| === Sarvatt is now known as Sarvatt_ | ||
| === thumper is now known as thumper-afk | ||
| pitti | Good morning | 04:20 |
|---|---|---|
| RAOF | pitti: Hey, I'm testing colord 1.0.1. Does adt | 04:51 |
| RAOF | pitti: Hey, I'm testing colord 1.0.1. Does adt-run-test support Restrictions: build-needed? Because it seems to not be doing that. | 04:51 |
| pitti | hey RAOF | 04:54 |
| pitti | RAOF: it does, but ATM it does it wrongly, see debian bug 711209 | 04:55 |
| ubot2` | Debian bug 711209 in autopkgtest "autopkgtest: build-needed restriction doesn't actually run tests in built tree" [Normal,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/711209 | 04:55 |
| pitti | RAOF: that bites me in umockdev as well, so today I'll look for a workaround | 04:55 |
| pitti | RAOF: or rather, fix that in adt-run | 04:55 |
| RAOF | pitti: So, with that caveat, you may enjoy the debian/1.0.1-1 tag in colord's collab-maint git repository. | 05:07 |
| pitti | RAOF: yay | 05:07 |
| * pitti checks whether the keyring update in Debian has happened by now | 05:08 | |
| pitti | RAOF: ah, seems it didn't yet, so I can't upload yet | 05:08 |
| RAOF | Heh. Fair 'nuff. | 05:09 |
| jibel | good morning | 07:04 |
| didrocks | salut jibel, ça va? | 07:09 |
| jibel | salut didrocks , bien et toi? | 07:12 |
| pitti | bonjour didrocks | 07:14 |
| didrocks | bonjour pitti, ça va? | 07:15 |
| didrocks | jibel: ça va, semaine qui démarrre en fanfarre, mais bon :) | 07:15 |
| pitti | didrocks: ça va très bien ! j'ai eu un bon week-end | 07:15 |
| didrocks | pitti: tu as fait quoi? | 07:15 |
| pitti | didrocks: I'm going to blog/G+ about it RSN, watch out :) | 07:16 |
| didrocks | pitti: heh, will do! :) | 07:18 |
| seb128 | good morning desktopers | 07:34 |
| didrocks | salut seb128! | 07:35 |
| seb128 | lut didrocks! | 07:36 |
| sil2100 | Morning! | 07:36 |
| sil2100 | didrocks: hi! How was your long weekend? :) | 07:36 |
| seb128 | hey sil2100 | 07:37 |
| didrocks | sil2100: hey, was hot in Lyon! :) Got to the spa on Friday morning | 07:37 |
| didrocks | was good, not too many people | 07:37 |
| sil2100 | Excellent | 07:37 |
| didrocks | then, a lot of cycling (~30 kms) within the city | 07:37 |
| didrocks | how was yours? | 07:38 |
| sil2100 | Ahh, I miss my bike, would love to ride a bit now that the weather is so nice | 07:38 |
| pitti | didrocks: done :) | 07:39 |
| pitti | bonjour seb128 | 07:39 |
| didrocks | pitti: looking :) | 07:39 |
| sil2100 | didrocks: not bad, only had one day for resting theoretically, but I bummed around as much as I could ;) | 07:39 |
| seb128 | pitti, salut, ça va bien ? | 07:39 |
| sil2100 | didrocks: btw. I see that the queue still has dbus-cpp and location-service waiting as (sync) | 07:39 |
| didrocks | sil2100: yeah, I waited to ask you for it | 07:39 |
| didrocks | it's from yesterday's right? | 07:40 |
| pitti | seb128: en effet, je vais très bien ! mon weekend était mervellieux | 07:40 |
| sil2100 | didrocks: it was from Friday | 07:40 |
| didrocks | sil2100: oh, is seb128 to blame? :p | 07:40 |
| seb128 | pitti, super, tu as fait quoi ? | 07:40 |
| sil2100 | seb128: hi! Was there some issue with NEWing those two? ^ | 07:40 |
| pitti | seb128: https://plus.google.com/107564545827215425270/posts/VtrGcA74wP9 | 07:40 |
| didrocks | sil2100: I can NEW them, I reviewed them, apart if seb128 has some remarks on them | 07:40 |
| seb128 | sil2100, no, they were just not in the queue at 7pm friday when I called it a week | 07:40 |
| didrocks | seb128: tsss, 7pm on Friday and you call it a week? How dare you! :p | 07:41 |
| sil2100 | seb128: ok! didrocks: could you NEW ;) ? | 07:41 |
| didrocks | sure | 07:41 |
| seb128 | haha | 07:41 |
| sil2100 | Thanks, I'll check the stacks now | 07:41 |
| didrocks | sil2100: ok, so on the stacks they both are, maybe you should rebuild those components | 07:41 |
| didrocks | sil2100: once the merge back to trunk is done | 07:41 |
| sil2100 | I think we missed some new packages, but since there were some issues with tests and releasing, we only got that many new ones out | 07:41 |
| didrocks | (for dbus-cpp and location-service) | 07:41 |
| didrocks | sil2100: otherwise, the changelog will be screwed | 07:41 |
| seb128 | didrocks, I was not sure they would land there since we had issue earlier in the day due to the lillypilly checklist (I think) | 07:42 |
| didrocks | seb128: yeah, I saw a reject | 07:42 |
| seb128 | didrocks, the copy there was not uptodate and not listing some of the components | 07:42 |
| didrocks | telepathy-ofono | 07:42 |
| didrocks | right? | 07:42 |
| seb128 | and apparently trying to republish the same version doesn't work | 07:42 |
| seb128 | yes | 07:42 |
| sil2100 | Yes | 07:42 |
| didrocks | seb128: you have to cheat, it's possible to republish | 07:42 |
| didrocks | seb128: sil2100: so that you know how it works | 07:43 |
