| thomi | robert_ancell: ping? | 02:03 |
|---|---|---|
| robert_ancell | thomi, hey | 02:03 |
| thomi | robert_ancell: so I think I'm getting close to getting all the infrastructure stuff lined up so we can run mir_stress as part of a CI run. However, there are a few issues yet to solve: | 02:03 |
| thomi | first, mir_stress currently fails - it causes the server to crash, and the test to hang, which means that if we were to integrate it today, it would take a long time before we got any MP feedback (although we could set the jenkins job timeout to something a little tighter I guess) | 02:05 |
| robert_ancell | bug #? | 02:05 |
| robert_ancell | (I know the bug, just don't have the number handy) | 02:05 |
| thomi | https://bugs.launchpad.net/mir/+bug/1195089 | 02:05 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1195089 in Mir "mir_stress suite causes mir_demo_server to crash" [Critical,Triaged] | 02:05 |
| thomi | the second issue is that our infrastructure seems really flakey, but until I have a job that passes when everything does work, it's hard for me to apply pressure to get those issues fixed up | 02:06 |
| robert_ancell | thomi, I'll have a look at that one | 02:08 |
| thomi | thanks. :) | 02:09 |
| duflu | robert_ancell: To clarify the confusion I've made this tag/group ... https://bugs.launchpad.net/mir/+bugs?field.tag=multimonitor | 02:25 |
| robert_ancell | duflu, thanks | 02:25 |
| duflu | RAOF: It's a bit inaccurate to keep tracking XMir bugs in the Mir project. Can we use a new project for it? | 02:40 |
| RAOF | duflu: We can file them against X with the xmir tag. | 02:41 |
| duflu | RAOF: Where's the code BTW? | 02:41 |
| RAOF | github.com/RAOF/xserver | 02:41 |
| duflu | Awesome. | 02:41 |
| duflu | Hmm | 02:41 |
| RAOF | Why is cmake suddenly unable to find glog? | 02:47 |
| RAOF | Argh. | 03:06 |
| RAOF | CMake doesn't understand multiarch? | 03:07 |
| RAOF | God damn it build systems. DON'T REIMPLEMENT A HALF-ARSED, BROKEN VERSION OF PKG-CONFIG. | 03:10 |
| kgunn | xmir...finally! | 03:20 |
| robert_ancell | kgunn, \o/ | 03:20 |
| kgunn | no doubt! | 03:21 |
| RAOF | Woot! | 03:23 |
| duflu | RAOF: It's not Mir's fault! (which is bad news) https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/1194004 | 03:37 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1194004 in xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu) "[regression] Compiz wakes up 200Hz while the screen is locked" [High,New] | 03:37 |
| RAOF | Whoops! | 03:38 |
| duflu | RAOF: Also, we now have https://launchpad.net/xmir | 03:41 |
| kgunn | quick, one, anyone know how to get runtime config dumps of xorg, e.g. let's say i want to see what the color format | 03:44 |
| kgunn | of a front buffer is that an app is rendering into | 03:45 |
| kgunn | or resolution etc | 03:45 |
| kgunn | RAOF: duflu ^ ? | 03:46 |
| duflu | kgunn: /var/log/Xorg.0.log is my best guess but may be insufficient | 03:47 |
| RAOF | kgunn: “xwininfo -root” does some of that. | 03:51 |
| RAOF | There's no single ‘introspect X’ tool, though. | 03:51 |
| kgunn | thanks guys....will poke around thos | 03:52 |
| duflu | kgunn: From memory, Compiz (rightly or wrongly) uses the current X visual. Even when it could (in theory) choose anything the GL implementation allows | 04:13 |
| duflu | So that means asking X tools should be accurate right now. But you can't rely on them indefinitely | 04:13 |
| robert_ancell | thomi, I've updated bug 1195089 - I'm not reproducing | 04:30 |
| ubot5 | bug 1195089 in Mir "mir_stress suite causes mir_demo_server to crash" [Critical,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1195089 | 04:31 |
| RAOF | Woot! | 04:31 |
| thomi | robert_ancell: hmmm | 04:31 |
| RAOF | So when the documentation says “set the CTEST_ENVIRONMENT variable to influence the environment your tests are run in” what it *means* is ‘the CTEST_ENVIRONMENT variable is totally ignored, sucker’. | 04:32 |
| thomi | robert_ancell: only thing I'm doing differently is I'm not running mir_demo_server or mir_stress as root. Will try with latest trunk - maybe it got fixed some time in the last 12 hours? | 04:32 |
| robert_ancell | thomi, hopefully :) | 04:32 |
| robert_ancell | thomi, note if you don't run as root you can't get the VT | 04:33 |
