| RAOF | Ok. What's on the list of "omg must be fixed" for landing now? | 00:48 |
|---|---|---|
| bregma | RAOF, the definitive landing list is https://bugs.launchpad.net/mir/+bugs?field.tag=entering-saucy | 02:18 |
| RAOF | Ok, that was what I was looking at. | 02:18 |
| duflu | bregma: Did mir ever support non-Android armhf? I suspect a fix could be quite non-trivial. Particularly if you need to avoid compiling the Android bits and don't have any adequate substitute for them. It could be a challenge to make it build at all... | 02:21 |
| bregma | duflu, I don't believe it was ever tested if it did support non-android on arm | 02:22 |
| duflu | bregma: It might require a stub graphics driver implementation. Which is related to https://bugs.launchpad.net/mir/+bug/1118903 | 02:23 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1118903 in Mir "Mir lacks a software rendering backend" [High,Triaged] | 02:23 |
| bregma | maybe I'll play with that in my tomorrow | 02:24 |
| RAOF | duflu: It should work on non-android with one of the free arm drivers. | 02:24 |
| RAOF | duflu: If we happen to have any device supported by freedreno, of course :) | 02:24 |
| duflu | RAOF: Are such things available on Qemu/Pandaboard? | 02:25 |
| duflu | Should be for Panda anyway | 02:25 |
| RAOF | What's the GPU on a pandaboard? | 02:25 |
| duflu | RAOF: SGX540, http://pandaboard.org/content/platform | 02:27 |
| duflu | Though it usually gets bundled into what's known as an omap4 driver | 02:27 |
| duflu | I think | 02:27 |
| RAOF | Hm, then not currently supported. | 02:30 |
| duflu | bregma: Also, I think alan_g is working on the driver model. It's quite likely you need a quicker fix than when such a thing will be ready | 02:33 |
| bregma | yep | 02:33 |
| bregma | I think short-term strategy is to just not run the android-specific tests during packaging (as opposed to not running any tests, which is what we have now) | 02:34 |
| duflu | There is some Android-specific linkage in there too... libhybris | 02:39 |
| tvoss | good morning :) | 05:13 |
| tvoss | RAOF, ping | 05:13 |
| RAOF | tvoss: Pong. | 05:14 |
| RAOF | Good morning! | 05:14 |
| RAOF | Oh, you don't have to travel *nearly* as far to get to IOM. | 05:14 |
| RAOF | That's why you're online :) | 05:14 |
| tvoss | RAOF, yeah :) I'm mostly in the usual timezone | 05:15 |
| tvoss | RAOF, waiting for the gym to open up | 05:15 |
| duflu | Morning tvoss | 05:34 |
| tvoss | duflu, good morning | 05:34 |
| tvoss | duflu, how goes? | 05:34 |
| duflu | tvoss: Almost good. Spent the weekend dealing with drain blockages. And I'm a bit unwell today... | 05:35 |
| duflu | tvoss: How are you? | 05:35 |
| tvoss | duflu, pretty good, waiting for the gym to open :) on the IoM | 05:36 |
| alf__ | duflu: Hi! I remember at some point you had a branch for a demo display server in which you could move client windows around. Do you have this still somewhere? | 06:49 |
| duflu | alf__: Umm, that feature landed ages ago :) | 06:50 |
| duflu | alf__: mir_demo_server_shell, and then Alt+drag (or three finger drag) | 06:50 |
| alf__ | duflu: Hmm, the demo shell makes all windows full screen, that's why I couldn't find it. I guess I need to replace the fullscreen policy. | 06:52 |
| duflu | alf__: Not really. Demo shell only sizes all surfaces to fullscreen. The "fullscreen" state and policy is not set/enforced so they're still moveable | 06:53 |
| alf__ | duflu: ok, thanks, although I'd like the surfaces not to be fullscreen for demo purposes. | 06:54 |
| duflu | alf__: Yeah, I've done the same for testing. Just remove a single line. You know which one | 06:55 |
| alf__ | duflu: thanks | 06:55 |
| duflu | I'm almost disappointed more people have not played with our primitive window management yet | 06:57 |
| dholbach | good morning | 06:58 |
| duflu | Morning dholbach | 07:00 |
| dholbach | hey duflu | 07:00 |
| RAOF | Why am I surrounded by slow computers?! | 07:34 |