| seb128 | we tweaked the changelog | 07:43 |
| seb128 | to bump the version | 07:43 |
| didrocks | remember those .project files? | 07:43 |
| didrocks | this is what are used to track what we didn't publish yet and need to monitor | 07:43 |
| sil2100 | didrocks: hm, so what should I do now with dbus-cpp and location-service? Should I rebuild those stacks and republish? Or merge something to their trunks? | 07:43 |
| sil2100 | didrocks: remember those, yes | 07:43 |
| didrocks | as you can rebuild one part of the stack, we remove those .project file and recreate them | 07:43 |
| didrocks | but you can as well publish them multiple times | 07:43 |
| didrocks | (without rebuilding the whole stack) | 07:43 |
| didrocks | so they are renamed .project_<timestamp> | 07:44 |
| seb128 | ok | 07:44 |
| didrocks | if you need to republish the same version again, you need to mv package.project_<timestamp> package.project | 07:44 |
| didrocks | then launching the publication | 07:44 |
| sil2100 | Awesome to know | 07:44 |
| sil2100 | \o/ | 07:44 |
| sil2100 | Cheating is awesome | 07:44 |
| didrocks | heh | 07:44 |
| didrocks | well, it's not that easy, but in practice, this is "only" for new components | 07:45 |
| seb128 | pitti, that sounds like a fun sunday ;-) | 07:45 |
| didrocks | sil2100: so, yeah, once the changelog is merged back to dbus-cpp and location-service, please rebuild those | 07:45 |
| didrocks | (just those components) | 07:45 |
| didrocks | so get a real changelog :p | 07:45 |
| didrocks | pitti: waow, excellent! | 07:46 |
| sil2100 | But but dbus-cpp and location-service already have 0.0.1daily13.06.14.1-0ubuntu1 in them ;p | 07:46 |
| didrocks | sil2100: oh oh, silly me :) | 07:46 |
| didrocks | yeah, it was "just" in NEW | 07:46 |
| didrocks | but the diff isn't correct | 07:46 |
| sil2100 | Since those got published and just got stuck in the queue | 07:46 |
| didrocks | yep :) | 07:46 |
| didrocks | the only thing not "right" is the diff | 07:47 |
| didrocks | between distro and bzr | 07:47 |
| didrocks | to know if anything new was generated | 07:47 |
| pitti | seb128: indeed it was, Lieutenant! | 07:47 |
| seb128 | pitti, ;-) | 07:47 |
| didrocks | sil2100: so, just wait them to be published in -proposed | 07:47 |
| didrocks | sil2100: and then relaunch them, maybe (I guess even :p) nothing new will be to be published | 07:47 |
| sil2100 | \o/ | 07:48 |
| * didrocks loves http://piware.de/fotos/Filmwelt-Bakede-Jun2013/slide_09.html | 07:48 | |
| didrocks | with the red eyes, it seems to be on purpose | 07:48 |
| pitti | didrocks: je crois que Kirk n'ai pas des yeux rouges ? | 07:50 |
| * hyperair wonders if anyone here is having intermittent issues with gtalk authentication in empathy | 07:50 | |
| didrocks | pitti: non, en effet, juste que je trouve que ça va bien dans le contexte tout de même :) | 07:50 |
| pitti | hyperair: I actually used to have, but it seems to have stabilized in the recent weeks | 07:50 |
| pitti | didrocks: :) | 07:50 |
| hyperair | pitti: in saucy? | 07:51 |
| didrocks | pitti: hum, it seems that Unity 7 became jaleous of the Unity 9 interface and decided to freeze :p | 07:51 |
| pitti | hyperair: yes (is there any other release? :) ) | 07:51 |
| hyperair | heh | 07:51 |
| hyperair | that should mean there's an SRUable patch, shouldn't it? | 07:51 |
| pitti | hyperair: I had the impression it was due to changes on the google side | 07:52 |
| hyperair | no, i'm not sure it is. | 07:52 |
| hyperair | i just killed signonpluginprocess, and it worked again | 07:52 |
| pitti | hyperair: maybe you have something different | 07:52 |
| hyperair | previously i'd been removing and re-adding the google account in signon-ui | 07:52 |
| sil2100 | didrocks, seb128: I'll jump out for a quick exercise now, since the weather is excellent | 07:59 |
| didrocks | sil2100: enjoy :) | 07:59 |
| sil2100 | Be back in some moments! | 07:59 |
| seb128 | have fun! | 07:59 |
| Laney | morning | 08:00 |
| hyperair | weather eh.. it's hazy as hell over here in singapore. | 08:01 |
| === thumper-afk is now known as thumper | ||
| === 13WAAK4RM is now known as tvoss | ||
| seb128 | Laney, oh, I didn't notice your "morning" earlier, good morning! ;-) | 08:35 |
| Laney | heh | 08:35 |
| Laney | hey seb128! | 08:35 |
| Laney | it does seem quiet ;-) | 08:35 |
| pitti | hey Laney, good morning | 08:35 |
| seb128 | everybody doing monday email catchup etc I guess | 08:35 |
| didrocks | hey Laney! | 08:36 |
| Laney | \o/ | 08:37 |
| mlankhorst | morning | 08:44 |
| mlankhorst | i mean | 08:44 |
| mlankhorst | bonjour! | 08:44 |
| pitti | ça va mlankhorst ? | 08:44 |
| mlankhorst | very good | 08:44 |
| mlankhorst | I exhausted my french for this week :-) | 08:44 |
| mlankhorst | but the weather was nice saturday http://imgur.com/uVxApz4 | 08:46 |
| didrocks | bonjour mlankhorst :) | 08:47 |
