[06:05] <dpm> good morning all
[06:35] <dholbach> good morning
[07:43] <dpm> hi jppiiroinen, I've got a very basic question on Qt Creator/qmake: if I add an install rule to a .pro file, is there a way I can invoke that rule from within Qt Creator, or do I have to do it on the command line (i.e. qmake && make install) ?
[07:45] <jppiiroinen> dpm: good question, never tried
[07:46] <dpm> jppiiroinen, I know there is a big button to build the project, but I wonder if there is support for running other targets from within Qt Creator
[07:47] <jppiiroinen> dpm: not that i would have seen one
[07:48] <dpm> jppiiroinen, hm then I guess there isn't a way
[07:48] <jppiiroinen> dpm: you might want to ask it in #qt-creator
[07:48] <dpm> thanks, joining that channel
[08:02] <nerochiaro> oSoMoN: good morning, I managed to get the ubuntu-ui-extras package to build, and am modifying webbrowser-app to use it. so far it works, but i have a problem: since i have been working on other stuff too in the meantime, there are extra changes in your tree that i haven't ported to the component (for example the tabs support). i will need help with those, I think
[08:05] <oSoMoN> nerochiaro: sure
[08:06] <oSoMoN> nerochiaro: the thing is, I’m leaving on holidays tonight, and I don’t think I’ll have time today (working hard on the history view)
[08:53] <gusch> nerochiaro: I have two camera MRs https://code.launchpad.net/~schwann/camera-app/camera-video-duration-orientation/+merge/170267 and https://code.launchpad.net/~schwann/camera-app/camera-video-orientation/+merge/170053
[09:04] <nerochiaro> timp: zsombi: Kaleo: i finally managed to put together an ubuntu-ui-extras branch that works. can any of you during the following days spend some time validating that it's up to standards, works fine, etc ? lp:~amanzi-team/ubuntu-ui-extras/ubuntu-ui-extras-initial
[09:05] <nerochiaro> timp: zsombi: Kaleo: i will get back to it on monday, so take your time, but make sure everything is there by that day so i can hack on it straight away
[09:06] <nerochiaro> gusch: the orientation for video MR basically makes sure the orientation is always set before starting a recording, right ?
[09:07] <gusch> nerochiaro: correct - before it was only for photos
[09:07] <gusch> nerochiaro: all the rest for the orientation support is reviewd by jim
[09:07] <nerochiaro> gusch: ok
[09:08] <nerochiaro> gusch: ok, both reviews comment-approved, one has a little nitpick that you may or may not want to fix
[09:08] <nerochiaro> gusch: other than that, i think you're good to go once someone verifies on device
[09:09] <gusch> nerochiaro: I use "d" as id - inspired by Qt C++ - but if you prefer another name, no problem - suggest one
[09:11] <nerochiaro> gusch: that's ok, it's just not very clear to me, and i think we have this best practice of always trying to have self-explanatory variable and object names
[09:11] <nerochiaro> gusch: but as i said: nitpick
[09:16] <dholbach> JamesTai2, thanks a bunch for sending the update!
[09:18] <zsombi> nerochiaro: took a quick look on it
[09:19] <nerochiaro> zsombi: thanks, i emailed you all about it too
[09:19] <zsombi> nerochiaro: SelectionPopover seems to be pretty similar to ActionSelectionPopover...
[09:20] <nerochiaro> zsombi: what i meant was not to review the Browser code itself, was more to validate the structure of the plugin and package in terms of directories, where things are installed, package names etc
[09:20] <nerochiaro> zsombi: but that comment regarding the Browser is probably valid and oSoMoN should have a look into that
[09:20] <zsombi> nerochiaro: should this be a separate package or should it be included in the Ubuntu Components?
[09:21] <nerochiaro> zsombi: separate, in a ubuntu-ui-extras package as it does not need to meet sdk full standards, according to Kaleo
[09:21] <JamesTai2> dholbach, I need to keep on top of them, hopefully make them weekly.
