bschaefer | sure, that'll be fun | 00:00 |
---|---|---|
bschaefer | is it a bit different than: ppa:canonical-x/x-staging | 00:00 |
bschaefer | oo thats xmirs rebased...nm! | 00:01 |
bschaefer | RAOF, Im still dropping a lot of events with the new 1.14 server :(, though it hasnt caused the server to crash yet | 01:48 |
RAOF | Hm. | 01:48 |
RAOF | Still dropping events in a libdrm-intel ioctl? | 01:49 |
* bschaefer looks | 01:49 | |
bschaefer | seems to be: (EE) 11: /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (ioctl+0x19) [0xb72160c9] | 01:50 |
bschaefer | which is above: | 01:50 |
bschaefer | (EE) 13: /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libdrm_intel.so.1 (0xb6aff000+0x5d6c) [0xb6b04d6c] | 01:50 |
bschaefer | (EE) 14: /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libdrm_intel.so.1 (drm_intel_bo_subdata+0x28) [0xb6b011f8] | 01:50 |
bschaefer | though this time mir isn't mentioned in the stacktraces | 01:51 |
RAOF | bschaefer: Do you know if that happens outside of Mir? | 02:09 |
bschaefer | RAOF, I have not tested that, but i've not noticed theses things until I swiched to xmir | 02:12 |
bschaefer | RAOF, let me see if I can get these problems when just using plain old X | 02:12 |
RAOF | Ta. | 02:13 |
bschaefer | np, and thanks for looking at the log! | 02:14 |
bschaefer | so far, plain X everythings fine...but Ill see what happens with working on it all day tomorrow | 02:32 |
RAOF | setup-partial-android-chroot.sh is annoying :( | 03:10 |
duflu | RAOF: Yep. Enhancements welcome | 03:18 |
duflu | RAOF: How so? | 03:19 |
duflu | RAOF: Also, if you're still tinkering in this, please unset Needs review: prober-drm-device-probe | 03:19 |
RAOF | duflu: No, should now be good. | 03:19 |
RAOF | Should have been good the last go around, but setup-partial-android-chroot.sh broke it. | 03:19 |
duflu | ? | 03:20 |
duflu | Farq. Another ABI bump?! | 03:20 |
RAOF | Because libhybris added a dependency, and setup-partial-android-chroot doesn't use apt. | 03:20 |
duflu | Come on people... | 03:20 |
RAOF | What? When? | 03:21 |
duflu | RAOF: Ahem. Just in the proposal I'm testing. Not as bad as I feared | 03:23 |
duflu | RAOF: What's the new dep? | 03:25 |
RAOF | libandroid-properties1 | 03:25 |
* duflu shrugs | 03:25 | |
RAOF | (Or see the merge proposal) | 03:25 |
duflu | RAOF: Hmm, so I can't run any *-tests any more? Is there a compromise possible? | 03:43 |
RAOF | I could push down the check so that you can't run any gbm tests, but I'm not sure if that's a good idea. | 03:44 |
RAOF | Basically, the further down I push that check, (a) the more complicated it is, and (b) the less obvious it is that you're not running the full test suite. | 03:45 |
duflu | RAOF: Yeah that's what I was suggesting originally | 03:45 |
* duflu hacks it up | 03:46 | |
kgunn | since i am xmir'ing now....ran my own data | 03:54 |
duflu | ?... | 03:55 |
robert_ancell | RAOF, is vladmir the correct branch on https://github.com/RAOF/xserver? | 05:09 |
robert_ancell | and egl-platform-mir on https://github.com/RAOF/mesa? | 05:10 |
RAOF | robert_ancell: Correct. | 05:10 |
RAOF | Anyone want to top-approve https://code.launchpad.net/~raof/mir/prober-drm-device-probe/+merge/170765 ? There have been enough changes since the other two approvals that it's probably worth a second lookover. | 05:41 |
tvoss | kgunn, ping | 06:01 |
duflu | Hmm 1am. Good luck :) | 06:07 |
RAOF | tvoss: Good morning! | 06:11 |
tvoss | RAOF, good afternoon :) how goes? | 06:12 |
RAOF | tvoss: Feel like top-approving https://code.launchpad.net/~raof/mir/prober-drm-device-probe/+merge/170765 ? :) | 06:12 |
tvoss | RAOF, for sure : | 06:12 |
tvoss | ) | 06:12 |
RAOF | Assuming you approve of disabling the whole testsuite when umockdev is not available. | 06:12 |
