[08:51] <bencer> hi guys. how you can report spam comments on launchpad? i just saw https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdm/+bug/577477/comments/26
[08:58] <cjwatson> bencer: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad
[09:12] <shadeslayer> hi, I'm getting a OOPS when copying packages
[09:13] <shadeslayer> OOPS-ac31afe79c02a3124719003e2e838590
[09:13] <shadeslayer> copying the "homerun-kickstarter" source from https://launchpad.net/~blue-shell/+archive/homerun to https://launchpad.net/~netrunner-os/+archive/enigma-1306-updates/+packages
[09:17] <shadeslayer> wgrant: ^^
[09:29] <cjwatson> There was a previous PackageDiff for that pair of SPRs, with requester==None.  I wonder how that happened ...
[09:32] <wgrant> cjwatson: PackageDiff.requester used to always be SPR.creator, but that became dangerous when it started being used as Job.requester, which can get emailed on failure
[09:33] <wgrant> So now it can be None when there is no obvious person to blame for the diff
[09:33] <wgrant> I thought StevenK checked that nothing actually used requester, but apparently somewhere was missed..
[09:34] <wgrant> It's odd that that case had no requester, though.
[11:00] <stub> I'm going to need to make the test runner unset the OS_* openstack environment variables so tests don't attempt to connect to random Swift servers if they happen to be set.
[11:00] <stub> I'll probably need the same change to 'make run'
[11:01] <stub> Any other problems I'm going to hit? Or should I not use the standard OS_* environment for Swift configuration and move it somewhere else?
[11:01] <stub> Dealing with secrets, so best not launchpad.conf I think
[11:02] <stub> I can put in a flag in the launchpad.conf (or a featureflag if you prefer) to not use Swift at all.
[11:05] <lifeless> stub: so the OS_* variables are really suited for command line tool usage; most libraries don't use them (because in part of the above, also because setting environment variables on daemon start up is a little icky)
[11:05] <lifeless> stub: also, ECHANNEL, perhaps #launchpad-dev ? :)
[11:14] <stub> ECHANNEL
[12:09] <shadeslayer> wgrant: should I file a bug on launchpad regarding that issue?
[12:13] <wgrant> shadeslayer: It's fixed in trunk. Let me just QA and deploy it.
[12:13] <shadeslayer> ack, would be super nice to have it deployed :)
[12:37] <toabctl> how long does it take before a package appears in launchpad when I uploaded a package to my ppa? minutes?hours?
[12:40] <Ampelbein> toabctl: minutes. You'll get an email when it's processed.
[12:40] <toabctl> Ampelbein: I'm not sure if I can receive the mail. is there any other method to get the possible reason why an upload fails?
[12:41] <Ampelbein> toabctl: That I do not know. Is your pgp key imported to launchpad? correct distribution set in debian/changelog? Correct signatures on the source package?
[12:42] <toabctl> Ampelbein: yes
[12:46] <wgrant> toabctl: Why can't you receive an email?
[12:47] <wgrant> toabctl: But you should receive an email within 5 minutes if you signed the package properly.
[12:49] <wgrant> I'm not seeing any successul or failed uploads to your PPA today.
[12:49] <shadeslayer> wgrant: fix deployed?
[12:50] <wgrant> shadeslayer: Waiting for the deployment to be kicked off.
[12:50] <shadeslayer> ah okay
[12:53] <toabctl> wgrant: my ppa?
[12:53] <wgrant> toabctl: Yes
[12:55] <toabctl> wgrant: I uploaded to the ~telekomcloud ppa
[12:55] <toabctl> wgrant: the ppa is called testing
[12:55] <wgrant> toabctl: 'Signing key C870D1F099D654756D227716767142C5A7C75548 not registered in launchpad.'
[12:58] <toabctl> wgrant: ~telekomcloud is a team. can a team register a key?
[12:59] <toabctl> wgrant: forget it. I have to validate the key. missed to validation mail.
[12:59] <wgrant> toabctl: Only people have keys, not teams. So you'd associate it with your personal account.
[13:00] <toabctl> wgrant: and the mails for the failure go to my primary email address?
[13:00] <toabctl> wgrant: or to the address mentioned in debian/changelog?
[13:01]  * czajkowski peers at wgrant 
[13:01] <wgrant> toabctl: They'll go to the primary email address of the Launchpad account to which the signing key is registered.
[13:02] <wgrant> But only if the signing key is known to Launchpad.
[13:03] <toabctl> wgrant: ah.ok. so without a known signing key, the user doesn't get an email.
[13:03] <wgrant> Right.
[13:03] <wgrant> We can't trust Maintainer or Changed-By
[13:03] <wgrant> So we can't safely email anyone if the signature can't be verified.
[13:06] <toabctl> wgrant: do you see an upload now?
[13:08] <wgrant> toabctl: You have mail.
[13:08] <wgrant> You need to build with debuild -S -sa, not just debuild -S
[13:11] <toabctl> wgrant: what is -sa for?