| pitti | mlankhorst: wow, that's a funny bike that you have there! | 08:49 |
| mlankhorst | aye, I haven't tried the max speed yet | 08:51 |
| Laney | bet it requires a lot more maintenance than a push bike :P | 08:52 |
| mlankhorst | yeah but I don't have to do most of it myself :-) | 08:54 |
| * mlankhorst is still using a conventional bike to get to the stables | 09:02 | |
| * didrocks tries some reboots, bbiab | 09:29 | |
| didrocks | sil2100: back from exercising? :) | 09:31 |
| didrocks | Laney: hum, you do have some upstart-session knowledge, right? :) | 09:47 |
| Laney | a small amount | 09:47 |
| didrocks | do you have time for a small experiment? I think I probably did something wrong and it will take more time for me to debug | 09:48 |
| didrocks | if you apt-get source unity | 09:48 |
| Laney | if I can't help then there are others who know more though :P | 09:48 |
| didrocks | and apply that patch: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~unity-team/unity/trunk/revision/3364 | 09:48 |
| didrocks | does it start the panel service on session startup for you? | 09:49 |
| didrocks | (it doesn't for me) | 09:49 |
| didrocks | I wonder if ted is relying on one of the new indicators to emit indicators-loaded | 09:49 |
| didrocks | and we don't have that signal | 09:49 |
| didrocks | (in a vanilla installation) | 09:49 |
| Laney | Looking at the file it could be that 'start on started' is too late | 09:50 |
| Laney | depending on what it needs | 09:50 |
| Laney | but let me try | 09:50 |
| didrocks | $ grep indicators-loaded /usr/share/upstart/sessions/* | 09:50 |
| didrocks | /usr/share/upstart/sessions/unity-panel-service.conf:emits indicators-loaded | 09:50 |
| didrocks | and nothing else | 09:50 |
| didrocks | Laney: yeah, keep me posted :) | 09:50 |
| didrocks | thanks! | 09:50 |
| Laney | that means that it sends a signal for others to look at | 09:50 |
| didrocks | yeah, I just realized I misread | 09:51 |
| Laney | shouldn't affect the emitting service being run | 09:51 |
| didrocks | I'll blame the hot weather :p | 09:51 |
| sil2100 | Back ;) | 09:51 |
| didrocks | oh but, the other patch is "if we are under gnome-session… don't use the unity upstart job" | 09:51 |
| Laney | the other? | 09:52 |
| sil2100 | Resuming loking at stacks this very instance! Had to freshen up, since it's a bit too sunny for exercising | 09:52 |
| didrocks | Laney: no, ignore me, the script exit 0, I think the event is emmitted | 09:52 |
| didrocks | (in unity.conf) | 09:52 |
| didrocks | sil2100: do you have time for a quick hangout to catch up? | 09:53 |
| Laney | didrocks: does 'status unity-panel-service' show it running? | 09:53 |
| sil2100 | didrocks: how about in 7 minutes? | 09:53 |
| didrocks | sil2100: sure | 09:53 |
| didrocks | Laney: I ran it by hand, does it impacts it? I can try a guest session | 09:54 |
| didrocks | $ status unity-panel-service | 09:54 |
| didrocks | unity-panel-service stop/waiting | 09:54 |
| didrocks | $ status unity | 09:54 |
| didrocks | unity stop/waiting | 09:54 |
| Laney | I don't have a unity upstart job | 09:54 |
| didrocks | Laney: weird, I didn't revert that one AFAIK | 09:55 |
| didrocks | http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~unity-team/unity/trunk/revision/3361 | 09:55 |
| didrocks | start on started gnome-settings-daemon and xsession SESSION=ubuntu | 09:55 |
| Laney | wait, I'm lying | 09:55 |
| didrocks | ah :) | 09:55 |
| didrocks | gnome-settings-daemon is started here | 09:55 |
| Laney | but it isn't running | 09:55 |
| Laney | unless I got it today | 09:55 |
| didrocks | Laney: no, not from today | 09:56 |
| didrocks | and not running here as well | 09:56 |
| didrocks | so "and xsession SESSION=ubuntu" is faly? | 09:56 |
| didrocks | falsy* | 09:56 |
| Laney | let me see | 09:56 |
| didrocks | ah, there is a stop in the script | 09:56 |
| Laney | aha, yes, it's tripping that | 09:57 |
| Laney | see ~/.cache/upstart/unity.log* | 09:57 |
| Laney | so your indicator event won't happen | 09:57 |
| didrocks | right | 09:57 |
| didrocks | grrr ted :p | 09:57 |
| didrocks | in fact the check should be in the exec part | 09:58 |
| Laney | that's the right way to do a conditional start | 09:58 |
| didrocks | yeah, but we still want to see the "unity" event started | 09:58 |
| didrocks | can this be expressed in some way? (I don't think we want a super long "exec" line) | 09:59 |
| Laney | kind of confused by this | 09:59 |
| Laney | when wouldn't gnome-session be used? | 09:59 |
| didrocks | Laney: touch | 09:59 |
| didrocks | (I know, no sense for unity7 without xmir for now) | 10:00 |
| didrocks | but I think ted wanted to implement it for the future | 10:00 |
| didrocks | (the day of releasing unity 7 of course, hence the revert I had to do :p) | 10:00 |
| sil2100 | didrocks: https://code.launchpad.net/~sil2100/cupstream2distro-config/apps_extra_packages_for_gallery/+merge/169756 <- could you take a look? | 10:00 |
