[02:28] <mfisch> why are some packages versioned with dfsg in the version number?
[02:29] <StevenK> mfisch: Because they're have non-free bits removed by the maintainer
[02:29] <StevenK> s/re/ve/
[02:29] <Unit193> they've have
[02:31] <mfisch> grammar or not, that makes sense, thanks
[02:32] <Unit193> (Debian Free Software Guidelines.)
[05:35] <jaalto> Hi, Whom should I ocntact to get few of the Launcpad bugs closed? I'm the Debian maintainer of those packages and have checked them.
[06:19] <dholbach> good morning
[06:49] <jaalto> Anyone in the channel with admin rights to close bugs in Launchpad?
[08:06] <Adri2000> jaalto: anyone can close a bug in LP afaik
[08:07] <Adri2000> jaalto: except maybe for the wontfix status
[08:11] <jaalto> Adri2000: you can? Hm
[08:12] <jaalto> Let's take e.g. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/speedometer/+bug/510800 ... I'm logged on, where is the knob?
[08:14] <Adri2000> jaalto: click the pencil icon near "new"
[08:15] <jaalto> Adri2000: Direction...? Up, Down, Right of page ....?
[08:15] <Adri2000> at the top of the page, where you can see the status, importance, and assignee of the bug
[08:15] <jaalto> Adri2000: got it.
[08:18] <jaalto> Adri2000: Does "Fix releaed" also close the bug?
[08:18] <lifeless> fix released/invalid/wonfix/opinion are all closed states
[08:19] <jaalto> lifeless: Ok. Thanks.
[11:40] <jaalto> What is the generic URL to access bug by number in Launchpag? In Debian that is http://bugs.debian.org/NNNNN
[11:41] <jaalto> Launchpad
[11:42] <TheLordOfTime> jaalto:  https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/NNNNNNN
[11:42] <Laney> pad.lv/nnnn
[11:43] <TheLordOfTime> that too
[11:44] <TheLordOfTime> Laney:  quick refresh of my memory in case patch policy has changed, Bug-Ubuntu lines in the DEP3 should have the bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/NNNNNN link format, or the pad.lv format?
[11:44] <TheLordOfTime> or does it not matter?
[11:44] <Laney> doubt it matters
[11:44]  * TheLordOfTime shrugs
[11:44] <Laney> I usually include the full one
[11:45] <TheLordOfTime> mhm
[11:45] <Laney> mainly because I'm copy and pasting rather than typing it
[11:45] <TheLordOfTime> xD
[11:45] <jaalto> Is pad.lv/nnnn official?
[11:45] <TheLordOfTime> jaalto:  afaict it's part of Launchpad, like a redirect, if you want to be "official" the link I gave you is more characters, but does the same thing.
[11:46] <TheLordOfTime> confirmed to work using one of the bug numbers i watch like a hawk (both methods)
[11:46] <jaalto> TheLordOfTime: ok.
[11:47] <TheLordOfTime> ... i lied
[11:47] <TheLordOfTime> pad.lv isn't part of LP
[11:47] <TheLordOfTime> my fault sorry
[11:47]  * TheLordOfTime woke up an hour ago
[11:48] <TheLordOfTime> jaalto:  but, pad.lv/NNNN and bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/NNNN do the same thing
[14:40] <Legendario> hi. I'm trying to build a package. After running lintian i corrected stuff it pointed but it still show the same warnings. What is wrong?
[14:57] <coolbhavi> Legendario, what are the errors you are getting?
[15:18] <Legendario> coolbhavi, regular errors on debian/files configuration. U wanna see?
[15:24] <Legendario> coolbhavi, http://pastebin.com/JDxmQdjL
[16:27] <coolbhavi> Legendario, most of them are related to debian/rules because some of the statements used there can be obsolete
[17:28] <Legendario> coolbhavi, i know but after changing that it still shows the same errors
[17:28] <Legendario> I have corrected them, but lintian shows the same stuff. What should I do?
[17:37] <geser> did you rebuild the source package you run lintian on?
[17:45] <Legendario> geser, yes. Do I have to pass some argument to bzr builddeb for that?
[17:51] <geser> I don't think so
[18:28] <jaalto> Could someone makr this "won't fix". I've written explanation why it's not https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zpaq/+bug/1074840
[18:31] <TheLordOfTime> jaalto:  probably should have asked in -bugs, but... *looks*
[18:36] <TheLordOfTime> actually i'll leave this for a MOTU :P
[18:38] <jaalto> I'm closing the Debian bug 693656 that is referened in the LP bug with similar explanation.
[18:39] <jaalto> TheLordOfTime: can the MOTU group be reached by email?
[18:39]  * TheLordOfTime shrugs
[18:39] <TheLordOfTime> jaalto:  i usually have good luck finding someine in-channel within a 30 minute period of time
[18:40] <TheLordOfTime> but that implies patience
[18:40]  * TheLordOfTime kicks his keyboard for beings tupid
[18:40] <jaalto> TheLordOfTime: The problem is with timezones...
[18:40] <TheLordOfTime> jaalto:  i'm pretty certain there's MOTUs on from all over.
[18:40] <geser> jaalto: set to "wontfix" as requested
[18:40] <TheLordOfTime> also devs, but... :P
[18:41] <jaalto> geser: Oh, good. Thanks.
[18:41] <TheLordOfTime> jaalto:  out of pure curiosity...
[18:42] <jaalto> TheLordOfTime: yes?
[18:42] <TheLordOfTime> there's no updated version in debian is there, as a separate package
[18:42] <TheLordOfTime> (on that bug)
[18:42] <TheLordOfTime> s/bug/package/
[18:43] <jaalto> TheLordOfTime: zpaq 1.x is all there is. I've reponded to numerous requests to upgrade, but unfortunately it's road closed (or bridge burnts) and not possible. Someone is free to packge the 6.x zpaq from scratch. Then 1.x can be obsoleted.
[18:43] <TheLordOfTime> that was my question :P
[18:44]  * TheLordOfTime was curious if anyone had an ITP up for zpaq 6.x as some other alternate package or not
[18:45] <TheLordOfTime> ... oh COME ON i fixed that FTBFS problem already...  *goes to kick the nginx package around a bit on his local builders*
[18:46] <jaalto> TheLordOfTime: Not to my knowledge, there is no RFP/ITP. See http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/requested
[20:48] <Laney> ah, yay, got lp-udd to verify the cert again
[20:49] <Laney> still had to monkeypatch httplib as python-launchpadlib doesn't have a way to let you override the default
[20:49] <Laney> afaict, anyway