| Saviq | robert_ancell, http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~mir-team/unity-mir/trunk/revision/20 | 07:34 |
| robert_ancell | Saviq, lp:~robert-ancell/unity-mir/libmirserver-includes corrects all the includes, though it doesn't build for me since the -I flags aren't being passed to the compiler so the includes don't resolve | 07:40 |
| Saviq | robert_ancell, I had the same before - remove your CMakeCache.txt | 07:41 |
| Saviq | robert_ancell, and see the output from cmake | 07:41 |
| Saviq | robert_ancell, http://www.cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=14310 | 07:41 |
| robert_ancell | Saviq, doesn't exist - this is a fresh debuild from trunk | 07:41 |
| Saviq | robert_ancell, I expect you're missing a dep, but cmake completes because of the bug above | 07:42 |
| Saviq | robert_ancell, try with mk-build-deps -s sudo -i | 07:42 |
| robert_ancell | Saviq, ok, in that case the dep must be missing from debian/control | 07:42 |
| Saviq | robert_ancell, ok, let me try | 07:42 |
| robert_ancell | Saviq, mk-build-deps didn't help | 07:43 |
| Saviq | robert_ancell, right, I only grepped for < includes | 07:46 |
| Saviq | robert_ancell, trying in sbuild now | 07:46 |
| Saviq | robert_ancell, trunk built fine, trying your branch | 07:51 |
| duflu | alf__: Moving surfaces across monitors, I presume... ? | 07:56 |
| alf__ | duflu: exactly | 07:57 |
| Saviq | robert_ancell, your branch builds just fine in sbuild, too... | 07:59 |
| seb128 | Saviq, robert_ancell: I don't have the start of the backlog, but that vcs fails to build for me on missing ubuntu_application_api_mirserver_priv.h | 08:07 |
| robert_ancell | seb128, my one or trunk? | 08:08 |
| duflu | RAOF: I can actually reproduce the lag with demo_client_fingerpaint too | 08:08 |
| seb128 | robert_ancell, lp:~robert-ancell/unity-mir/libmirserver-includes | 08:08 |
| seb128 | robert_ancell, hey btw, enjoying IoM? | 08:08 |
| robert_ancell | seb128, yeah, you not here? | 08:09 |
| seb128 | robert_ancell, no, didn't get invited to this one... | 08:09 |
| Saviq | robert_ancell, is this the same failure you get? | 08:10 |
| seb128 | Saviq, dpkg -S ubuntu_application_api_mirserver_priv.h ? | 08:10 |
| robert_ancell | Saviq, I get http://paste.ubuntu.com/5924478/, but that sounds like the include path not being set again | 08:11 |
| robert_ancell | actually, no that sounds like a unity api issue, not a mir issue | 08:11 |
| Saviq | robert_ancell, are you using the mir integration ppa for that, though? | 08:11 |
| Saviq | robert_ancell, maybe there's something there that's not yet in mir trunk? | 08:11 |
| Saviq | robert_ancell, seb128 'cause it builds fine for me with https://launchpad.net/~phablet-team/+archive/mir/ | 08:12 |
| robert_ancell | Saviq, I'm using didrocks daily-build-next PPA, but that's not a mir header | 08:12 |
| Saviq | in an sbuild, so starting from a clean slate | 08:12 |
| seb128 | Saviq, robert_ancell: I'm using daily-build-next as well | 08:12 |
| seb128 | too many ppas :/ | 08:12 |
| seb128 | we need things in the archive | 08:12 |
| robert_ancell | seb128, we have face time to try and make that happen this week :) | 08:13 |
| seb128 | robert_ancell, good luck ;-) | 08:13 |
| Saviq | seb128, yeah, of course, just this stuff (unity-mir integration) is not yet archive-ready | 08:13 |
| Saviq | seb128, it's not even image-ready yet (so it's not there yet) | 08:14 |
| mlankhorst | morning | 08:46 |
| mlankhorst | seb128: if it was ready for the archive I would agree, but I don't think it is currently. :P | 08:47 |
| duflu | Hmm, having a bad run. Every time I update any system lately, it breaks for a new reason | 09:38 |
| duflu | Has anyone else had trouble with system-compositor-testing? | 09:43 |
| duflu | I've just updated and can't start X at all any more | 09:43 |
| RAOF | I upgraded my ATI box from raring to saucy and added that PPA, and it worked this morning | 09:44 |