[09:21] <dholbach> great :)
[09:21] <zsombi> nerochiaro: then perhaps Ubuntu.Extras as module would be better as Ubuntu.Components and anything under it should meet SDK standards...
[09:22] <nerochiaro> zsombi: we discussed this with Kaleo and he was ok with Ubuntu.Components.Extras but i'm up for changing things if he agrees
[09:22] <oSoMoN> nerochiaro: which comment?
[09:22] <zsombi> nerochiaro: at least that's my opinion... but he's the boss :)
[09:23] <nerochiaro> zsombi: in any case, i have to run for now, i might be back later. ideally if it's possible to create an lp:ubuntu-ui-extras and request a merge of my branch into it, then we can have proper MR comments that i can go and check when i'm back
[09:24] <nerochiaro> zsombi: Kaleo was the one i discuss all this with, i'm including you and timp as i know he doesn't have tons of time, but you 3 should discuss it together and then someone review i guess
[09:24] <JamesTai2> Good morning all - have a happy, relaxed World Sauntering Day. :)
[09:24] <nerochiaro> zsombi: i sent you 3 an email with more details
[09:24] <zsombi> nerochiaro: well, in the case it doesn' tneed to meet SDK standards, I don't think we have anything to ask :)
[09:24] <zsombi> nerochiaro: I saw it
[09:24] <nerochiaro> oSoMoN: <zsombi> nerochiaro: SelectionPopover seems to be pretty similar to ActionSelectionPopover...
[09:25] <oSoMoN> nerochiaro: can you please file a bug to track that?
[09:25] <nerochiaro> zsombi: :) well, i'm not sure how you guys want to do it, i just thought that since it is still related to sdk you would need to be somehow the gatekeepers of it
[09:25] <zsombi> nerochiaro: right :)
[09:26] <nerochiaro> oSoMoN: i'll let zsombi file it as he knows better what he meant with that comment
[09:26] <nerochiaro> oSoMoN: if you and him don't mind ;)
[09:26] <oSoMoN> sure
[09:26] <zsombi> oSoMoN: where should I file the bug? There' snothing released, no MR to comment yet...
[09:27] <nerochiaro> zsombi: i would've asked Kaleo only but I thought i would include you too as well as you always have more time and good input
[09:27] <oSoMoN> zsombi: https://bugs.launchpad.net/webbrowser-app/+filebug
[09:28] <nerochiaro> oSoMoN: zsombi: anyway, time for me to go for now, thanks for all the help
[09:28] <zsombi> nerochiaro: cheers!
[09:28] <oSoMoN> cheers, have a good rest of the week
[09:28] <nerochiaro> you too guys
[09:29] <nerochiaro> and oSoMoN happy holidays
[09:30] <zsombi> oSoMoN: shoudl I assign to U?
[09:30] <oSoMoN> zsombi: please do
[09:31] <zsombi> oSoMoN: https://bugs.launchpad.net/webbrowser-app/+bug/1192507
[09:31] <ubot2> Ubuntu bug 1192507 in webbrowser-app "Ubuntu.Component.Extras SelectionPopover looks similar to ActionSelectionPopover" [Undecided,New]
[09:31] <timp> what's the ubuntu-ui-extras for?
[09:32] <timp> it makes me wonder, is ubuntu-ui-toolkit the only project using qmake instead of cmake? perhaps we should consider switching to cmake
[09:34] <oSoMoN> zsombi: thanks
[10:05] <mzanetti> tmoenicke: hey
[10:06] <mzanetti> tmoenicke: I'm trying to debug why maliit-server crashes when introspecting with autopilot
[10:06] <mzanetti> tmoenicke: but Can't see any debug output.
[10:06] <mzanetti> tmoenicke: any idea if that's disabled somewhere in maliit?
[10:18] <timp> zsombi: will you review https://code.launchpad.net/~tpeeters/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/toolbarItems/+merge/170070 ?
