| === defunctzombie_zz is now known as defunctzombie | ||
| === defunctzombie is now known as defunctzombie_zz | ||
| === defunctzombie_zz is now known as defunctzombie | ||
| === thumper is now known as thumper-afk | ||
| === defunctzombie is now known as defunctzombie_zz | ||
| === thumper-afk is now known as thumper | ||
| === danilos__ is now known as danilos | ||
| pavel | Is there any way I can increase size of root partition in EC2 instance? Or at least attach extra ebs volume? | 09:37 |
|---|---|---|
| pavel | my problem is that by default lucid images are 8gb and it's totally not enough for my purposes | 09:41 |
| === huats_ is now known as huats | ||
| mgz | gah, why are recreating the error of having 'docs' as a series of the main project? | 10:27 |
| mgz | juju-core/docs makes no sense | 10:28 |
| stub | oh noes! Where has debug-hooks gone | 10:52 |
| mgz | stub: bug 1027876 | 10:55 |
| _mup_ | Bug #1027876: cmdline: Support debug-hooks <cmdline> <juju-core:Confirmed> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1027876> | 10:55 |
| stub | In the -broken hook, the relation is already gone... so I need to use my -changed hooks to remember state somewhere else so my -broken hook can actually clean up? | 10:56 |
| mgz | that sounds possible to me, hopefully someone with experience of charming something like that can give suggestions | 10:58 |
| mthaddon | hi folks, I have three instances in an environment that I want to get rid of (no longer needed). I've removed them via juju destroy-service (for 2) and a juju remove-unit (for 1). I've then done a nova delete, but juju has reprovisioned the instances. Is this expected behaviour? is there some way to work around it? | 11:11 |
| mgz | yes, you want `juju terminate-machine` | 11:13 |
| mgz | mthaddon: ^ | 11:13 |
| mthaddon | mgz: awesome, thanks | 11:13 |
| === wedgwood_away is now known as wedgwood | ||
| ehg | hi - does anyone have any idea of how to get rid of zombie services/machines in the go juju DB? i.e. services that won't die, machines that are pending | 14:04 |
| RAZORQ | Hi guys | 14:41 |
| RAZORQ | i have question about Ubuntu for phones. I Have ZTE GXI with Intel atom processor, and i want to know that, will be there ubuntu for my phone official, or i must port it on my own? | 14:42 |
| === RAZORQ changed the topic of #juju to: k | ||
| === marcoceppi changed the topic of #juju to: Reviewer: ~charmers || Review Calendar: http://goo.gl/uK9HD || Review Queue: http://jujucharms.com/review-queue || Charms at http://jujucharms.com || Want to write a charm? https://juju.ubuntu.com/docs/charm-store.html || OSX client: http://jujutools.github.com/ | ||
| === medberry is now known as med_ | ||
| === defunctzombie_zz is now known as defunctzombie | ||
| === defunctzombie is now known as defunctzombie_zz | ||
| vennenno | (?) | 16:53 |
| jamespage | wedgwood, adam_g_: cached decoration and some hookenv normalization - https://code.launchpad.net/~james-page/charm-helpers/caching_hookenv/+merge/169160 | 16:59 |
| === defunctzombie_zz is now known as defunctzombie | ||
| wedgwood | jamespage: we can't cache relation-get. we may want to see our own relation variables | 17:01 |
| wedgwood | same for the other relation_* commands | 17:02 |
| wedgwood | er, some of them anyway. the ones that call relation-get | 17:03 |
| jamespage | wedgwood: not sure I understand why that is? | 17:31 |
| wedgwood | jamespage: if, in one part of my hook I call relation-get -r <some relation id> - <my unit name>, then relation-set -r <same relation id>, I won't see the changes if they're cached | 17:32 |
| jamespage | wedgwood: you can't see data in that way within a relation | 17:33 |
| jamespage | hmm - or maybe... | 17:33 |