| RAOF | FSVO ‘worked’, of course. | 09:44 |
| RAOF | (values of ‘work’ may include https://bugs.launchpad.net/mir/+bug/1204939) | 09:45 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1204939 in Mir "Unity doesn't start on ATI test machine (fails to find GL acceleration) (logind fails to track session?)" [Critical,Triaged] | 09:45 |
| duflu | RAOF: No, this is intel. I shall update again to be sure, then log a bug | 09:45 |
| * duflu realizes he doesn't need X to compile and run on Android | 09:49 | |
| duflu | But a desktop would be nice... | 09:49 |
| duflu | Argh! Can't log bugs without a browser :( | 09:50 |
| duflu | RAOF: Any ideas? https://bugs.launchpad.net/xmir/+bug/1206067 | 09:58 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1206067 in XMir "X crashes on startup. Can't log in." [Critical,New] | 09:58 |
| duflu | RAOF: Oh, the callstack matches an existing bug. Duplicate... | 10:00 |
| === sil2100_ is now known as sil2100 | ||
| === pete-woods1 is now known as pete-woods | ||
| === hikiko is now known as hikiko_lunch | ||
| === hikiko_lunch is now known as hikiko | ||
| === alan_g is now known as alan_g|lunch | ||
| mlankhorst | so what ati has issues? | 12:34 |
| mlankhorst | ok wtf | 12:44 |
| mlankhorst | yeah it definitely hits the wrong path on ati | 12:48 |
| mlankhorst | which is funny since I don't see how it could.. ah well maybe #error reveals :P | 12:51 |
| mlankhorst | [ 2025.510] (II) Module "dri2" already built-in | 13:11 |
| mlankhorst | [ 2025.510] (II) Loading sub module "exa" | 13:11 |
| mlankhorst | [ 2025.510] (II) LoadModule: "exa" | 13:11 |
| mlankhorst | [ 2025.515] (WW) Warning, couldn't open module exa | 13:11 |
| mlankhorst | [ 2025.515] (II) UnloadModule: "exa" | 13:11 |
| mlankhorst | [ 2025.515] (II) Unloading exa | 13:12 |
| mlankhorst | [ 2025.515] (EE) Failed to load module "exa" (module does not exist, 0) | 13:12 |
| mlankhorst | hm o.O | 13:12 |
| mlankhorst | RAOF: I seem to be losing the exa module when I restart X.. did you add an unlink somewhere? | 13:15 |
| mlankhorst | oh nm, you're installing it wrongly.. | 13:17 |
| mlankhorst | the modules appear to be installed to /usr/lib/xorg, not /usr/lib/xorg/modules.. | 13:17 |
| === alan_g|lunch is now known as alan_g | ||
| === alan_g is now known as alan_g|tea | ||
| alf__ | alan_g|tea: @multimonitor-gbm-display, what's the benefit of using vector::swap() instead of moving the contents? | 14:34 |
| === alan_g|tea is now known as alan_g | ||
| alan_g | alf__: it is as efficient, and less typing | 14:40 |
| === owner_ is now known as Guest93626 | ||
| alf__ | alan_g: it doesn't matter in this case, but with swap() object deletion is delayed until the temp vector goes out of scope | 14:43 |
| alan_g | alf__: yes | 14:43 |
| racarr | Mornnnning | 14:43 |
| alf__ | racarr: hi | 14:44 |
| alan_g | racarr: Afternoon | 14:44 |
| hikiko | bye | 15:16 |
| === alan_g is now known as alan_g|reboot | ||
| === alan_g is now known as alan_g|EOD | ||
| racarr | XD. playing around in msh::... | 18:05 |
| racarr | "Factory, Builder, Controller, and Source" | 18:05 |
| racarr | are tghe surface interfaces -.- | 18:05 |
| racarr | I dont think thats a pattern lol | 18:05 |
| robert_ancell | RAOF, hey | 18:22 |
| racarr | today is finally the death of single visibility focus mechanism | 18:28 |
| racarr | started trying to finish the last OSK requirement (client side initiated hide/show). which I guess is minimize/restore. I realized the input stack doesn't ignore hidden surfaces, so I implemented that. Implementing that breaks existing multiple client input acceptance tests though, so I need to rebuild the single visibility focus mechanism to raise surfaces instead | 19:29 |
| racarr | which is just almost finished :) then I think I will go back and add a second method to the SurfaceConfigurator, like | 19:29 |
| racarr | attribute_applied | 19:29 |
| racarr | and then unity8 can implement hide/show in response to minimize/restore | 19:29 |
