[09:39] <seb128> hey xorg guys
[09:39] <seb128> is that a known issue with -intel on saucy?
[09:39] <seb128> http://paste.ubuntu.com/5738268/
[09:39] <seb128> #9  <signal handler called>
[09:39] <seb128> #10 region_subsumes_damage (damage=0x0, region=0xbf87b824)
[09:39] <seb128>     at ../../../src/sna/sna.h:569
[09:39] <seb128> #11 sna_drawable_use_bo (drawable=drawable@entry=0xb850d320, 
[09:39] <seb128> abort of xorg
[09:39] <seb128> seems to happen when starting software-center
[09:40] <seb128> it happens here and didrocks confirmed it
[09:40] <seb128> tjaalton, mlankhorst: ^
[09:40] <tjaalton> I'll try
[09:41] <tjaalton> doesn't crash when using nvidia optimus too
[09:41] <tjaalton> I'll try just -intel
[09:42] <seb128> it doesn't happen every time
[09:42] <seb128> but I just got it twice in 5 minutes of playing in test sessions
[09:42] <seb128> and didrocks got it on first try
[09:45] <tjaalton> meh, stupid SDP... fails to boot (uefi) after powering it down post-installation
[09:46] <tjaalton> ok another machine then..
[09:48] <mlankhorst> hm
[09:48] <mlankhorst> seb128: valgrind it? :>
[09:49] <tjaalton> ..which has no working touchpad or wifi.. so can't upgrade it to current saucy without reinstalling it :P
[09:49] <seb128> mlankhorst, how do I do this? valgrind X :1 from a vt?
[09:49] <tjaalton> intel driver it has is the same as on raring, saucy has .7
[09:50] <seb128> tjaalton, I can try downgrading the driver if that helps
[09:50] <tjaalton> seb128: yeah that would help confirming it's the ddx at fault
[09:50] <mlankhorst> I'm trying to run nouveau in real optimus mode, I keep hitting funny bugs atm. Most of the nouveau ddx expects that a display is attached for some reason :-)
[09:50] <tjaalton> I know there's some regression with 2.21.8 which is fixed upstream
[09:51] <tjaalton> but we don't have that
[09:51] <mlankhorst> seb128: install xserver.*dbg, libdrm.*dbg, valgrind
[09:52] <mlankhorst> then see https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56578#c54 for how to start a normal lightdm session
[09:53] <tjaalton> ickle confirmed it's fixed upstream
[09:54] <seb128> tjaalton, seems to not happen with .6
[09:54] <tjaalton> lp:1186573
[09:54] <mlankhorst> ok
[09:55] <tjaalton> we'll have 2.21.9 in a few hours :)
[09:55] <mlankhorst> I'll upload that to saucy
[09:55] <tjaalton> .9?
[09:55] <tjaalton> not released yet
[09:56] <seb128> tjaalton, is there any version I can try?
[09:56] <mlankhorst> few hours :
[09:57] <tjaalton> seb128: not yet
[09:58] <jcristau> well
[09:58] <jcristau> you could try git
[09:58] <tjaalton> right
[09:58] <tjaalton> but no package
[09:58] <mlankhorst> ugh backlight is off
[09:59] <seb128> tjaalton, any commit I can try to backport?
[10:00] <tjaalton> checking
[10:03] <tjaalton> maybe c4ad7b14ca71b95
[10:08] <seb128> tjaalton, http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/driver/xf86-video-intel/commit/?id=c4ad7b14ca71b95af83864b05793ea357f48bb88 ?
[10:10] <tjaalton> seb128: yep
[10:51] <tjaalton> mlankhorst: do you have the bug graphs somewhere yet+
[10:51] <tjaalton> ?
[10:52] <mlankhorst> no it doesn't work yet for some reason, I don't know why
[10:52] <mlankhorst> you have some clickable links but there is no plot
[10:52] <mlankhorst> http://people.canonical.com/~mlankhorst/arsenal/ubuntu-x-swat/Reports/totals-saucy.svg
[10:53] <mlankhorst> hm maybe it does work after all
[10:53] <tjaalton> graph looks fine apart from the scaling :)
[10:53] <tjaalton> on x-axis
[10:53] <mlankhorst> yeah
[10:54] <mlankhorst> I thought it wasn't working, guess i was wrong
[10:54] <tjaalton> and doesn't show the bug count
[10:58] <mlankhorst> grrrr I'm hitting some random memory corruption >:(
[11:07] <tjaalton> pulling the hsw pci-id fixes for libdrm
[12:16] <mlankhorst> yay
[12:17] <mlankhorst> optimus mode nouveau working, I think
[12:23] <mlankhorst> yeah
[12:23] <mlankhorst> $ nfs/glxspheres 
[12:23] <mlankhorst> Polygons in scene: 62464
[12:23] <mlankhorst> Visual ID of window: 0x1cb
[12:23] <mlankhorst> Context is Direct
[12:23] <mlankhorst> OpenGL Renderer: Gallium 0.4 on NVD7
[12:23] <mlankhorst> 81.425963 frames/sec - 90.871375 Mpixels/sec
[12:43] <jcristau> oh, look, a 2.21.9
[12:43] <jcristau> :)
[12:45] <tjaalton> finally :)
[12:49] <mlankhorst> race you to it!
