| === Guest95146 is now known as mfisch | ||
| === mfisch is now known as Guest57100 | ||
| === duflu_ is now known as duflu | ||
| === jono is now known as Guest27980 | ||
| Saviq | mzanetti, I wonder if we should actually bump UNITY_API_MINOR in your branch... it's not like we're affected/affecting anything with the launcher api | 07:51 |
|---|---|---|
| mzanetti | Saviq: I don't mind tbh... Just did it because you asked for it | 07:51 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, no, not that | 07:52 |
| greyback | morning folks | 07:52 |
| mzanetti | hey greyback. good morning | 07:52 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, I meant here http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~unity-team/unity-api/trunk/view/head:/include/unity/shell/launcher/CMakeLists.txt | 07:52 |
| Saviq | hey greyback | 07:53 |
| greyback | mzanetti: Guten Morgen! I had a 1-on-1 German lesson yesterday. Aside from poor grammar, I'm not terrible! | 07:53 |
| mzanetti | Saviq: you mean that set(VERSION 2) ? | 07:53 |
| greyback | Saviq: eh oh | 07:53 |
| mzanetti | haha | 07:53 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, yup | 07:53 |
| Saviq | greyback, eh oh what? | 07:53 |
| mzanetti | Saviq: so what now? bump it or not? (I still don't mind at this stage of the project) | 07:54 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, yeah, bump the launcher-specific one, not UNITY_API_VERSION | 07:54 |
| mzanetti | ack | 07:54 |
| Saviq | s/VERSION/MINOR/ | 07:54 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, we're going for the app id in the LauncherModelInterface, btw? | 07:56 |
| greyback | Saviq: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1wyW7uaXV8E | 07:57 |
| Saviq | greyback, ah | 07:57 |
| Saviq | greyback, it was translated here into "hey-o" or similar | 07:58 |
| Saviq | and it's the most psychedelic thing EVER | 07:58 |
| greyback | :D | 07:59 |
| mzanetti | Saviq: yeah sure. | 07:59 |
| Saviq | all of Teletubbies look like the whole thing is a recording of someone's acid trip... | 07:59 |
| * mzanetti remembers how he had to spend 3 months in a room with like 200 teletubbies | 08:05 | |
| Saviq | mzanetti, that explains things... | 08:05 |
| * mzanetti starts crying | 08:05 | |
| * greyback hands mzanetti some acid, thinks it might help | 08:10 | |
| mzanetti | :D | 08:13 |
| Mirv | does someone know the Qt bug Florian referred to me? https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-30246 "QML Text Component ignores alpha component of color property" | 08:19 |
| Mirv | could you test a build with two patches for it with apt-add-repository ppa:canonical-qt5-edgers/qt5-beta2 on device? | 08:19 |
| Mirv | Kaleo_: I'm trying to find someone to test those patches, now built successfully ^ | 08:21 |
| Mirv | but someone more likely awake around now :) | 08:21 |
| Saviq | Mirv, I'll try it out in 10, ok? | 08:23 |
| Mirv | Saviq: excellent, thanks | 08:24 |
| Mirv | filed a bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qtdeclarative-opensource-src/+bug/1198830 for it | 08:24 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1198830 in qtdeclarative-opensource-src (Ubuntu) "QML Text Component ignores alpha component of color property " [Undecided,New] | 08:24 |
| Mirv | I'm not seeing anything wrong on my device with that updated, but would like to have another confirmation. preferrably by someone who knows where the bug would be seen fixed. | 08:25 |
| dpm | morning Saviq. We've got a bug in the calculator app that is caused by the shell killing the process on exit without notification. I'm not sure what the best project to add a bug task for might be. Do you have any suggestions? It's bug 1188292 | 08:31 |
| ubot5 | bug 1188292 in Ubuntu Calculator App "Saved calculations are lost when the app is closed" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1188292 | 08:31 |
| Saviq | dpm, it's something the app lifecycle will handle - apps will be given some grace period to save their data / serialize their state | 08:32 |
| Saviq | dpm, after that they're stopped and the process is not guaranteed to be started again | 08:32 |
| dpm | Saviq, gotcha. Do you know where the bugs for app lifecycle are tracked? Is it platform-api? | 08:34 |
| Saviq | dpm, I don't think there's any place yet, as the whole thing isn't built yet | 08:34 |
| Saviq | greyback, any ideas ↑ | 08:34 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, here's a breakdown of a qmluitests run http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/5854765/ | 08:35 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, so it's 16 mins to build, 3 mins to test | 08:36 |
| mzanetti | Saviq: yeah... | 08:36 |
| mzanetti | Saviq: there are lots of things that could be tweaked. but it takes time I don't really have right now to do such stuff | 08:37 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, I'm not trying to drop this work on oyu | 08:38 |
| greyback | dpm: please log in "qtubuntu" package for now | 08:39 |
| Saviq | veebers, you'll be interested, too ↑↑ (pastebin) | 08:41 |
| Saviq | veebers, it's a breakdown of a unity-phablet-qmluitests-saucy job | 08:42 |
| Saviq | veebers, which suggest we're wasting time building over and over again | 08:42 |
| Saviq | IMO we should only build once per CI run / arch | 08:43 |
| Saviq | now we're building 2 times in -ci, once in mediumtests-builder, once in qmluitests, and for qmluitests we're even building in VM, which takes 16 minutes instead of 6 (unity8-saucy-i386-ci) | 08:46 |
| * greyback kills unity-panel-service again to stop it using a whole cpu core | 08:51 | |
| didrocks | greyback: do you have indicator-network or indicator-clients installed? | 08:58 |
| Saviq | didrocks, indicators-client is a runtime dep of unity8, so yeah, probably | 08:59 |
| didrocks | Saviq: i wonder if it doesn't try to communicate with u-p-s and maybe there is a mismatch | 09:00 |
| Saviq | Mirv, +1 | 09:02 |
| === zequence_ is now known as zequence | ||
| greyback | didrocks: network. | 09:04 |
