[00:10] <darkxst> ubuntu GNOME 20130723.2 images have not appeared on cdimage.u.c
[00:10] <darkxst> is something broken?
[00:13] <phillw> darkxst: they are not showing as rebuilding on http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/270/builds it does not even show a .1 rebuild on there>?
[00:13] <phillw> correction, the .1 rebuild IS there, but it does show as marked for a respin
[00:14] <phillw> *does NOT show*.... wanders off for a ciggie.
[00:17] <slangasek> darkxst, phillw: I think you probably want http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/299/builds fwiw.  There is a '20130723.2' listed there, but it never built; I don't know what that means, but I'll go ahead and trigger a manual rebuild
[00:17] <slangasek> rsalveti: maliit-frameworks> ack, will have a look :)
[00:19] <phillw> sorry, slangasek I'd moved back to look at the PPC images on the dailes.... Darn easy to be on the wrong area :/
[00:21] <phillw> infinity: are you still around?
[00:22] <jbicha> UG's 20130723.1 amd64 iso was a bit weird too as the .manifest wasn't updated
[01:23] <ScottK> If there's a respin for something, please also let kubuntu-meta and kubuntu-settings through to go with it.
[02:58] <jdstrand> can someone deNEW click-apparmor? it is fine in universe for now
[10:01] <ogra_> infinity, ubuntu-core seems unwell
[10:01] <ogra_> (or rather debootstrap)
[10:16] <infinity> ogra_: debootstrap being unwell is less than good.
[10:16]  * infinity looks.
[10:16] <ogra_> it trips over python2.7-minimal seemingly
[10:16] <infinity> ogra_: Erm, unwell how?  The build log looks sane.
[10:17] <ogra_> not in the mail i just got
[10:17] <ogra_> oh, wait
[10:17] <ogra_> thats precise
[10:17]  * ogra_ missed that in the subject
[10:17] <ogra_> W: Failure while configuring base packages.  This will be re-attempted up to five times.
[10:17] <ogra_> I: Configuring python2.7-minimal...
[10:17] <ogra_> W: Failure while configuring base packages.  This will be re-attempted up to five times.
[10:17] <infinity> Oh, precise may well be sad.
[10:18] <infinity> Breaking the world on the way to the point release.
[10:18] <ogra_> ah
[10:18]  * ogra_ will ignore it then
[10:18] <ogra_> sorry for the noise ... if i had noticed its precise ...
[10:23] <cjwatson> ogra_: that looks like a pandabug to me
[10:26] <ogra_> cjwatson, could well be
[11:39] <phillw> infinity: I have a rather odd email regarding PPC in 13.10. After a month of not working, the ISO from 23rd July now works.... There's nothing more peculiar than testing!
[11:41] <phillw> this has been confirmed by another of the testers....
[13:07] <jdstrand> infinity: hi! I am looking at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/2.8.0-0ubuntu23/+build/4820740
[13:07] <jdstrand> infinity: it looks like the build died, but it is still showing as building and I don't have a way to retry it. can you help?
[13:08] <infinity> jdstrand: I can get it killed, sure.
[13:08] <infinity> jdstrand: Quite possible that the buildd had a sad, given where it's stalled.
[13:11] <jdstrand> infinity: thanks
[13:48] <seb128> infinity, cjwatson: hey, britney question ... maliit has been doing qt4 -> qt5, which means it stopped building on ppc (rather in depwait), what's the right way to get the new version to migrate to saucy? delete the old ppc binaries?
[13:48] <cjwatson> yes, assuming they have no revdeps
[13:48] <infinity> seb128: Yeah, and rdeps.
[13:48] <infinity> (It does have some... I suspect some of those things need rebuilding anyway)
[13:49] <seb128> it does?
[13:49] <seb128> well, maliit has 2 sources
[13:49] <seb128> the rdepends should be only binaries from those
[13:49] <rsalveti> yeah
[13:50] <infinity> * maliit-keyboard               (for maliit-framework)
[13:50] <infinity> * nemo-keyboard                 (for maliit-framework)
[13:50] <infinity> * ubuntu-touch [amd64 armhf i386]  (for maliit-framework)
[13:50] <infinity> One of those is arch:all though, I think.