| Laney | I guess started unity is the wrong thing for us at this point | 10:01 |
| didrocks | sil2100: ok, making sense, thanks! | 10:02 |
| * Laney fires up the vm | 10:02 | |
| sil2100 | didrocks: this would unblock Apps, looking at Indicators but LP is taking its time today\ | 10:02 |
| sil2100 | didrocks: hanging out in a moment? | 10:03 |
| didrocks | Laney: do you mind tracking that once ted is back? you clearly have more knowledge on how we should build the sessions upstart once moving away from gnome-session to upstart to handle it | 10:03 |
| didrocks | sil2100: I'm ready right now, tell me when you are | 10:03 |
| didrocks | (I'll just exercice after this hangout) | 10:03 |
| Laney | I can probably figure out something to fix this up | 10:03 |
| sil2100 | didrocks: I'll just finish indicators and ready | 10:03 |
| Laney | but I don't really have a handle on moving away from gnome-session completely | 10:03 |
| didrocks | thanks Laney :) | 10:03 |
| Laney | np | 10:04 |
| didrocks | sil2100: ok | 10:04 |
| sil2100 | didrocks: ok, it seems that jbicha broke indicator-session on Saturday | 10:05 |
| sil2100 | Will have to wait for him to pop up | 10:05 |
| didrocks | "nice", ok :/ | 10:05 |
| sil2100 | didrocks: do you have a hangout link ready by any chance ;)? | 10:07 |
| didrocks | sil2100: https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/d9e1fb52de2cf1cc1d14d5aca163296f609ed875?hl=fr | 10:08 |
| seb128 | sil2100, how did he break it? | 10:24 |
| Laney | didrocks: OK, got it | 10:36 |
| Laney | didrocks: try "start on started unity or desktop-start DESKTOP_SESSION=ubuntu" / "stop on desktop-end" | 10:36 |
| Laney | seb128: have you tried system-settings on the device? | 10:52 |
| seb128 | Laney, no, I planned to do that today ... does it work? | 10:52 |
| Laney | it's a bit buggy | 10:52 |
| Laney | like I couldn't get back from the individual panels | 10:52 |
| seb128 | it's a bit annoying that you can't just deploy from qtcreator as you do for pure qml programs | 10:52 |
| seb128 | oh | 10:52 |
| seb128 | I will have a look | 10:53 |
| Laney | it just flicked instead | 10:53 |
| Laney | do you think it's ok to merge the appearance stuff with the example content? | 10:54 |
| Laney | I don't think I can do much more without dconf or the content picker | 10:54 |
| didrocks | Laney: sorry, was in this hangout :) | 11:02 |
| Laney | np | 11:02 |
| didrocks | Laney: nice! | 11:02 |
| Laney | does it work? | 11:02 |
| didrocks | let me try | 11:02 |
| Laney | you can't have 'stop on stopping unity' because that is triggered by the job aborting itself | 11:03 |
| Laney | that one confused me for a bit | 11:03 |
| didrocks | started unity is true even if the job stopped I guess? | 11:03 |
| Laney | no | 11:04 |
| didrocks | ah or | 11:04 |
| Laney | but stopping is | 11:04 |
| didrocks | hum | 11:04 |
| Laney | pre-start -> stopping -> stopped I think | 11:04 |
| didrocks | I think ted wanted to start only if unity startede | 11:04 |
| didrocks | started* | 11:04 |
| Laney | that's what the desktop-start should do | 11:04 |
| Laney | it comes from gnome-session | 11:04 |
| Laney | so you have both | 11:04 |
| didrocks | yeah, it's a bit "uncrystalclear" | 11:04 |
| didrocks | but works in theory | 11:05 |
| didrocks | let me see :) | 11:05 |
| Laney | can comment it | 11:05 |
| didrocks | contrive* was the term I was looking for :) | 11:05 |
| Laney | it's new world and old world | 11:05 |
| didrocks | heh, right | 11:05 |
| Laney | you're going to get stuff like this until we are ... converged ... | 11:05 |
| didrocks | Laney: working fine :) | 11:07 |
| didrocks | (tried multiple starts) | 11:07 |
| didrocks | so yeah, please, add a comment and I'll approve it :) | 11:07 |
| Laney | I suppose you could simplify it further if you made the unity job emit that desktop-start signal | 11:07 |
| Laney | thanks! | 11:07 |
| didrocks | yeah, not sure if we can emits since the pre-start script though | 11:08 |
| didrocks | from* | 11:08 |
| Laney | you'd probably do it in post-start | 11:08 |
| Laney | see /usr/share/upstart/sessions/gnome-session.conf | 11:08 |
| didrocks | ah, so you mean, removing the unity signal, but have "destkop-start & session==…" | 11:09 |
| Laney | edit debian/unity.conf to have the same post-start and pre-stop as gnome-session does | 11:09 |
| Laney | then have unity-panel-service just listen for desktop-start/desktop-end | 11:09 |
| didrocks | not sure if it's semantically correct, it's like if we were telling the session is ready if unity is ready (and we don't care about the rest) | 11:10 |
| didrocks | as you wish, the best in your opinion :) | 11:10 |
| didrocks | if we tell "DESKTOP_SESSION" is used to detect we are using gnome-session, I'm fine with it | 11:11 |
| Laney | ok | 11:12 |
