hashken | Hi, I am planning to create a custom Amazon image from Ubuntu Minimal CD. | 05:55 |
---|---|---|
hashken | After going through a few forums, I am under the impression that the kernel needs to have certain modules compiled, so that it runs in Amzon EC2. | 05:56 |
hashken | Is the kernel in the Ubuntu Minimal CD, capable of runningin an Amazon EC2 instance? | 05:57 |
hashken | Is the regular Ubuntu kernel capable of running in an Amazon EC2 instance? | 06:13 |
=== smb` is now known as smb | ||
smb | hashken, It varies depending on release. But in general all of them should. The only thing to check is whether xen-blkfront is built in or that the module is requested to be in the initrd. | 07:23 |
smb | hashken, If you pull in the linux-virtual meta-package that gives you the same kernel as in the cloud-images. | 07:27 |
hashken | thanks smb | 07:43 |
=== apachelogger_ is now known as apachelogger | ||
* apw yawns ... | 07:48 | |
apw | it is very hot here | 07:48 |
RAOF | apw: How are the bees finding it? | 07:49 |
smb | They probably have been replaced by real-fire flies | 07:49 |
apw | if they have any sense they are in the cup, hiding from the sun | 07:49 |
apw | smb, turned into by the sun more like | 07:50 |
smb | apw, You should get rid of that sun thing completely. | 07:52 |
RAOF | The Daystar? | 07:55 |
smb | Just place a huge solar panel over the UK... above cloud level so they can enjoy their rain still | 07:57 |
apw | smb, good plan | 07:57 |
=== fmasi_afk is now known as fmasi | ||
* apw hs being promised some rain over the next two days, thats something | 08:14 | |
=== fmasi is now known as fmasi_afk | ||
=== fmasi_afk is now known as fmasi | ||
brendand | is this verification testing week for the -proposed kernels? | 08:56 |
smb | "14-Jul - 20-Jul Bug verification." (from the email everyone gets) | 09:08 |
=== fmasi is now known as fmasi_afk | ||
=== fmasi_afk is now known as fmasi | ||
Guest46086 | Can we get https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/LTSEnablementStack linked from https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/FAQ somewhere? | 09:16 |
=== Guest46086 is now known as jpds | ||
rtg | I've rebased saucy against v3.10.1 and ready to push. are you still looking at those arm dtb patches ? | 12:34 |
rtg | apw, ^^ | 12:34 |
apw | rtg, i have them applied here indeed, but push away and i'll sort it out | 13:03 |
rtg | are you gonna worry about 3.10 ? or just do it for 3.11 ? | 13:03 |
apw | i was assuming i'd apply them to both once i had build tested them on both | 13:04 |
apw | they seem sane if my chat with infinity is anytyhing to go by | 13:04 |
rtg | ok | 13:04 |
infinity | Oh dear. I shouldn't be the yard stick for sanity. | 13:06 |
rtg | apw, saucy pushed. still testing armhf build, but I expect it to be OK | 13:06 |
apw | infinity, hey i am comparing to me | 13:07 |
=== cmagina-away is now known as cmagina | ||
apw | rtg, don't we have a per kernel directory already | 13:24 |
rtg | apw, for firmware in the kernel package | 13:24 |
apw | for firmware, could we perhaps drop the linux-firmware-lts contents into those as if they were part of the kernel | 13:24 |
rtg | but each one is ABI specific | 13:24 |
apw | bah | 13:24 |
rtg | apw, sounds like a sprint topic | 13:25 |
apw | yeah shove it in, a plan indeed | 13:25 |
apw | as we'll have infinity to poke too | 13:25 |
rtg | apw, lemme know when you've pushed those arm patches. everything else is ready to go. | 13:26 |
apw | rtg ack, just checking the udebs builds | 13:26 |
rtg | apw, pushed saucy unstable rebase onto v3.11-rc1 | 13:32 |
apw | rtg, ack | 13:37 |
apw | not far behind, just rebased and doing final checks | 13:37 |
apw | missing some ?'s which i've added and fingers crossed | 13:37 |
jibel | ogasawara, apw, there is a first iteration of dkms testing ready for review http://10.98.0.1:8080/view/DKMS/view/All/ | 13:53 |
jibel | It covers precise, precise+hwe kernels, saucy+proposed, saucy+prerelease ppa | 13:53 |
jibel | This a build/install test but I disabled modprobing for the moment. | 13:53 |
jibel | ogasawara, Could your team review the results, then we can schedule a call ? | 13:54 |
ogasawara | jibel: awesome, thanks! yes, we'll review. lets go ahead and schedule a call on the calendar for later this week? | 13:54 |
jibel | ogasawara, this week is fine, I'll let you schedule it, your time will be mine. | 13:55 |
ogasawara | jibel: ack | 13:55 |
apw | rtg, ok i also need to fix linux-signed before you do your do on this one | 14:13 |