| thomi | robert_ancell: I ususally ssh in to run mir_stress | 04:33 |
| RAOF | Man, I get all the good things. | 04:53 |
| RAOF | Non-deterministic double-free in unit-tests.GBMGraphicsPlatform.* | 04:54 |
| tvoss_ | good morning :) | 05:05 |
| duflu | Ah tvoss_ is here. | 05:05 |
| duflu | Must be time for lunch | 05:05 |
| duflu | :) | 05:05 |
| tvoss_ | duflu, exactly :) | 05:05 |
| tvoss_ | RAOF, good morning :) | 05:05 |
| RAOF | tvoss_: Good morning. | 05:05 |
| tvoss_ | RAOF, happy new week | 05:06 |
| RAOF | tvoss_: You should be pleased to learn that https://code.launchpad.net/~raof/mir/prober-drm-device-probe/+merge/170765 should finally pass the tests on the CI infrastructure. | 05:06 |
| tvoss_ | \o/ | 05:06 |
| RAOF | (Pending one final change to mir_discover_gtest_tests) | 05:06 |
| tvoss_ | RAOF, that's great news :) | 05:07 |
| tvoss_ | thomi, hey there :) | 05:10 |
| thomi | tvoss_: o/ | 05:10 |
| tvoss_ | thomi, hey, for the autopilot integration tests: sounds good, thanks for clarifying :) | 05:10 |
| thomi | tvoss_: it sucks that the three of us are in really awkward timezones, but I think it'd be good to have a chat some time to work out the big picture: what we need, and where autopilot fits | 05:11 |
| thomi | Martin knew a lot more about the app functional test suite progress .... | 05:12 |
| tvoss_ | thomi, yeah, I know. Are there some example jobs that are run on real hardware? | 05:13 |
| thomi | tvoss_: Yes, I believe that all the core apps are run on the real hardware, but I'm not the person to speak to about that | 05:15 |
| tvoss_ | thomi, who would that be now? | 05:15 |
| thomi | tvoss_: I think ChrisGagnon and om26er are the ones to try | 05:15 |
| tvoss_ | thomi, cool, thx | 05:15 |
| thomi | tvoss_: no worries - Omer is (AFAIK) the one working for the phone app teams | 05:15 |
| thomi | Chris does a lot of deployment work | 05:16 |
| tvoss_ | RAOF, still get the non-deterministic double-free? | 05:31 |
| RAOF | Yes, but I'm pretty sure I can avoid it. | 05:31 |
| tvoss_ | RAOF, if the busid is still a char*, it's most likely that :) | 05:32 |
| RAOF | Could be :) | 05:32 |
| tvoss_ | RAOF, I think I had this pastebin last week ... | 05:32 |
| RAOF | I've still got the patch in a bzr shelf. | 05:32 |
| tvoss_ | RAOF, ah cool | 05:32 |
| NikTh | Hello. I have reported this bug : https://bugs.launchpad.net/mir/+bug/1196355 . Now I'm in this corrupted system and I will stay for 2 hours at least. Anything you want me to do, just ask it. I will not logout-login or reboot or restart DM. | 05:49 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1196355 in xmir "After the latest updates, no desktop session - Ubuntu 13.10 (2013/07/01) - XMir dies with signal 6" [High,Incomplete] | 05:49 |
| tvoss_ | duflu, ping | 05:51 |
| duflu | tvoss_, hi | 05:51 |
| tvoss_ | NikTh, looking at your bug report :) | 05:51 |
| NikTh | Also you have to know that is difficult for me to handle the system , because of the lack of windows decoration , unity and almost everything else. | 05:51 |
| duflu | NikTh, unfortunately lack of decorations and general "wrong things on screen" is not related to Mir | 05:52 |
| duflu | NikTh: Only failure to start up is a Mir issue. Can't you reproduce it? | 05:52 |
| NikTh | duflu, I attached the logs you asked. | 05:53 |
| * duflu looks | 05:53 | |
| duflu | NikTh: Yep, if it's working now then we can't figure out the original problem | 05:57 |
| duflu | Unity failing to start is a different bug | 05:57 |
| NikTh | duflu: I will reboot the system and see if I can reproduce it. Thanks | 05:59 |
| duflu | Though it looks like the issue was XMir crashing. I suspect other people have reported similar but not known why they had blank screens | 05:59 |
| duflu | So we have some progress I guess | 05:59 |
| RAOF | Hah. Once again my tests catch me out :) | 06:00 |
| NikTh | Is it a big difference if Xmir is enabled or disabled ? | 06:01 |
| duflu | tvoss_, I think sabdfl was getting similar startup issues till last weekend. Now he doesn't... randomly | 06:02 |
| tvoss_ | duflu, yup, RAOF's prober branch should help a lot here | 06:03 |
| tvoss_ | duflu, at least in diagnosing | 06:03 |
