=== Guest81623 is now known as Zic [07:18] good morning [13:15] hello all [13:15] need a small help === jtechidna is now known as JontheEchidna [13:55] Hi where can I find the list of packages that failed to build in saucy [13:55] thanks [13:57] obounaim: in the title [13:57] s/title/topic [13:58] Ok thanks [14:00] Building the last version of wget in Saucy using pbuilder fails on my machine is that normal [14:01] maybe [14:01] what's the error [14:04] something related to generating docs [14:05] This is a known bug in Debian #711028 [14:05] Debian bug 711028 in src:wget "wget: FTBFS: texinfo errors" [Serious,Fixed] http://bugs.debian.org/711028 [14:10] build errors: http://paste.ubuntu.com/5887668/ [14:13] Currently http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ does not list wget as FTBFS [14:19] obounaim: that's probably because the last build worked [14:20] is that a build of the version in saucy or a merge? [14:20] The build of the version in saucy [14:21] I have merge the last version in Debian [14:21] this fixes the issue [14:21] ok, so? [14:21] https://code.launchpad.net/~obounaim/ubuntu/saucy/wget/merge-from-debian/+merge/175580 [14:22] * micahg isn't sure what's being asked here [14:24] I just asked if it is normal that a package fails to build in pbuilder and successfully build in Ubuntu build architecture? [14:24] who says it does? [14:24] hrm, it worked in the rebuild [14:25] the answer is sometimes it will fail locally and work on the buildd (less common) and vice versa (more common) [14:27] ok thanks [14:28] Is there a way to get the time and the date of the last build? [14:28] obounaim: the failure was due to texinfo 5 which entered saucy a few days ago, which is why it didn't show up on the rebuild test [14:29] rebuild test: http://people.ubuntuwire.org/~wgrant/rebuild-ftbfs-test/test-rebuild-20130614-saucy.html [14:33] obounaim: yes, look at the build page for that package and architecture [14:38] thank you everybody [14:38] Now it makes sense === dpm_ is now known as dpm