=== RAOF_ is now known as RAOF
=== Logan_ is now known as Guest48721
=== Guest128 is now known as Logan_
=== Logan_ is now known as Guest15447
=== Logan__ is now known as Logan_
=== 92AAAUIMO is now known as RAOF
[06:35] <dholbach> good morning
=== bigon_ is now known as bigon
=== dholbach_ is now known as dholbach
[13:09] <mitya57> dholbach: https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-packaging-guide-team/+archive/ppa/+build/4727530 <- \o/
[13:10] <dholbach> mitya57, great work!
[13:14] <mitya57> I've also subscribed to the bug reports, so will now respond more quickly
=== menesis1 is now known as menesis
=== dholbach_ is now known as dholbach
[15:49] <alex-foo> ahoy. can anyone tell me  - when GCC version 4.7.0 is updated to 4.7.1, do we recompile every package in the universe!?
[15:58] <maxb> alex-foo: No, it's not uncommon for packages to go un-recompiled from one release to another.
[15:58] <maxb> There are however rebuild *tests* done from time to time, but the build results don't go into the primary archive
[15:58] <alex-foo> maxb, so if the whole archive was rebuilt from source it would differ? or do packages explicitly build-depend on a given compiler?
[16:00] <maxb> I don't think you can rely on compilation being bytewise identical even if you keep the exact same compiler
[16:00] <alex-foo> because of other dependencies changing?
=== ryanakca_ is now known as ryanakca
=== LordOfTime is now known as LordOfTime|EC2
[18:45] <geser> alex-foo: for example, it happens, that a package isn't rebuild for several releases as there was no package update in the meantime
[18:46] <geser> alex-foo: you can see the results of the latest rebuild test at http://people.ubuntuwire.org/~wgrant/rebuild-ftbfs-test/test-rebuild-20130614-saucy.html
[18:46] <geser> (many packages to investigate and fix :( )
=== dpm is now known as dpm-afk
=== kees_ is now known as kees
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
[20:48] <alex-foo> geser: interesting, thanks