[12:30] <phillw> darkxst: just as thought.. have you got a restricted extras package? aka https://help.ubuntu.com/community/RestrictedFormats
[21:35] <darkxst> phillw, no we dont, but we probably should have!
[21:39] <phillw> darkxst: I'd suggest using the lubuntu one, but that is currently pulling in chromium as a web-browser. If you have a chat
[21:40] <phillw> juilen (gilir) I'm sure he'd be happy to give the details needed
[21:47] <jbicha> why wouldn't ubuntu-restricted-extras also work for Ubuntu GNOME?
[21:51] <darkxst> jbicha, well it would, only thing I see with that is that it pulls in both gstreamer 0.1 and 1.0
[21:53] <jbicha> there is still stuff in the Ubuntu archives that use gstreamer 0.10
[21:54] <jbicha> it looks like lubuntu-restricted-addons is inadequate compared to ubuntu's
[21:55] <jbicha> Xubuntu's is probably inadequate for not including the gstreamer 1.0 stuff
[21:57] <jbicha> my opinion is that Xubuntu should just just use ubuntu-restricted-extras
[21:58] <jbicha> and that lubuntu-restricted-extras can recommend ubuntu-restricted-addons and the chromium extra codecs
[21:59] <jbicha> on the other hand, even lubuntu is using Firefox now so maybe even that's not needed (except for upgraders)
[22:00] <jbicha> alternatively, I'll ask qengho why the chromium codecs need to depend on chromium-browser; maybe we can get rid of all the other -extras except Kubuntu's
[22:01] <jbicha> because many people using Ubuntu use Chromium too
[22:03] <jbicha> ubuntu-restricted-extras needs to install a few extra things (like gstreamer 0.10 *and* 1.0 support) because it's not possible for other packages to recommend that stuff