[10:19] <zsombi> timp: yes
[10:19] <timp> thanks
[10:20] <tmoenicke> mzanetti: yes, it redirects it somehow
[10:20] <tmoenicke> mzanetti: export MALIIT_DEBUG=enabled
[10:20] <mzanetti> tmoenicke: thanks!
[10:20] <mzanetti> tmoenicke: I found out that qWarning()s are printed
[10:21] <tmoenicke> yep, just not qDebug()
[10:41] <Laney> Kaleo: here? Can you take a look at http://paste.ubuntu.com/5780061/ and tell me if I'm using the SES right?
[10:41] <Laney> because it doesn't get rounded goodness
[11:18] <Kaleo> Laney: it's right but you are not hiding the original image
[11:18] <Kaleo> Laney: so you still see it on top
[11:19] <Kaleo> http://qt-project.org/doc/qt-5.0/qtquick/qml-qtquick2-shadereffectsource.html#hideSource-prop
[11:20] <Laney> Kaleo: That just seems to make it disappear completely
[11:21] <Kaleo> Laney: if you remove the whos SES and Image do you see the Shape?
[11:23] <Laney> Kaleo: There's no border, no
[11:23] <Laney> Does that make a difference?
[11:23] <Kaleo> Laney: yes
[11:23] <Laney> UbuntuShape.qml does some stuff which looks to be setting that up
[11:23] <Kaleo> Laney: try setting a baseColor, a gradientColor and radius: "medium"
[11:23] <Kaleo> Laney: and visible: true
[11:25] <Laney> OK so I'm copying some stuff from UbuntuShape
[11:29] <Laney> Kaleo: ItemStyle.class seemed to be the key one
[11:30] <Laney> Kaleo: So I have the border now but still no image
[11:32] <timp> Laney: try adding radius: frame.radius to the Shape
[11:32] <timp> uhm, sorry not frame.radius
[11:32] <timp> but "small"
[11:33] <timp> or "medium" :)
[11:33] <timp> as Kaleo said
[11:33] <Laney> I had medium, that's how I got the border to work
[11:33] <Laney> it's just the image contained within it that doesn't appear
[11:34] <timp> Laney: shadereffectsource doesn't have a width/height
[11:34] <timp> try to set that explicitly
[11:36] <Laney> timp: no good :/
[11:36] <Laney> sorry
[11:37] <Laney> http://paste.ubuntu.com/5780177/
[11:39] <Laney> I'll get back to integrating CrossFadeImage for now
[11:47] <Kaleo> Laney: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/5780204/
[11:47] <Kaleo> Laney: that works
[11:48] <Kaleo> Laney: the reason why it was not working is that the SES needs to be instantiated outside of the Shape for some reason
[11:48] <Kaleo> Laney: I also had to add a hack so that the SES is not visible
[11:48] <Kaleo> Laney: width and height: 1
[11:49] <Laney> aha
[11:49] <Laney> also the fillMode is ignored
[11:49] <Kaleo> Laney: yes so look at how it's done in UbuntuShape to respect it
[12:40] <dpm> seb128, I'm writing a scope for a tutorial on d.u.c. One of the parts is to create a dbus .service file that contains an Exec= line with the path to the executable. The path is /usr/lib/[arch-triplet]/blahblah - do you know if there is any clever trick to express that [arch-triplet] part in there so that it's valid for all architectures, or do I need to get the build system to determine it and replace it at build time?
[12:41] <seb128> dpm, you need the build system to do it
[12:41] <dpm> I thought so, bummer
[12:42] <seb128> dpm, well just install ot /usr/lib/<software> if you want to make things easier
[12:43] <dpm> seb128, thanks for confirming. Hm, no, I want to make it easier for app devs, but they should really install in the same location as the other scopes
[13:35]  * timp sent e-mail to ubuntu-phone about toolbar API update.
[13:46] <timp> gusch: the updates I made to the toolbar are now in UITK trunk.
[13:46] <timp> gusch: so you if you have no further comments on https://code.launchpad.net/~tpeeters/gallery-app/toolbarItems/+merge/170115 you can approve it.
