* snwh is back (gone 00:22:35) | 00:27 | |
=== chriadam|away is now known as chriadam | ||
dpm | good morning | 06:59 |
---|---|---|
dholbach | good morning | 07:43 |
nerochiaro | oSoMoN_: hi, back from your vacations ? hope you had a great time. ping me when you're not busy so we can figure out how to schedule the next two days work to finish the webbrowser component | 08:38 |
oSoMoN_ | nerochiaro: hey, yep I’m back, give me an hour or so to catch up | 08:38 |
oSoMoN_ | with the outstanding stuff, and I’ll ping you | 08:39 |
JamesTait | Good morning all, happy Second Half of the Year Day! :-D | 08:39 |
nerochiaro | oSoMoN_: sounds good | 08:39 |
=== oSoMoN__ is now known as oSoMoN | ||
oSoMoN | nerochiaro: ping | 09:59 |
nerochiaro | oSoMoN: hi | 09:59 |
nerochiaro | oSoMoN: so the current status for backporting all your changes is that they have been done up to revision 176 | 10:00 |
nerochiaro | oSoMoN: and they are pushed to lp:~~amanzi-team/ubuntu-ui-extras/ubuntu-ui-extras-initial/ | 10:00 |
oSoMoN | nerochiaro: looks like you’ve done most of the backporting, are you blocked on anything special? | 10:01 |
nerochiaro | oSoMoN: the remaining revisions to merge are few (4 totals I think) and easy, so probably no blockers, but i would like to have my work checked properly by someone that undertands it. and i think i will especially need some help in 2 areas: (a) translations and (b) remove from webbrowser-app what is already in the component | 10:02 |
oSoMoN | nerochiaro: ok, I’ll start checking your branch while you backport the remaining revisions | 10:03 |
nerochiaro | oSoMoN: sounds like a plan | 10:03 |
nerochiaro | oSoMoN: i think i submitted an MR for it already | 10:03 |
=== MacSlow is now known as MacSlow|lunch | ||
=== oSoMoN_ is now known as oSoMoN | ||
=== MacSlow|lunch is now known as MacSlow | ||
=== _salem is now known as salem_ | ||
om26er | nerochiaro, Hey! | 13:05 |
=== oSoMoN_ is now known as oSoMoN | ||
nerochiaro | om26er: ho | 13:08 |
nerochiaro | hi | 13:08 |
om26er | nerochiaro, when we switch to video recording camera goes blank. is that something you aware of ? | 13:09 |
nerochiaro | om26er: gusch probably knows more about that, he's worked on video recording | 13:09 |
gusch | om26er: just for a second - that's expected | 13:10 |
om26er | gusch, its like that forever on flipped image I am using http://imagebin.org/index.php?mode=image&id=263089 | 13:12 |
gusch | om26er: hmmm - then something is wrong with the flipped image :( | 13:13 |
om26er | gusch, is there a way to launch the camera directly in video recording mode? | 13:14 |
om26er | I want to make sure the problem only happens when we switch mode | 13:14 |
om26er | btw video recording works for the front camera, the problem is only with the back camera | 13:18 |
gusch | om26er: let me check the fiel toch change for video mode | 13:22 |
odra | Hey | 13:23 |
om26er | gusch, gusch switching to front camera for video recording and then getting back to rare camera makes t | 13:23 |
om26er | oops | 13:23 |
odra | Can someone try to install my app? | 13:23 |
nerochiaro | oSoMoN: do you think we should split the assets into a separate pacakge for the browser component too ? | 13:23 |
gusch | om26er: camera-app.qml line 72 has to be set to "captureMode: Camera.CaptureVideo" | 13:23 |
om26er | i mean switching to front camera and switching back to rare makes the video recording work again | 13:23 |
odra | I've been trying to find someone to try to install it for days :( | 13:23 |
om26er | *rear | 13:24 |
odra | Here, https://github.com/odraencoded/pynorama tell me if you can do it. :| | 13:24 |
odra | (it's a gtk app btw not a qml one) | 13:25 |
gusch | om26er: can you reproduce the error reliably? | 13:25 |
oSoMoN | nerochiaro: yes, it has been done for the app, so it should be done for the component | 13:25 |
om26er | gusch, yep totally | 13:25 |
nerochiaro | oSoMoN: ok | 13:26 |
gusch | om26er: you might fiel a bug - or wait until flipped container is default | 13:26 |
om26er | gusch, I can wait ;) | 13:26 |
gusch | odra: I don't think gtk apps work on touch ubuntu devices atm. | 13:27 |
odra | gusch: I know they don't. | 13:29 |
odra | gusch: But it's an app, and it runs on ubuntu, and I developed it. See, where I'm going? | 13:29 |
odra | Also I can't find another channel for app development :| | 13:30 |
gusch | odra: sou you want it to install on desktop ubuntu? | 13:31 |
odra | Yes. | 13:31 |
odra | I've never made anything that installs on linux so I don't know if it installs correctly. | 13:31 |
gusch | odra: well - automake/autoconf - haven't used it since 10 years or so ;) | 13:34 |
gusch | odra: does "make install" do something? | 13:34 |
odra | gusch: It should install. | 13:34 |
gusch | odra: and in the end, you'll want to create a debian package | 13:34 |
gusch | odra: google for debian package create | 13:34 |
odra | gusch: Yes but there is no point having a makefile that doesn't install | 13:34 |
gusch | odra: sorry - but I'n ot an expert there | 13:34 |
gusch | odra: as you have image and python files, you could even create a debian configuration without install | 13:35 |
odra | gusch: Just type "aclocal && autoconf && automake --foreign --add-missing && ./configure && make" and then "make install" with permissions :u | 13:35 |