tvoss | RAOF, mind renaming TESTS_ENABLED to MIR_TESTS_ENABLED? | 06:22 |
RAOF | Not at all. | 06:23 |
mlankhorst | smurf everything | 06:23 |
RAOF | tvoss: Anything else? | 06:24 |
* duflu thinks mlankhorst might have a valid point | 06:25 | |
tvoss | RAOF, nope | 06:28 |
RAOF | Dear System76 Galago: make with the getting here faster. | 06:30 |
* duflu gives in and grabs the Mesa source as *documentation* | 06:33 | |
RAOF | duflu: Hunting down bypass support? :) | 06:36 |
duflu | RAOF: Not even that. Hunting down an understanding of src/server/* | 06:36 |
RAOF | Ah. | 06:37 |
duflu | Hmm. GBM has documentation but it's buried in the source package as alf mentioned. They really should have put it in the header | 06:37 |
RAOF | Or even build it and ship it? :) | 06:38 |
duflu | Yeah, shipping the docs would be nice. | 06:39 |
duflu | alf: Hello... | 06:54 |
alf | duflu: hi :) | 06:54 |
duflu | alf: "Schedule the current front buffer object for display" ... how is it GBM doesn't think the "front buffer" is front? | 06:54 |
duflu | Or is it just a "new" frontbuffer object each time? | 06:55 |
tvoss | duflu, mind if I top-approve the prober-mp? | 06:56 |
duflu | tvoss: My eyes are closed. | 06:56 |
duflu | .. which means I will mind later when I open them. But that won't be today | 06:57 |
tvoss | duflu, ack ;) | 06:57 |
alf | duflu: gbm doesn't handle display itself, it just has a surface with two (or conceivably) more buffers. When we swap the buffers we get a new front buffer that we are responsible for displaying if we want. | 06:58 |
duflu | alf: I am very confused by that terminology. "Front" usually means the one and only buffer visible right now | 06:58 |
alf | duflu: this is the front buffer from the surface's perspective (the one that should be visible, gbm_surface_lock_front_buffer()), independent of what is actually displayed. | 07:03 |
duflu | alf: That makes sense. I'm just trying to understand why GBM says you call gbm_surface_lock_front_buffer _after_ swap buffers | 07:05 |
duflu | alf: Oh, yes, I see. Because swap buffers is not "visible" either. You still have to flip it (which is another buffer swap of sorts) | 07:06 |
alf | duflu: right, the swapping operation is independent of displaying any buffers, it's literally just swapping two buffers. | 07:07 |
hikiko | I forgot my objectives :/ | 07:41 |
tvoss | hikiko, ? | 07:44 |
hikiko | I forgot to set them this weekend and now I can't do it anymore | 07:45 |
hikiko | :s | 07:45 |
* RAOF returns from his impromptu IRC bouncer explosion | 07:51 | |
alan_g | Good morning all, you've had a busy week and a day! | 08:12 |
duflu | alan_g: Hello. Yes it seems to always be busy | 08:18 |
duflu | I find myself drawing up a class diagram for parts of mirserver. Has anyone else does this yet?... | 08:18 |
alan_g | hi duflu - I see you've taken on comp-bypass. Got all you need> | 08:19 |
alan_g | *? | 08:19 |
alan_g | @diagram - only the one in the source tree (which is less granular) | 08:19 |
duflu | alan_g: All except about 1 month of learning libmirserver's workings I think | 08:20 |
duflu | alan_g: Yeah my diagram is quite disparate to the Architecture.dia | 08:20 |
alan_g | Doesn't doygen do diagrams if you've got dot? | 08:20 |
duflu | Hmm, I suspect it might | 08:21 |
duflu | alan_g: Yes doxygen does one diagram per class. I need more | 08:22 |
duflu | Oh, there's a more complete one: http://unity.ubuntu.com/mir/inherits.html | 08:25 |
alan_g | If that doesn't suit it ought to be possible to munge the doxygen representation - I know folks do that | 08:27 |
duflu | On that note, the doxygen style feels a bit ugly and more difficult to navigate than it should be. Can we configure it for other HTML styles? | 08:33 |
