[07:32] <dholbach> good morning
[07:38] <iulian> Morning dholbach.
[07:38] <dholbach> hi iulian
[10:36] <mfisch> how can I tell who sync'd a package?
[10:37] <smartboyhw> mfisch, look at the publishing history?
[10:39] <mfisch> I must be looking in the wrong place, it says sync'd by Ubuntu Archive auto-sync
[10:39] <mfisch> sponsored by the bot
[10:39] <mfisch> but I did that one
[10:39] <mfisch> pycode-browser
[10:45] <geser> mfisch: look at the entry for saucy-proposed on https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pycode-browser/+publishinghistory (Copied from debian sid in Primary Archive for Debian GNU/Linux by Matthew Fischer)
[10:56] <mfisch> thanks geser
[11:01] <mlankhorst> can I get some feedback on https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1208431 ?
[13:22] <mfisch> I'm in meetings all week, but I can look at your package some today
[13:23] <mfisch> mlankhorst: ^^
[13:23] <mlankhorst> ty
[13:30] <mfisch> mlankhorst: is this package in debian already?
[13:30] <mlankhorst> no they don't have autopkgtest, so it's useless there, also some requirements missing
[13:30] <mfisch> where did Uploaders and Original Maintainer come from?
[13:31] <mlankhorst> ugh oops, copy/paste :P
[13:31] <mlankhorst> those fields can be killed
[13:34] <smartboyhw> I don't think you should kill Original Maintainer...
[13:34] <smartboyhw> Uploaders should be killed....
[13:35] <mfisch> I dont think XSBC-Original-Maintainer makes sense in this case
[13:35] <mfisch> it's not a debian merge
[13:36] <mfisch> the copyright file will contain the upstream author
[13:36] <mfisch> mlankhorst: you need some different copyright stuff for debian/
[13:37] <mfisch> mlankhorst: apt-get source unyaffs (in saucy) to get an example
[13:42] <mlankhorst> oh I like MIT, do I need a separate license for debian/* ? :P
[13:42] <smartboyhw> mlankhorst, probably GPL:)
[13:42] <mlankhorst> no
[13:44] <mlankhorst> if I'm lucky I can get the packaging upstream, but then it has to be same license
[14:21] <mlankhorst> mfisch: I fixed the packaging now with the points you raised
[14:21] <mfisch> mlankhorst: I cannot get it to build atm
[14:21] <mlankhorst> needs xorg-gtest from saucy
[14:22] <mfisch> mlankhorst: so why isn't that a dep?
[14:22] <mfisch> mlankhorst: I'm curious if there are lintian issues
[14:22] <mlankhorst> I was waiting for upstream to cut a new xorg-gtest release
[14:23] <mlankhorst> there are 2 afaik, not much I can do about them :/
[14:23] <mlankhorst> W: xorg-integration-tests source: illegal-runtime-test-name lib.libX11
[14:23] <mlankhorst> W: xorg-integration-tests source: illegal-runtime-test-name lib.libXi
[14:26] <mlankhorst> oh woops, third one from empty newlines in debian/copyright, ah well fixed that one
[14:27] <mlankhorst> I filed debian bug 711844 about that one, btw
[14:31] <mfisch> mlankhorst: the . is also an issue right?
[14:31] <mlankhorst> I don't believe it is
[14:32] <mlankhorst> unless you don't have linux-image-3.* ;-)
[14:33] <mfisch> mlankhorst: "dots" sorry I missed that in the list
[14:35] <mfisch> mlankhorst: does the warning cause the test to be skipped?
[14:35] <mlankhorst> no if it did none of the tests would work
[14:36] <mfisch> mlankhorst: ok. well sounds like whats left is to add that gtest dep and wait for a new version to show up
[14:39] <mlankhorst> ok, if i require 0.7.1-0ubuntu1 should I depend on >= that version or is 0.7.1 enough?
[14:41] <mfisch> I'd rely on whatever one has the changes you need
[14:42] <mfisch> for Ubuntu specifically 0.7.1 and 0.7.1-0ubuntu1 would be the same
[14:42] <mfisch> if this was in Debian that may not be true
[14:42] <mlankhorst> shrug debian version wouldn't work, package is not ready for debian yet, guess it doesn't matter
[14:43] <mfisch> yeah
[14:43] <mfisch> if you plan on pushing it to debian, I think 0.7.1 makes sense
[14:49] <mlankhorst> available now
[14:49] <mlankhorst> https://launchpadlibrarian.net/146840908/xorg-integration-tests_0.0.1%2Bgit20130725%2Bbf7fc95-0ubuntu1%2Btry3_0.0.1%2Bgit20130725%2Bbf7fc95-0ubuntu1%2Btry4.diff.gz
[19:42] <jtaylor> zzzzZZZzz compiling 70k line c++ files takes forever on qemu ppc :(
[19:45] <jtaylor> I'd like to get the gnu parallel situation solved in ubuntu
[19:45] <jtaylor> someone familiar with the package?
[19:45] <jtaylor> it conflicts with moreutils parallels in debian now
[19:45] <jtaylor> I don't like that because the stuff in moreutils is useful
[19:45] <jtaylor> I was thinking about splitting moreutils into two packages, one without parallel that does not conflict with gnu parallel
[19:45] <jtaylor> thoughts?
[19:47] <jtaylor> hurray compile done after 16 minutes :D
[20:04] <ScottK> jtaylor: Fix it in Debian in my thought.
[20:05] <jtaylor> I'm not sure that will be easy
[20:05] <jtaylor> the history between parallel and moreutils is not so good
[20:05] <jtaylor> before I propose anything I'd like some input if its even a good idea
[20:06] <ScottK> I know just enough about it to think we don't want to deal with the diff.
[20:06] <jtaylor> the diff probably wouldn't be big
[20:07] <jtaylor> two extra packages
[20:14] <jtaylor> hm I guess I can file a bug and see what happens
[20:24] <jtaylor> X-Debbugs-CC can be put directly into the text header of a mail?
[20:24] <jtaylor> or is it some special header I can't add with e.g. thunderbird
[20:25] <jtaylor> found the section in the docs, should work