odra | If it works, running "pynorama" from console should open a window without showing errors on the terminal. :/ | 13:37 |
gusch | odra: crashes for me - I think I miss some package | 13:38 |
odra | gusch: try "apt-get install python3 python3-gi python3-gi-cairo python3-cairo" | 13:39 |
gusch | odra: btw did you read this already? http://askubuntu.com/questions/144178/how-to-distribute-python-gtk-applications | 13:40 |
odra | gusch: Most likely not | 13:41 |
gusch | odra: or this http://askubuntu.com/questions/46325/how-to-make-a-deb-pkg-for-my-pygtk-app | 13:41 |
odra | gusch: I didn't try to make a debian package why would I have looked into debian packaging? | 13:42 |
gusch | odra: the cleanest way to install, is to build a package, and then install that package | 13:43 |
odra | make builds, make install installs. :| | 13:43 |
odra | I'll package this later once I get a few other features working :/ | 13:44 |
odra | gusch: But could you do it? | 13:58 |
gusch | odra: packaging? sorry - I'm pretty busy | 14:00 |
odra | gusch: no... | 14:00 |
gusch | odra: and ./configure gave me an error | 14:00 |
odra | I'm asking if you could install it. | 14:00 |
gusch | odra: configure: error: Package requirements (pygobject-3.0) were not met: | 14:00 |
odra | gusch: did you install python3-gi? | 14:01 |
odra | I'm fairly sure that was the package for pygobject-3.0 :S | 14:01 |
odra | (then again I just guessed it) | 14:01 |
gusch | odra: yes - is installed | 14:01 |
odra | How confusing D: | 14:02 |
odra | Why are there so many packages with similar names. | 14:02 |
odra | Hmm :/ | 14:04 |
odra | I haven't got the slightest idea of what packages my program needs. | 14:04 |
odra | I guess it can't be installed after all. | 14:04 |
m_tadeu | hi | 14:08 |
m_tadeu | if an application has a custom lib dir (like /usr/lib/myapp) to store .so files that are specific to the app, how should I proceed?if nothing is done, ldd doesn't find the .so files...adding the path in /etc/ld.so.conf.d works but, seems wrong by yhe debian specs | 14:08 |
m_tadeu | rpath's are also discouraged | 14:10 |
=== oSoMoN_ is now known as oSoMoN | ||
oSoMoN | kenvandine: ping | 15:00 |
kenvandine | oSoMoN, pong | 15:04 |
odra | oSoMoN, kenvandine: pang | 15:13 |
* oSoMoN is hit | 15:15 | |
nerochiaro | oSoMoN: how do the whole translations look in the component ? | 16:21 |
nerochiaro | oSoMoN: that was the part i had the most concerns about | 16:21 |
oSoMoN | nerochiaro: not looked at it yet | 16:23 |
oSoMoN | will do later | 16:23 |
nerochiaro | oSoMoN: so if I understand you correctly, you want the webbrowser component to be able to display pages and allow the user to enter addresses, but have history not exposed ? how would you separate that ? | 16:31 |
oSoMoN | nerochiaro: I don’t even see a use case for letting the user enter an address, I think the address bar would be read-only (at least by default) | 16:32 |
oSoMoN | nerochiaro: and I would achieve that by having a webview+chrome component, and the rest be part of the app | 16:33 |
nerochiaro | oSoMoN: so what's the point to even have it ? either the browser is a just pure viewer or it has also navigation controls | 16:33 |
oSoMoN | nerochiaro: the point is explained in the use cases document | 16:33 |
oSoMoN | which is where we should have started, frankly | 16:34 |
oSoMoN | nerochiaro: most apps embedding the component will use it as a view-only thing, not a full-fledged browser | 16:35 |
oSoMoN | nerochiaro: if an app needs a full-fledged browser, then it shouldn’t embed it, it should make an external call to it | 16:36 |
nerochiaro | oSoMoN: what of the use cases needs a chrome ? friends don't seem to need it | 16:36 |
oSoMoN | nerochiaro: the webapps container will need it | 16:36 |
nerochiaro | oSoMoN: it's not in the uses case document, is it ? | 16:37 |
oSoMoN | nerochiaro: no, but I’ll add it right away | 16:37 |
gusch | boiko: I fixed the typo (and the crash resulting of the trunk merge) https://code.launchpad.net/~schwann/gallery-app/gallery-more-loaders/+merge/172116 | 16:37 |
nerochiaro | oSoMoN: cool, thanks | 16:37 |
boiko | gusch: great! I will give it a try in a few minutes | 16:37 |
gusch | boiko: cool | 16:39 |
oSoMoN | nerochiaro: done | 16:42 |
nerochiaro | oSoMoN: makes sense to me | 16:43 |
mspencer | I'm almost ready to upload an application to sell in the Software Center. It is a cmake-based KDE program licensed under the GPLv3, but requires a secret api-key for a web-servie when compiled. What would be the best format to upload it? | 17:15 |
=== mspencer is now known as iBelieve | ||
iBelieve | oops, typo, should be "api-key for a web-service" | 17:24 |
dpm | iBelieve, check out http://developer.ubuntu.com/publish/licence-key-infrastructure/ | 17:31 |
iBelieve | dpm, will that work with having one key for every installation of the app? | 17:39 |
iBelieve | dpm, my understanding is that the license key infrastructure is for verifying if the user actually bought the app. My api key is a single api key for all instances of my app the gives it access to a web service. | 17:41 |
xzcvczx | lol, if he returns someone might want to tell him if he uses a single api key for each user then if popular it won't be secret for long | 18:16 |
=== salem_ is now known as _salem |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!