| greyback | didrocks: that the culprit? | 09:04 |
| greyback | by which I mean indicators-client-plugin-network | 09:04 |
| didrocks | greyback: try removing it and restarts, it thowed u-p-s crazy and that's why I remove it from daily release a month and half ago | 09:04 |
| didrocks | not sure if it was fixed | 09:04 |
| dpm | thanks Saviq, greyback, added a task for qtubuntu for that bug ^ | 09:05 |
| greyback | didrocks: thanks for the tip! | 09:05 |
| greyback | dpm: thank you | 09:05 |
| didrocks | greyback: please keep me posted | 09:05 |
| Mirv | Saviq: thanks | 09:05 |
| dednick | mzanetti: do you know what autopilot does with the console output when it's running? | 09:12 |
| mzanetti | dednick: it should print it at the beginning of the results output | 09:12 |
| dednick | mzanetti: only error's, or all output? | 09:14 |
| mzanetti | dednick: all output | 09:14 |
| mzanetti | dednick: doesn't work? | 09:14 |
| dednick | mzanetti: hm. not getting anything | 09:14 |
| dednick | https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/generic-mediumtests-runner-saucy/711/testReport/indicators_client.tests.test_power/TestDisplayMenus/test_auto_bright_switch_with_mouse_/ | 09:14 |
| dednick | mzanetti: ^ | 09:14 |
| mzanetti | dednick: hmm... process-stdout: empty attachment | 09:15 |
| mzanetti | dednick: strange... should be in there... | 09:15 |
| dednick | mzanetti: i've never really figured out how to capture qt output though | 09:15 |
| mzanetti | dednick: also, the "Loading testability driver" which you can see in the process-stderr is actually a qDebug() | 09:15 |
| dednick | mzanetti: it doesnt seem to go to stdout | 09:16 |
| mhr3 | didrocks, did the rebuild work on friday? | 09:25 |
| didrocks | mhr3: no, we still had issues, but discovered it was some regressions due to other components in proposed | 09:26 |
| mhr3 | didrocks, which components? | 09:26 |
| didrocks | mhr3: so, it has been rerun without those | 09:26 |
| didrocks | mhr3: was quite late, didn't do the dpkg diff, but we can do those now :) | 09:26 |
| mhr3 | didrocks, i'm just wondering if one of those components was something dbus-y | 09:27 |
| didrocks | mhr3: http://10.97.0.1:8080/job/autopilot-saucy-daily_release/345/, with all updates | 09:29 |
| didrocks | mhr3: http://10.97.0.1:8080/job/autopilot-saucy-daily_release/347/ with only the stack + xorg | 09:29 |
| didrocks | mhr3: and the diff: http://paste.ubuntu.com/5854882/ | 09:30 |
| mhr3 | ETOOMANY, we really need nice way to get some general dbus stats on AP runs | 09:32 |
| didrocks | mhr3: the thing we can be sure of is that we need to find where the regression comes from, or we'll stuck now for unity | 09:32 |
| mhr3 | didrocks, indeed | 09:32 |
| didrocks | at least, we are lucky to get such a diff to know that something here makes everything screwing :p | 09:33 |
| didrocks | mhr3: but TBH, apart from the new udev from systemd… | 09:36 |
| didrocks | the only diff with patch refresh is this Add 0000-upstream-keymaps.patch: Backport latest keymap fixes from | 09:36 |
| didrocks | upstream, as we won't be able to update to newer upstream releases anytime | 09:36 |
| didrocks | soon | 09:36 |
| mhr3 | didrocks, hmm, yea seems to be most likely | 09:38 |
| mhr3 | i mean udev | 09:39 |
| didrocks | yep, as soon as we'll have anything merged into unity, we'll get the confirmation, but I'm a little bit afraid that will be the next issue | 09:40 |
| mhr3 | could be an interaction of udev + something and that something might get fixed :) | 09:41 |
| mhr3 | so called wishful thinking development :P | 09:41 |
| didrocks | mhr3: the diff from earlier in the morning on Friday shows the same: http://paste.ubuntu.com/5854902/ | 09:42 |
| mhr3 | theoretically could be apparmor too if it decided to disallow dbus traffic by default :) | 09:43 |
| * greyback bbiab | 09:45 | |
| didrocks | mhr3: from the changelog, it's only related to sdk + apache transition | 09:47 |
| mhr3 | mzanetti, could you look at https://code.launchpad.net/~mhr3/unity8/use-dee-filtermodel/+merge/171846/comments/387814 | 09:51 |
| mzanetti | mhr3: done | 09:54 |
| mhr3 | mzanetti, thx | 09:56 |
| mhr3 | Saviq, top ack on https://code.launchpad.net/~mhr3/unity8/use-dee-filtermodel/+merge/171846 pls? | 09:56 |
| Cimi | Saviq, so the meeting I supposed to have last friday moved today at 3 | 10:04 |
| Cimi | Saviq, I had a look at unity, so far I think we should make | 10:05 |
| Cimi | tile, ratingstarts, dash bar, panelseparatorline, maybe notifications | 10:05 |
| Cimi | a little bit themeable | 10:05 |
| Cimi | maybe panel | 10:05 |
| Cimi | Saviq, there's also to say that we might want to move ratingstars into the sdk | 10:05 |
| Cimi | and some js utils files | 10:06 |
| Saviq | Cimi, yeah, stars should probably have light & dark mode, so yeah, SDK and theming makes sense here | 10:20 |
| Saviq | mhr3, done | 10:20 |
| dednick | Saviq: ping | 10:44 |
| Saviq | dednick, pong | 10:44 |
| tsdgeos | Saviq: greyback: i'm going to use http://paste.kde.org/~tsdgeos/791234/ to highlight the need of being able to tell a gridview the parts of it that are exposed and thus should care about it's delegate creation, what you think? | 10:44 |
| dednick | Saviq: hi. apparently some of the new indicator file formats are in already, and it's causing conflicts with indicators-client because it's expecting a "phone" profile. But the new indicators dont have that yet. | 10:45 |
| dednick | Saviq: i think this is the problem with the AP tests | 10:45 |
| Saviq | tsdgeos, yeah, looks good | 10:46 |
| dednick | Saviq: i think the test system may be installing both indicator-power and indicator-battery | 10:46 |
| greyback | tsdgeos: +1 from me | 10:47 |
| Cimi | mzanetti, did you have time to look at the calendar? | 10:49 |
| Saviq | dednick, having a look | 10:49 |
| dednick | Saviq: how does one actually have a look at the test env? | 10:50 |
| Saviq | dednick, doesn't look like it https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/generic-mediumtests-runner-saucy/711/console | 10:50 |
