| === james_ is now known as Guest6142 | ||
| === hggdh_ is now known as hggdh | ||
| micahg | if an AA has a minute, Bug #1187435 is blocking abiword from migrating to the release pocket | 05:06 |
|---|---|---|
| ubot2` | Launchpad bug 1187435 in sugar-write-activity-0.86 (Ubuntu) "Please remove pyabiword" [Wishlist,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1187435 | 05:06 |
| tjaalton | is there a way to push an update to -updates quicker than letting it linger on -proposed for one week? | 06:54 |
| RAOF | tjaalton: Yeah, you can prod SRU people to release it sooner if you can justify (a) why it's safe and (b) why it's urgent. | 06:56 |
| tjaalton | it's bug 1197316 | 06:56 |
| ubot2` | Launchpad bug 1197316 in mesa (Ubuntu Raring) "GPU hang with Haswell GT3" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1197316 | 06:56 |
| tjaalton | kinda urgent now that the new pci-id additions got through :) | 06:57 |
| tjaalton | also, an IHV wants it yesterday.. | 06:57 |
| tjaalton | the quantal ones are urgent, raring bumps the version too | 06:58 |
| tjaalton | so that can bake in until the piglit tests are done | 06:58 |
| RAOF | I wish that people would actually comment when they set "verification-done" | 06:59 |
| tjaalton | acelan did | 07:00 |
| tjaalton | I added a new tag for raring | 07:00 |
| RAOF | No, he just set "verification-done-quantal" without making any comment. | 07:00 |
| tjaalton | refresh | 07:00 |
| RAOF | At least as far as I can tel. | 07:00 |
| RAOF | :) | 07:00 |
| tjaalton | maybe should've tagged precise though, that's my bad | 07:00 |
| RAOF | Yay! | 07:00 |
| tjaalton | or, the tagging doesn't actually work with all these combos :) | 07:01 |
| tjaalton | but it's essentially the same package, even though not run on quantal | 07:01 |
| RAOF | Ok, those changes seem sensible enough. How much testing has that package got so far? | 07:04 |
| infinity | s/package/package set/ as I assume it also need the new xvideo-intel? | 07:05 |
| tjaalton | not this bug | 07:05 |
| tjaalton | infinity: ^ | 07:05 |
| infinity | But, the other bug? | 07:05 |
| tjaalton | it's two bugs, this one was "caused" by updates for bug 1175533 | 07:06 |
| ubot2` | Launchpad bug 1175533 in linux (Ubuntu Quantal) "[HSW] intel VGA driver i915 doesn't support new haswell graphics [8086:0a2e] " [Critical,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1175533 | 07:06 |
| RAOF | s/caused/exposed by/ | 07:06 |
| tjaalton | right, 9.0.3 needed these backports | 07:06 |
| infinity | Okay, but no one's re-verified that bug with the new packages. | 07:06 |
| tjaalton | and 9.1.4 for raring includes both the new pci-id's and the GT3 enablement work | 07:06 |
| tjaalton | the quantal backports have been verified | 07:07 |
| tjaalton | by hwe | 07:07 |
| infinity | I like the theory, but I see no evidence of that on the bug log. | 07:07 |
| infinity | Not since the new packages were accepted last night by me. | 07:07 |
| tjaalton | well you accepted -intel yesterday, so it's only mesa now that needs an update on quantal :) | 07:07 |
| infinity | "I verified this once, then things got changed again" doesn't quite qualify. | 07:07 |
| tjaalton | and mesa-lts-quantal | 07:07 |
| infinity | Especially when update A caused regression B. | 07:08 |
| tjaalton | it wouldn't work without the new intel | 07:08 |
| infinity | I kinda want to see it all well-tested again in the current state, not something hand-wavy. | 07:08 |
| tjaalton | these were tested with -proposed | 07:08 |
| infinity | They were tested BEFORE they built. | 07:08 |
| infinity | ie: with the previous versions. | 07:09 |
| tjaalton | how so? | 07:09 |
| infinity | The last action on 1175533 is on June 27th. | 07:09 |
| infinity | Then I accepted a new mesa. | 07:09 |
| tjaalton | oh you mean that | 07:09 |
| tjaalton | hmm so the -intel was binary new for proposed | 07:10 |
| tjaalton | http://paste.ubuntu.com/5842611/ | 07:10 |
| tjaalton | this is what he had installed | 07:10 |
| tjaalton | plus kernel -36 | 07:10 |
