=== tasdomas_afk is now known as tasdomas === tasdomas is now known as tasdomas_afk === tasdomas_afk is now known as tasdomas === tasdomas is now known as tasdomas_afk === tasdomas_afk is now known as tasdomas [08:15] wgrant: remember me complaining about the download stats doing weird things? [08:16] wgrant: running "python ~/ppastats.py libreoffice ppa saucy i386" returns weird results right now. [08:22] Sweetshark: Weird results? [08:22] It's all 0 here [08:22] wgrant: right [08:23] wgrant: it usually prints "$PACKAGENAME $COUNT" [08:24] Sweetshark: Yes, but you just uploaded a new version that presumably hasn't been downloaded yet... [08:24] wgrant: and it did -- up until I copied the package with binaries from ppa:bjoern-michaelsen/libreoffice-staging to that ppa [08:24] Sweetshark: The download counts are per version [08:25] wgrant: hmm, ok, lets see after the first download. [08:25] It's the number of times that the deb has been downloaded from that archive. [08:25] So I'd be quite concerned if it wasn't 0./ [08:25] wgrant: still, i wonder why the pkgname isnt printed. [08:26] Sweetshark: That would be the fault of your script. [08:26] That's nothing to do with Launchpad. [08:26] wgrant: k === jamesh_ is now known as jamesh === Sweetsha1k is now known as Sweetshark === Guest85887 is now known as LoganCloud [11:30] Hi. Is OAuth required for API consumers or is it possible to query bug data without it? [11:33] pkern: You don't need it for anonymous requests [11:34] So obviously you can't see private bugs without OAuth signing, but you can query public bug data [11:37] cjwatson: Thanks. I guess the lesson here is "don't use api.staging" :) [11:41] pkern: staging shouldn't be different in this regard. What are you trying to do? [11:44] % curl -k "https://api.staging.launchpad.net/1.0/bugs/1191993" [11:44] Object: , name: u'1191993' [11:44] If I remove the staging it looks much better. [11:44] For example GET 'http://api.staging.launchpad.net/1.0/ubuntu?ws.op=searchTasks&assignee=/~cjwatson' works here, though I can't say it's the most convenient way to get at that kind of thing [11:44] Ah, that's probably just because staging's database dump is old [11:45] https://staging.launchpad.net/bugs/1191993 doesn't show it either [11:45] Ubuntu bug 1191993 in net-retriever (Ubuntu) "net-retriever relies on MD5SUMs, should use SHA256" [Undecided,New] [11:45] Yes thank you ubot5 [11:45] Oh ok. [11:45] And the API is not even excluded by robots.txt \o/ [11:46] $ GET http://api.staging.launchpad.net/robots.txt | tail -n2 [11:46] User-agent: * [11:46] Disallow: / [11:46] cjwatson: Not on non-staging. [11:47] (FWIW I was not sarcastic. Here it will help me to do what I want to do.) [11:47] Ah, I'm not sure why that's the case. It disallows http://api.launchpad.net/api/, but that's 404 anyway [11:47] Might be an error [11:48] You might find it easier to use something like lp-shell [11:48] Working with the raw API isn't so pleasant that I'd go out of my way to do it rather than using the bindings === tasdomas is now known as tasdomas_afk === tasdomas_afk is now known as tasdomas [11:49] I can't use lp-shell or the Python bindings. [11:49] OK, but how come? [11:49] :) === daker_ is now known as daker === mordred is now known as TheRonin [15:32] i need help [15:33] With ... [15:33] i need help [15:34] help [15:34] unable to update launchpad.net ppa s [15:34] What's your Launchpad username, and exactly what did you try that failed/ [15:35] ? [15:35] username cshubhamrao [15:35] on trying apt-get update, I get error, failed to fetch http://ppa.launchpad.net/yannubuntu/boot-repair/ubuntu/dists/saucy/main/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found [15:36] That PPA doesn't have anything published for saucy, only for precise/quantal/raring [15:36] So I suggest editing the relevant file in /etc/apt/sources.list or /etc/apt/sources.list.d/* to say "raring" for that archive rather than "saucy" === tasdomas is now known as tasdomas_afk === hggdh_ is now known as hggdh [20:04] Hi there. What could be the reason that https://launchpad.net/debian/+source/xalan shows the latest version in unstable as 1.11-1, when http://packages.qa.debian.org/x/xalan.html says that 1.11-2 is the current version? The upload to unstable was 2 weeks ago. Is the package import manual? [21:26] seeing an odd issue with https://launchpad.net/ubuntu - in Get Involved - Report a bug - mouseover shows the right path - click the button and I get https://help.ubuntu.com/community/ReportingBugs [21:32] it's not an issue. you can't report a bug against the ubuntu distribution. if you want to report a bug, pick the source package it is in, and file a bug against that. for example, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gedit if it's a bug in gedit. [21:32] read the help page you get redirected to [21:32] ta [21:33] fwiw, it works for me and gets me to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+filebug [21:34] Ampelbein: you're probably in a team that it is special for and allows that. [21:34] there is generally no reason to report a bug against ubuntu rather than a source package in ubuntu [21:35] Yeah, except for "needs-packaging" sort of bugs. So it is probably the correct thing to redirect to the wiki. [21:35] I know - I don't do it personally - it's just new to me = having done it the other way with ubuntu-bug etc [21:35] yes it is the correct and intentional thing to redirect to the wiki :) [21:35] I was asking for someone esle [21:36] perhaps it should be changed to read - How to report a bug [21:36] anyway - thanks peeps :) [21:36] for the person who e-mailed the list about it? [21:36] you don't need to ask N different places for help either. one will do :) [21:37] no idea if they mailed the list? I'd doubt it [21:37] they didn't :) [21:38] someone mailed ubuntu-devel-discuss less than an hour ago, about it. [21:38] someone might have - but it wasn't this person nor me [21:39] anyway - really not an issue - just asked the question and got the answer === Vorpal_ is now known as Vorpal