[13:50] <cjwatson> checkrdepends on lillypilly will tell you
[13:51] <seb128> infinity, which one?
[13:52] <infinity> nemo-keyboard
[13:52] <infinity> Ahh, and it's in -proposed too.  So, yeah.
[13:52] <cjwatson> 'checkrdepends maliit' on lillypilly isn't showing anything
[13:52] <infinity> We can transition this.
[13:52] <infinity> I'll whack the PPC binaries from the release pocket now.
[13:54] <cjwatson> Ah, seb128 didn't give me the exact source name
[13:54] <seb128> cjwatson, sorry
[13:54] <seb128> infinity, cjwatson: thanks for the help
[13:55] <infinity> seb128: Done.  We'll see if that makes it happier.
[13:56] <seb128> rsalveti, ^
[13:56] <seb128> infinity, thanks ;-)
[13:56] <rsalveti> great, thanks all
[14:13] <Riddell> infinity: there's a nasty kmail bug on the candidate images and I think I'd like to respin, can I do that now from the iso tracker?
[14:15] <infinity> Riddell: Yup.
[14:19] <Riddell> infinity: remind me again how?
[14:19] <Riddell> ooh I see a button
[14:20] <Riddell> groovy, rebuilding
[14:25] <slangasek> infinity: when you respun for the kernel update last night, do you happen to know what build # ubuntu-gnome was at?  Because a problem turned up later where the tracker listed a version that had never been built (no log on nusakan, etc)
[14:25] <slangasek> dunno if that was because someone manually fiddled, or because the rube goldberg failed
[14:26] <infinity> slangasek: No idea.  I just clicked the boxes and mashed the button.
[14:26] <slangasek> ok
[14:26] <infinity> slangasek: Logs would be potentially enlightening, and cjwatson and stgraber might care about the above result.
[14:26] <slangasek> infinity: logs of what?
[14:27] <infinity> slangasek: Oh, you said there were no logs on nusakan for that build?  Fun.
[14:27] <slangasek> right
[14:27] <infinity> slangasek: So, this is all stgraber, I guess.
[14:27] <slangasek> stgraber: ^^ fyi, this is all in scrollback from yesterday too (around 1am BST)
[14:30] <mlankhorst> is lts-raring in -updates yet?
[14:31] <jbicha> 0723 was the regular cronjob, 0723.1 was the one for the kernel rebuild (but amd64 didn't have the new kernel and the .manifest was outdated), 0723.2 was the phantom rebuild darkxst triggered last night to correct that (it was announced in this channel but never showed up), finally fixed by 20130724
[14:41] <infinity> mlankhorst: The kernel, or the whole stack?
[14:41] <infinity> mlankhorst: http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/pending-sru.html will tell you that the stack is still in proposed.
[14:42] <stgraber> qatracker=> SELECT qatracker_build.id, qatracker_product.title, users.name, qatracker_build_milestone.date, qatracker_milestone.title FROM qatracker_build LEFT JOIN qatracker_build_milestone ON qatracker_build_milestone.buildid=qatracker_build.id LEFT JOIN qatracker_product ON qatracker_product.id=qatracker_build.productid LEFT JOIN users ON users.uid=qatracker_build_milestone.userid LEFT JOIN qatracker_milestone ON qatracker_milestone.id
[14:42] <stgraber>   id   |           title            |  name   |        date         |     title
[14:42] <stgraber> -------+----------------------------+---------+---------------------+---------------
[14:42] <stgraber>  49691 | Ubuntu GNOME Desktop i386  | darkxst | 2013-07-23 20:16:03 | Saucy Daily
[14:42] <stgraber>  49691 | Ubuntu GNOME Desktop i386  | darkxst | 2013-07-23 19:26:56 | Saucy Alpha 2
[14:42] <stgraber>  49690 | Ubuntu GNOME Desktop amd64 | darkxst | 2013-07-23 20:16:03 | Saucy Daily
[14:42] <stgraber>  49690 | Ubuntu GNOME Desktop amd64 | darkxst | 2013-07-23 19:26:56 | Saucy Alpha 2
[14:42] <stgraber> (4 rows)
[14:43] <stgraber> slangasek: so it looks like darkxst manually added 20130723.2 to the tracker, the timing is a bit odd though
[14:43] <stgraber> slangasek: anyway, that's not my script as it'd have shown up as ubuntu-cdimage otherwise
[14:45] <mlankhorst> infinity: the stack parts
[14:46] <slangasek> stgraber: AIUI infinity launched the rebuild and it didn't show up
[14:46] <slangasek> stgraber: n/m, looking at scrollback, infinity's rebuild was 20130723.1
[14:47] <slangasek> so I don't know why darkxst wanted 20130723.2, or why he added it manually
[14:48] <mlankhorst> infinity: yeah I marked it as verification-done now because I've been running it locally for a while :-)
[14:49] <infinity> mlankhorst: Alright.  I'll try to have a look at that all later.