| duflu | Oh, wait, no. Twas a different error: https://bugs.launchpad.net/mir/+bug/1195509 | 06:04 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1195509 in Unity System Compositor "System compositor fails to start - Failed to set the current VT mode: Input/output error (5)" [Critical,Triaged] | 06:04 |
| * RAOF is just removing intermediate debugging before pushing something that will pass CI (fingers crossed) | 06:04 | |
| NikTh | This system was created for this propose . Testing Xmir . So it is a pure system. The only package I installed is "ubuntu-restricted-extras" . Nothing else. | 06:04 |
| duflu | RAOF: If Mir spits an exception to stderr will it go in the X log? | 06:04 |
| RAOF | duflu: Do you mean if libmirclient spits an exception to stderr? | 06:05 |
| duflu | RAOF: Not sure. I mean XMir | 06:05 |
| NikTh | I will reboot now to see if I can reproduce the problem. Thanks. | 06:05 |
| RAOF | The X log will only catch output generated by X, and XMir only links to libmirclient. | 06:05 |
| RAOF | duflu: But lightdm will (should) catch anything printed to either stderr or stdout by unity-system-compositor | 06:06 |
| duflu | RAOF: Hmm, well it was the X server crashing apparently. | 06:11 |
| duflu | Forgive me for not continuing with this issue. I've already spent half the day triaging Mir bugs | 06:12 |
| duflu | ... which is enough | 06:12 |
| RAOF | NikTh: Neither of the Xorg.0.log files attached on that bug appear to come from failed attempts to run xmir? | 06:17 |
| RAOF | duflu: If you want to comment on https://code.launchpad.net/~raof/mir/prober-drm-device-probe/+merge/170765 beyond your ‘abstain’, I'm pretty confident that this go will pass CI :) | 06:56 |
| RAOF | Hah. Apart from the merge conflicts, apparently :( | 06:57 |
| duflu | RAOF: Yeah trying to catch up on all the MPs I'm holding up :( | 07:01 |
| * duflu wishes it was easier to have a say in what lands, _and_ get some work done himself | 07:02 | |
| arsson | latest updates, unity is gone. | 07:34 |
| tvoss_ | arsson, did you pin the ppa priority? | 07:42 |
| arsson | tvoss_ no special methods are use in here | 07:46 |
| tvoss_ | arsson, the lightdm version you are pulling in is newer than the version in the system compositor testing ppa | 07:46 |
| tvoss_ | see https://launchpad.net/~mir-team/+archive/system-compositor-testing | 07:47 |
| tvoss_ | arsson, let me find you the pinning instructions | 07:47 |
| arsson | tvoss_ dumbass version please? | 07:48 |
| tvoss_ | arsson, so when upgrading, you get a lightdm version that is newer than the one in the testing ppa. That newer version is not mir-enabled right now as we are in the process of landing Mir to universe | 07:49 |
| tvoss_ | arsson, to make a long story short: yup, might well break your setup and I'm searching for the instructions to help you fix the issue :) | 07:49 |
| arsson | there was some kernel and unity updates and i was using gdm at the time. | 07:53 |
| tvoss_ | arsson, okay, thx for the information | 08:13 |
| admiralmarcus | hi, how will window decorations be handled in mir? client side (csd) or server side (ssd)? | 08:37 |
| duflu | admiralmarcus: It's still debatable. The people designing it argue client side whereas the people implementing it still prefer server side | 08:42 |
| duflu | Not sure where the argument ended last | 08:42 |
| tvoss_ | duflu, the tendency is server-side right now | 08:43 |
| duflu | \o/ | 08:43 |
| duflu | admiralmarcus: Though technically right now, XMir makes X a single client and everything (including compiz and decorations) is inside the client | 08:46 |
| duflu | ping RAOF | 08:46 |
| RAOF | Pong duflu | 08:47 |
| RAOF | duflu: You're aware that "the tests" that are disabled without umockdev are "all the GBM tests", right? | 08:47 |
| duflu | RAOF: Different subject :) | 08:48 |
| duflu | RAOF: So XMir talks native GBM, but only as far as being a native GBM client, right? It never accesses the physical server buffers by GBM? | 08:48 |
| duflu | Cos that would be bypass | 08:49 |
| RAOF | I'm not sure what you mean by "physical server buffers" in this case; it does directly touch the buffers handed out via libmirclient, which means it's touching the server buffers. | 08:50 |
| RAOF | But it's *not* touching the framebuffer, unless the server is handing that out (and it doesn't, yet) | 08:50 |