[12:49] <tjaalton> haha
[12:56] <mlankhorst> jcristau: now just enable sna for intel, and we can copy from debian next time :-)
[12:56] <tjaalton> oh you really started merging it
[12:57] <tjaalton> just make sure to close all the bugs, like 1175533 :)
[12:57] <mlankhorst> kk
[12:57] <tjaalton> and 1188123
[12:58] <tjaalton> and we probably need to add the mesa revert back
[12:58] <jcristau> mlankhorst: or we can get your key into the dm keyring and you do it yourself
[12:58] <jcristau> (queue evil laugh)
[12:58] <mlankhorst> that seems to be going slowly atm, nobody replied to my mail :P
[13:01] <mlankhorst> tjaalton: any others?
[13:01] <tjaalton> also, remove test/tearing.mp4 :)
[13:01] <mlankhorst> yeah
[13:02] <tjaalton> well I think lp:1186573 could just be duped to the newer bug
[13:03] <tjaalton> the saucy queue at least is empty after those
[13:04] <mlankhorst> ah good
[13:04] <tjaalton> wait, that guy filed the same bug three times
[13:04] <tjaalton> -> duping
[13:04] <tjaalton> done, those two should be enough for now
[13:05] <tjaalton> since .7 is what added the regressions, saucy only
[13:06] <mlankhorst> ok I'll do a quick test build locally, then upload to saucy
[13:06] <tjaalton> k
[13:06] <tjaalton> seb128: ^
[13:09] <seb128> tjaalton, great ;-)
[13:22] <tjaalton> mlankhorst: well, -intel did have support for haswell, but this one added new pci-id's ;)
[13:23] <tjaalton> and the other bug# is too short :)
[13:23] <mlankhorst> ugh :P
[13:23] <mlankhorst> ah yeah indeed
[13:23] <mlankhorst> my room is reaching insane temperatures
[13:23] <mlankhorst> -> break
[13:23] <tjaalton> only 27C here
[13:23] <tjaalton> eod->
[13:24] <tjaalton> 32C on the terrace, let's see..
[13:24] <mlankhorst> worst part was that the bug # did look too short, but on visual verification it looked fine, it's definitely too warm for me to think straight now :-)
[13:25] <mlankhorst> I bet it's warmer in my room
[13:27] <tjaalton> it's getting cooler here
[13:28] <bjsnider> it's so cool here the furnace would be running if we hadn't turned it off
[13:28] <bjsnider> this is supposed to be summer
[13:28] <tjaalton> hehe
[13:29] <tjaalton> so I'm told
[13:29] <mlankhorst> ah no wonder
[13:29] <mlankhorst> if i put the thermometer on my curtains it reaches 38°c and higher
[13:30] <mlankhorst> and it's radiating that onto me, no wonder i always feel warm working
[13:30] <tjaalton> yep, you need proper shades
[13:31] <mlankhorst> indeed, or a different working room :-)
[13:31] <tjaalton> that could work
[13:33] <bjsnider> a/c?
[13:34] <tjaalton> typical, just throw new tech at the problem ;)
[13:35] <mlankhorst> a/c? do you want me to catch a cold >:O
[13:36] <tjaalton> an awning blind would be cheaper to operate
[13:36] <tjaalton> awling
[13:36] <tjaalton> hum, both are the same
[13:37] <mlankhorst> I can just tilt the window, put water on top and have water cooling :-)
[13:37] <tjaalton> now I'm blind
[16:32] <mdeslaur> does anybody have any hardware that uses the openchrome driver?
[20:40] <mlankhorst> i don't even know what that hardware would look like
[20:42] <jcristau> it'd look like a motherboard
[20:45] <Sarvatt> mlankhorst: absolute crappiest/cheapest athlon xp motherboards you could buy at the time  :P
[20:45] <mlankhorst> haha
[20:47] <mdeslaur> so that would be a no I guess? :)
[20:48] <jcristau> testing security fixes is overrated anyway
[20:49]  * jcristau hides
[20:49] <mdeslaur> haha
[20:49] <mdeslaur> testing security fixes for hardware nobody uses is overrated :)
[20:49] <jcristau> though i think raphael has openchrome hw and tested the packages before we shipped
[20:50]  * mdeslaur looks at powerpc
[20:52] <Sarvatt> thought i might have had one in the box of old boards but its SIS, ah well
[20:54] <mdeslaur> I'll just mail a $10 to whoever reports a regression so they can buy a better computer
[20:58] <jcristau> fwiw i didn't hear anything
[20:58] <jcristau> after the first libxvmc screwup
[20:59] <mdeslaur> jcristau: ok, thanks