| Laney | where's the MP? | 11:12 |
| didrocks | Laney: oh, there is none, it's part from a revert, so reintroduce the revert + your additional commit I would say | 11:13 |
| Laney | sure | 11:13 |
| didrocks | (I had to revert it in a hurry the day we released unity 7 as having that + a segfault was enough :p) | 11:13 |
| * Laney meditates for a minute on what is better | 11:14 | |
| * didrocks lights a candle for Laney | 11:14 | |
| seb128 | Laney, sorry, I was grabbing a bite ... merge the background panel makes sense yes | 11:16 |
| Laney | ok | 11:17 |
| Laney | I want to get a widget merged into the ui toolkit first, so will try that this afternoon | 11:17 |
| === MacSlow is now known as MacSlow|lunch | ||
| seb128 | cool | 11:18 |
| xclaesse | is there a trick to restart unity and keep the workspace where each window are? | 11:20 |
| xclaesse | like gnome-shell does when doing alt-f2 r | 11:20 |
| xclaesse | if I just do unity --replace then all my windows goes to first workspace | 11:20 |
| seb128 | hum, they should not, seems like a bug | 11:21 |
| === greyback is now known as greyback|lunch | ||
| === MacSlow|lunch is now known as MacSlow | ||
| sil2100 | seb128: regarding the indicator-session, I just checked and my conclusions were too soon - jbicha did not break it, it broke itself probably due to changes in saucy | 12:25 |
| sil2100 | seb128: as it's the same issue as with some other packages - pthread errors | 12:25 |
| seb128 | sil2100, what's the error it hits? | 12:25 |
| seb128 | oh, yeah, new binutils being pickier about incorrect linkage | 12:26 |
| sil2100 | /usr/bin/ld: libgtest.a(gtest-all.o): undefined reference to symbol 'pthread_key_delete@@GLIBC_2.2.5' | 12:26 |
| sil2100 | Yes | 12:26 |
| Laney | grr, silent rules! | 12:30 |
| === greyback|lunch is now known as greyback | ||
| seb128 | Laney, how did you run the settings app on the device? | 13:12 |
| didrocks | sil2100: needing any packaging ack? | 13:24 |
| sil2100 | didrocks: not yet, uno momentos | 13:33 |
| didrocks | tedg: hey! FYI, after some tests, there was still an issue with your panel-service + upstart branch, after talking to Laney, there is a solution that is merging right now (https://code.launchpad.net/~laney/unity/user-session-jobs/+merge/169771) | 13:37 |
| didrocks | tedg: basically, the issue was that unity event always stops when using gnome-session, so the event for starting unity-panel-service was never triggered | 13:38 |
| tedg | didrocks, Ah, cool! | 13:39 |
| tedg | didrocks, Great stuff! | 13:39 |
| didrocks | thanks Laney for providing an elegant solution :) | 13:40 |
| tedg | It should make debugging the indicator issues there *much* easier. | 13:40 |
| didrocks | and make it starting faster | 13:40 |
| didrocks | I can feel the difference, even on my beefy machine :) | 13:40 |
| tedg | Heh, great! | 13:40 |
| didrocks | stopping seems a little bit longer, but on startup, it feels like if unity was already started :) | 13:40 |
| tedg | didrocks, I think that's because not all of our stuff is responding to SIGTERM properly. | 13:42 |
| tedg | didrocks, So then upstart has to formally kill things after a 5 second timeout. | 13:42 |
| didrocks | tedg: I agree with you, we seem to timeout systematically | 13:43 |
| tedg | didrocks, I think we should look at some of the offenders, we have a SIGTERM handler in HUD that just shutsdown the mainloop gracefully, and it works with usptart well. | 13:43 |
| tedg | didrocks, Probably need to add that code around. | 13:43 |
| sil2100 | didrocks: hmmm... still checking that, but the new package dependency of gir1.2-dbusmenu-glib-0.4 for raring is a bit fishy | 13:44 |
| didrocks | tedg: do you know if upstart has a way to tell "this is what timed out" | 13:44 |
| didrocks | at least to have a list | 13:44 |
| didrocks | sil2100: hum, didn't we decide to look at saucy first, making all possible publication and move on the SRU then? | 13:45 |
| sil2100 | didrocks: since I checked all the obvious projects and the only place where the gir1.2-dbusmenu-glib-0.4 dependency was added was libdbusmenu, but for saucy | 13:45 |
| sil2100 | didrocks: doing that too, was waiting for Apps to finish, I also re-ran Unity, will check the publications too | 13:45 |
| didrocks | ok :) | 13:46 |
| sil2100 | didrocks: I'm just afraid that there might have been a stack publishing missing somewhere ;/ | 13:46 |
| didrocks | sil2100: so let's ignore it | 13:46 |
| sil2100 | FOr raring | 13:46 |
| tedg | didrocks, Hmm, not sure it has a way to see that. It can give a reason that it was stopped, but I think the only cases now are pass/fail. Perhaps we could add "timeout" | 13:46 |
| didrocks | sil2100: I wonder if it's not part of the "this used to work" | 13:46 |
| didrocks | (ignored by UTAH checks) | 13:46 |
| didrocks | and now otto really checks it | 13:46 |
| didrocks | tedg: yeah, that would be interesting for debugging | 13:47 |