| Saviq | dednick, I just go through that log and see what it installs | 10:50 |
| dednick | Saviq: what about the default installed packages? | 10:51 |
| mzanetti | Cimi: did you update the merge proposal? | 10:51 |
| Saviq | dednick, there shouldn't be any | 10:51 |
| Cimi | mzanetti, y | 10:51 |
| Saviq | dednick, it should be a minimal installation | 10:51 |
| mzanetti | Cimi: so no, I didn't yet. but I have time now | 10:51 |
| Saviq | dednick, if you want a look, mzanetti can get you to ssh in | 10:51 |
| dednick | Saviq: i see. in which case indicator-battery isn't being installed anyway | 10:52 |
| dednick | Saviq: do i need to add that to the recommended packages for unity8? | 10:52 |
| Saviq | dednick, yeah, no of them are installed - if they should be, we should Recommend them | 10:52 |
| mzanetti | Saviq: https://code.launchpad.net/~mzanetti/unity-api/launcher-api-pinning/+merge/173064/comments/387864 | 10:52 |
| Saviq | dednick, or for unity8-autopilot | 10:52 |
| mzanetti | Saviq: and this is updated accordingly too: https://code.launchpad.net/~unity-team/unity8/launcher-backend/+merge/173189 | 10:52 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, k, will look | 10:52 |
| mzanetti | dednick: let me know if you need some support with jenkins | 10:53 |
| mzanetti | Cimi: looking at it now | 10:53 |
| Saviq | dednick, but yeah, probably makes sense to add them to Recommends for unity8 | 10:53 |
| Saviq | dednick, instead of indicators-client and the plugins | 10:53 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, shouldn't ::pin(appid) be ::pin(appid, index) already? maybe with a default of -1 in case it's not passed? | 11:04 |
| mzanetti | Saviq: hmm... ok. /me changes... | 11:05 |
| mzanetti | give me a sec | 11:05 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, k | 11:05 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, "Request removal an item from the model." +of | 11:05 |
| === MacSlow is now known as MacSlow|lunch | ||
| Saviq | mzanetti, I wonder if "applicationId" would be better, too... but not really sold - we're talking "apps" everywhere anyway | 11:07 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, also, triggerQuickListAction - would triggerAction be enough do you think? | 11:17 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, also, I think we used "invokeAction" in Notifications | 11:17 |
| * Saviq looks | 11:17 | |
| Saviq | mzanetti, we have NotificationInterface::actionInvoked(QString id) | 11:19 |
| mzanetti | Saviq: yeah. the difference is that each Notification has a actionInvoked() slot while in the launcher there's only one for all. So I kinda prefer more descriptive names | 11:20 |
| mzanetti | I can change it to quickListActionInvoked() tho | 11:20 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, yeah, let's keep them as consistent as possible | 11:21 |
| mzanetti | ack | 11:21 |
| mzanetti | Saviq: both pushed | 11:30 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, cheers | 11:30 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, any idea about http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/5855131/ ? | 11:33 |
| mzanetti | Saviq: apt-get install autopilot-touch | 11:33 |
| mzanetti | Saviq: don't ask me why that is not integrated or a dependency or a recommends... | 11:34 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, same thing, autopilot-desktop was installed | 11:34 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, installed autopilot-touch, same, removed -desktop, same | 11:34 |
| mzanetti | Saviq: you need both for unity8 I think | 11:35 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, still, same | 11:35 |
| mzanetti | anyways... if that doesn't fix it... let me think | 11:35 |
| mzanetti | Saviq: hmm. it really looks like he can't create the touch input stuff | 11:36 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, I'm doing a minimal VM for autopilot, maybe I'm missing python-evdev or something | 11:37 |
| mzanetti | Saviq: python-evdev should be a dependency of autopilot-touch I think | 11:37 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, yeah, it's there | 11:37 |
| mzanetti | Cimi: fails to start because of ItemStyle.class assignments | 11:41 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, you need to update launcher-backend for the new interface | 11:45 |
| mzanetti | Saviq: on it | 11:45 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, k | 11:45 |
| mzanetti | Saviq: wait... | 11:45 |
| mzanetti | Saviq: launcher-backend? | 11:45 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, https://code.launchpad.net/~unity-team/unity8/launcher-backend/+merge/173189 | 11:45 |
| mzanetti | Saviq: ah... the branch | 11:45 |
| mzanetti | Saviq: I thought you mean the real backend | 11:45 |
| mzanetti | Saviq: but yeah, I'm on it right now | 11:46 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, k | 11:46 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, while you're at it: | 11:46 |
| Saviq | 78+ unity8-private | unity8-launcher-impl, | 11:46 |
| Saviq | 79+ unity8-launcher-impl-0.2, | 11:46 |
| Saviq | 87+Provides: unity-launcher-impl, | 11:46 |
| Saviq | 88+ unity-launcher-impl-0.2 | 11:46 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, this needs to be the same (unity-launcher-impl) | 11:46 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, and the -0.2 part needs to equal the VERSION you set in the branch for unity-api | 11:47 |
| mzanetti | Saviq: I'm not entirely sure what this should do | 11:53 |
| mzanetti | Saviq: can you explain please? | 11:54 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, unity-launcher-impl-2 == this package provides the implementation of the Launcher API version 2 | 11:54 |
| Saviq | the Launcher API version is defined in unity-shell-launcher.pc (we'll automate extracting it later) | 11:54 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, Depends: unity8-private | unity-launcher-impl, unity-launcher-impl-2 means: | 11:55 |