| wedgwood | jamespage: I'm pretty sure you can | 17:33 |
| wedgwood | jamespage: I did a lot of experimenting when I wrote http://senselessranting.org/post/52242864437/juju-relations-how-do-they-work | 17:33 |
| wedgwood | jamespage: you can see your own changes immedately | 17:33 |
| wedgwood | they're not committed and sent to other units until you exit the hook, but you can see your own | 17:34 |
| wedgwood | none of the rest of charm-helpers operates with that assumption, but I wouldn't want to surprise someone | 17:35 |
| wedgwood | jamespage: I also have another branch that may give you similar results. | 17:36 |
| wedgwood | jamespage: it's not completely finished: https://code.launchpad.net/~mew/charm-helpers/persistence | 17:36 |
| wedgwood | jamespage: you could always call cached(relation_get(...)) in your own charm. | 17:38 |
| jcastro | wedgwood: mind if I syndicate that blog on juju.u.c? | 17:38 |
| wedgwood | jcastro: by all means | 17:38 |
| jamespage | wedgwood: well I never even knew you could do that | 17:41 |
| wedgwood | neither did I :) | 17:41 |
| jamespage | wedgwood: I can probably figure out how to selectively flush the cache if that happens | 17:43 |
| === defunctzombie is now known as defunctzombie_zz | ||
| Slaytorson | How can I destroy a charm? | 17:55 |
| jcastro | can you specify what you mean by destroy? | 17:58 |
| jcastro | as in, remove the machine it's running on or destroy the service or ... ? | 17:59 |
| Slaytorson | Perhaps I meant service. Completely delete and terminate the service and all machines running it | 17:59 |
| jcastro | look at destroy-service and destroy-machine | 18:01 |
| Slaytorson | Thanks. I did "juju --help" and nothing about destroying came about. | 18:01 |
| jcastro | actually, I wonder what happens when you destroy-machine before destroying a service | 18:01 |
| jcastro | `juju help commands` is what you want | 18:01 |
| jcastro | oh, which version of juju are you on? | 18:01 |
| Slaytorson | Not sure. juju --version doesn't give me the version | 18:02 |
| jcastro | if you do "juju" and then hit enter do you get a nice list of basic commands and a link to the website? | 18:03 |
| Slaytorson | Sort of. I don't get anything about destroying. https://gist.github.com/bslayton/197c168321381135556e | 18:05 |
| jcastro | ah yeah | 18:05 |
| jcastro | you're on the right version then | 18:05 |
| jcastro | but still crappy that we don't make --version, etc. | 18:05 |
| jcastro | I think I filed a bug about that | 18:05 |
| jcastro | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/juju-core/+bug/1182898 | 18:06 |
| _mup_ | Bug #1182898: Please support `juju --version` <amd64> <apport-bug> <raring> <juju-core:New> <juju-core (Ubuntu):New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1182898> | 18:06 |
| === koolhead11|away is now known as koolhead17 | ||
| jhf | hey all - I think I'm in some weird state.. after a reboot (with all my juju running and happy), when I run 'juju status' I get 'ERROR could not connect before timeout' yet 'juju bootstrap' reports 'ERROR Environment already bootstrapped' - this is using LXC containers. | 19:32 |
| jhf | any ideas? | 19:32 |
| jhf | 'juju -v status' errors with Socket [10.0.3.1:60460] zk retcode=-4, errno=111(Connection refused): server refused to accept the client | 19:33 |
| sarnold | jhf: I vaguely think I recall someone complaiing about their network bridge not coming back up after a reboot recently... | 19:41 |
| jhf | yeah… I ended up doing a destroy-environment and starting over for now.. | 19:41 |
| jhf | but I imagine if I reboot again it'll happen again. | 19:41 |
| jcastro | http://andrewsomething.wordpress.com/2013/06/13/introducing-bug-2-trello/ | 20:13 |