alan_g | duflu: there are a lot of config options. IIRC tvoss found a volunteer to investigate (I don't remember who) but I never heard any more. | 08:35 |
tvoss | alan_g, that guy never came back to me :/ | 08:35 |
tvoss | alan_g, welcome back | 08:35 |
alan_g | duflu: here's one starting point: http://www.stack.nl/~dimitri/doxygen/manual/customize.html | 08:36 |
duflu | Ah, too technical. I was thinking more like pick and choose a "theme" | 08:37 |
alan_g | duflu: I've seen mention of a graphical front-end. | 08:38 |
* alan_g doesn't believe it is as easy as wordpress | 08:39 | |
iceroot | hi | 08:40 |
RAOF | hey. | 08:41 |
iceroot | i am running MIR at the moment and i dont see a real difference to X11 (just a broken mouse pointer), can you recommend a ressource where i will find examples to test out the advantages of MIR? so it would be easier to understand MIR | 08:41 |
RAOF | At the moment the advantages are mostly latent. There are a bunch of demos in the mir-demos package, but nothing particularly "wow" | 08:43 |
RAOF | Mostly the advantages are when the shell (ie: unity) becomes the display server as well. | 08:44 |
iceroot | maybe there is something like "ssh -X" which is running much better then on old X11 | 08:45 |
RAOF | Nope; we've got no special remote protocol. | 08:45 |
RAOF | What we should have for 13.10 is nicer boot→greeter→login→user switch→shutdown transitions. | 08:46 |
iceroot | when my vga is fully supported will i face differences/problems when using games from steam? or is this not realted to MIR but just the display driver itself? the programs dont need a change? | 08:48 |
RAOF | The programs don't need to change; we'll support running X11 apps for the forseeable future. | 08:52 |
RAOF | (They may get the ability to be more awesome if they do change, though) | 08:52 |
duflu | alf: Roughly speaking a DisplayBuffer is presently an output, and "Display" is the set of all outputs, right? | 08:56 |
duflu | So in Compiz-speak DisplayBuffer==Output and Display==Screen | 08:57 |
duflu | Though it would all sound the same to the casual reader | 08:57 |
dholbach | hey, so I'm trying to follow the build instructions for mir, but I run into the following: | 08:58 |
dholbach | CMake Error at shared/protobuf/CMakeLists.txt:11 (protobuf_generate_cpp): | 08:58 |
dholbach | Unknown CMake command "protobuf_generate_cpp". | 08:58 |
dholbach | ^ any advice? | 08:58 |
alf | duflu: correct, with the detail that a DisplayBuffer could be shared by different physical monitors (e.g. if we are cloning), so it's not strictly DisplayBuffer==Output | 09:00 |
duflu | alf: Sure. OK thanks | 09:00 |
iceroot | RAOF: thank you for the useful info | 09:00 |
alan_g | dholbach: that sounds like you're missing the protobuf dependency. Did you get errors running "sudo mk-build-deps --install --tool "apt-get -y" --build-dep debian/control"? | 09:02 |
duflu | dholbach: It's actually part of CMake (you need a newer CMake): http://www.cmake.org/cmake/help/v2.8.8/cmake.html#module:FindProtobuf | 09:03 |
dholbach | duflu, I'm on saucy - how do we build mir in the ppa then? I didn't see a newer cmake in there | 09:04 |
duflu | dholbach: Oh actually seems like we might be missing: | 09:05 |
duflu | find_package(Protobuf REQUIRED) | 09:05 |
duflu | Which should come before the function | 09:05 |
duflu | Not sure why it works for the rest of us | 09:05 |
dholbach | so if I install all the build dependencies, should bzr branch lp:mir; cd mir;mkdir build; cd build; cmake .. succeed? | 09:06 |
duflu | dholbach: Yes. Otherwise it's a bug (which is quite possible) | 09:06 |
duflu | dholbach: Actually the top-level CMakeLists.txt gets protobuf, which should be inherited in subdirs | 09:06 |