| Saviq | we depend on *an* implementation of the Launcher API version 2, of which the default implementation is in unity8-private now | 11:55 |
| mzanetti | Saviq: hmm.. I would read it as "depend on unity8-private or unity-launcher-impl AND unity-launcher-impl-2 | 11:56 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, yeah, that's the same, really | 11:57 |
| mzanetti | Saviq: why not just unity-launcher-impl-2? | 11:57 |
| mzanetti | Saviq: if unity8-private provides that, that one will be selected | 11:57 |
| Saviq | didrocks, why was that ↑? | 11:57 |
| Saviq | didrocks, it's some dpkg trickery | 11:57 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, ↑ | 11:57 |
| === hikiko is now known as hikiko|lunch | ||
| didrocks | let me backlog to get the context :) | 11:59 |
| mzanetti | didrocks: the question is just why to use "unity8-private | unity-launcher-impl, unity-launcher-impl-2" instead of just "unity-launcher-impl2" | 12:00 |
| === alan_g is now known as alan_g|lunch | ||
| mzanetti | didrocks: given that unity8-private provides unity-launcher-impl-2 | 12:00 |
| didrocks | mzanetti: to ensure we are getting the right version of the API installed | 12:01 |
| didrocks | so that you can't update unity8-private for instance | 12:01 |
| didrocks | (implementing a new version of the API) | 12:01 |
| didrocks | without the package that adapats on this new API | 12:01 |
| didrocks | otherwise, you would be able to update unity8-private for instance | 12:01 |
| Kaleo_ | Mirv: thanks, did you find somebody? | 12:02 |
| didrocks | without the shell which is compatible with the new "api 2" of unity-private | 12:02 |
| mzanetti | didrocks: hmm.. ok... still seems a bit weird but I gess its just how it works | 12:03 |
| mzanetti | Saviq: updated all branchtes btw | 12:03 |
| Saviq | didrocks, you wouldn't be able to upgrade unity8-private, if it only provided unity-launcher-impl-3 | 12:04 |
| didrocks | mzanetti: it's just a question of enforcing the right dep :) | 12:04 |
| Saviq | didrocks, and unity8 depended on unity-launcher-impl-2 | 12:04 |
| didrocks | Saviq: right, hence the ", unity-launcher-impl-2" | 12:04 |
| Saviq | didrocks, I think the question is why do we need "unity-launcher-impl" | 12:04 |
| didrocks | ah | 12:04 |
| mzanetti | yeah | 12:04 |
| didrocks | IIRC, you told that this launcher implementation can be implemented by another component, right? | 12:05 |
| didrocks | than unity8-private | 12:05 |
| mzanetti | didrocks: could be in the future, yes | 12:05 |
| Saviq | didrocks, yes | 12:05 |
| didrocks | so you need to be able to either install unity8-private | 12:05 |
| didrocks | or this alternative implementation | 12:05 |
| Saviq | didrocks, yeah, but why not "unity8-private | unity-launcher-impl-2" directly? | 12:05 |
| * mzanetti still doesn't see why just "unity-launcher-impl-2" wouldn't be enough... | 12:06 | |
| Saviq | didrocks, the other component is still required to Provide: unity-launcher-impl-$VERSION | 12:06 |
| didrocks | Saviq: otherwise, you loose the "force having the same implementation version" | 12:06 |
| didrocks | that we just discussed | 12:06 |
| didrocks | so, let's say you update unity8-private to unity-launcher-impl-3 | 12:06 |
| didrocks | then, we release that | 12:06 |
| didrocks | I just apt-get update and apt-get install unity8-private | 12:06 |
| didrocks | "unity8-private | unity-launcher-impl-2" is matched then | 12:07 |
| Saviq | didrocks, right! | 12:07 |
| didrocks | and I'm screwed as I have and unity-launcher-impl-3 implementation for unity8-private | 12:07 |
| mzanetti | yeah.... so why use unity8-private all | 12:07 |
| didrocks | and a unity-launcher-impl-2 for unity8 | 12:07 |
| mzanetti | at all | 12:07 |
| didrocks | mzanetti: you still need to "hint" you want to install one | 12:07 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, it can't only be a virtual one, right, didrocks? | 12:07 |
| didrocks | virtual packages are not installed | 12:07 |
| didrocks | Saviq: yep :) | 12:08 |
| Saviq | that | 12:08 |
| mzanetti | ahhh... ok... that was the missing link | 12:08 |
| mzanetti | ok. everything clear now | 12:08 |
| didrocks | mzanetti: you can't install a virtual package, which one to pick if multiples of them? :) | 12:08 |
| Saviq | didrocks, thanks | 12:08 |
| didrocks | yw! | 12:08 |
| Saviq | didrocks, random ;) | 12:08 |
| didrocks | we all know it always work! ;) | 12:08 |
| mzanetti | didrocks: I would have assumed that all providers of unity-launcher-impl-2 would show up and update-alternatives or the like would ask me which one I want | 12:09 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, update-alternatives is unrelated :) | 12:09 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, since you can't have two of unity-launcher-impl-2 installed at the same time | 12:09 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, as they conflict | 12:09 |
| mzanetti | like for example phonon backends | 12:10 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, and yeah, that would happen | 12:10 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, but then you couldn't just go "apt-get install unity8" | 12:10 |
| mzanetti | Saviq: right | 12:10 |
| didrocks | mzanetti: doesn't work well when you try to spin an iso :) | 12:10 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, 'cause you'd have to go "apt-get install unity8 unity8-launcher-implementation unity8-notifications-implementation ..." | 12:11 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, the idea is that we have the default impl | 12:11 |
| mzanetti | ok... I start to understand reasonings behind those things | 12:11 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, but the seed can override | 12:11 |
| Saviq | and we Depend: default | some_other, version_x | 12:12 |
| Mirv | Kaleo_: yes, saviq tested it, I now proposed those for upload together with the other merge I mentioned | 12:13 |
| Kaleo_ | Mirv: great | 12:15 |
| Kaleo_ | Mirv: do you know how long it takes from now to having it in the ouch image? | 12:16 |
| Kaleo_ | +t | 12:16 |