| duflu | RAOF: Yes, umm, I mean it still can't bypass the composition | 08:50 |
| duflu | Right | 08:50 |
| duflu | RAOF: OK I will look at ways to automagically hand out the framebuffer (under conditions when it's safe) | 08:51 |
| RAOF | That would be good | 08:51 |
| duflu | Though I thought alf might have strong opinions on that | 08:52 |
| RAOF | Plausibly? | 08:53 |
| tvoss_ | alf, ping | 08:54 |
| alf | duflu: I haven't looked into bypass at all. Last I know alan_g was looking into it for Android, but I guess the non-platform specific part of the mechanisms would be made generic enough to support all platforms. | 08:55 |
| alf | tvoss_: pong | 08:55 |
| * tvoss_ calls trigger_conversation(duflu, alf); :)) | 08:56 | |
| alf | duflu: also kdub was working into supporting it in the buffer swapping component | 08:56 |
| admiralmarcus | duflu: okay, thanks for the answer | 08:57 |
| alf | duflu: it's probably worth syncing with both alan_g and kdub to check what their plans where | 08:58 |
| alf | were | 08:58 |
| duflu | alf: kgunn asked me to start on it ASAP. Research at least | 09:02 |
| duflu | alf: Oh I see where alan_g started | 09:03 |
| RAOF | duflu: Note: when I said "the framebuffer", what I really meant was "a framebuffer"; for the gbm platform we can have arbitrarily many framebuffers. The only difference between a potential framebuffer and a regular buffer is an allocation flag. | 09:08 |
| duflu | RAOF: OK, so something scan-out-able | 09:09 |
| NikTh | Hi again. Sorry before, but I had a connection problem. (general not IRC only). I attached the new logs, I reproduced the problem. You can review them when you have time. https://bugs.launchpad.net/mir/+bug/1196355 . Thanks | 09:09 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1196355 in xmir "After the latest updates, no desktop session - Ubuntu 13.10 (2013/07/01) - XMir dies with signal 6" [High,Incomplete] | 09:09 |
| alf | RAOF: duflu: (also keep in mind the discussions we had about giving new framebuffers or clearing the framebuffer for security reasons) | 09:10 |
| alf | RAOF: or is this resolved with prime fds? | 09:10 |
| duflu | alf: OK, I have the issue in mind. But was not in the discussions | 09:10 |
| RAOF | alf: No, not resolved with prime fds. | 09:11 |
| duflu | alf: Yep, the code I was already looking at is the groundwork that Alan did late May | 09:14 |
| alf | duflu: ok | 09:16 |
| duflu | alf: GBM doesn't have actual documentation does it? | 09:31 |
| alf | duflu: there is doxygen documentation in the source files (in the mesa tree) | 09:35 |
| alf | RAOF: Have you started working on a C++ Udev class? I may need to do some work there soon to support monitor hotplugging. | 09:49 |
| tvoss | duflu, regarding the prober branch: What would be your proposal for an alternative umockdev package available on other platforms? | 09:49 |
| duflu | tvoss: My only suggestion is: Fall back to whatever we do now (without umockdev) if it's not present | 09:50 |
| duflu | I don't know the details, but I'm pretty sure it's not a portable assumption to assume a distro has it | 09:50 |
| tvoss | duflu, not appropriate from my perspective, we will skip a bunch of tests | 09:51 |
| duflu | tvoss: People building on other distros care more that the code is unbuildable than the reduced coverage, I think | 09:51 |
| tvoss | duflu, and that makes it a required build-dep from my pov | 09:51 |
| duflu | I mean, we're moving further away from Mir being portable and usable outside of Ubuntu. And we said we would work on that | 09:52 |
| tvoss | duflu, hmmm, I think failing at build time with a clear indication of the missing dependency is quite straightforward to fix outside of Ubuntu | 09:54 |
| duflu | tvoss: Not realistic. We can't depend on packages that other distros don't have packaging for yet. Unless we properly document how to build all-the-things from source | 09:55 |
| tvoss | duflu, hold on: I think it's a bad idea to automatically skip tests that ensure that Mir's components are working correctly | 09:56 |
| duflu | tvoss: It's not as bad as not being able to build (or test) it at all | 09:56 |
| duflu | tvoss: The debian build-dep is OK. We use that for Jenkins. I'm just saying don't impose it as a CMake requirement | 09:57 |