| jcastro | m_3: marcoceppi: arosales ^^^^^ | 20:13 |
| marcoceppi | jcastro: wat. awesome | 20:14 |
| marcoceppi | Oh, I thought it did sync stuff, it's a chrome plugin | 20:14 |
| marcoceppi | still, very cool | 20:14 |
| thumper | FunnyLookinHat: ping | 21:35 |
| FunnyLookinHat | thumper, howdy | 21:35 |
| thumper | FunnyLookinHat: hey hey | 21:35 |
| thumper | so | 21:35 |
| thumper | containers... | 21:35 |
| FunnyLookinHat | Ha | 21:35 |
| thumper | good progress is being made | 21:35 |
| thumper | but nothing ready to test yet | 21:35 |
| thumper | we have managed to get some things working with manual poking | 21:36 |
| thumper | but not fully automated yet | 21:36 |
| FunnyLookinHat | Ah interesting | 21:36 |
| FunnyLookinHat | Any idea on a timeline ? | 21:36 |
| thumper | :) | 21:36 |
| thumper | that's the question isn't it? | 21:36 |
| thumper | as fast as possible | 21:36 |
| * thumper considers carefully | 21:36 | |
| thumper | I *think* we should have something very beta by the end of next week (hopefully( | 21:37 |
| thumper | this depends on some network refactoring | 21:37 |
| thumper | to make sure the containers are properly addressable from the rest of the machines | 21:37 |
| thumper | sorry it isn't more concrete | 21:38 |
| thumper | but since this is the first iteration | 21:38 |
| thumper | it is bound to be wrong | 21:38 |
| * thumper quotes kiko - the first two times will be wrong | 21:39 | |
| thumper | FunnyLookinHat: are you on the juju-dev email list? | 21:40 |
| thumper | FunnyLookinHat: I'm trying to post updates there | 21:40 |
| thumper | FunnyLookinHat: so, completely different question - the new ultrabook - does it have a metal outer? | 21:42 |
| FunnyLookinHat | Sorry was AFK - had to take care of something | 21:42 |
| thumper | FunnyLookinHat: np | 21:42 |
| FunnyLookinHat | Ok so - Q#1 - at some point could you give me a high level idea of how the charms would work to deploy applications within containers? i.e. will much have to change from a standard charm? On top of that - I'm still not sure if this means I'd put the entire LAMP stack in the container or just LAP and then do MySQL elsewhere. | 21:44 |
| FunnyLookinHat | RE: mailing list - I'm not - I asked for approval and never got it I believe : | 21:44 |
| FunnyLookinHat | RE: Ultrabook - not metal, but a VERY strong polycarbonate. I can't bend the one sitting next to me at all if I try to twist one way or another | 21:45 |
| FunnyLookinHat | The metal chassis inside is quite awesome :) | 21:45 |
| thumper | ?! you need approval for juju-dev list? | 21:46 |
| FunnyLookinHat | I guess so? I threw in my email address and it said "pending approval" - no emails yet :) | 21:46 |
| thumper | A#1 - charms shouldn't need any modification *at all* - should ben entirely transparent | 21:46 |
| FunnyLookinHat | I used my personal, so that might be it - funnylookinhat@gmail.com - if you could approve | 21:47 |
| thumper | I'll take a look | 21:47 |
| FunnyLookinHat | thumper, ok - so charm theory follow-up. Given that I don't care about actually "scaling" any of our deployed applications, would it make sense to have a charm wrap an entire LAMP stack? I would _really_ like to be able to do that for security and backup purposes | 21:56 |
| thumper | FunnyLookinHat: I think that idea may well suit your needs very well | 21:56 |
| FunnyLookinHat | Ok - good deal. | 21:56 |
| FunnyLookinHat | Gotta run - but thanks for the update thumper | 22:04 |
| === wedgwood is now known as wedgwood_away | ||
| === mramm2 is now known as mramm | ||
| === mramm is now known as mramm22 | ||
| === mramm22 is now known as mramm | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!