| didrocks | Saviq: exactly, the default is always the first one that apt will pick if we don't have one already seeded/installed | 12:17 |
| Mirv | Kaleo_: seb128 promised to upload it already earlier, so I believe we can ping him also now on this updated proposal https://code.launchpad.net/~timo-jyrinki/ubuntu/saucy/qtdeclarative-opensource-src/merge_continued/+merge/173448 | 12:19 |
| Mirv | Kaleo_: it'd be in tomorrow's builds with luck then | 12:20 |
| Cimi | mzanetti, comment it | 12:22 |
| mzanetti | Cimi: yeah. I removed it from 5 places or so until it starts up | 12:22 |
| Cimi | mzanetti, it's weird cause I remember to comment everything here locally... | 12:22 |
| seb128 | Mirv, yeah, it's on my todo but I got busy, I wouldn't say no if didrocks or the day patch pilot would handle it ... will try to have a look today otherwise | 12:22 |
| mzanetti | Cimi: but then the calendar just says white | 12:22 |
| didrocks | same, I'll try to get to it if I get a chance | 12:23 |
| mzanetti | Cimi: oh... I had trunk for some reason... works with your branch | 12:23 |
| Kaleo_ | Mirv: great | 12:23 |
| Cimi | mzanetti, ah ok :) | 12:23 |
| Mirv | yeah, I'd have qtbase and now qtpim uploads tested and ready as well, but I'll wait until someone gets to that qtdeclarative first :) | 12:29 |
| === MacSlow|lunch is now known as MacSlow | ||
| === hikiko|lunch is now known as hikiko | ||
| === _salem is now known as salem_ | ||
| Saviq | tvoss, TheMuso, I only just noticed the invite, won't be able to be there before 15 mins | 12:58 |
| tvoss | Saviq, ack :) themuso, you about? | 12:58 |
| === alan_g|lunch is now known as alan_g | ||
| === cking_ is now known as cking | ||
| tvoss | mterry, ping | 13:13 |
| mterry | tvoss, i just guessed on a time for you | 13:13 |
| mterry | tvoss, should have thought of pinging you first ;) | 13:13 |
| tvoss | mterry, the time is okay-ish, but: a day ahead would help me :) Can we move the meeting to Tuesday? | 13:14 |
| mterry | tvoss, sure | 13:14 |
| tvoss | mterry, thx :) | 13:16 |
| tvoss | Saviq, TheMuso does not seem to be around, will reschedule the meeting | 13:16 |
| === jhodapp|afk is now known as jhodapp | ||
| Saviq | guys, I gotta skip standup, got a guy coming to fix my cool | 13:23 |
| paulliu | mhr3: I found that there's no resulttype in your branch? How do I get that value? | 13:30 |
| paulliu | mhr3: should I add that by myself in categoryresults.cpp? | 13:33 |
| mzanetti | dednick: standup | 13:33 |
| mzanetti | Saviq: will you join? | 13:33 |
| greyback | Cimi: standup? | 13:34 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, <Saviq> guys, I gotta skip standup, got a guy coming to fix my cool | 13:34 |
| mzanetti | nic-doffay: standup | 13:34 |
| greyback | nic-doffay: standup? | 13:34 |
| Saviq | greyback, nic's out | 13:34 |
| greyback | Saviq: ta | 13:34 |
| greyback | kgunn: any link to XMir debug doc? | 13:38 |
| Saviq | dednick, conflict on indicators-client branch | 13:45 |
| kgunn | greyback: https://code.launchpad.net/~kgunn72/mir/add_xmir_debug_guide/+merge/173260 | 13:46 |
| greyback | kgunn: thanks | 13:46 |
| kgunn | greyback: only a start....if you have something to add...feel free :) | 13:46 |
| dednick | Saviq: ta | 13:48 |
| mhr3 | paulliu, hardcode it to 0, there's no need for dash nor scopes to know | 13:53 |
| greyback | kgunn: noticed a few typos, hope you don't mind | 13:55 |
| * greyback really needs to eat something today | 13:55 | |
| kgunn | greyback: aboslutely...let me have it | 13:56 |
| greyback | kgunn: added as MR comment. | 13:56 |
| kgunn | greyback: great...go eat | 13:56 |
| * greyback eating | 13:57 | |
| === Guest57100 is now known as mfisch | ||
| tvoss | Saviq, ping | 14:00 |
| === mfisch is now known as Guest86601 | ||
| Saviq | tvoss, pong | 14:42 |
| * Saviq has a new mobo and heatsink... still hot as hell... | 14:42 | |
| tsdgeos | Saviq: get some AC ¿ :D | 14:52 |
| Saviq | :P | 14:52 |
| Saviq | dednick, http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~unity-team/unity8/indicators-client/revision/101 should be a separate MR against trunk | 15:05 |
| dednick | Saviq: yeah. i thought it probably should. i'll revert it | 15:06 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, yeah, leave it in | 15:30 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, just noticed you took it off the MR, last response from me just went out | 15:31 |
| mzanetti | Saviq: no, not on purpose... just clicked "reply" instead of "reply all" | 15:31 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, k | 15:31 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, you're actually *clicking*? ;) | 15:31 |
| mzanetti | haha | 15:31 |
| mzanetti | yes, sometimes I do | 15:31 |
| mzanetti | :D | 15:31 |
| Saviq | my left hand is just used to Ctrl+Shift+r already | 15:32 |
| mzanetti | hmm... its actually even easier in kmail... its just "a" | 15:33 |
| * mzanetti tries to remember | 15:33 | |
| nic-doffay | Saviq, re the scrolling container. Would it make sense to make this a separate SDK or something specific to the option selector? If it's the latter I can just move it out... | 15:38 |
| nic-doffay | *separate SDK component. | 15:39 |
| Saviq | nic-doffay, it shouldn't be specific for the option selector, it should be generic for any component inheriting the Expandable | 15:41 |
| Saviq | nic-doffay, which right now in the SDK would only be the Option Selector | 15:41 |
| Saviq | nic-doffay, but the messaging entries in the indicators would be another | 15:41 |
| nic-doffay | Saviq, cool, I'll chat further to the sdk guys about the specifics. | 15:41 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, don't we need something like "type" role in QuickListModelInterface? | 15:50 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, like for the separator at least | 15:50 |
| mzanetti | Saviq: afaik we won't have such things in the first iteration. Thats because I removed all those properties again | 15:51 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, not even separators? please make sure that's the case | 15:51 |