| * didrocks proposes a shutchart :) | 13:47 | |
| Laney | seb128: I installed and launched it from the terminal | 13:49 |
| Laney | don't know why it didn't appear in the app lens | 13:49 |
| seb128 | Laney, do you know how to get an icon for it? | 13:49 |
| Laney | it has a desktop file | 13:50 |
| seb128 | kenvandine, hey, do you know what would be needed for system settings to get an icon on ubuntu touch. | 13:50 |
| seb128 | ? | 13:50 |
| Laney | didrocks: that was one of the issues ;-) The other one was that the condition for gnome-session was never fired so you never got it started on the desktop | 13:51 |
| didrocks | indeed :) | 13:52 |
| Laney | ooh, britney/autopkgtest is coming | 13:53 |
| Laney | so everyone will really have to make sure tests work ;-) | 13:53 |
| * mlankhorst still can't push xorg-integration-tests :( | 13:54 | |
| mlankhorst | it won't compile until x1.14 lands | 13:56 |
| sil2100 | didrocks: maybe... are you ready for some ACK's for publishing? ;) | 13:58 |
| didrocks | sil2100: I fully am! | 13:59 |
| kenvandine | just need to reference an icon that is installed | 13:59 |
| kenvandine | right now it is using one from a theme that isn't installed | 14:00 |
| kenvandine | seb128, ^^ | 14:00 |
| sil2100 | didrocks: platform: http://10.97.0.1:8080/view/cu2d/view/Head/view/Platform/job/cu2d-platform-head-3.0publish/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/packaging_changes_qtubuntu_0.51daily13.06.17-0ubuntu1.diff/*view*/ <- but here I see a small problem with the changelog | 14:00 |
| sil2100 | didrocks: as one entry is duplicated by Tim and Ken | 14:00 |
| didrocks | sil2100: it's not an issue, it means that both contributed to the branch that was merged | 14:00 |
| didrocks | (they did each one at least one commit) | 14:00 |
| sil2100 | Awesome, then it's all ok in my eyes | 14:01 |
| didrocks | sil2100: fine for me as well, feel free to publish :) | 14:01 |
| seb128 | kenvandine, ok, I will do a MR to fix that then ;-) | 14:01 |
| sil2100 | didrocks: published, now sdk: | 14:03 |
| sil2100 | http://10.97.0.1:8080/view/cu2d/view/Head/view/SDK/job/cu2d-sdk-head-3.0publish/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/packaging_changes_dee-qt_3.0daily13.06.17-0ubuntu1.diff/*view*/ | 14:03 |
| sil2100 | (no deps, just packaging) | 14:03 |
| kenvandine | seb128, cool | 14:04 |
| didrocks | sil2100: good good! :) | 14:04 |
| Laney | seb128: kenvandine: I thought there was a touch icon theme? | 14:04 |
| Laney | Some of the panels in there don't have icons either | 14:04 |
| seb128 | Laney, ubuntu-mobile-icons | 14:05 |
| seb128 | Laney, but it's not complete | 14:05 |
| Laney | so the ones we chose are just what it will be? | 14:05 |
| seb128 | you mean? the icon names? no, I tried to pick available icons as place holders | 14:06 |
| seb128 | we will need to update that once design provides the icons | 14:06 |
| didrocks | sil2100: on the indicator with binutils being pickier, this is fixed/merging or do we need help? | 14:06 |
| sil2100 | didrocks: published, settings now: http://10.97.0.1:8080/view/cu2d/view/Head/view/Settings/job/cu2d-settings-head-3.0publish/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/packaging_changes_ubuntu-system-settings_0.1daily13.06.17-0ubuntu1.diff/*view*/ | 14:07 |
| sil2100 | didrocks: I think it's not being worked on yet, but I guess I could quickly fix that | 14:08 |
| didrocks | sil2100: +1 | 14:09 |
| didrocks | (we can notice seb128 writing commit message of 3 kms long :)) | 14:09 |
| seb128 | heh | 14:09 |
| * Laney approves of that! | 14:10 | |
| seb128 | I'm writing nice details for you to read ;-) | 14:10 |
| didrocks | seb128: that's kind of you :p | 14:10 |
| didrocks | seb128: "settings": is there anything else? it's the name of the panel? | 14:10 |
| didrocks | the settings panel of system settings? | 14:10 |
| sil2100 | didrocks: cyphermox fixed the indicator-session thing, so it's getting merged now | 14:10 |
| didrocks | \o/ | 14:10 |
| cyphermox | moo | 14:11 |
| didrocks | thanks cyphermox :) | 14:11 |
| sil2100 | ;) | 14:11 |
| seb128 | didrocks, no, it's the settings app itsel ... you can notice some are "about: ..." which is the about panel | 14:11 |
| cyphermox | didrocks: I was surprised Laney didn't beat me to it like for indicator-datetime :) | 14:11 |
| Laney | I got the wrong impression that those were all fixed | 14:11 |
| Laney | otherwise I would have ;P | 14:11 |
| cyphermox | Laney: ahah ;) | 14:12 |
| didrocks | cyphermox: oh, he did merge back his commit for it now? | 14:12 |
| didrocks | Laney: did you? ^ | 14:12 |
| cyphermox | hmm, I should double-check | 14:12 |
| Laney | did I what? | 14:12 |
| Laney | oh hey, datetime is stuck in proposed | 14:12 |
| cyphermox | yup | 14:12 |
| Laney | oh, /that/ | 14:12 |
| Laney | now I remember | 14:12 |