| infinity | And the binary new Intel stuff too, yeah. I only accepted that yesterday. | 07:10 |
| tjaalton | oh libdrm needs a shove too | 07:10 |
| infinity | So, it can't have been tested before. | 07:10 |
| tjaalton | so it's easy, accept them all together :) | 07:11 |
| infinity | I can do that, I just want to make sure all the bugs addressed have all had some solid verification with current versions. | 07:11 |
| infinity | And that there's been at least some attempt at regression testing on perhaps more than one specific HWE platform. | 07:12 |
| tjaalton | I can ask acelan to update 1175533 too | 07:12 |
| infinity | (I'd like to think both these things are true, but I see little evidence of either) | 07:12 |
| tjaalton | and I can test them on another haswell | 07:12 |
| tjaalton | non-gt3 | 07:13 |
| infinity | Kay. Please do. | 07:13 |
| infinity | And get me a complete package list that needs to go in on both precise and quantal in one shot. | 07:14 |
| infinity | And make sure all the referenced bugs appear to have been addressed in some fashion. | 07:14 |
| infinity | And I'll happily promote the lot early. | 07:14 |
| tjaalton | sure, thanks! | 07:14 |
| tjaalton | well the kernel probably will have it's own schedule but should happen later this week anyway | 07:15 |
| RAOF | tjaalton: That code doesn't only hit haswell, though? infinity might be happier if sandybridge and ivybridge get some regression-testing, too? | 07:15 |
| infinity | tjaalton: And please do the matching raring bits ASAP too, since I'm about to switch the precise dailies to the raring stack. :P | 07:15 |
| tjaalton | RAOF: right, I'll boot my laptop with 12.04.. | 07:15 |
| tjaalton | sandybridge | 07:15 |
| infinity | tjaalton: Kernel's just waiting on Cert, everything else is done, so they may be released by me tomorrow. You could try to light a fire there and ask what's up. | 07:15 |
| tjaalton | infinity: yeah, I'll get that done today | 07:16 |
| tjaalton | infinity: we asked bjf and nothing should be blocking it afaik | 07:16 |
| infinity | tjaalton: Like I said, they're blocked on Cert testing. | 07:17 |
| infinity | (Which has nothing to do with bjf) | 07:17 |
| tjaalton | hmm | 07:17 |
| tjaalton | ok I'll ask someone from cert then :) | 07:17 |
| infinity | tjaalton: spineau is the one who appears to have taken the tasks. | 07:17 |
| brendand | tjaalton, we aim to get the bugs updated by thursday of the testing week | 07:17 |
| infinity | tjaalton: See http://people.canonical.com/~kernel/reports/kernel-sru-workflow.html | 07:18 |
| brendand | tjaalton, that's today | 07:18 |
| infinity | brendand: Ahh, you're listening in. Hi. :) | 07:18 |
| brendand | infinity, just dropping some eaves | 07:18 |
| infinity | brendand: If they get updated during EUR work hours, I can promote during my NA day, which would make me happy. | 07:18 |
| brendand | infinity, actually i'm not marshalling that testing this week, but the person who is is in France, so yes it should happen by end of Europe day | 07:19 |
| tjaalton | oh ok cool | 07:19 |
| infinity | brendand: Yeah, I noticed it was spineau. Though, he hasn't claimed all the kernels, just some of them (according to the bugs, anyway). | 07:19 |
| infinity | brendand: If you want to look into if some of them got "lost", that would be nice. :) | 07:20 |
| infinity | brendand: Looks like they're all in progress except for linux/raring. | 07:20 |
| infinity | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1191955 | 07:21 |
| ubot2` | Ubuntu bug 1191955 in Kernel SRU Workflow "linux: 3.8.0-26.38 -proposed tracker" [Medium,In progress] | 07:21 |
| tjaalton | infinity: if you want to switch stacks, you probably want to accept the lts-raring backports as well then, aiui those have been in proposed for a loong time now, 36 days in fact | 07:21 |
| brendand | infinity, we did start testing that - it looks almost finished | 07:21 |
| infinity | tjaalton: I'll be building the dailies from -proposed initially anyway, but yeah, that's the ultimate plan, obviously. | 07:22 |