| racarr | hook it up in QT boom | 19:29 |
| racarr | :) | 19:29 |
| racarr | LUNCCCH | 19:29 |
| === racarr is now known as racarr|lunch | ||
| === racarr|lunch is now known as racarr | ||
| racarr | back | 20:02 |
| racarr | feels great to kill single visibility focus mechanism | 20:59 |
| bschaefer | :), nice! | 21:01 |
| racarr | the pervasive threading makes the input acceptance tests so hard...every time there is some little surprise. | 21:23 |
| racarr | for example. | 21:23 |
| racarr | inject_event_to_event_hub. hide_surface. inject_eent_to_event_hub | 21:23 |
| racarr | is racy because the event isnt targeted until it gets to the dispatcher | 21:24 |
| bschaefer | o .. so it might get to the wrong surface? So if you have the stack as A > B, then inject event wanting to go A, then hide, it'll get to B sometimes? | 21:25 |
| racarr | yeah | 21:25 |
| racarr | and its always like this so you always have to find a different way to synchronize it | 21:25 |
| bschaefer | :( stacking issues are never fun | 21:25 |
| * bschaefer has flash backs of compiz stacking | 21:26 | |
| racarr | and it seems like there is rarely a pattern | 21:26 |
| racarr | aha yeah | 21:26 |
| racarr | it's really mostly a test bug because | 21:27 |
| racarr | in real behavior, if a surface is destroyed in between reading an event from the device and targeting it to a surface | 21:27 |
| racarr | then...that's just what happened | 21:27 |
| racarr | and it goes to a different surface XD | 21:28 |
| bschaefer | so if a surface is hidden you destroy them? | 21:28 |
| bschaefer | or rather, it goes from showing to hidden? | 21:28 |
| racarr | err, s/destroyed/hidden | 21:28 |
| bschaefer | right, just double checking :) | 21:28 |
| racarr | RIght | 21:28 |
| racarr | its only a problem when you need to orchestrate a particular series of events in a test or something | 21:28 |
| bschaefer | a unit test...you can add a bunch of sleeps :) | 21:29 |
| bschaefer | i mean hard for a unit test* | 21:29 |
| racarr | no :( sometimes full server tests take a LONNNG time | 21:29 |
| racarr | like valgrind in qemu | 21:29 |
| racarr | so the sleep has to be really high | 21:29 |
| racarr | but then tests would take too long | 21:29 |
| racarr | plus it's an acceptance test XD it would be pretty hard for a unit test | 21:30 |
| bschaefer | o my...yeah you don't want that | 21:30 |
| racarr | would be nice to have cucumber for input acceptance tests | 21:33 |
| racarr | Given a surface at 75,40 with size 30,30 and a surface at 63, 20 with size 50, 50, and the first surface is maximized, when a button is pressed then the first surface will... | 21:34 |
| racarr | hahahaha... | 21:34 |
| racarr | the fixture | 21:35 |
| bschaefer | thats what cucumber can do? That is nice! | 21:35 |
| racarr | would be hard to design though because | 21:35 |
| racarr | of all these synchronization problems | 21:35 |
| bschaefer | I've seen it in lp:mir, but i've never used it | 21:35 |
| racarr | the thing is you implement these constructs | 21:35 |
| racarr | given, when, then | 21:35 |
| racarr | and the test format is | 21:35 |
| racarr | given, and given, and given...when...and when...and when...then and then and then bla bla | 21:35 |
| bschaefer | do you have to rebuild/tear down the server for each test? | 21:35 |
| racarr | but the constructs are just regex | 21:35 |
| racarr | with parameters | 21:35 |
| racarr | and its hard to come up | 21:35 |
| racarr | with a set of words and sentence and such | 21:35 |
| racarr | that you can match with regex that describe your problem domain XD | 21:36 |
| racarr | yeah normally | 21:36 |
| bschaefer | yeah, well regex isn't always easy on the eyes either | 21:36 |
| bschaefer | unless you are doing it a lot haha | 21:36 |
| kdub | boost, gtest/gmock is like the perfect storm of compiler errors | 21:48 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!