[12:42] <rtg> when is the Saucy kernel currently lodged in -proposed gonna get promoted ? Is it automagic ?
[12:42] <cjwatson> It is automagic if you get it right
[12:43] <infinity> rtg: Sometime, and maybe.
[12:43] <cjwatson> I'm currently writing docs on how it all works ...
[12:43] <cjwatson> (Well, modifying Debian's docs to taste)
[12:44] <cjwatson> Looks like the linux-signed/amd64 autopkgtest is running
[12:45] <cjwatson> Or rather the linux/amd64 autopkgtest, triggered by linux-signed
[12:45] <cjwatson> As previously discussed there's an argument that that test is useless as well as broken
[12:45] <infinity> (Forcing it for now anyway)
[12:46] <infinity> rtg: Should squirt out the other end into release in the next cycle.
[12:46] <infinity> rtg: We'll discuss the uselessness of that test in general when we're in the same room next week.
[12:48] <rtg> otp - be with you in  a sec
[12:49] <infinity> rtg: The point of the above was that I don't need you, enjoy your phone call.
[12:50] <rtg> infinity, ack
[14:02] <phillw> Hi good people, would anyone have the time to look over the two lubuntu ppc images and see if they can be put on a quick diet to get them back to CD size for tonights autobuild as I've asked the testers to give them a thorough test over the weekend. Thanks.
[14:07] <infinity> phillw: They're broken anyway, remember?
[14:08] <infinity> phillw: BenC and I need to do some playing with the kernel before it's worth looking at the CD images.
[14:11] <phillw> infinity: that's the odd thing... they're not! I did send you an email :)
[14:15] <infinity> phillw: The alternates are definitely broken.  The live ones may or may not be.  They probably weren't testing the absolute latest.
[14:16] <cjwatson> The live ones are using an old squashfs.
[14:16] <cjwatson> Success is irrelevant.
[14:16] <cjwatson> You should unask your testers.
[14:16] <phillw> okies, will do!
[14:19] <cjwatson> infinity: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ProposedMigration
[14:38] <rtg> cjwatson, how about 'Migrating packages from -proposed to -updates' ? Otherwise it sounds like an idea that you're putting forth, rather then a fait accompli. It also a bit more searchable IMHO.
[14:39] <cjwatson> Probably true except that it's not to -updates
[14:40] <cjwatson> Changed the page title; do I have to rename it as well?  I've already linked to it from a couple of places :)
[14:40] <rtg> cjI'm fine with that :)
[14:41] <rtg> cjwatson, ^ (dang tab completion)
[14:41] <cjwatson> When we create the devel* links that page will get a lot more comprehensibly drafted
[14:41] <cjwatson> Very fed up with writing "the release pocket"