dholbach | ok, nevermind - I got it working now - I had to regenerate the cmake data bits after I installed all the build-deps | 09:07 |
dholbach | thanks duflu | 09:07 |
duflu | dholbach: Cool. Yes CMake often thinks its cache is clean when it's not :/ | 09:07 |
NikTh | Hello everyone | 09:09 |
NikTh | duflu: available ? | 09:10 |
duflu | NikTh, yes? | 09:10 |
NikTh | Is it a good idea to re-install the system, make all the updates and activate again the PPA to see what's happen ? | 09:10 |
NikTh | Now things are messed up. From 4 reboots, 1 can start the display manager with a corrupted desktop (but as you said this is not xmir's problem) and other 3 cannot even start a display manager, I cannot even switch to a VT. | 09:11 |
NikTh | If I re-install the system and things are good, we can close this bug as fix released or invalid.. maybe. | 09:11 |
NikTh | What you say ? | 09:11 |
NikTh | https://bugs.launchpad.net/mir/+bug/1196355 | 09:11 |
ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1196355 in XMir "After the latest updates, no desktop session - Ubuntu 13.10 (2013/07/01) - XMir dies with signal 6" [High,Incomplete] | 09:11 |
duflu | NikTh, I find sometimes with similar issues, I just need to delete ".Xauthority" from the home directory to get my desktop back | 09:13 |
duflu | Delete it and then reboot, try again | 09:13 |
NikTh | duflu: I have already tried this but to no avail :) | 09:13 |
duflu | NikTh: OK, well if it's causing such system-wide issues and you can't debug it further by yourself, then yes I would suggest a full re-install and avoiding all PPAs. Because PPAs are use-at-your-own-risk | 09:15 |
NikTh | duflu: The PPA and my own-risk is not the problem. I created this installation to test xmir and help.. (in any way I can- I'm not a programmer) | 09:16 |
NikTh | To report bugs.. etc | 09:16 |
NikTh | But now, I cannot do much. The system is unusable. If I re-install and after full updates, the same problem occurs, then this is definitely a bug. And you(we) should check it, seriously. | 09:17 |
NikTh | But If I re-install and after full updates, this is not happen , maybe we can close this as invalid or something ;) | 09:18 |
NikTh | xmir will be the default Display Server in 13.10 as I know. If I (or some other people) cannot install and use 13.10... well I guess this is a problem :) | 09:19 |
NikTh | What you suggest. To re-install, or wait for updates ? I can still update the system. I can chroot. | 09:20 |
duflu | NikTh: I know it's something that needs wider testing. But at the same time, we can only easily fix the bugs that we (any Mir developer) can reproduce. | 09:21 |
duflu | Other bugs are still bugs, certainly, but we can't fix them (knowingly and confidently) without reproducing them | 09:22 |
NikTh | hmm.. I think I understand that. Then I guess 13.10 will be a "testing release" for xmir. When you getting in to universe and apport works, It will be easier to report bugs. | 09:23 |
duflu | NikTh: Certainly managing bugs will be easier when everyone is using the same installation and updates (13.10) | 09:25 |
NikTh | Then I will leave it to your judge to do whatever you want with my report :) | 09:25 |
duflu | NikTh: Incomplete can stay so indefinitely. And if more information comes up, even from other people, then it can be re-opened and work continue on that bug | 09:26 |
NikTh | More info came from me last night. See the last logs but I don't know if they help. | 09:26 |
NikTh | OK, nice talking to you.. I have to leave now. :) | 09:27 |
NikTh | duflu: Thanks ) | 09:27 |
duflu | Hmm, doxygen documents deleted methods. Useful | 09:35 |
alf | duflu: @threadsafe-clients, are the locks recursive to handle the protobuf RPC "done" callbacks? | 10:00 |