| brendand | infinity, if you're interested, bookmark this: http://people.canonical.com/~hwcert/sru-testing/current/ | 07:22 |
| infinity | I might have to add a link to that on the bottom of sru-workflow, so I don't lose it. | 07:23 |
| infinity | brendand: And thanks. I'll check the state of the world in the morning and hope for a pleasant surprise. :) | 07:25 |
| infinity | tjaalton: So, that should handle the kernel side. Just get me whatever verification and regression testing I need for the mesa/X bits, and poke me for my morning. | 07:26 |
| tjaalton | infinity: ok, cool | 07:26 |
| infinity | tjaalton: /msg if you don't want me to lose it in a haze of morning pre-coffee madness. :) | 07:26 |
| tjaalton | it's what, 0:26AM there now? | 07:26 |
| infinity | 01:26 | 07:26 |
| tjaalton | alright | 07:27 |
| tjaalton | I'll get it done and ping, react when ready :) | 07:27 |
| jibel | cjwatson, I push r211 of adt-britney. collect now returns all the latest results, and should not forget previous status. Just in case, I added option -n to revert to the previous behavior and show only freshly collected results. | 07:37 |
| === ara_ is now known as ara | ||
| cjwatson | jibel: Great, thanks | 08:39 |
| Laney | Does britney consider Breaks for uninstallability? | 08:56 |
| seb128 | or asked different "if the new xorg-server Breaks: unity (<< to-be-uploaded)", will britney stop it to migrate to saucy while unity is not updated? | 08:58 |
| === Daviey_ is now known as Daviey | ||
| cjwatson | Laney,seb128: only if some package depends on both xorg-server and unity, or if unity depends on xorg-server | 10:44 |
| cjwatson | proposed-migration doesn't (and can't) require everything to be coinstallable | 10:44 |
| Laney | cjwatson: Yeah. I thought maybe it would see that the situation is worse (i.e. that they were coinstallable and now are not) and care about that. | 10:48 |
| cjwatson | Nope, that gets into NP-complete hell very quickly. | 10:49 |
| Laney | Right, and it might not necessarily be a problem | 10:49 |
| cjwatson | Indeed. | 10:49 |
| Laney | Do we have a fauxpkg (I think that's the right term) for ubuntu-desktop et al? | 10:50 |
| infinity | cjwatson: "some package" does depend on xorg-server and unity, it's called ubuntu-desktop. | 10:50 |
| Laney | wait, that's not even necessary | 10:50 |
| cjwatson | Then that ought to do it. | 10:50 |
| Laney | yeah | 10:50 |
| Laney | I thought they were recommends, but checked and they are not | 10:50 |
| cjwatson | (I'm sick. All you get from me today is the stuff most deeply embedded into my consciousness. Sadly that appears to include the fundamental workings of britney) | 10:51 |
| Laney | Yeah, a fauxpkg for the ubuntu-desktop /task/ was probably what I was thinking of | 10:53 |
| === chuck__ is now known as zul | ||
| cjwatson | jibel: Great, this is working (cf. xorg-server -> firefox). So now it's just the fix for virtual package handling, I think? | 14:36 |
| * cjwatson goes to announce this | 14:37 | |
| jibel | cjwatson, yes virtual packages and the retry command. | 14:38 |
| cjwatson | The first is workaroundable by forcing occasionally, so I won't block announcing on that | 14:40 |
| cjwatson | Sent to u-d-a | 14:40 |
| * cjwatson sticks a chdist-mainonly command in lillypilly:/home/ubuntu-archive/bin/ and removes the -mainonly chdist configs | 15:53 | |
| cjwatson | should speed up archive-reports | 15:53 |
| micahg | cjwatson: can you look at Bug #1187435 is blocking abiword from migrating to the release pocket | 16:23 |
| ubot2` | Launchpad bug 1187435 in sugar-write-activity-0.86 (Ubuntu) "Please remove pyabiword" [Wishlist,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1187435 | 16:23 |
| jbicha | please promote the activity-log-manager binary to main | 18:03 |
| infinity | jbicha: Done. | 18:09 |
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| === Trevinho_ is now known as Trevinho | ||
| === iulian_ is now known as iulian | ||
| === Termana is now known as Guest49333 | ||
| mlankhorst | !! | 20:52 |
| === RAOF_ is now known as RAOF | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!