[00:10] <LeoNerd> I haven't found a bug or a missing feature in the last year
[00:10] <LeoNerd> For me bzr JustWorks
[00:12] <hachre> well, I guess it just looks bad
[00:42] <lifeless> hachre: there has been some dev - bug fixes mainly
[00:45] <hachre> https://launchpad.net/bzr
[00:45] <hachre> the last release I see here is a beta from one year ago
[00:45] <hachre> that's what I'm referring to
[00:46] <hachre> and before then there was a release every month
[00:46] <hachre> what happened?
[01:09] <maxb> hachre: If I understand correctly, the amount of employee time that Canonical devotes to Bazaar decreased sharply. Unfortunately that seems to have revealed that no-one else is doing significant Bazaar core dev.
[01:10] <maxb> I still like and use Bazaar, but I have to admit I wonder what its long-term future is going to be, given Git and Mercurial seem to be winning the popularity battle.
[01:14] <hachre> yea, I'm wondering the same
[01:14] <hachre> and I think it's detrimental by now for launchpad to be only supporting bazaar...
[02:06] <ScottK> It's OK, ~no one is working on developing that either, so they are even.
[02:26] <hachre> yea
[02:27] <hachre> lol
[02:27] <hachre> I noticed that too
[09:07] <mlischke> hi, I have moved a number of files in my branch (manually) and now want bzr to update its internal references. So I tried bzr mv —auto, but that does not have any effect.
[09:08] <mlischke> Does this only work for single file changes?
[09:25] <LarstiQ_> mlischke: that should work for multiple files
[09:26] <mlischke> I tried with —verbose but get no output at all, it just returns without effect.
[09:26] <LarstiQ_> mlischke: are you sure you're in the right branch?
[09:26] <mlischke> I have now prepared a text file with all the mv commands and am running that.
[09:26] <LarstiQ_> mlischke: what does `bzr status` say?
[09:26] <mlischke> I am, yes
[09:26] <LarstiQ_> mlischke: you want --after for that probably
[09:27] <mlischke> tried that too
[09:27] <LarstiQ_> I mean for the text file you mentioned
[09:27] <mlischke> That file is only for easy search and replace etc. so I don't need to type all the commands.
[09:28] <mlischke> (doing it file by file)
[09:41] <icebrain> hi! Is there any way to branch a branch (ha) from Launchpad using HTTPS? It seems bzr is trying to use bzr+ssh, and my proxy doesn't like that
[09:44] <mgz> no, but you can use http
[10:28] <icebrain> mgz: sorry for the delay, I missed your reply. How can I set it to use HTTP?
[10:30] <LarstiQ_> icebrain: if you're not using bzr+ssh, you can comment out launchpad_username in bazaar.conf
[10:30] <LarstiQ_> icebrain: which then will have lp: resolve to http
[10:35] <icebrain> LarstiQ_: it doesn't seem to work. I get the message "You have not informed bzr of your Launchpad ID", but still "ERROR: Invalid url supplied to transport: "bzr+ssh://bazaar.launchpadd..."
[10:36] <LarstiQ_> icebrain: that soudns like you already branched something?
[10:36] <icebrain> LarstiQ_: well, not successfully, no ;)
[10:36] <icebrain> I've been trying to, though
[10:36] <LarstiQ_> icebrain: can you paste the relevant bit from .bzr.log?
[10:36] <icebrain> sure
[10:37] <mgz> icebrain: there's a trick to just getting the http url as well, if a branch is the main one for a project
[10:37] <mgz> for example, use `bzr info http://launchpad.net/bzr` and take the branch url that give
[10:37] <mgz> then you don't need to fiddle with launchpad login
[10:38] <icebrain> mgz: thanks, I'll try that.
[10:38] <icebrain> LarstiQ_: http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=diGYYR7Y
[10:40] <icebrain> mgz: that worked, thanks!
[10:40] <icebrain> LarstiQ_: thanks for your help as well
[11:02] <LarstiQ_> icebrain: I'm a bit confused about that error. You don't have launchpad username set, you apparently do not have support for bzr+ssh (nothing to do with your proxy), yet it tries to use it?
[11:03] <LarstiQ_> ho hum
[11:03] <LarstiQ_> same happens here
[11:05] <LarstiQ_> but it does work for lp:bzr
[19:35] <mathrick_> hiya, I'm seeing TREE_ROOT rear its ugly head again, and I can't see why
[19:36] <mathrick_> namely, I tried joining a git-derived tree into a development-colo branch of mine, and it complained about same root
[19:36] <mathrick_> turns out both are TREE_ROOT, which baffles me
[19:37] <mathrick_> moreover, if I attempt to restart the branch by fast-export, fast-import, it turns into TREE_ROOT as well, even though a freshly init'd branch has a proper randomly generated root name
[19:37] <mathrick_> it's really throwing a spanner in the works for me