/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2013/07/19/#ubuntu-discuss.txt

Desync as far as the future of ubuntu to the consumer/business market, what are they planning to do in regards to integration/support for running certain critical applications (i.e. - Quickbooks with payroll for whatever latest calendar year it may be)? It seems to be the main thing keeping a majority of small business users from making the transition from microsoft. Myself being on of those in that possible customer base for their advan16:57
Desyncced suppo16:57
Desync rt they sell.16:57
Frogging|workI think the future is smartphones and tablets, unfortunately.17:01
Frogging|workOf Ubuntu, that is17:01
Frogging|workThat seems to be what Shuttleworth wants, anyway.17:01
k1l_the commercial support didnt change, did it?17:06
k1l_and to believe only smartphones and tablets would be the only future is a trap. ubuntu will keep the desktop because the whole package (desktop and mobile and tv) does make the difference in the game against the big ones (android, windows, redhat,...)17:07
k1l_and quickbooks got a macos version. so talk to quickbooks if they offer a linux version17:10
Frogging|workk1l_: I know, but the thing is that they're developing the mobile version at the expense of the desktop one; instead of taking the desktop version and forking it to make a mobile one, they're trying to make a single unified UI that "works" on both (the result being that the quality of both suffers because of the vastly different controls)17:21
k1l_Frogging|work: the most work is to do on the mobile one17:21
k1l_ubuntu got a running desktop. but not a running mobile so far.17:22
Frogging|workUnity, the desktop UI that most people dislike, was designed for the purpose of being touch-friendly. This is the same mistake that Windows 8 made.17:22
Frogging|workAnd it had the same result; nobody likes it because it destroys any possibility of an efficient workflo17:23
Frogging|workworkflow*17:23
k1l_Frogging|work: dont mix the loud shouting from the "few" nerds who dont even use ubuntu with the opnion from the mainstream user17:23
k1l_Frogging|work: :/17:23
k1l_dont tell me that "nobody can work with unity"17:23
k1l_that is just stupid17:24
Frogging|workWell for one thing, I can barely use it on my laptop (Intel graphics) because it has these ridiculous transparency effects and such that add little and slow it down.17:24
k1l_you dont like unity? ok. you want a gnome2-desktop back? ok. but dont say nobody can work with unity17:24
Frogging|workAnd they removed the one-click option to turn desktop effects on and off that they had a couple years ago17:25
DesyncMainstream user here. I love unity.17:25
Frogging|workWhy?17:25
Frogging|workTell me one thing about it that is better than gnome 2 or whatever it was that was there before17:26
k1l_the problem right now is, that they will not invest alot of work into the old X-server+unity because they are working on the MIR-server with unity817:26
DesyncOne thing? I would say it has support directly from Canonical as that's what they are pushing.17:27
k1l_Frogging|work: ever thought about that your learning of where to click in the gnome-menue of the last years, to find a app to start is not really considered intuitive or fast at all?17:27
k1l_like i give you a mixed startmenue and you need to start a program.17:28
Frogging|workDesync: That's irrelevant to the user experience. And just because they're pushing it doesn't mean by any stretch that it's good17:28
Desyncgood being an opinion of every individual user17:29
Desyncgranted I have no problem learning new things and actually enjoy it. Maybe im the minority on this topic17:29
k1l_Frogging|work: or the space on the screen that is now free for more informations because the global menue saves that space17:29
Frogging|workAnd about mir, what about this, huh? http://news.softpedia.com/news/Mir-Developers-Acknowledges-20-Performance-Drop-Over-the-X-Display-Server-369155.shtml17:30
Desynci do not have much experience working with UX in anything nix. Always been terminal stuff for me17:31
k1l_Frogging|work: its still in development. did you think of that?17:31
Frogging|workk1l_: Yes, but then there's this (one sec while I find the link)17:31
Frogging|workhttp://www.zdnet.com/mark-shuttleworth-mir-has-delivered-what-we-hoped-7000017897/17:32
Frogging|workHe said that a little over a week before that other article was posted17:32
Frogging|workSo it's delivered what they hoped, yet it's still 20% slower? What?17:32
k1l_Frogging|work: they have lots of potential to at least get as fast as X with Xmir. at least!17:33
k1l_Frogging|work: didnt you read that bit where the mir devs said that?17:33
Frogging|workWhere?17:34
k1l_i thought you did a well research on that topic?17:34
Frogging|workAlso, that image in the first link is a bit weird... Looks like you have to make 2 clicks instead of 1 to open the terminal.17:34
Frogging|workJust a sec17:35
Frogging|workI do remember seeing something like that somewhere, but forget where17:35
Frogging|workThere are a few conflicting reports17:35
Frogging|workBut what's with the contradiction, anyway? Shuttleworth says that it's faster than X on his laptop, yet a week later an actual dev comes out and says that it's 20% slower17:36
Desyncpossibly the dev was using a different version?17:37
Frogging|workMaybe it will end up being faster, maybe not. But the point is, what Shuttleworth is saying is rather suspicious.17:38
k1l_http://blog.cooperteam.net/  Frogging|work17:41
Frogging|workHmm...17:42
Frogging|workWho are they? Just curious17:42
k1l_chris h rogers is one of the MIR devs17:43
k1l_thought you knew something about MIR17:43
Frogging|workI never said that, I just saw what I saw17:47
k1l_Frogging|work: ok, then im telling you: you only saw on side of the medal17:48

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!