependency if debian/libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0-udeb/usr/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0.2800.1 debian/libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0-udeb/usr/lib/libgdk_pixbuf_xlib-2.0.so.0.2800.1 debian/libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0-udeb/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/gdk-pixbuf-2.0/2.10.0/loaders/libpixbufloader-png.so were not linked against libpthread.so.0 (they use none of the library's symbols) | 19:59 |
| bjsnider | yep, look at the last of the 3 results | 20:00 |
| bjsnider | it's a soft link installed by the udeb | 20:01 |
| bjsnider | i don't see how ldd can return results on a file not installed | 20:01 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!