=== LordOfTime is now known as LordOfTime|EC2 === iulian is now known as Guest48666 === forestpi1kie is now known as forestpiskie === forestpiskie is now known as Guest36249 === Guest36249 is now known as forestpiskie === Guest48666 is now known as iulian === elmo__ is now known as elmo === yofel_ is now known as yofel === fabo is now known as fabo_away [10:23] halp, need someone to approve mesa & mesa-lts-quantal [10:24] HALPPP PLXX [10:27] On it. [10:28] :) [10:28] thanks [10:28] I'll do the same for raring [10:29] mesa-lts-quantal's changelog history seems to have gotten mangled. [10:29] we don't care about that [10:29] it's scripted [10:30] the changelog should have everything via the quantal "upstream" [10:30] the latest one just adds ~preciseN [10:30] sec [10:31] of course this is the first time I'm on this, so could have messed things [10:31] you did mess up [10:31] :P [10:31] damn [10:31] how? [10:31] tjaalton: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/144071101/mesa-lts-quantal_9.0.3-0ubuntu0.3~precise1_9.0.3-0ubuntu0.4~precise1.diff.gz [10:32] that's why lts-pkg-rename takes an argument to the old stack dir [10:32] oh [10:32] but just fix it up manually [10:32] so you did have those [10:32] *keep [10:33] yeah, just the ones in release, the ubuntu0.3 one never left NEW so I don't care about it [10:33] but you wiped the original LP bug entry [10:34] the diff doesn't show 0.3 [10:34] oh I see [10:34] still shows up in the changes file though, so meh.. [10:34] I'll merge that too then [10:34] What do you mean "0.3 never left NEW"? [10:34] infinity: ok I'll fix it up [10:34] It's in -proposed. [10:34] it's in NEW [10:34] Oh, it's in binary NEW, sure. [10:34] I can fix that. :P [10:35] hehehe [10:35] you could fix xserver-xorg-video-intel-lts-quantal still being there :) [10:35] yeah I hate this stuff [10:35] I'll fix the changelog and reupload, feel free to reject the current one [10:35] dual-level changelogs suck [10:35] right, two steps to bug the archive admins [10:35] that too [10:37] infinity: xxv-intel-lts-raring is in unapproved, can you accept it too? [10:45] mesa-lts-raring also seems to have a vaguely confused changelog, but maybe that one's unavoidable, I dunno. [10:47] sadly no way out [10:48] it had to close the original bug too [10:50] ok new version uploaded [10:55] meh, mesa 9.1.4 needs an sru bug [11:51] cjwatson, removed all the binaries built with gdc-v1 on powerpc. except for plplot, which ftbfs for qt reasons currently [11:52] and cleaned up the lib*-ruby binaries [11:52] armhf too? [11:54] there were none [11:54] that was gcc-4.4 based [12:20] infinity: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnuradio/3.6.5.1-1ubuntu1/+build/4766558 is dead, can that build be done on the fast one? (sagari?!) [12:23] xnox: I don't imagine speed will help it much, but it could be tried. [12:23] doko: There are certainly some out-of-dates on armhf from the set of packages we were talking about. [12:37] xnox: Retried on sagari. Good luck. Maybe I should bump the timeout back up a bit. That said, a build that produces no output for 60m isn't ideal. [12:39] infinity: it only took 27minutes to build on amd64.... [12:40] * xnox likes the build score of 99999999 === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha [17:13] who should I ask politely to review mozjs17 in new? [19:14] hmm [19:14] Could it be that proposed-migration is forgetting about failed tests? [19:14] I just uploaded glib2.0 and some rdep autopkgtests definitely did fail - colord and firefox are two examples. They were on excuses as FAILED but now they're not there. [19:17] Did someone override the results? [19:20] firefox is, yeah, but not colord as far as I can see [19:20] wait, I can't remember which way around the force-footests are [19:21] Did you see the new way to do it (-release) [19:21] I only know force-badtest force-skiptest [19:21] Thos. [19:21] * Laney nods [19:21] Those even [19:22] badtest means skip that test for all cases since the test is bad. [19:22] OK, so firefox is skipped then [19:22] skiptest means don't trigger tests for this package, skip them because we want it in -release ASAP. [19:22] but still colord. [19:22] Dunno [19:23] Maybe it's bug. Not sure how cjwatson tested it. [19:24] Not gonna complain if it lets it migrate. ;-) [19:34] Laney, "forgotten failed" is a bug. I have a fix that will be pushed tomorrow morning. [19:35] Laney: Quick, upload today. === seb128_ is now known as seb128 [20:47] Laney: forgetting failed tests> yes, cjwatson mentioned something about that today [20:48] right, jibel said already [20:48] slangasek: yeah, jibel just confirmed [20:48] :-)