[00:03] <ikonia> what's up now dolphin-man ?
[00:03] <dolphin-man> oops
[00:03] <dolphin-man> sorry i meant to join #ubuntu-irc
[00:03] <ikonia> no problem
[10:12] <reisio> bazinga!
[10:13] <k1l> hi reisio
[10:13] <reisio> hiyo
[10:15] <k1l> how can we help you?
[10:16] <reisio> meeting bazhang
[10:16] <ikonia> reisio: do you have a moment ?
[10:17] <reisio> yup
[10:17] <ikonia> I just wanted to clarify something after you've been ranting about being banned for saying clamav is an anti-virtus
[10:17] <ikonia> I think you know that wasn't the case, but I wanted to clarify
[10:17] <reisio> you wanted to clarify that you thought that, or something else?
[10:18] <ikonia> you where banned because you where not offering help - the guy in question wanted to scan his system for linux virus's - you kept telling him clamAV - which wasn't what he needed or wasn't going to solve his problem
[10:18] <reisio> I could get my log, but IIRC the guy sent a smiley face? He was quite satisfied
[10:18] <ikonia> yes, he was, with the wrong information
[10:18] <reisio> wrong? :)
[10:19] <ikonia> that was the point
[10:19] <reisio> did he not ask for an antivirus application?
[10:19] <ikonia> yes, but it wouldn't help him
[10:19] <reisio> why wouldn't it?
[10:19] <reisio> it's what he asked for
[10:19] <ikonia> how is clamav going to help him scan his linux system for linux virus ?
[10:19] <reisio> by using it
[10:19] <reisio> it's an antivirus, you see
[10:19] <reisio> that's what it does
[10:20] <ikonia> and this is the problem
[10:20] <reisio> what is?
[10:20] <ikonia> I think you know exactly what you are doing
[10:20] <reisio> I think you know exactly what I'm doing, too
[10:20] <reisio> because it's obvious
[10:20] <reisio> because I'm being perfectly rational
[10:20] <reisio> :D
[10:21] <reisio> or at least 99% perfectly
[10:24] <k1l> reisio: i think idleone made it quite clear that your ban will stand for at least 3 month now.
[10:24] <ikonia> hang on
[10:24] <ikonia> (today)
[10:24] <ikonia> bazhang: said he'd pick it up with him
[10:24] <reisio> k1l: he did make that quite clear
[10:24] <reisio> and also what ikonia said
[10:24] <k1l> ikonia: ok
[10:26] <k1l> bazhang: seems afk for now. please come back some time later. we will inform bazhang that you were here and tell him to pm you if he is back on
[10:27] <reisio> I can wait
[10:28] <k1l> please dont idle in this channel here. come back in some time or wait untill bazhang messages you that he is available to solve that issue here in this channel. thank you
[10:31] <reisio> presumably that will serve some codified purpose? Presumably one that is being applied to others here even though it seems not the case?
[10:32] <ikonia> reisio: it's just a simple rule of not idling so that others can use the channel if need be
[10:32] <k1l> reisio: do you have a problem with following rules?
[10:32] <ikonia> reisio: the only guys idling are on the ops team, nothing hidden or coded,
[10:32] <ikonia> it's in the topic,
[10:33] <k1l> because showing you have a problem with following rules will not convince the ops team to lift a ban for a user in the support channel.
[10:33] <ikonia> reisio: it's only to keep the channel clear, nothing else,
[10:33] <reisio> k1l: well I can hardly attempt to prove otherwise now that you've said all that, can I?
[10:33] <reisio> asked a question and got an answer, catch you later
[13:05] <Myrtti> did someone remove the ban then?
[13:05] <ikonia> yes
[13:07] <Myrtti> ok, my brain is shortcircuiting quite badly so I can't see anything
[13:07] <ikonia> there is a comment in BT explaining that I'd removed it
[13:08] <ikonia> (and obviously BT logs me removing it too)
[13:08] <Myrtti> oh yeah, I could've looked from there
[13:08] <Myrtti> silly me
[13:09] <ikonia> (also put a comment in the secret channel explaining this)
  ban removed so soon ikonia ?
[16:20] <ikonia> changed to account based
[16:20] <bazhang> ok thanks
[16:21] <ikonia> he always identified but the BT ip range he uses is huge and changes
[16:21] <ikonia> just seemed a simpler approach
[16:23] <DJones> I'm not sure if that was a script, looked like they joined, did /me is back & lewq lewq and then quit
[16:23] <ikonia> DJones: he knows not to do it now though
[16:25] <DJones> Thats true, the same nick does have a 12 month old entry in BT using a Sky broadband ip for spamming the channel
[17:13] <DJones> Hah. Abolfazl_Olaf Hello everyone, I'm here and ready to DDos..   Is that why his connection was reset by peer a few seconds later
[17:52] <IdleOne> never mind
[17:59] <jrib> can we just get the bots to auto-ban the i am here to ddos phrase...?
[18:00] <IdleOne> idoru can do it
[18:00] <IdleOne> but idoru is not in #ubuntu
[18:01] <IdleOne> floodbots could do it also but LjL is in the mountains, probably not caring about PHP
[20:32] <IdleOne> googanger: you said you wanted to speak to the ops. Please go ahead.
[21:15] <k1l_> AndresSM: hi, can we help you?
[21:15] <AndresSM> oh sorry was just checking if the channel did exist
[21:15] <AndresSM> I'll leave
[21:15] <k1l_> alright :)