[02:06] somsip called the ops in #ubuntu (we have a problem with fishedhoo pm'ing users.) === jbroome_ is now known as jbroome [16:15] Can somebody remove/ban cease in -ot [16:15] Just had to ban them from -uk [16:15] Thanks funkyHat [16:16] ok, #ubuntu* troll hitting multiple channels [16:18] Started in uk, hit -ot followed by -touch [16:25] whats the nick [16:27] cease [16:27] that nick is currently offline [16:27] gateway/web/freenode/ip.178.73.202.76 [16:28] Probably hit & run, ip resolves to sweden [16:28] those darn Swedes! [16:29] Thought they were targetting channels I was in after banning them from -uk, but then they hit -touch which I'm not in [16:40] Appears to back using a different ip and the nick fluids [16:41] now in #freenode [16:43] 17:42 < fluids> ban webchat pls [16:43] i actually agree with that. :) [16:44] the opinion expressed is solely that of jbroome and does not represent freenode, freenode staffers, or anyone else [16:45] Possibly related to exatsssl who's just been banned in -uk for multiple 'NIGGERS' lines [16:45] fluids has quit (Disconnected by services) [16:45] right after the demand [16:45] exatsssl!2ef65a57@gateway/web/freenode/ip.46.246.90.87 [17:23] Must be a full moon today [17:28] marching language! ya da de da dadda duh [17:28] I still think that planetary alignment thing might also be having residual effects [17:41] Could anyone help me test this recompiled Quassel in -sandbox? I need 2-3 people to see if when I try to remove a nonexistant name whether it kicks * or just does something else now like give a chanserv error [17:41] Jordan_U is already there but no one else [17:42] Just joined [17:44] Test was successful. If it wasn't everyone would have got booted :) [17:44] hi i asked a question in #ubuntu several times, nobody responded, so i called them fags to see if they could hear me (they could) [17:45] does #ubuntu hate homosexuals, or hate me, if the latter, what can i do to alleviate this h8 [17:49] fowl, hi [17:50] fowl: They do not hate either. The philosophy of Ubuntu is tolerance. So racial/religious/homophobic behaviour ( such as calling the channel "fags" even in jest ) is disruptive and against the rules. [17:50] if you didnt hate homosexuals, you wouldn't get offended at being called a fag [17:52] fowl, there's nothing to discuss. please exit the channel [17:54] fuck me off [17:54] break it off in my asshole and leave me bleeding [17:55] What a polite young man. [18:11] who would have thought that's how that account would have played out [18:20] since when does side by side = wubi [18:21] wow,... fowl was looking for the ban hammer [18:23] side by side means a true dual boot afaik [18:23] wubi means bleh [18:25] bazhang: I always thought of side by side as meaning host + guest [18:25] so I could run them side by side... not run one at boot then reboot to get the other one [18:26] thats interesting cprofitt ; I always thought of them dual boot, but never wubi [18:27] yeah... I never considered wubi in my equations [18:27] I saw no need fo rit [18:27] https://help.ubuntu.com/community/MigrateWubi looks useful in this instance. But i think they'd need handholding during the process. [18:27] he is giving very confusing info [18:28] bazhang: what channel? #ubuntu [18:29] cprofitt, and #xubuntu cross-posting, yeah [18:44] dirk just does not listen. holstein in #xubuntu explained very clearly a day or so before how changing swap / DE / WM will not give him a faster better video card [18:44] and he's repeating the same exact questions in #ubuntu right now [18:51] safely delete vmlinuz? seriously? [18:54] Not /vmlinuz and not /boot/vmlinuz [18:54] *Note [18:55] Files /vmlinuz /initrd.img and /libnss3.so exist. Can I safely delete those? [18:55] a better question would be: will I ever be able to reboot? [18:56] If it's in his root directory grub's not looking there for those files anyhow. Should be in the /boot directory [19:05] jrib: I tried to tell him that --system doesn't make a $HOME (although my www-data user does have /var/www/ defined for that) [19:06] Pici: also I think system users end up with /bin/false as shells [19:06] or at least that's what the info page claims. All my users, including www-data, seem to have /bin/sh as the shell here [19:06] mine too [19:06] he pastebins something else... [19:08] right, adduser --system does create a user with shell /bin/false [19:37] It would be useful if nogal had actually reported the bug properly, rather than just commenting in #u and then quitting the channel [19:40] Antarctica people [19:40] I knew I shouldn't have worn shorts [19:40] haha [19:51] I think D jones must have a neural link ot the ubuntuforums [19:51] augh typing [20:01] ? [20:21] Yuch... Really... 21:20 < ahalverson> neyder: try http://www.pcworld.com/article/2028896/how-to-make-ubuntu-linux-look-like-windows-7.html [20:54] * genii makes some more coffee [21:07] is nantou crossposting? [21:08] Doesn't look like it. [21:15] You'll remember him better as martinphone of course. [21:23] Pici: by the way, that ssh issue turned out to be some sort of user error where the authorized_keys weren't properly setup for www-data (though when he created the system user the commands he was running failed to run because shell was /bin/false) [21:29] Unit193, i do, i know the link. [22:20] !guidelines > Draxelis [22:23] draxelis clearly doesnt care about rules or suggestions to stick to the guidelines