[17:46] <bkerensa> slangasek: is there rules surrounding the inclusion of image files in debian packages that are trademark/copyright protected?
[17:47] <slangasek> trademark and copyright are two different things
[17:47] <bkerensa> slangasek: yes but both can protect a  brand/image
[17:47] <bkerensa> a image can be protected by copyright and also trademarked
[17:47] <bkerensa> I ask because the Facebook Core App has a Facebook logo bundled in
[17:47] <bkerensa> and is copyright Facebook Inc. and Trademark them
[17:47] <slangasek> sure
[17:47] <bkerensa> yet its not an official app being made by them
[17:48] <slangasek> and under trademark law, this is arguably nominative use
[17:48] <slangasek> as for the copyright, that would depend on the copyright license
[17:49] <bkerensa> In this case Canonical has licensed the entire source package under the GPLv3 and claims ownership of all the files
[17:49] <bkerensa> http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-facebook-dev/ubuntu-facebook-app/trunk/view/head:/debian/copyright
[17:49] <bkerensa> including the Facebook logo
[18:24] <slangasek> bkerensa: that's really an entirely separate question from whether it's legitimate to include the icon in the package; in all cases the artwork should of course have the correct copyright listed in debian/copyright
[19:09] <thefinn93> bkerensa: ping
[20:10] <blkperl> slangasek: ping, can you mark bug 1188793 for me as affecting raring, and kick it towards SRU possibly