[00:27] * snwh is back (gone 00:22:35) === chriadam|away is now known as chriadam [06:59] good morning [07:43] good morning [08:38] oSoMoN_: hi, back from your vacations ? hope you had a great time. ping me when you're not busy so we can figure out how to schedule the next two days work to finish the webbrowser component [08:38] nerochiaro: hey, yep I’m back, give me an hour or so to catch up [08:39] with the outstanding stuff, and I’ll ping you [08:39] Good morning all, happy Second Half of the Year Day! :-D [08:39] oSoMoN_: sounds good === oSoMoN__ is now known as oSoMoN [09:59] nerochiaro: ping [09:59] oSoMoN: hi [10:00] oSoMoN: so the current status for backporting all your changes is that they have been done up to revision 176 [10:00] oSoMoN: and they are pushed to lp:~~amanzi-team/ubuntu-ui-extras/ubuntu-ui-extras-initial/ [10:01] nerochiaro: looks like you’ve done most of the backporting, are you blocked on anything special? [10:02] oSoMoN: the remaining revisions to merge are few (4 totals I think) and easy, so probably no blockers, but i would like to have my work checked properly by someone that undertands it. and i think i will especially need some help in 2 areas: (a) translations and (b) remove from webbrowser-app what is already in the component [10:03] nerochiaro: ok, I’ll start checking your branch while you backport the remaining revisions [10:03] oSoMoN: sounds like a plan [10:03] oSoMoN: i think i submitted an MR for it already === MacSlow is now known as MacSlow|lunch === oSoMoN_ is now known as oSoMoN === MacSlow|lunch is now known as MacSlow === _salem is now known as salem_ [13:05] nerochiaro, Hey! === oSoMoN_ is now known as oSoMoN [13:08] om26er: ho [13:08] hi [13:09] nerochiaro, when we switch to video recording camera goes blank. is that something you aware of ? [13:09] om26er: gusch probably knows more about that, he's worked on video recording [13:10] om26er: just for a second - that's expected [13:12] gusch, its like that forever on flipped image I am using http://imagebin.org/index.php?mode=image&id=263089 [13:13] om26er: hmmm - then something is wrong with the flipped image :( [13:14] gusch, is there a way to launch the camera directly in video recording mode? [13:14] I want to make sure the problem only happens when we switch mode [13:18] btw video recording works for the front camera, the problem is only with the back camera [13:22] om26er: let me check the fiel toch change for video mode [13:23] Hey [13:23] gusch, gusch switching to front camera for video recording and then getting back to rare camera makes t [13:23] oops [13:23] Can someone try to install my app? [13:23] oSoMoN: do you think we should split the assets into a separate pacakge for the browser component too ? [13:23] om26er: camera-app.qml line 72 has to be set to "captureMode: Camera.CaptureVideo" [13:23] i mean switching to front camera and switching back to rare makes the video recording work again [13:23] I've been trying to find someone to try to install it for days :( [13:24] *rear [13:24] Here, https://github.com/odraencoded/pynorama tell me if you can do it. :| [13:25] (it's a gtk app btw not a qml one) [13:25] om26er: can you reproduce the error reliably? [13:25] nerochiaro: yes, it has been done for the app, so it should be done for the component [13:25] gusch, yep totally [13:26] oSoMoN: ok [13:26] om26er: you might fiel a bug - or wait until flipped container is default [13:26] gusch, I can wait ;) [13:27] odra: I don't think gtk apps work on touch ubuntu devices atm. [13:29] gusch: I know they don't. [13:29] gusch: But it's an app, and it runs on ubuntu, and I developed it. See, where I'm going? [13:30] Also I can't find another channel for app development :| [13:31] odra: sou you want it to install on desktop ubuntu? [13:31] Yes. [13:31] I've never made anything that installs on linux so I don't know if it installs correctly. [13:34] odra: well - automake/autoconf - haven't used it since 10 years or so ;) [13:34] odra: does "make install" do something? [13:34] gusch: It should install. [13:34] odra: and in the end, you'll want to create a debian package [13:34] odra: google for debian package create [13:34] gusch: Yes but there is no point having a makefile that doesn't install [13:34] odra: sorry - but I'n ot an expert there [13:35] odra: as you have image and python files, you could even create a debian configuration without install [13:35] gusch: Just type "aclocal && autoconf && automake --foreign --add-missing && ./configure && make" and then "make install" with permissions :u [13:37] If it works, running "pynorama" from console should open a window without showing errors on the terminal. :/ [13:38] odra: crashes for me - I think I miss some package [13:39] gusch: try "apt-get install python3 python3-gi python3-gi-cairo python3-cairo" [13:40] odra: btw did you read this already? http://askubuntu.com/questions/144178/how-to-distribute-python-gtk-applications [13:41] gusch: Most likely not [13:41] odra: or this http://askubuntu.com/questions/46325/how-to-make-a-deb-pkg-for-my-pygtk-app [13:42] gusch: I didn't try to make a debian package why would I have looked into debian packaging? [13:43] odra: the cleanest way to install, is to build a package, and then install that package [13:43] make builds, make install installs. :| [13:44] I'll package this later once I get a few other features working :/ [13:58] gusch: But could you do it? [14:00] odra: packaging? sorry - I'm pretty busy [14:00] gusch: no... [14:00] odra: and ./configure gave me an error [14:00] I'm asking if you could install it. [14:00] odra: configure: error: Package requirements (pygobject-3.0) were not met: [14:01] gusch: did you install python3-gi? [14:01] I'm fairly sure that was the package for pygobject-3.0 :S [14:01] (then again I just guessed it) [14:01] odra: yes - is installed [14:02] How confusing D: [14:02] Why are there so many packages with similar names. [14:04] Hmm :/ [14:04] I haven't got the slightest idea of what packages my program needs. [14:04] I guess it can't be installed after all. [14:08] hi [14:08] if an application has a custom lib dir (like /usr/lib/myapp) to store .so files that are specific to the app, how should I proceed?if nothing is done, ldd doesn't find the .so files...adding the path in /etc/ld.so.conf.d works but, seems wrong by yhe debian specs [14:10] rpath's are also discouraged === oSoMoN_ is now known as oSoMoN [15:00] kenvandine: ping [15:04] oSoMoN, pong [15:13] oSoMoN, kenvandine: pang [15:15] * oSoMoN is hit [16:21] oSoMoN: how do the whole translations look in the component ? [16:21] oSoMoN: that was the part i had the most concerns about [16:23] nerochiaro: not looked at it yet [16:23] will do later [16:31] oSoMoN: so if I understand you correctly, you want the webbrowser component to be able to display pages and allow the user to enter addresses, but have history not exposed ? how would you separate that ? [16:32] nerochiaro: I don’t even see a use case for letting the user enter an address, I think the address bar would be read-only (at least by default) [16:33] nerochiaro: and I would achieve that by having a webview+chrome component, and the rest be part of the app [16:33] oSoMoN: so what's the point to even have it ? either the browser is a just pure viewer or it has also navigation controls [16:33] nerochiaro: the point is explained in the use cases document [16:34] which is where we should have started, frankly [16:35] nerochiaro: most apps embedding the component will use it as a view-only thing, not a full-fledged browser [16:36] nerochiaro: if an app needs a full-fledged browser, then it shouldn’t embed it, it should make an external call to it [16:36] oSoMoN: what of the use cases needs a chrome ? friends don't seem to need it [16:36] nerochiaro: the webapps container will need it [16:37] oSoMoN: it's not in the uses case document, is it ? [16:37] nerochiaro: no, but I’ll add it right away [16:37] boiko: I fixed the typo (and the crash resulting of the trunk merge) https://code.launchpad.net/~schwann/gallery-app/gallery-more-loaders/+merge/172116 [16:37] oSoMoN: cool, thanks [16:37] gusch: great! I will give it a try in a few minutes [16:39] boiko: cool [16:42] nerochiaro: done [16:43] oSoMoN: makes sense to me [17:15] I'm almost ready to upload an application to sell in the Software Center. It is a cmake-based KDE program licensed under the GPLv3, but requires a secret api-key for a web-servie when compiled. What would be the best format to upload it? === mspencer is now known as iBelieve [17:24] oops, typo, should be "api-key for a web-service" [17:31] iBelieve, check out http://developer.ubuntu.com/publish/licence-key-infrastructure/ [17:39] dpm, will that work with having one key for every installation of the app? [17:41] dpm, my understanding is that the license key infrastructure is for verifying if the user actually bought the app. My api key is a single api key for all instances of my app the gives it access to a web service. [18:16] lol, if he returns someone might want to tell him if he uses a single api key for each user then if popular it won't be secret for long === salem_ is now known as _salem