| didrocks | and it's not in trunk | 14:12 |
| cyphermox | yes, it's fine | 14:12 |
| didrocks | so the daily release is sad and complaining: | 14:12 |
| didrocks | A version (12.10.3daily13.06.07-0ubuntu2) is available at the destination for that component but is not in trunk which is still at 12.10.3daily13.06.07-0ubuntu2. Ignoring that component for source: indicator-datetime, branch: lp:indicator-datetime, series: saucy. | 14:12 |
| cyphermox | didrocks: sure it is? | 14:12 |
| Laney | I didn't do this to the archive | 14:13 |
| didrocks | interesting | 14:13 |
| Laney | I only touched trunk ;-) | 14:13 |
| cyphermox | oh, but UNRELEASED | 14:13 |
| didrocks | ah! | 14:13 |
| didrocks | so my system works \o/ | 14:13 |
| cyphermox | yup | 14:13 |
| didrocks | hum, I thought sil2100 fixed it IIRC | 14:13 |
| didrocks | or maybe I'm misleading with something else? | 14:13 |
| sil2100 | What what? | 14:14 |
| cyphermox | unmerged still | 14:14 |
| Laney | it should be fine if you can somehow tell it to ignore that | 14:14 |
| didrocks | sil2100: do you remember that you backported a commit? | 14:14 |
| didrocks | ah, unmerged :p | 14:14 |
| Laney | the one in saucy is effectively a no-change rebuild | 14:14 |
| cyphermox | sil2100: needs fixing: https://code.launchpad.net/~sil2100/indicator-datetime/include_direct_push/+merge/169255 | 14:14 |
| didrocks | Laney: no, it's on my list of enhancement | 14:14 |
| didrocks | Laney: but yeah, would be cool | 14:14 |
| sil2100 | uuuh | 14:14 |
| didrocks | I prefer to be too strict for now :) | 14:14 |
| sil2100 | Ok, so libical-dev | 14:15 |
| didrocks | ah, it was that one :) | 14:15 |
| sil2100 | It should work now | 14:15 |
| sil2100 | I'll reapprove, as 1.0 is in ubuntu now | 14:15 |
| Laney | hrm, not sure I like calling it a bad idea | 14:15 |
| Laney | the FAQ says it's fine ;-) | 14:15 |
| didrocks | Laney: sorry, what about a bad idea? | 14:15 |
| Laney | "Include the missing version that got directly pushed to the distro... which is generally a bad idea. Someone pushed directly to distro and now we have to fix that." | 14:16 |
| Laney | on that MP ^ | 14:16 |
| didrocks | Laney: I think the "bad idea" that sil2100 is telling is about not taking care of Vcs-Bzr :p | 14:16 |
| didrocks | (or at least asking) | 14:17 |
| sil2100 | ;) | 14:18 |
| sil2100 | Yep, it's generally a bad idea to workaround our daily-release machinery ;p | 14:18 |
| didrocks | sil2100: have you touch to the .project files for dbus-cpp and location-service? | 14:18 |
| sil2100 | Without letting us know that is | 14:18 |
| didrocks | 2013-06-17 14:16:08,599 ERROR A manual upload of location-service (0.0.1daily13.06.14.1-0ubuntu1) to distro has been done after the current daily release was prepared (it was at 0) at this time.Ignore uploading 0.0.1daily13.06.17-0ubuntu1. | 14:19 |
| didrocks | 2013-06-17 14:16:12,870 ERROR A manual upload of dbus-cpp (0.0.1daily13.06.14.1-0ubuntu1) to distro has been done after the current daily release was prepared (it was at 0) at this time.Ignore uploading 0.0.1daily13.06.17-0ubuntu1. | 14:19 |
| sil2100 | didrocks: hm, I don't think so | 14:19 |
| didrocks | ah no, that's normal | 14:19 |
| didrocks | as it wasn't in distro and we NEW them afterwards | 14:20 |
| didrocks | there has been an intermediate upload to distro for it | 14:20 |
| didrocks | that's why it ignored it | 14:20 |
| didrocks | sil2100: you didn't relaunch a build for them as we discussed this morning, right? | 14:20 |
| sil2100 | didrocks: oh shit, hoho, dammit, I did not relaunch, I just published the platform stack | 14:26 |
| didrocks | sil2100: no worry, it's just creating a dummy commit upstream | 14:26 |
| didrocks | (with a revision from today) | 14:26 |
| didrocks | it will never surface to distro, just pollute upstream (well, low level pollution) :) | 14:27 |
| didrocks | sil2100: thanks for testing my protection code btw :p | 14:27 |
| sil2100 | didrocks: in the meantime while your coffee is being made! apps stack: http://10.97.0.1:8080/view/cu2d/view/Head/view/Apps/job/cu2d-apps-head-3.0publish/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/packaging_changes_gallery-app_0.0.67daily13.06.17-0ubuntu1.diff/*view*/ | 14:29 |
| didrocks | sil2100: +1 | 14:30 |
| sil2100 | didrocks: heh, funny thing - I just wanted to add the missing gir1.2-dbusmenu-glib-0.4 to packages in raring, but it's there already! | 14:56 |
| sil2100 | didrocks: just a redeploy was missing | 14:56 |
| sil2100 | didrocks: can I redeploy? | 14:56 |
| didrocks | sil2100: sure sure, if the stack is not running | 14:56 |
| didrocks | sil2100: so, with all those publishing, it seems I didn't break the traditional "copy to distro" case, at least, right? | 15:03 |
| sil2100 | didrocks: right, at least I see that gallery-app got uploaded properly, so it should work alright | 15:07 |