| duflu | Make the CMakeLists smarter | 09:57 |
| tvoss | RAOF, want me to help with that? | 09:57 |
| duflu | tvoss: didrocks and RAOF has already said that build-dep is a superset of the actual requirements. But if you're clever enough to build from CMake then you should have the option of not requiring things that are not required | 09:59 |
| duflu | -has +have | 09:59 |
| tvoss | duflu, I would consider something that enables all of our gbm-platform testing as required | 09:59 |
| duflu | tvoss: This does not limit the Ubuntu requirements. Those come from debian/control. I'm only saying loosen the restriction in CMakeLists | 10:00 |
| duflu | We're going in the wrong direction if Mir continually becomes less portable, as it keeps doing | 10:00 |
| tvoss | duflu, that's what I'm trying to say: disabling tests that are meant to be run at build-time is a dangerous thing | 10:01 |
| duflu | tvoss: They're still enabled for Ubuntu builds | 10:01 |
| duflu | By virtue of debian/control forcing them to be installed | 10:01 |
| duflu | But we need to be more flexible for people building Mir by hand (which includes external packagers) | 10:02 |
| tvoss | duflu, how do you document the udevmock dependency then for external packagers? | 10:03 |
| duflu | tvoss: It's enforced for Ubuntu in debian/control, and documented for everyone in CMake output as the usual "detecting XYZ: Not found: Not enabling XYZ" | 10:04 |
| tvoss | duflu, hmm, is that really sufficient? | 10:04 |
| duflu | tvoss: It's how all CMake projects work | 10:04 |
| duflu | You give a warning that "we think you should install XYZ", but don't absolutely require it | 10:05 |
| duflu | And Ubuntu packagers will never see that warning because the control file already forces umockdev to be installed | 10:05 |
| tvoss | okay, I think we need to agree to disagree here | 10:06 |
| duflu | tvoss: No problem. You can land stuff without my approval. I'll propose changes if/when it bugs me. Or someone else will | 10:06 |
| tvoss | duflu, fair | 10:07 |
| duflu | We'll stall too much if we allow vetos on everything. And we'll also land things that need more fixing later. But that's life | 10:08 |
| RAOF | alf: I have indeed started on a udev C++ class. | 10:08 |
| alf | RAOF: ok, then I will use something hacky as a first step with a TODO to replace it with services from your class when it lands | 10:10 |
| RAOF | alf: Sounds good. | 10:12 |
| tvoss_ | alf, any news from jenkins? | 12:09 |
| alf | tvoss_: no, jobs still stuck http://s-jenkins:8080/job/mir-ci/ | 12:10 |
| ogra_ | did you contact IS ? | 12:11 |
| alf | ogra_: We are waiting for the US to wake up | 12:12 |
| ogra_ | ah, yeah, lexington | 12:12 |
| racarr | Morning! | 14:49 |
| alf | racarr: Hi! | 14:52 |
| kdub | morning racarr | 15:00 |
| alf | status: Implementing notification and reconfiguration when a monitor is plugged in/out | 15:02 |
| * alf has found a new indicator for EOD... noticable reduction in internet speed as people come home from work and start browsing :) | 15:07 | |
| kdub | status, got rid of ms::Surface : public mi::InputTarget, which lets us untangle a few things | 15:08 |
| racarr | kdub: ? What is the InputTarget then | 15:15 |
| racarr | alf: Happens to me too XD | 15:16 |
| kdub | ms::Surface is not an InputTarget, but rather owns an InputTarget | 15:18 |
| racarr | ok | 15:19 |
| racarr | kdub: I think the toyds.Window should just fire up an inputReceiver goroutine | 15:19 |
| racarr | err | 15:19 |
| racarr | :p | 15:20 |
| kdub | hah :P | 15:21 |
| kdub | breaking that inheritance though lets us proxy ms::Surface, which resolves a lot of funny lifetime issues in msh | 15:22 |
| racarr | I understand I think | 15:22 |
| racarr | makes sense | 15:22 |
| kgunn | bregma: ping | 16:39 |
| kgunn | bregma: just curious, since your guys do a lot of x debug....if i have an app rendering, and i wanted to check (runtime) what the color format of the render buffer is...is there a simple way to do that? | 16:40 |
| mhall119 | kgunn: did we get any metrics for XMir vs. just X that aren't based on OpenGL and Framerate? | 17:34 |
| mhall119 | for things like Lubuntu, who's performance concerns aren't about games, but rather how fast Gtk and Openbox are | 17:35 |