[13:47] <gusch> timp: I did not yet really review it - will do it now
[13:47] <timp> gusch: one jenkins test is marked as UNSTABLE. I don't know why. Is it a jenkins issue or something with the MR?
[13:48] <boiko> timp: I'll go ahead and update the phone-app too
[13:48] <timp> gusch: I sent an e-mail to ubuntu-phone mailing list with a bit of background information
[13:48] <gusch> timp: I retrigger the jenkins job, and will have a look
[13:48] <timp> boiko: ok, great. let me know if you need help
[13:49] <boiko> timp: thanks
[13:49] <timp> gusch, boiko I don't know when the new uitk packages are built, but they should appear automatically
[13:49] <boiko> timp: if you happen to notice when it gets released, please let us know
[13:50] <timp> ok
[13:50] <boiko> timp: (phone-app is in manual release mode still so we can control when to release it)
[13:59] <gusch> timp: ok - looks good - I will update the UITK later today and test it
[14:04] <timp> gusch: thanks. you'll need version bzr550 of the uitk packages. current is 549
[14:57] <nik90> timp: Thanks for the update on the core-apps mailing list.
[14:57] <nik90> timp: I have some questions if you are free to answer
[15:00] <timp> nik90: sure
[15:02] <timp> qtdeclarative5-ubuntu-ui-toolkit-plugin: Installed: 0.1.46daily13.06.14bzr544raring0 Candidate: 0.1.46daily13.06.19bzr550raring0
[15:03] <timp> boiko, gusch ^ 550 is there, so good to go.
[15:04] <gusch> timp: ok - thx
[15:04] <nik90> timp: I see that property bool visible has been deprecated. Does this mean that it wouldn
[15:04] <nik90> timp: wouldn't be able to hide toolbar buttons anymore?
[15:09] <timp> nik90: it is, but now you use a ToolbarButton inside a ToolbarItems to define the buttons.
[15:10] <timp> nik90: ToolbarButton inherits ActionItem, which inherits Item, which has a visible property
[15:10] <timp> nik90: so you can use visible in the ToolbarButton as you used in the Action before
[15:10] <nik90> timp: ah ok. that's nice
[15:10] <nik90> timp: one more thing
[15:10] <nik90> timp: In the email, you mentioned CHANGED in Page: property ToolbarActions tools TO property Item tools
[15:11] <nik90> timp: However, in the example you use items: ToolbarItems
[15:11] <timp> yes, that means that in theory you can put *any* Item in tools
[15:11] <nik90> timp: I am guessing you meant that the property has been changed to ToolbarItems
[15:11] <nik90> timp: oh ok
[15:11] <timp> tools: Rectangle { anchors.fill: parent; color: "red" }, you'll have only a red rectangle in the toolbar
[15:12] <timp> nik90: no, it can be anything, including the deprecated ToolbarActions, so apps that are using ToolbarActions will not break (for now)
[15:12] <nik90> timp: ok. Nice finally it will be much easier to also write autopilot tests for these.
[15:12] <nik90> thnx for the update
[15:12] <timp> I'm glad to help :)
[15:14] <timp> nik90: also have a look at the API docs for ToolbarItem and ToolbarButton in the ubuntu-ui-toolkit-doc package (you need version bzr550)
[15:14] <nik90> timp: ok. I just got the update to the latest package
[15:36] <marcoceppi> So, I'm reading http://developer.ubuntu.com/packaging/html/python-packaging.html and I know my app does not work with python3 yet, what should my debian/rules file look like?
[15:41] <gusch> timp: please merge with trunk from gallery
[15:41] <gusch> timp: there is a merge conflict
[15:44] <timp> gusch: ok
[15:47] <timp> gusch: done
[15:47] <timp> pushed
[15:48] <gusch> timp: thx - now let's wait for jenkins
[16:54] <nik90> timp: I am unable to find an example of a back toolbar button in the docs
[16:55] <nik90> timp: the closest I could find was http://paste.ubuntu.com/5781002/
[16:55] <nik90> timp: however even that creates a custom back button.
