=== holstein_ is now known as holstein [01:28] Unit193: where in the repos? I don't see it, even with proposed enabled [01:29] bluesabre: Saucy proposed (universe) - https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/abiword [01:31] ah, looks like they've not been published yet [01:32] I look forward to testing those and watching my doc files get turned to mush [01:32] Dowh, crap... This is a bad day for me... [01:32] I'm sorry. [01:34] think abiword will ever handle doc files well? [01:38] I always end up removing abi for libre for my wife. It works better between that and that other wordwrecker [01:38] Eh, who knows. Docx is the new kid anyway. LibreOffice does better, and that's what I have. [01:41] We have a desktop file we put at the top of the office menu that opens USC pointed at libreoffice. We don't want to ship it. Yoou are welcome to a copy. (or steal it from our -settings) [01:42] LSC doesn't have that feature (yet?) [03:59] mr_pouit: knome: re: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Xubuntu/Roadmap/Specifications/Saucy/EnablingXubuntuDevelopers, there's already a xubuntu packageset, see http://people.canonical.com/~stgraber/package_sets/saucy/xubuntu [03:59] Unit193: people should not be running things out of proposed in the devel release as it's unstable [04:00] Sorry. [04:08] micahg: The packageset is there but from what I could gather from the DMB documentation...there isn't a team that actually "owns" the packageset [04:10] micahg: The packageset is defined but has no uploaders as compared to say Kubuntu: http://people.canonical.com/~stgraber/package_sets/saucy/kubuntu [04:11] skellat: that's an implementation detail that we'll fix when needed [04:12] Unit193: I meant to look at the build failure for abiword, but have been lacking time and won't have any until Wed most probably [04:20] micahg: Oh sure, sure. [04:37] someone fixed the build failure, now so rdeps need fixing for it to migrate [04:38] micahg: Did I fill this out right: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/skellat/skellatDeveloperApplication [04:38] ? [04:40] skellat: you're not ready for upload rights, you have no sponsored uploads and only 2 sponsored syncs AFAICY [04:40] *AFAICT [04:40] Okay [04:40] No problemo [04:41] if you want PPU for xubuntu-docs, that should be doable once you've had some sponsored updates to that package [04:41] FWIW, it looks filled out properly [04:42] * skellat recognizes he is an apparatchik of the worst sort [04:42] I'll take the MoinMoin text, save it to local disk, and nuke the page for now [04:42] skellat: heh, as long as it's not on the agenda, it can sit there and you can keep refining until you're ready [04:42] I do need a clarification as to what "sponsored update" to the package is. I have had merges accepted. [04:43] skellat: and the help is much appreciated, but I think you were pushed a little too soon [04:43] skellat: sponsored update is where you prepare an entire new version that only needs an uploader to set the series (or in some cases you can do this) and upload [04:43] Ah [04:44] your name is in the changelog in the uploader line [04:44] I gotta go back and re-read the sponsored upload documentation. I keep feeling like I am missing a step or two [04:44] accepted merges can help towards something like dev membership without upload rights, but you're already an Ubuntu member [04:44] (Does uploading to Debian count?) [04:45] not for Ubuntu membership (though it does look good on an application :)) [04:45] well, it helps such that you show competence with a package [04:47] Unit193 has Ubuntu membership too [04:47] Many people do... [04:47] Unit193: 774 people on-planet have Ubuntu Membership [04:47] As of my last check earlier tonight [04:48] We have 6 people in the Ohio LoCo with such including me and you (Unit193) [04:48] I will catch up with email eventually...feel free to ping me if there's something I need to see [04:48] micahg: I just need to find better documentation on the sponsored upload process [04:50] This is what I do have for sponsored upload process documentation on the Ubuntu side: http://developer.ubuntu.com/packaging/html/udd-sponsorship.html [04:51] docs might have their own process, idk [04:52] Xubuntu is diverging from Ubuntu Documentation Project on that [04:52] I think [04:53] And I don't think bkerensa has that addressed yet at UDP level [04:54] Hmm [04:54] ok, well, the basic idea is to prepare the upload as if you had upload rights (with UNRELEASED in the changelog if you're using bzr) and poke someone to upload (either with a bug + sponsors team subscribed, bzr merge into UDD branch, poke on IRC for the exceptions where the other 2 don't make sense) [04:54] * poke someone to *review* and upload [04:55] Okay [04:55] That I can do [04:55] After I get some sleep [04:56] Writing text at this hour of night is one thing. Making bzr go kaboom happens way too easily at this hour for me. [04:56] * micahg is heading to sleep, will check scrollback sometime tomorrow [04:57] * skellat bids goodnight too [04:59] 'Night. [07:15] i believe i've done a (semi-)"sponsored upload" with docs, with not really trying to achieve that, just doing what we need to get packages uploaded :P [07:22] Best way to do it. [07:27] definitely. [07:28] i don't think upload rights have any absolute value for me [07:28] i think splitting the work is actually not a bad idea [07:29] ofc it's also not bad if we all have upload-rights additionally [07:29] (That may be bad.) [07:29] but the workload for each individual might increase if everyone has to upload their own stuff [07:31] ochosi, i'm not saying it wouldn't be good. i'm just saying that i don't necessarily need package upload permissions, because 1) i'm not a developer and require other people to work on changes to most packages (excluding some artwork, docs, settings stuff) and 2) i don't specifically *want* to to uploads [07:31] yeah, i wasn't arguing for or against what you said, mostly adding my pov to the conversation [07:35] (and yeah, i'm not sure i wanna do uploads either, i feel my capacities are quite fully used as it is) [07:38] i probably could, but then i'd want to drop other stuff, and that doesn't work while i'm XPL; when i'm not, i probably don't want to do that anymore as much [07:39] for me it'd mean we'd have to e.g. drop maintenance of themes [07:39] i mean of the other themes, and only focus on Greybird [07:40] Bleh, nooooooo. [07:40] That means Blackbird gets even less. [07:41] Unit193: you mean you'd rather try to get upload rights yourself? :} [07:41] ochosi: Is that a good idea? Just ask mi [07:42] wouldn't know why not [08:07] me neither [08:08] At least I'm learning. [08:24] motivation gets you far. [08:25] (that's you in the broader sense (as well)) [17:41] micahg: this package set is missing most panel plugins and contains things we don't care about (lyx? really?) [17:44] and people (bluesabre, ochosi) who want to gain upload right for the package set could do the merges from unstable to saucy (I haven't touched anything but the ppa). [18:33] mr_pouit: I would be interested in helping with the merges [18:33] :) [18:34] in addition to the other packages in our package set that ochosi and I are maintaining [18:35] released lightdm-gtk-greeter 1.6.0, parole 0.5.1, and catfish 0.6.4 today [18:35] (going to do sponsored uploads for those)