duflu | alf: Actually they're recursive because they used to be around all client callbacks too. But no longer. I'm not sure if there's a remaining need for recursiveness, but that bug is still open | 10:01 |
duflu | Good point, but I must go set dinner on fire | 10:02 |
=== dholbach_ is now known as dholbach | ||
dholbach | so I just built mir locally and built RAOF's xserver branch with --enable-xmir - it can't seem to find mir_client_library.h though (it was placed in /usr/local/include/mirclient/mir_toolkit/mir_client_library.h) - anything I probably missed somewhere? | 10:11 |
dholbach | basically what I ran into was: http://paste.ubuntu.com/5835758/ | 10:11 |
greyback | hi folks, am having problem with Mir with egl clients. They fail with libegl - unsupported platform (null) | 11:31 |
greyback | alan_g: ^ any idea? | 11:32 |
alan_g | greyback: on desktop? | 11:34 |
greyback | alan_g: yep | 11:34 |
alan_g | Last time I had that it was because of a bad mesa version (caused by the repo being messed up) | 11:35 |
greyback | alan_g: what mesa package version have you? Are accelerated demo clients working ok for you? I'm using mir staging | 11:36 |
alan_g | greyback: I'm about a week out of date - been on vacation and not updated | 11:38 |
greyback | ok | 11:39 |
alan_g | alf: anything you're aware of ^^ | 11:39 |
alf | greyback: what version does dpkg -s libegl1-mesa give you? | 11:44 |
alf | alan_g: I am not aware of any problems | 11:44 |
greyback | alf: 9.2~git20130628.g6b676e6-0ubuntu0+mir1-jenkins83saucy0 | 11:44 |
alf | greyback: is mir from the ppa too, or are you building from source? | 11:45 |
greyback | alf: from mir staging ppa | 11:45 |
greyback | as are all the mir-related packages on my machine right now | 11:46 |
=== alan_g is now known as alan_g|lunch | ||
greyback | alf: any ideas? My problem or no? | 12:15 |
alf | greyback: Does mir server start fine, only clients fail? | 12:19 |
greyback | alf: server fine. unaccelerated clients fine. Only those using egl | 12:22 |
kgunn | greyback: i would change ppa to be system-compositor-testing | 12:25 |
kgunn | http://unity.ubuntu.com/mir/installing_prebuilt_on_pc.html | 12:25 |
kgunn | the staging ppa is wild west | 12:25 |
greyback | kgunn: apparantly so. | 12:26 |
kgunn | greyback: note, if you're running xmir....they moved type==unity to a "unitysystemcompositor" conf file (out of lightdm) | 12:27 |
kgunn | just in case you're toggling xmir/x in lightdm....it could trip you up | 12:27 |
greyback | kgunn: noted, thanks | 12:27 |
greyback | rebooting | 12:31 |
=== alan_g|lunch is now known as alan_g | ||
didrocks | kgunn: hey! how are you? | 13:15 |
kgunn | didrocks: good (crazy times) | 13:15 |
didrocks | kgunn: I'm looking at the progress on https://bugs.launchpad.net/mir/+bugs?field.tag=entering-saucy and it doesn't seem good (the only ones which are fixed committed are the copyright stuff my team worked on with robert) | 13:16 |
didrocks | kgunn: FYI, since Thursday, I have nothing I can do more to get mir under dailies, the ball is in your team's camp :) | 13:16 |
didrocks | (for daily release and then distro) | 13:16 |
didrocks | just as a reminder, the armhf FTBFS is a blocker for dailies | 13:16 |
kgunn | didrocks: understood... | 13:17 |
didrocks | the rest are blockers for distro | 13:17 |
didrocks | kgunn: do you have any idea for a date at least to get dailies? | 13:17 |
kgunn | didrocks: yeah, bregma was looking at arm build and it was canadian holiday yesterday | 13:17 |
didrocks | kgunn: ok, please keep me in touch :) | 13:17 |
* bregma lifts his groggy head | 13:18 | |
kgunn | :) | 13:18 |
kgunn | alan_g: alf question...regarding swapinterval(0), i noticed a caveat on kdub's mp, that it'll work for work for gbm ipc clients only | 13:44 |
kgunn | doesn't that only really mean you couldn't get the shell to set it via this mech | 13:45 |