[16:57] <om26er> boiko, is there a way I could make the telephony app think we are on a network ? so could get certain panels to show up ? like on clicking the 'dial' icon i would like to see the onCallPanel to get some data out of autopilot vis
[16:57] <boiko> om26er: other than running the ofono-phonesim?
[16:58] <boiko> om26er: https://docs.google.com/a/canonical.com/document/d/1bntPn5Jj7TI5KTMZmFSSbOmKydoRrRqz15eQ8sRvBJ4/edit#heading=h.4eqfacsvxava
[16:59] <om26er> boiko, yeah, I think that should work
[17:04] <nik90> timp: Another thing is that I am unable to hide the toolbar using code. This is the code that I have for the toolbar http://paste.ubuntu.com/5781023/
[17:05] <nik90> timp: However when you press the "Add City" ToolbarButton, onTriggered() it does not hide the toolbar
[17:05] <nik90> timp: Is this a bug or am I doing to completely wrong?
[17:05] <om26er> boiko, would that work on the desktop as well ?
[17:06] <boiko> om26er: yes, the ofono-phonesim is what salem_ and I were using to develop phone-app when the backend was not yet ready
[17:08] <om26er> boiko, i get this http://paste.ubuntu.com/5781031/
[17:09] <boiko> om26er: did you run the ofono-phonesim with the args as described in the doc?
[17:09] <boiko> om26er: do you have ofono running there?
[17:11] <om26er> boiko, yes, ofono-phonesim is running
[17:11] <boiko> om26er: and ofono iself? do you see it in the system dbus?
[17:38] <gusch> timp: to fix your gallery branch: https://pastebin.canonical.com/93110/
[18:42] <timp> nik90: it is a bug. can you report it on the ubuntu-ui-toolkit? thanks
[18:44] <timp> gusch: oops. I pushed an update.
[18:44] <timp> gusch: thanks
[18:45]  * timp eod.
[18:45] <gusch> timp: ok
[18:51] <nik90> timp: sure
[20:36] <AskUbuntu> Qt Creator's pop up gets frozen when click on Develop menu or Start Developing link | http://askubuntu.com/q/310302
[20:58] <dmiller309> Question: Is there a way to emit a PropertiesChanged signal using Q_PROPERTIES? I'm trying to implement this: http://dbus.freedesktop.org/doc/dbus-specification.html#standard-interfaces-properties, as per http://www.mentby.com/Group/dbus/propertieschanged-signal-take-2.html.
[20:59] <dmiller309> I know that I could add a Q_SIGNAL to my Q_PROPERTY declaration, but I have multiple properties and I only want my client to have to subscribe to one signal.
[21:02] <dmiller309> I also know how that I could add a Q_SCRIPTABLE tag to a function called "propertiesChanged(QString interface_name, QMap<QString,QVariant> changed_properties, QList<QString> invalidated_properties)", but that's not ideal because then the method wouldn't be registered under the org.freedesktop.DBus.Properties interface.
[21:03] <dmiller309> Is this the correct place to ask a question like this? Is anyone here?
[22:14] <AskUbuntu> hi i would like to devellop my onw network based on the unbuntu linux distribution | http://askubuntu.com/q/310331
[22:19] <dmiller309> You have some spelling issues in your title.
[23:18] <dmiller309> Is there a way to emit a PropertiesChanged signal with DBus?
[23:30] <TwitchTEK> Howdy All!
[23:31] <TwitchTEK> Longtime Windows Network Admin, short term (noob) to Linux with a question regarding the existance of an app that does what I want and if not, how do i make it.  Anybody interested?
[23:32] <TwitchTEK> Anybody even here?
[23:32] <fugue88> TwitchTEK: Welcome to the channel.  Just ask your question, don't ask to ask.  :)
[23:34] <TwitchTEK> Thanks fugue, dont want to be impolite...