| mzanetti | Saviq: however, my proposal had a groupId | 15:52 |
| Saviq | dednick, https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/generic-mediumtests-runner-saucy/726/? same error again | 15:52 |
| mzanetti | Saviq: I think that could paint separators between different groups | 15:52 |
| Saviq | dednick, it did install indicator-battery this time | 15:52 |
| pstolowski | bschaefer: morning! | 15:53 |
| bschaefer | pstolowski, hello! | 15:53 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, I think that'd not be flexible enough | 15:53 |
| mzanetti | Saviq: yeah... probably right... just thought a bit more about it | 15:53 |
| mzanetti | Saviq: so yes, in the long run we'd need that | 15:53 |
| pstolowski | bschaefer: thanks for another look at my MP! can you top-approve today? | 15:54 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, and IIRC that's how it is now - you can just add a separator anywhere you like | 15:54 |
| bschaefer | pstolowski, yup! any changes? | 15:54 |
| * bschaefer digs up MP | 15:54 | |
| pstolowski | bschaefer: nope. https://code.launchpad.net/~stolowski/unity/no-click-preview-for-apps/+merge/172787 | 15:54 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, k, let's get to it when we need i | 15:54 |
| Saviq | t | 15:54 |
| bschaefer | pstolowski, awesome, approved :) | 15:54 |
| pstolowski | bschaefer: thanks! | 15:55 |
| bschaefer | np! | 15:55 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, is there fewer entries in the launcher now? | 15:56 |
| pstolowski | didrocks: hey, the most hated behavior about to be disabled, it's ready to land ^ :) | 15:57 |
| dednick | Saviq: hm. thats weird. succeeded earlier. | 15:57 |
| mzanetti | Saviq: hmm... shouldn't be | 15:57 |
| dednick | Saviq: maybe a instability rather than "not working" | 15:58 |
| Saviq | dednick, it didn't run the indicators_client suite | 15:58 |
| didrocks | pstolowski: \o/ | 15:58 |
| Saviq | dednick, we only enable that suite manually (with "Rebuild") now | 15:58 |
| dednick | Saviq: ah | 15:58 |
| didrocks | pstolowski: autopilot tests are compatible? | 15:58 |
| Saviq | dednick, as otherwise we'd just fail | 15:58 |
| mzanetti | Saviq: no, its the same as the released version | 15:58 |
| mzanetti | Saviq: the new animation makes it look a bit less indeed | 15:58 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, k, was tricked | 15:58 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, ah there is a new animation | 15:58 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, like the fact that the last and first two items fold ~together? | 15:59 |
| mzanetti | Saviq: no... I mean the one with the fading out icons... as opposed the stack I had in the first revision | 15:59 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, right | 15:59 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, is it on purpose then that the first and last two items fold almost together? | 15:59 |
| mzanetti | Saviq: yep | 16:00 |
| Saviq | feels inconsistent to me... | 16:00 |
| Saviq | but hey | 16:00 |
| mzanetti | :D | 16:00 |
| tsdgeos | meh, the range for delegate creation is harder than i expected | 16:01 |
| tsdgeos | dumb optimist me | 16:01 |
| Saviq | tsdgeos, :/ | 16:01 |
| tsdgeos | Saviq: it's not ultra hard | 16:02 |
| tsdgeos | but there's more parts of the code that expect that if nothing changed you don't need to care about culling/unculling the items | 16:02 |
| tsdgeos | and now i do | 16:02 |
| Saviq | tsdgeos, right | 16:02 |
| tsdgeos | i'm almost there | 16:02 |
| mzanetti | ultra hard :) | 16:02 |
| tsdgeos | but still need to fix a few small issues with my example qml code | 16:03 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, 178+ * Note: If an item is not contained in the launcher yet, calling this without an index | 16:04 |
| Saviq | 179+ * will fail to pin the item. | 16:04 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, should just pin at the end | 16:04 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, is what happens now | 16:04 |
| mzanetti | Saviq: ah ok...makes sense | 16:04 |
| * mzanetti fixes | 16:04 | |
| Saviq | mzanetti, 186+ * Note: In case the according application is running, it will only | 16:05 |
| Saviq | 187+ * disappear once the application is closed. In this case, this | 16:05 |
| Saviq | 188+ * operation just unpins the item. | 16:05 |
| dednick | Saviq: runs from installer on my box. no idea why it's failing | 16:05 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, that's too much, I'd say - it should really only say "it might be delayed for different reasons" | 16:05 |
| mzanetti | Saviq: fixing | 16:05 |
| Saviq | dednick, do you want access to a machine today to test, or tomorrow? | 16:06 |
| pstolowski | didrocks: I think so, but you know whom to attack if there are new failues.. ;) | 16:06 |
| dednick | Saviq: yeah, that would be usefull | 16:06 |
| didrocks | pstolowski: hehe, sure! | 16:06 |
| === tvoss is now known as tvoss|dinner | ||
| Saviq | dednick, you want to try and tackle it today? | 16:07 |
| dednick | Saviq: yeah | 16:07 |
| Saviq | fginther, could we have a jenkins machine unhooked for dednick to debug some autopilot issues? | 16:07 |
| fginther | Saviq, sure, i386 or amd64? | 16:08 |
| Saviq | dednick, ↑? | 16:08 |
| dednick | fginther: amd64 please | 16:08 |
| Saviq | dednick, fginther I'd suggest i386 :) | 16:08 |
| Saviq | dednick, as you can then get http://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/generic-mediumtests-builder-saucy/817/artifact/work/output/*zip*/output.zip | 16:08 |
| Saviq | dednick, and test on the packages the builder came up with | 16:09 |
| dednick | Saviq: ok. | 16:09 |
| Saviq | dednick, btw, if you look at https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/generic-mediumtests-runner-saucy/726/console | 16:09 |
| Saviq | dednick, the lines prefixed with + | 16:09 |
| Saviq | dednick, are usually the command lines run | 16:09 |
| fginther | dednick, ps-saucy-server-i386-3 is all yours | 16:09 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, what's the IP to naartije? naartjie? naartje? | 16:10 |