rtg | apw, no problem, am pursuing an __udivdi3 issue on unstable i386 | 14:14 |
=== fmasi is now known as fmasi_afk | ||
apw | rtg, ok saucy master-next is pushed, off to un-f*ck -signed | 14:46 |
rtg | apw, ack | 14:46 |
=== fmasi_afk is now known as fmasi | ||
apw | rtg, ok i have pushed signed, but once you have linux in the pipe for upload i would like to do the update to ensure the update-versions is going to handle this situation, we have never had to test this before | 15:07 |
apw | (do the update for linux-signed) | 15:07 |
rtg | apw, If you want, then go ahead and package saucy master-next. I'm still messing with unstable. | 15:08 |
rtg | (and upload) | 15:08 |
apw | rtg ok will do | 15:09 |
apw | rtg, you did a rebase on this right ? | 15:10 |
rtg | yeah, to v3.10.1 | 15:10 |
apw | i don't see it in the changelog | 15:10 |
rtg | apw, oh shit, forgot | 15:10 |
apw | did you miss it (then i can add it) or do i have the wrong brnach | 15:10 |
apw | if you missed it i can retrofit for you | 15:10 |
rtg | apw, yeah, go ahead and run insert-mainline-changes | 15:11 |
apw | will do | 15:11 |
=== rtg is now known as rtg-afk | ||
=== fmasi is now known as fmasi_afk | ||
=== fmasi_afk is now known as fmasi | ||
* _bjf -> dr. appt. | 16:14 | |
=== _bjf is now known as bjf | ||
=== fmasi is now known as fmasi_afk | ||
brendand | bjf - i noticed a couple of the kernels went to confirmed today, that doesn't imply a change in schedule does it? | 16:15 |
brendand | bjf, the raring and quantal backports kernels were the ones | 16:16 |
=== chrisccoulson_ is now known as chrisccoulson | ||
=== fmasi_afk is now known as fmasi | ||
apw | brendand, those normally lag don't they, as in wait on their parent branches to build before being done (but i'll let bjf say for sure) | 17:14 |
brendand | apw, i would have expected then for the raring and quantal proposed kernels to be confirmed prior then, rather than the other way around | 17:16 |
psivaa | sbeattie: We are seeing https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/view/All/job/sru_kernel-quantal_lts_hwe-generic_i386-intel_64-mga_g200ew/39/testReport/junit/autotest/ubuntu_qrt_apparmor/test_apparmor_py/ in regression testing. | 17:18 |
psivaa | sbeattie: guess you are the one to talk to? | 17:19 |
apw | psivaa, if it is apparmor i expect jjohansen will be interested as well | 17:20 |
psivaa | apw: ack, thanks :) | 17:20 |
jjohansen | psivaa: thanks, this regression is known about and temporary | 17:23 |
jjohansen | psivaa: its due to work item scheduling | 17:23 |
apw | jjohansen, so we'll get some more bits in the mail :) | 17:24 |
jjohansen | apw: oh yes, there will be at least two more syncs | 17:24 |
apw | jjohansen, thanks | 17:25 |
* bjf -> back | 17:26 | |
bjf | brendand, would be nice if you'd have stuck around :-( | 17:27 |
psivaa | jjohansen: ack, not sure what i should do with the workflow task, (fix-release with qa-testing-passed ?) | 17:27 |
jjohansen | psivaa: err just a sec, this is the quantal backport? | 17:30 |
psivaa | jjohansen: yes | 17:30 |
jjohansen | psivaa: on i386? | 17:31 |
psivaa | jjohansen: yes, on amd64 hardware i think | 17:32 |
jjohansen | psivaa: sorry ignore what I said before, this just looks like a known bug. It is not. The quantal backport should be good here | 17:32 |
jjohansen | psivaa: okay, we will poke at it | 17:33 |
psivaa | jjohansen: ack, ill report a bug then | 17:33 |
jjohansen | sbeattie: we have a regression on the quantal backport to investigate | 17:33 |
sbeattie | jjohansen: looking at that output, it seems to be the tcp tests that failed? | 17:35 |
jjohansen | sbeattie: yep | 17:35 |
psivaa | jjohansen: sbeattie: reported bug #1201530 for the above failure. | 17:54 |
ubot2` | Launchpad bug 1201530 in ubuntu-kernel-tests "Failure in apparmor tests with quantal lts-hwe 3.5.0-37.58~precise1-generic 3.5.7.16" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1201530 | 17:54 |
jjohansen | psivaa: okay, thanks | 17:54 |
* sbeattie is trying to reproduce the issue | 17:57 | |
=== rtg-afk is now known as rtg | ||
=== fmasi is now known as fmasi_afk | ||
=== cmagina is now known as cmagina-away | ||
rtg | apw, pushed Ubuntu-3.10.0-3.12 on to saucy master | 19:51 |
apw | rtg, how is it i keep forgetting to do that, spack | 19:51 |
rtg | apw, I didn't notice until I went to do the LTS version | 19:51 |
=== cmagina-away is now known as cmagina | ||
=== cmagina is now known as cmagina-away | ||
=== cmagina-away is now known as cmagina | ||
* rtg -> EOD | 21:30 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!