[18:07] <Riddell> is there a current list of flavour leads?  the ReleaseManifest pages don't exist any more and I don't think it can be taken out of iso tracker?
[18:32] <phillw> there is somewhere, but I can't find it at the moment :/
[19:49] <infinity> Riddell: http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/series/37/manifest ?
[19:57] <Riddell> infinity: ooh that website is a mine of cool stuff now
[20:02] <infinity> Riddell: Linked from the front page on the series list, FWIW.
[20:02] <infinity> "Milestones for 'Saucy' series (product manifest | testsuites)"
[20:02] <infinity> etc.
[21:05] <phillw> A quick question.. there was a kernel release yesterday that got into the alpha 2 re-build for lubuntu, uname -a reports me as having 3.10.0-0-generic but bug 1204005 reports 3.10.0-5 has there been an interim kernel release?
[21:05] <ubot2`> Launchpad bug 1204005 in linux (Ubuntu) "[saucy] kvm host hangs of guest boot with 3.10.0-5" [Critical,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1204005
[21:06] <slangasek> phillw: are you testing on powerpc?
[21:07] <phillw> slangasek: nope, I'm on amd64
[21:07] <slangasek> hmm
[21:07] <phillw> slangasek: ahh, let me just check if my own system has been updated... (egg on face)
[21:08] <phillw> I'm smoke testing 13.10 :)
[21:09] <phillw> sorry, there are updates for my host machine :/
[21:10] <phillw> I'll update and add an 'affects me' to the bug once I confirm it still happens.
[21:12] <phillw> oh,  a kernel developer is on the case, so an affects me will simply subscribe me. Thanks, slangasek
[21:12] <slangasek> sure
[21:23] <phillw> slangasek: sorry to be back, but apt-get upgrade is telling me that it is holding back (amongst others) linux-generic linux-headers-generic linux-image-generic would you know why?
[21:24] <slangasek> because apt-get upgrade is the wrong tool
[21:24] <slangasek> you should be using apt-get dist-upgrade
[21:24] <phillw> thank you, will add that to the wiki page :)
[21:25] <slangasek> what wiki page?
[21:25] <phillw> for how to do upgrades when smoke testing ubuntu+1
[21:26] <slangasek> "what wiki page" - please tell me the url
[21:26] <phillw> the page is going to be written tonight :)
[21:26] <slangasek> hmm
[21:26] <phillw> I don't like to keep coming here asking you guys stuff.
[21:27] <slangasek> I find it hard to believe that there aren't existing wiki pages that cover this stuff... or should do so
[21:28] <phillw> slangasek: I will look, as https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/Testing_The_Devlopment_Release is a header page holding links to others.
[21:29] <phillw> (as is it's parent page)
[22:29] <darkxst> stgraber, yes I manually added ubuntu GNOME  20130723.2 via tracker but the images never showed up on cdimage. ( 20130723.1 still had a broken kernel)
[22:44] <slangasek> darkxst: manually adding is not how you trigger a rebuild
[22:45] <slangasek> darkxst: you should be using the 'request a rebuild' option at the bottom of http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/299/builds
[22:45] <darkxst> slangasek, manually as in through tracker admin page?
[22:46] <darkxst> oh never saw the box at the bottom there