| Saviq | dednick, so if you follow those, you should be able to get to where jenkins fails | 16:10 |
| mzanetti | Saviq: .0.6 | 16:11 |
| Saviq | dednick, so you can ssh to ubuntu@10.97.0.6 | 16:12 |
| Saviq | dednick, and then from that ps-saucy-server-i386-3 should resolve | 16:12 |
| Saviq | fginther, it's down, though, is it? | 16:12 |
| Saviq | $ ssh ps-saucy-server-i386-3 | 16:12 |
| Saviq | ssh: connect to host ps-saucy-server-i386-3 port 22: No route to host | 16:12 |
| dednick | Saviq: ya, getting that as well | 16:13 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, for 186+ * Note: In case the according application is running, the actual removal of the | 16:16 |
| Saviq | 187+ * item will be delayed | 16:16 |
| fginther | dednick, now try it | 16:16 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, I meant that "in case .... is running" is a detail I don't think makes sense to mention there | 16:16 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, i.e. it's the backend's decision when will it remove the item | 16:16 |
| mzanetti | Saviq: ah. sorry | 16:16 |
| mzanetti | yeah, changing | 16:16 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, don't be | 16:16 |
| dednick | fginther: yep, working now | 16:17 |
| mzanetti | Saviq: ok with this: * Note: The actual removal of the item might be delayed in certain circumstances. | 16:17 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, +1 | 16:18 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, QuickListModelInterface::roleNames creates the list every time, too | 16:18 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, 289+} // unity | 16:18 |
| Saviq | 290+} // shell | 16:18 |
| Saviq | 291+} // launcher | 16:18 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, reverse | 16:19 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, why do we have MockLauncherModel::pin, ::requestRemove, ::quickListActionInvoked, ::findApp, if we're not testing it in lp:unity-api? | 16:21 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, I mean why do we have them implemented | 16:21 |
| Saviq | same for MockQuickListModel | 16:21 |
| mzanetti | Saviq: there needs to be something so that the test if the function exists succeed. But yeah... the logic in the mocks is probably not that useful... | 16:22 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, yeah, just { } should be enough | 16:22 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, there's an indent issue in test_quicklist_model_roles_data() with the brackets | 16:22 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, and yeah, do we actually want test_pinning and test_remove there | 16:23 |
| mzanetti | Saviq: yeah... that would need to go if the mock code goes away | 16:24 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, I know it's tempting to put them there :) | 16:24 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, yeah, but those tests ideally should not test behaviours | 16:25 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, as they can be different per implementation | 16:25 |
| mzanetti | Saviq: yeah... agreed | 16:25 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, I will remove those from notifications probably | 16:25 |
| === boiko_ is now known as boiko | ||
| Saviq | mzanetti, do you want to push it through today/tonight? or shall we wait until tomorrow morning just in case? | 16:26 |
| mzanetti | Saviq: just in case of what? | 16:27 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, in case they both don't merge before daily release takes over | 16:27 |
| mzanetti | Saviq: ah... hmm... if you think tomorrow would be safer, I'm fine with that... | 16:28 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, what I mean is "do you want to go away and have your evening or do we want to push it through and you'll be around in case something needs tweaking?" | 16:28 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, your call | 16:28 |
| mzanetti | Saviq: I'm fine here | 16:28 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, ok, so for unity-api I'm +1 after the last few tweaks | 16:30 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, same for launcher-backend it seems, just a few last tweaks remaining | 16:30 |
| === jhodapp is now known as jhodapp|lunch | ||
| mzanetti | Saviq: ok. I think everything fixed and pushed | 16:32 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, ah, http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/5855854/ | 16:34 |
| mzanetti | dammit | 16:35 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, _data() indentation is inconsistent with brackets, but I'll let it slide ;) | 16:37 |
| mzanetti | Saviq: can fix it, np | 16:37 |
| Saviq | k | 16:37 |
| mhr3 | Saviq, btw now that scopes have the formfactor prop, could you guys set it to somewhere? | 16:38 |
| mhr3 | to something... | 16:38 |
| Saviq | mhr3, k, will do | 16:38 |
| Saviq | mhr3, it's on the Scope class, right? | 16:39 |
| mhr3 | Saviq, yep | 16:39 |
| Saviq | mhr3, k | 16:39 |
| mhr3 | Saviq, should affect the apps lens at least | 16:39 |
| mzanetti | Saviq: ok, now it should be ok... | 16:42 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, k, here's my last comment for launcher-backend https://code.launchpad.net/~unity-team/unity8/launcher-backend/+merge/173189/comments/388094 | 16:45 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, I've approved unity-api, will be back in 1/2 hr to see what's what and make sure unity8 lands | 16:45 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, thanks! | 16:45 |
| === jhodapp|lunch is now known as jhodapp | ||
| fginther | dednick, still using that VM? | 18:49 |
| === tvoss|dinner is now known as tvoss|test | ||
| === tvoss|test is now known as tvoss | ||
| dednick | fginther: yep | 19:12 |
| fginther | dednick, ok, just checking | 19:13 |
| dednick | fginther: i'll let you know when i'm done | 19:13 |
| fginther | dednick, thx | 19:13 |
