=== kees_ is now known as kees | ||
=== pedro_ is now known as Guest31580 | ||
=== pedro_ is now known as Guest28600 | ||
=== pedro_ is now known as Guest89666 | ||
caribou | Hi, I'm working on the following bug : https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dante/+bug/857598 | 10:51 |
---|---|---|
ubot2` | Ubuntu bug 857598 in dante (Ubuntu) "socksify fails to run" [Undecided,In progress] | 10:51 |
caribou | I would need a task for precise as I will also propose a fix for precise as part of another bug I'm working on | 10:52 |
caribou | I have also taken the liberty to switch it to In Progress as I've assigned myself to it | 10:54 |
caribou | not sure if it was to proper thing to do | 10:54 |
jibel | caribou, done and assigned to you | 10:55 |
caribou | jibel: merci | 10:55 |
jibel | caribou, if you're working on it in progress is the right status | 10:55 |
caribou | jibel: that's what I thought | 10:56 |
jibel | for reference https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Status | 10:56 |
=== pedro_ is now known as Guest39639 | ||
caribou | What should I do if I have a debdiff that fixes two separate bugs ? | 14:18 |
caribou | attach it to both bugs ? | 14:18 |
=== Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha | ||
=== Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk | ||
=== Jikan is now known as Jikai | ||
=== Jikai is now known as Jikan | ||
=== Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha | ||
phillw | Hi good people, can someone check out bug 1200304 and get any private data removed so that it can be made public. | 20:00 |
phillw | The request comes from the OP | 20:00 |
=== pedro_ is now known as Guest17976 | ||
jtaylor | op can make it public himself | 20:14 |
jtaylor | and I think he can also read and remove his own data | 20:15 |
TheLordOfTime | ^ that | 20:15 |
TheLordOfTime | phillw: ^ | 20:16 |
phillw | jtaylor: I'll ask that he does. | 20:16 |
jtaylor | strangely I can't even see the bug | 20:16 |
TheLordOfTime | jtaylor: nor I which is suspicious | 20:17 |
TheLordOfTime | or suggests something broke | 20:17 |
TheLordOfTime | or maybe its one of the packages or projects bugcontrol doesn't have access to | 20:17 |
hggdh | not really. It all depends on how the bug was opened, and against what | 20:17 |
hggdh | ^ | 20:17 |
* TheLordOfTime shrugs | 20:17 | |
hggdh | anyway, phillw ^ we cannot see it | 20:18 |
TheLordOfTime | so the OP will have to remove the data, or wait until someone who can see it can get to it | 20:18 |
hggdh | yep | 20:18 |
TheLordOfTime | hmmmmmmmmmmm | 20:18 |
* TheLordOfTime checks something | 20:18 | |
phillw | I've asked the OP to mark it as public, but I'm a little concerned that in doing so, it could reveal private information that should not be made public before having such data removed.... | 20:19 |
TheLordOfTime | phillw: he should go through the data and remove it himself | 20:19 |
phillw | He is a tester, not a programmer! | 20:19 |
TheLordOfTime | hehe | 20:19 |
hggdh | phillw: it might, indeed. But since we cannot see it -- not even to know what is in there --, there is not much we can do. If you could find from the OP what he opened the bug against, we then could find who would have access | 20:20 |
TheLordOfTime | mhm | 20:20 |
hggdh | like, opened against upstream as opposed to an Ubuntu package, marked the bug as a security issue (which means only the security team can see it), etc | 20:21 |
TheLordOfTime | yep | 20:22 |
phillw | I've copied this chat to the OP, not too sure which time zone he is on, so I will await a reply. Thanks for your help. | 20:23 |
hggdh | phillw: glad to help, even if we did not actually helped... | 20:25 |
hggdh | oh, bad tense. Ah well. It is Friday. | 20:25 |
TheLordOfTime | hggdh: you're excused :) | 20:27 |
phillw | hopefully the grammer nazis are jumping off cliffs :P | 20:28 |
TheLordOfTime | phillw: i'm a grammar nazi usually | 20:28 |
TheLordOfTime | but i'm just as bad typing from a phone | 20:28 |
TheLordOfTime | :/ | 20:28 |
hggdh | TheLordOfTime: since it is Friday, you should have said "... excuset", or something like it. So that I would not feel alone, and all that :-) | 20:35 |
TheLordOfTime | :P | 20:35 |
TheLordOfTime | hggdh: autocorrect on the iOS is decent at doing its actual jonbn | 20:36 |
TheLordOfTime | job* | 20:36 |
hggdh | TheLordOfTime: THANK YOU! | 20:36 |
* hggdh now has company | 20:36 | |
TheLordOfTime | :P | 20:36 |
* TheLordOfTime goes back to figuring out an FTBFS problem in non-Ubuntu software. | 20:37 | |
phillw | the bug is against lightdm | 20:49 |
hggdh | phillw: not lightdm(Ubuntu), but just lightdm, right? | 21:03 |
TheLordOfTime | hggdh: is it against "lightdm (Ubuntu)" or just the lightdm project | 21:03 |
TheLordOfTime | because if it's the second of those i don't think bugcontrol has access | 21:03 |
phillw | hggdh: lightdm(Ubuntu) | 21:03 |
hggdh | then it was probably masked as a security bug | 21:04 |
TheLordOfTime | ehh whatever i was going to say is bleh | 21:04 |
TheLordOfTime | that's probably it then | 21:04 |
hggdh | cuz otherwise we would have access to it | 21:04 |
TheLordOfTime | private security i think needs sec team | 21:04 |
TheLordOfTime | security* | 21:04 |
hggdh | yes. They are the only ones that can see them | 21:04 |
phillw | the screen shot is at http://imagebin.org/264322 | 21:05 |
hggdh | phillw: oh, OK, it is a crash. Only apport retracing has access to it right now | 21:06 |
phillw | who are they? :) | 21:06 |
hggdh | phillw: others will only have access *after* initial apport processing | 21:06 |
hggdh | phillw: they who? | 21:07 |
phillw | apport retracing | 21:07 |
hggdh | phillw: when a crash bug is opened, the bug is restricted -- the presence of a coredump is more than enough to make it restricted | 21:07 |
phillw | So, what advice should I give to the OP? | 21:08 |
hggdh | so only an internal back-office process -- the apport retracing utility -- has access to the bug. When the retracing is done, the coredump is deleted, and the bug is accessible for some | 21:08 |
hggdh | phillw: tell him/her to please wait. The bug should NOT be made public right now | 21:09 |
phillw | okies, again - thanks | 21:09 |
hggdh | phillw: after we have the retracing done, we can look at it, and see if it is good to be public | 21:09 |
phillw | TheLordOfTime: could you have a read of a new section https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/Overview#My_bug_is_marked_private to see if it is factually correct, thanks. | 23:08 |
TheLordOfTime | phillw: someone else can, I'm busy atm yelling at PayPal | 23:09 |
phillw | okies! | 23:09 |
pleia2 | phillw: have a moment for a quick PM? | 23:10 |
phillw | Hi, can someone from bug-squad check on if https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/Overview#My_bug_is_marked_private is factually correct, i | 23:10 |
phillw | pleia2: always :) | 23:10 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!