| robotfuel | mhall119: is there an existing test that measures that? | 17:42 |
| mhall119 | I don't know | 17:45 |
| mhall119 | just wondering if the phoronix guy measured anything except games | 17:45 |
| kdub | hey racarr, if you have time today look over lp:~kdub/mir/remove-surface-target :) | 17:46 |
| robotfuel | mhall119: I can have jenkins run test via utah, if you have a test you want me to run I can set that up. | 17:48 |
| racarr | kdub: Ok | 17:48 |
| robotfuel | there is a regression today though. so the results won't be very useful | 17:48 |
| robotfuel | until that's fixed. | 17:48 |
| kdub | racarr, thanks :D | 17:48 |
| greyback | mhall119: you've seen: http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=ubuntu_xmir_2d&num=1 - he measured gtk and x11 perf | 17:55 |
| mhall119 | greyback: ah, thanks, missed that somehow | 17:57 |
| mhall119 | robotfuel: could we run those gtkperf tests (and any other performance benchmarks" in utah? | 18:00 |
| racarr | Anyone...flashed a phone this morning? | 19:31 |
| racarr | phablet-flash is failing over and over with md5 validation errors | 19:31 |
| racarr | when I download the images | 19:31 |
| ogra_ | racarr, tried re-downloading ? | 19:52 |
| racarr | ogra_: Like 20 times now :p | 19:53 |
| racarr | I am now faking the md5sum | 19:53 |
| racarr | That can't go wrong right | 19:53 |
| ogra_ | which images is that ? flipped (as you should) or unflipped ? | 19:53 |
| racarr | the md5sum on +mako was right, just not on | 19:54 |
| racarr | preinstalled-touch-armhf | 19:54 |
| racarr | flipped | 19:54 |
| ogra_ | hmm | 19:54 |
| racarr | ogra_: Presumably its the NSA slipping a backdoor in ubuntu touch | 19:54 |
| racarr | though you'd think theyw ould update .md5sum | 19:55 |
| racarr | :p | 19:55 |
| ogra_ | we do | 19:55 |
| ogra_ | oh, they, heh | 19:55 |
| ogra_ | racarr, well, comparing the md5sums here all seems right | 19:58 |
| racarr | :/ | 19:58 |
| racarr | what does it mean | 19:58 |
| racarr | haha | 19:58 |
| ogra_ | racarr, oh | 19:58 |
| ogra_ | can you check if there is a path in your md5sum ? | 19:58 |
| ogra_ | if so, edit it and remove that | 19:59 |
| ogra_ | you only want a filename | 19:59 |
| racarr | lets see, I already replaced the downloaded version with one that works | 19:59 |
| racarr | but didnt look at the contents | 19:59 |
| ogra_ | ah, well | 19:59 |
| * ogra_ thinks he fixed it server side now | 20:02 | |
| racarr | ailed to fetch bzip2:/var/lib/apt/lists/partial/ports.ubuntu.com_ubuntu-ports_dists_saucy_main_binary-armhf_Packages Hash Sum mismatch | 20:06 |
| racarr | W: Failed to fetch bzip2:/var/lib/apt/lists/partial/ports.ubuntu.com_ubuntu-ports_dists_saucy_universe_binary-armhf_Packages Hash Sum mismatch | 20:06 |
| racarr | wow | 20:06 |
| racarr | am I being | 20:06 |
| racarr | mitmed on apt by comcast | 20:07 |
| racarr | or something | 20:07 |
| racarr | hmm things are in fact broken on nexus 4 | 20:18 |
| racarr | will investigate ter lunch | 20:18 |
| racarr | things are still running and input still works but nothing | 20:18 |
| racarr | on screen | 20:18 |
| === racarr is now known as racarr|lunch | ||
| kdub | really o.O? tip worked on my device this morning | 20:19 |
| kdub | granted, its a week or two since I flashed latest phablet | 20:19 |
| racarr|lunch | well this is unity | 20:24 |
| racarr|lunch | I will test just mir after I eat SPICY BASIL WITH TOFU AND VEGETABLES | 20:24 |
| racarr|lunch | omnomnom | 20:25 |
| === racarr|lunch is now known as racarr | ||
| racarr | hmm | 20:46 |
| racarr | mir_demo_egltriangle works | 20:46 |
| bschaefer | interesting crash that halted the xserver: http://paste.ubuntu.com/5834336/ | 21:17 |
| bschaefer | full x log: http://paste.ubuntu.com/5834333/ | 21:17 |
| jono | olli, tvoss hey | 21:23 |
| olli | jono, what's up | 21:23 |
| jono | olli, tvoss so I think it could be useful to have a schedule in place for dogfooding | 21:23 |
| jono | as an example, this is what I would need: | 21:24 |
| jono | * Get rid of the cursor and use an overlay (cursor makes it difficult to use) | 21:24 |
| jono | * Basic multi-monitor support (even if just mirrored) | 21:25 |
| jono | Unity 7 seems functional on XMir for me for daily use | 21:25 |