kgunn | ? | 13:45 |
kgunn | e.g. any other app will work just fine | 13:45 |
alf | kgunn: that MP implements SwapInterval support for IPC clients only, native client (e.g. the shell) support hasn't been implemented yet. | 13:52 |
kgunn | alf thanks...i was just verifying my thot/understanding. hooray...i understood | 13:53 |
kgunn | alf: which also means, we need a cooresponding bit in xmir to pass it through....which probably isn't there yet ? | 13:54 |
alf | kgunn: I think the code in Mesa is already hooked up | 13:54 |
alf | kgunn: so in theory now eglSwapInterval(0) from a IPC client should work | 13:55 |
alan_g | WTF? ctest only runs 2 tests | 13:57 |
kgunn | alf: thanks | 13:57 |
alf | alan_g: there were some changes while you were away... we decided that TDD isn't worth it after all :D | 13:58 |
* alan_g is glad he hasn't signed the new contract | 13:58 | |
kgunn | :) | 14:00 |
alan_g | alf: is it just me? OR has something changed? | 14:03 |
alf | alan_g: ctest runs fine for me. I remember having come across a similar situation and the solution was a fresh build in my case. | 14:05 |
alan_g | alf: tried that, and deleting the cmake cache and regenerating | 14:06 |
alf | alan_g: ahh, got it... apt-get install libumockdev-dev | 14:06 |
alan_g | ? | 14:07 |
alan_g | That's why my test binaries are old? | 14:07 |
alan_g | Couldn't cmake give me a useful message instead of dropping build targets? | 14:09 |
alf | alan_g: https://code.launchpad.net/~raof/mir/prober-drm-device-probe/+merge/170765 check comments from 2013-07-01 and on | 14:09 |
* alan_g glad he's not the only one not happy with this | 14:12 | |
kdub | good morning | 14:12 |
alan_g | LOL | 14:13 |
kdub | welcome back alan_g | 14:36 |
alan_g | thanks kdub - looks like fun has been had while I was away | 14:36 |
greyback | hey, I'm using the cross-compiler script to build Mir. Is failing with this error: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/5836380/ | 14:36 |
greyback | where do I get libandroid-properties.so.1 ? | 14:37 |
=== alan_g is now known as alan_g|tea | ||
kdub | greyback, i'll look for it... | 14:38 |
kdub | hopefully the script isnt broken | 14:38 |
greyback | kdub: thanks! | 14:41 |
kdub | greyback, i see the script in lp:mir downloading that dependency... perhaps merge the tip of lp:mir? | 14:46 |
kdub | and regenerate the ndk | 14:46 |
=== alan_g|tea is now known as alan_g | ||
greyback | kdub: by "regenerate the ndk" you mean what exactly? | 14:48 |
kdub | rm the partial-armhf-chroot in the build directory | 14:49 |
greyback | gotcha | 14:49 |
kdub | greyback, the file appears to be in 'libandroid-properties1', by the way | 14:49 |
greyback | kdub: makes sense :) | 14:50 |
greyback | it's been downloaded into the chroot anyway | 14:50 |
kgunn | rebooting | 14:58 |
kdub | doh, my mir-devel mails were ending up in a never checked gmail folder -_- | 15:08 |
greyback | oh today is not my day with Mir. I'm on GalaxyNexus, using saucy flipped image, installed the mir-team/staging PPA, now mir_demo_server* fails this this error : http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/5836465/ | 15:14 |
kdub | greyback, somehow, you look to be loading the mesa drivers | 15:15 |
* alf is unhappy that umockdev is leaking memory and his tests fail under valgrind :/ | 15:16 | |
greyback | kdub: sorry to sound like an idiot, but what driver should load? | 15:17 |
alan_g | alf should punish those that approved the MP | 15:17 |
kdub | greyback, it should link tho the hybris egl implementations, not the mesa ones. check where libEGL.so is resolving into | 15:17 |
greyback | alan_g: that's what reverting is for :) | 15:18 |
alan_g | alf: ^ | 15:18 |
alf | greyback: alan_g: that's what whips are for ;) | 15:18 |
