bkerensa | slangasek: is there rules surrounding the inclusion of image files in debian packages that are trademark/copyright protected? | 17:46 |
---|---|---|
slangasek | trademark and copyright are two different things | 17:47 |
bkerensa | slangasek: yes but both can protect a brand/image | 17:47 |
bkerensa | a image can be protected by copyright and also trademarked | 17:47 |
bkerensa | I ask because the Facebook Core App has a Facebook logo bundled in | 17:47 |
bkerensa | and is copyright Facebook Inc. and Trademark them | 17:47 |
slangasek | sure | 17:47 |
bkerensa | yet its not an official app being made by them | 17:47 |
slangasek | and under trademark law, this is arguably nominative use | 17:48 |
slangasek | as for the copyright, that would depend on the copyright license | 17:48 |
bkerensa | In this case Canonical has licensed the entire source package under the GPLv3 and claims ownership of all the files | 17:49 |
bkerensa | http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-facebook-dev/ubuntu-facebook-app/trunk/view/head:/debian/copyright | 17:49 |
bkerensa | including the Facebook logo | 17:49 |
slangasek | bkerensa: that's really an entirely separate question from whether it's legitimate to include the icon in the package; in all cases the artwork should of course have the correct copyright listed in debian/copyright | 18:24 |
thefinn93 | bkerensa: ping | 19:09 |
blkperl | slangasek: ping, can you mark bug 1188793 for me as affecting raring, and kick it towards SRU possibly | 20:10 |
lubotu1 | bug 1188793 in virt-viewer (Ubuntu) "virt-viewer has GTK error on connection to remote" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1188793 | 20:10 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!