| jono | olli, would this be worth posting about to mir-devel? | 21:25 |
| olli | jono, I just took an AI to follow up | 21:26 |
| olli | I think it's good for us to have a more specific plan in place | 21:26 |
| olli | need to chat with poor kgunn though | 21:26 |
| ahayzen | is there any way of running Mir in a VM yet? | 21:26 |
| jono | olli, yeah | 21:27 |
| olli | jono, eta Wed/Thu | 21:27 |
| jono | olli, I think it could be good for rallying around a goal | 21:27 |
| jono | olli, cool | 21:27 |
| greyback | racarr: hey, compiler errors for you: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/5834366/ I've merged Mir trunk into implement-client-credentials, and installed that, all fine. Then trying to build platform-api "mir-with-packaging" branch again with platform-api trunk merged into that. But it fails to compile with that message | 21:29 |
| racarr | greyback: Just revert the last revision | 21:31 |
| racarr | I tried merging trunk and didn't test yet | 21:31 |
| greyback | racarr: ah ok | 21:31 |
| racarr | I dunno | 21:31 |
| racarr | hmm I dont even know in regards to that compile error -.- | 21:35 |
| greyback | racarr: this should fix the first error: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/5834416/ . still not sure about the second | 21:47 |
| racarr | greyback: Do you have any ide hat | 21:49 |
| racarr | //home/phablet/phablet-integrate-mir/Shell.qml:20:1: module "LightDM" plugin "LightDM-qml" not found import LightDM 0.1 as LightDM | 21:49 |
| racarr | may be about? | 21:49 |
| racarr | greyback: Something weird is going on there I have to understand | 21:50 |
| racarr | because mir trunk compiles... | 21:50 |
| greyback | racarr: did you run the "./run" script in phablet-integrate-mir? | 21:51 |
| greyback | racarr: it should compile the QML plugin that you're missing | 21:51 |
| greyback | racarr: sorry, I meant "./build" | 21:53 |
| greyback | "./build -s" will pull in any build dependencies it needs, so that's usually run first. | 21:53 |
| racarr | greyback: Yeah :) nvm | 21:53 |
| racarr | I was trying to get away with a partial build XD | 21:53 |
| racarr | and forgot what I did | 21:53 |
| greyback | :) | 21:53 |
| racarr | no one can make it work | 21:54 |
| racarr | including me :( | 21:54 |
| racarr | it's all black screens | 21:54 |
| racarr | input works because multi touch crashes the binary (and doesnt with ix-pointer-indexing!) | 21:54 |
| greyback | grrr, what broke/changed | 21:54 |
| racarr | I dunno | 21:59 |
| racarr | build -s doesn't work either because it wants libboost 1.49 | 21:59 |
| racarr | and mir wants 1.53 now | 21:59 |
| racarr | Ill figure out what broke XD | 21:59 |
| greyback | blimey, dependencies are changing all over the place | 22:02 |
| greyback | racarr: above patch fixes platform-api compile error completey | 22:07 |
| racarr | greyback: I don't understand it though | 22:08 |
| racarr | how can mir build | 22:09 |
| racarr | if that header cant be included | 22:09 |
| greyback | racarr: see that the inherited class SurfaceBufferAccess has a deconstructor defined as ~SurfaceBufferAccess() noexcept - explicitly says it won't throw an exception | 22:09 |
| greyback | but Surface's deconstructor didn't define what exceptions it could throw (if any) - which is considered too loose by gcc. I think clang is ok with it though, if you don't define what exceptions you throw, it assumes you can throw any | 22:11 |
| racarr | except it's not | 22:11 |
| racarr | because it builds :p | 22:11 |
| greyback | why Mir builds: you using gcc4.7? | 22:11 |
| racarr | so why doesn't it build in the platorm-api pbuilder | 22:11 |
| racarr | I think we are using 4. | 22:11 |
| racarr | 8 | 22:11 |
| greyback | ok, me too | 22:11 |
| racarr | 4.8 | 22:11 |
| racarr | yeah | 22:11 |
| greyback | then yeah, I don't understand that. | 22:12 |
| racarr | I don't think noexceot should be needed because it's the parent is defaulted | 22:14 |
| racarr | greyback: Maybe you are using 4.7 somehow? https://code.launchpad.net/~vanvugt/mir/fix-1196415/+merge/172279 | 22:16 |
| greyback | racarr: holy sh*t I am. wtf | 22:17 |
| greyback | whaaat | 22:17 |
| racarr | greyback: It's ok. I'm begining to suspect the structure of logic itself is deteriorating | 22:18 |