greyback | kdub: yep is mesa. but no idea where the hybris egl implementation is. | 15:26 |
kdub | greyback, i'd make sure you have libhybris installed (although i think its default on phablet) | 15:29 |
kdub | /usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libhybris-egl/libEGL.so.1.0.0 | 15:29 |
greyback | kdub: libhybris installed ok, but seems all mir demos are linked to mesa | 15:39 |
* alan_g has just lost all his window decorations | 16:36 | |
=== alan_g is now known as alan_g|reboot | ||
kdub | we have like an 'on air' meeting in a bit? | 16:47 |
kdub | is that still true jono? :) | 16:48 |
dholbach | kdub, AFAIK it's kgunn, jono, pmcgowan, mramm, thostr_ (and a few others) giving a weekly update on ubuntuonair.com | 16:49 |
dholbach | or did kgunn send you as his replacement? :) | 16:50 |
kgunn | dholbach: coming.... | 16:50 |
kdub | dholbach, nah, just made a note of 'mir meeting 5pm utc today' while reading planet ubuntu a while back | 16:50 |
dholbach | ahhhh ok | 16:51 |
kgunn | work still happens before the weekly ;) | 16:51 |
jono | kdub, Mir meeting is after the weekly update | 16:52 |
alan_g | Goodbye all | 17:02 |
=== alan_g is now known as alan_g|EOD | ||
kdub | english needs more synonyms for 'surface' | 17:10 |
kdub | racarr got lucky revno #800 | 17:22 |
kgunn | kdub: i feel totally challenged....synonyms for surface | 17:30 |
kgunn | kdub: skin | 17:30 |
baronos | the last daily-live image the ubuntu is already with the mir by default? | 17:35 |
ogra_ | baronos, images are only built from packages in the ubuntu archive ... Mir is not in the archive yet | 17:42 |
baronos | ok, thanks :) | 17:42 |
tvoss | RAOF, you about? | 17:57 |
RAOF | Yes. | 17:58 |
robert_ancell | thomi, there? | 17:59 |
tvoss | RAOF, mute mic and cam | 17:59 |
tvoss | :) | 17:59 |
=== kdub is now known as kdub^lunch | ||
=== ari_ is now known as arsson | ||
thomi | robert_ancell: no, sorry, but I am now | 18:56 |
robert_ancell | thomi, np, on air session finishing now. | 18:56 |
robert_ancell | thomi, there wasn't any major testing questions for you :) | 19:02 |
thomi | robert_ancell: nuts, sorry, I completely forgot. TBH, somehow it never made it on my calendar | 19:03 |
thomi | sorry about that | 19:03 |
=== kdub^lunch is now known as kdub | ||
kdub | wait... is desktop using boost 1.53? | 21:56 |
racarr | Seems so | 21:57 |
kdub | doh. android is still using 1.49 | 21:58 |
kdub | well, rather... if you cross compile using the scripts, its 1.49 (pbuilder probably does the right thing) | 22:00 |
racarr | somehow I am not getting a vtable for my interface | 22:07 |
racarr | SessionAuthorizer, when I remove the std::string argument | 22:08 |
racarr | the method gets inlined and there is no vtable for the whole class as far as I can tell | 22:08 |
racarr | what does it mean : | 22:08 |
racarr | ( | 22:08 |
racarr | oh it means I deleted the = 0 | 22:08 |
robert_ancell | RAOF, ping | 22:38 |
robert_ancell | RAOF, It seems the vladmir-ubuntu branch is the correct xserver branch, not vladmir - Is there a way to set up github to use vladmir-ubuntu by default? Or delete the old branch / update it? | 22:50 |
racarr | for each acceptance test client that is connecting | 22:51 |
racarr | SocketSession::on_new_connection is being called twice | 22:51 |
racarr | and it's being added to the | 22:51 |
racarr | connected sessions list twice | 22:51 |
racarr | except the first time the socket credentials are nonsense | 22:51 |
racarr | and the second time they are the correct client PID | 22:52 |
racarr | oO | 22:52 |
RAOF | robert_ancell: github now shows vladmir-ubuntu by default. I forgot that I'd started to just make changes directly to the ubuntu branch. | 23:54 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!