| kgunn | mterry: ping | 19:44 |
| mterry | kgunn, h | 19:46 |
| mterry | i | 19:46 |
| kgunn | mterry: hey...just curious...wrt https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Touch/Testing/Mir | 19:47 |
| dednick | fginther: ping | 19:47 |
| kgunn | i know you are a N7 user | 19:47 |
| kgunn | any caveats there ? | 19:47 |
| fginther | dednick, hello | 19:47 |
| dednick | fginther: hi. do you know how to turn on the debug logging in autopilot? | 19:47 |
| kgunn | e.g. "this doesn't work on N7" :) | 19:47 |
| mterry | kgunn, yes, those are instructions I was following to try to get N7 to work, (and theoretically would let it work), but when I got to the end, nothing showed on screen after all | 19:48 |
| fginther | dednick, 'autopilto run -v -v test-suite' I think | 19:48 |
| mterry | kgunn, so "this doesn't work on N7, but it should and I don't know why not" | 19:48 |
| dednick | fginther: thanks, that did it | 19:49 |
| dednick | Saviq: figured out the AP issue. the indicators-client app is starting at a negative x/y which is screwing with the pointer. Dont know why it's starting at that position though :( | 20:42 |
| Saviq | dednick, ugh! | 20:42 |
| Saviq | dednick, I thought the window was quite small in the videos... | 20:42 |
| Saviq | but wouldn't have guessed | 20:43 |
| dednick | Saviq: yeah. me too. i've been screwing around with object introspection for the last few hours before i found that out. | 20:44 |
| Saviq | dednick, is the window set up the same way as in main.cpp for unity8? | 20:44 |
| dednick | except for the explicit size, i think so. | 20:46 |
| dednick | I'm trying it with explicit sizing and see how it goes. | 20:46 |
| dednick | Saviq: have to check it in detail some more | 20:46 |
| dednick | Saviq: AP specifies an explicit size for the window in unity8. Also the grid size. | 20:47 |
| Saviq | dednick, right, that might be what's helping (we need that for testing for different devices) | 20:47 |
| Saviq | dednick, but obviously it should work fine without | 20:47 |
| dednick | Saviq: i think unity8 is also started frameless. | 20:48 |
| Saviq | dednick, yeah, but that shouldn't be an issue | 20:48 |
| dednick | Saviq: but yeah. not sure why either would change anything. it's not position related, it's all about size. | 20:49 |
| Saviq | veebers, ping | 20:50 |
| veebers | Saviq: pong | 20:51 |
| Saviq | veebers, hey, we're trying to get a job like so https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/generic-mediumtests-saucy/815/parameters/? | 20:51 |
| Saviq | veebers, working with two test suites (note there's unity8 and indicators_client) | 20:52 |
| Saviq | veebers, dednick just found out the window in indicators_client is laid out at negative geometry | 20:52 |
| Saviq | veebers, which makes the tests fail 'cause the input can't reach the right coords | 20:53 |
| Saviq | veebers, would you have time to investigate? or even have a ready-made solution? | 20:53 |
| veebers | Saviq: I can have a look today and see what I can find | 20:53 |
| Saviq | veebers, one thing dednick's not doing in the indicators_client suite is that he's not setting the geometry explicitly in autopilot | 20:53 |
| Saviq | veebers, which we're doing for unity8 (which tests fine | 20:54 |
| veebers | Saviq: sure, cheers that gives me a good starting place | 20:54 |
| Saviq | veebers, so that could probably be one solution - but then it'd be surprising if that's really required | 20:54 |
| Saviq | dednick, and you man go away | 20:55 |
| veebers | Saviq: I've been meaning to look closer at the geometry/setup of the tests, so this will be the start :-) | 20:55 |
| Saviq | veebers, yup, thanks | 20:55 |
| veebers | Saviq: nw | 20:56 |
| dednick | veebers, Saviq: ta | 20:57 |
| veebers | Hi dednick :-) | 20:58 |
| dednick | veebers: Hi :) | 20:59 |
| dednick | veebers: just ran a test on jenkins, looks like setting explicit geo in qt fixes the issue | 20:59 |
| dednick | https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/generic-mediumtests-runner-saucy/735/testReport/junit/indicators_client.tests.test_battery/TestDisplayMenus/test_auto_bright_switch_with_mouse_/ | 20:59 |
| dednick | it got further | 20:59 |
| veebers | dednick: ah ok. I'll look into the setup and need for the geo etc. today | 20:59 |
| dednick | veebers: thanks | 21:00 |
| === salem_ is now known as _salem | ||
| Saviq | veebers, one more question - I'm trying to build a minimal VirtualBox VM we could use for autopilot / UI tests that would not take your host over | 21:25 |
| Saviq | veebers, everything seems almost fine except that autopilot errors out with http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/5856659/ | 21:25 |
| Saviq | veebers, any idea what I'm missing | 21:26 |
| Saviq | ? | 21:26 |
| Saviq | veebers, I could get you a more complete and verbose log from autopilot if it'd help | 21:27 |
| dednick | Saviq: now indicators-battery-service is seg-faulting :) | 21:34 |
| Saviq | dednick, right | 21:34 |
| dednick | Saviq: which means i'm going to bed | 21:34 |
| dednick | :) | 21:34 |
| Saviq | dednick, go to sleep! veebers is having a look at the autopilot issue | 21:34 |
| dednick | Saviq: ok. the remaining issue i think is because indicators-battery-service is not running on jenkins (it crashes on startup), so the indicator menu isn't being populated. | 21:35 |
| dednick | veebers: ^ | 21:36 |
| Saviq | dednick, you sorted out the geometry? | 21:36 |
| Saviq | dednick, by explicitly sizing in autopilot? | 21:36 |
| dednick | Saviq: setting it explicitly fixes, but not auto | 21:36 |
| Saviq | dednick, right | 21:36 |
| dednick | Saviq: the fix is in a debug branch at the moment. https://code.launchpad.net/~nick-dedekind/unity8/indicators-client.jenkins-debug/+merge/173563 | 21:37 |
| Saviq | dednick, k | 21:38 |
| dednick | fginther: i'm done with the VM. | 21:38 |
| fginther | dednick, thanks | 21:39 |
| === Trevinho_ is now known as Trevinho | ||
| veebers | Saviq: that's odd, I'll take a look at it now | 21:47 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!