| greyback | racarr: I've both 4.7 and 4.8 installed. cmake must go for the first one it sees, even though 4.8 is the default | 22:19 |
| greyback | dammit, sorry for wasting your item | 22:19 |
| greyback | time | 22:19 |
| racarr | no worries :) | 22:20 |
| RAOF | racarr: Good morning! | 23:03 |
| RAOF | Or afternoon. Or whatever. | 23:03 |
| bschaefer | RAOF, hey, I've a new crash from the x.log...this time it actually killed the server... figure you were the one to poke about it | 23:05 |
| bschaefer | full log: http://paste.ubuntu.com/5834333/, cut out bit: http://paste.ubuntu.com/5834336/ | 23:05 |
| bschaefer | also, when the xserver went down, mir was still running, as the hardware cursor was still working. Just everything else was black....if thats any help :) | 23:07 |
| olli | RAOF, ping | 23:08 |
| olli | bschaefer, ping | 23:11 |
| bschaefer | olli, hello | 23:11 |
| racarr | RAOF: Morning! | 23:12 |
| racarr | RAOF: You must have good news right? ; | 23:12 |
| racarr | ) | 23:12 |
| RAOF | bschaefer: Cool. | 23:13 |
| RAOF | racarr: Not any particularly good news? Except that it's morning! | 23:14 |
| racarr | oh well that's great news | 23:15 |
| thomi | hi guys - what things land in the compositor-testing PPA? | 23:39 |
| RAOF | thomi: Whatever we manually copy across. | 23:39 |
| RAOF | thomi: Also, hi! | 23:39 |
| thomi | RAOF: Hi :) | 23:39 |
| RAOF | thomi: How do I get umockdev installed in jenkins? https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/mir-saucy-amd64-ci/105/console | 23:40 |
| thomi | RAOF: hmmmm, olli is wondering if we can do something to prevent people having to use pinning in order to test the compositor - any ideas? | 23:40 |
| thomi | RAOF: add it as a build-dep to the mir source package, if you need it as part of the build process | 23:40 |
| RAOF | Impromptu baby,. | 23:42 |
| thomi | RAOF: ..... | 23:43 |
| thomi | Of course I'm serious, and stop calling me Shirley? | 23:43 |
| RAOF | thomi: Re: not pinning. | 23:47 |
| thomi | I don't understand... | 23:48 |
| RAOF | There are two options that I can think of - | 23:48 |
| RAOF | 1) Ensure everything in the PPA has a higher version than in the archive. We can do this with an epoch. Downsides: you'll need to ppa-purge to get off those package versions, and that's somewhat fragile. | 23:49 |
| RAOF | 2) Add a new package in the PPA, depending on a virtual package provided only by the packages in the PPA. | 23:49 |
| RAOF | Downsides: users who dist-upgrade need to be sure the upgrade doesn't remove that package. | 23:50 |
| RAOF | bschaefer: Wow, that's a fun Xorg log! | 23:53 |
| thomi | RAOF: hmmm, it seems to be that those options both suck :-/ | 23:53 |
| RAOF | thomi: Correct. Which is why we chose pinning ☺ | 23:53 |
| thomi | yeah | 23:53 |
| thomi | ok | 23:53 |
| bschaefer | RAOF, yeah, its only happened twice today though...both while my CPU was close to 100% (from compiling..) | 23:53 |
| RAOF | Is your system particularly slow? | 23:54 |
| bschaefer | hmm not really, every now and then everything hangs for 5-10 seconds | 23:54 |
| bschaefer | and sometimes during that hang, the xserver crashes...which it just seems like the event queue is getting filled up | 23:55 |
| RAOF | It looks like it might be triggered by something that only happens when the event queue fills up, yeah. | 23:55 |
| bschaefer | does mir give events off to X? If so maybe mir needs to filter out more events? | 23:56 |
| RAOF | Mir doesn't give X any events; it's a strictly standard X input stack. | 23:56 |
| bschaefer | o well ignore that thought then :) | 23:57 |
| RAOF | It's a bit curious that libmirclient is above synaptics in that stack, but I suspect that's it being slow on message submission because everything's slow. | 23:58 |
| bschaefer | hmm yeah, im really wondering what is blocking...that causes ~500 events to be missed | 23:59 |
| RAOF | You're not using something silly, like btrfs are you? | 23:59 |
| RAOF | That's *excellent* at blocking | 23:59 |
| * bschaefer isn't sure what that is | 23:59 | |
| bschaefer | haha | 23:59 |
| RAOF | bschaefer: Want to try the X stack from ppa:raof/aubergine? That's xmir rebased on 1.14, which may just fix this for you. | 23:59 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!