| didrocks | sil2100: ok, let's see what will happened once you publish the SRUs :) | 15:07 |
| sil2100 | huh | 15:17 |
| sil2100 | bleh... | 15:19 |
| sil2100 | didrocks: in the meantime, media looking good: http://10.97.0.1:8080/view/cu2d/view/Head/view/Media/job/cu2d-media-head-3.0publish/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/packaging_changes_camera-app_2.9.1daily13.06.17-0ubuntu1.diff | 15:19 |
| didrocks | sil2100: sounds fine | 15:20 |
| sil2100 | didrocks: btw. I checked wrongly and my indicator-datetime merge can't go in still, since libical-dev 1.0-0ubuntu1 is still in -proposed, not in saucy ;( | 15:24 |
| sil2100 | s/go/get | 15:25 |
| jbicha | sil2100: ical won't migrate to saucy until after indicator-datetime is built with the new ical | 15:32 |
| sil2100 | jbicha: that might be hard to do, as because of someone's direct push to the archive, indicator-datetime cannot be released before we get the changelog entry back into trunk manually, which is failing to merge - one solution would be to merge in directly without the merger, as the merger does not have -proposed enabled | 15:35 |
| sil2100 | jbicha: but I'll merge it in manually then | 15:35 |
| sil2100 | didrocks: you fine with that? ^ | 15:35 |
| jbicha | like I said last week, I think you guys would have /less/ problems if you just built against -proposed than requiring manual overrides every time there is a transition | 15:36 |
| didrocks | sil2100: I'm fine with that | 15:36 |
| * Sweetsha1k improved the general build time of LibreOffice by 10% on all platforms at the Hackfest it seems ... | 16:03 | |
| mlankhorst | it now takes 55 minutes instead of 50? | 16:40 |
| sarnold | lol | 16:42 |
| Sweetsha1k | mlankhorst: on Windows it now takes 89 minutes instead of 99 minutes on a i7-4470K with 16GB RAM. on big bertha it takes 2min10sec instead of 2min25sec to build from scratch .... | 16:54 |
| rickspencer3 | kenvandine, hey, I think that maybe gallery -> facebook uploads broke? | 17:09 |
| rickspencer3 | it seemed to not work for me over the weekend | 17:09 |
| kenvandine | rickspencer3, i haven't been able to test it on saucy yet | 17:10 |
| kenvandine | rickspencer3, i'll check it out today | 17:10 |
| * didrocks waves good evening | 17:13 | |
| rickspencer3 | thanks kenvandine | 17:17 |
| rickspencer3 | kenvandine, is there anyway to automate it? | 17:17 |
| rickspencer3 | I know that the web apps team have some automated tests to catch when web integration breaks | 17:17 |
| kenvandine | not without storing credentials in a public place | 17:20 |
| kenvandine | we do have autopilot tests for webcred | 17:20 |
| kenvandine | friends itself hasn't changed, i think there are problems with the webcred saucy stack on the device | 17:20 |
| kenvandine | works on the desktop fine | 17:21 |
| kenvandine | and i just got saucy flashed to my phone | 17:21 |
| kenvandine | so i'll test | 17:21 |
| === m_conley_away is now known as m_conley | ||
| kenvandine | rickspencer3, confirmed, sharing works with the version of signon-ui in saucy-proposed | 17:59 |
| kenvandine | we just need to get that published, blocked on the lack of powerpc build | 17:59 |
| rickspencer3 | kenvandine, ok, I'll try it later this week ;) | 17:59 |
| rickspencer3 | lack of powerpc build? | 17:59 |
| rickspencer3 | er | 17:59 |
| * rickspencer3 shakes fist at PowerPC | 17:59 | |
| kenvandine | yeah | 18:00 |
| kenvandine | it depends on qtdeclarative | 18:00 |
| kenvandine | which doesn't support ppc | 18:00 |
| kenvandine | so anything qml lacks ppc builds | 18:00 |
| kenvandine | and for signon-ui to work on the phone... we have to use the qtdeclarative | 18:00 |
| rickspencer3 | hmmmm | 18:01 |
| kenvandine | rickspencer3, also of interest... i just added my facebook account with ubuntu-system-settings | 18:01 |
| rickspencer3 | I don't think we want to hold up all phone development for PPC | 18:01 |
| kenvandine | rickspencer3, indeed... it's been a real pain | 18:01 |
| rickspencer3 | kenvandine, well, we should find a way to decouple it | 18:01 |
| kenvandine | yes | 18:01 |
| rickspencer3 | aiui we only support PPC for the Xubuntu flavor community | 18:02 |
| kenvandine | we've been working on that everywhere we've hit this | 18:02 |
| Laney | so it seems that nautilus double signal handler disconnect wasn't the bug ;-) | 21:00 |
| === Aww is now known as RedShark | ||
| === RedShark is now known as NotAww | ||
| === NotAww is now known as Aww | ||
| === tkamppeter__ is now known as tkamppeter | ||
| === m_conley is now known as m_conley_away | ||
| xnox | Is there a ppa or something for me to try gtk 3.9+? | 22:24 |
| jbicha | xnox: ricotz/testing has a git snapshot; it's not been packaged elsewhere that I know of | 22:26 |
| === rickspencer3_ is now known as rickspencer3 | ||
| xnox | jbicha thanks =) | 22:28 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!