[13:13] <wgrant> toabctl: It includes the orig.tar.gz
[13:13] <wgrant> In the changes file
[13:14] <toabctl> wgrant: ok. thanks!
[14:19] <jf_> Hi, I don't have any access to my proprietary project: https://launchpad.net/iller : the commercial subscription has expired. I bought a new subscription, but can't link it to the project. Could you help me ? Thanks.
[14:26] <czajkowski> jf_: if you look under https://launchpad.net/~/+vouchers
[14:26] <czajkowski> you'll see your voucher so you can apply it
[14:26] <czajkowski> if your project has expired
[14:26] <czajkowski> you';ll need an admin to make it unexpired in order to apply the voucher
[14:26] <jf_> czajkowski, and where can I find an admin ?
[14:28] <czajkowski> jf_: maybe not around at this hour of the day, you'll need to file a answer on lp - https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+addquestion
[14:28] <jf_> czajkowski, ok I'll try, thanks.
[14:30] <wgrant> jf_: I've revived the project.
[14:30] <wgrant> You should be able to apply the voucher now.
[14:31] <wgrant> shadeslayer: That copy should work now.
[14:31] <shadeslayer> Launchpad encountered an internal error during the following operation: copying a package.  It was logged with id OOPS-89b73987b42084f729cac479dfd3eb62.  Sorry for the inconvenience.
[14:31] <shadeslayer> though I used a script to do it
[14:32] <jf_> wgrant, it works, many thanks.
[14:32] <czajkowski> wgrant: thanks :)
[14:34] <shadeslayer> wgrant: same thing from the webui
[14:34] <shadeslayer> OOPS-df5803a99f82e519a2d75b6cbc5f28a8 from webui
[14:34] <wgrant> shadeslayer: Missed something. Can you try again now?
[14:35] <wgrant> Running...
[14:35] <wgrant> Or another job is :)
[14:35] <wgrant> It worked.
[14:35] <shadeslayer> yay
[14:35] <shadeslayer> yep :)
[14:35] <shadeslayer> thanks wgrant
[14:35] <wgrant> np, sorry about the glitch
[14:38] <shadeslayer> wgrant: did that affect all repos?
[14:39] <wgrant> shadeslayer: It only affected certain packages for which we couldn't determine the uploader when generating the diff. It's a rare situation, and I don't yet know why it affected that particular package.
[14:39] <wgrant> I worked it out half way through that last sentence, though.
[14:39] <shadeslayer> recipe builds?
[14:40] <wgrant> Yup
[14:40] <shadeslayer> yeah thought so :)
[14:40] <shadeslayer> I am pretty certain I have copied recipe builds before
[14:40] <wgrant> It only broke last week
[14:41] <wgrant> And recipe builds are copied infrequently enough that it's only shown up a few times since then.
[14:41] <shadeslayer> ah that probably explains why :)
[15:01] <dobey> how can i get an mbox or maildir or something of a mailing list archive on lp?
[15:02] <shadeslayer> IIRC you create a team
[15:02] <shadeslayer> and then you get a mailing list for free?
[15:03] <shadeslayer> oh
[15:03] <shadeslayer> you want an archive of old posts
[15:03] <shadeslayer> https://lists.launchpad.net/team_name/ ?
[15:03] <dobey> yeah, i don't want more mailing lists
[15:04] <dobey> yes i can see the archive. i don't want to read it on the web. i want to import it into evolution so i can reply to stuff properly
[15:05] <dobey> typical mailman setups have a "download a tarball of this month" or "download an mbox of this message" thing. lp seems to not expose that
[15:05] <shadeslayer> ahhh nope, not that I know of
[15:10] <czajkowski> dobey: nope cant be done, there can be a once off dump if needed
[15:11] <dobey> can i do it, or does someone with more duck powers than i, have to do it?
[15:13] <czajkowski> dobey: you'd need to file a lp Q and webops do it for you
[16:54] <elfy> is there anyone about that could guide me in part of creating a team page - in particular how I can make a NEW team page be owned by  this teamhttps://launchpad.net/~forum-council
[16:55] <elfy> I need to create a team page similar to https://launchpad.net/~ubuntuforums-staff but for a slightly different group of people
[16:55] <elfy> or do I need to get the communiyt council to do it and make the FC admins
[16:55] <elfy> thanks
[16:56] <cjwatson> Creating a team is done here: https://launchpad.net/people/+newteam
[16:56] <saiarcot895> elfy: I can't guide you here, but I think you have to create a team page from the Launchpad home page with either Moderated or Restricted permissions, and request to be considered as a subteam of the forum-council team
[16:57] <elfy> cjwatson: yea I know that - there doesn't appear to be anywhere to specify an owner though
[16:57] <cjwatson> If you own the team you can go to "Change details" on the team page, then "Change owner"
[16:57] <elfy> cjwatson: aaah - ok :)
[16:57] <cjwatson> (or https://launchpad.net/~TEAM/+reassign)
[16:58] <cjwatson> Permissions don't matter
[16:58] <elfy> so just forge ahead and build it with restricted and then reassign - thanks :)
[16:58] <cjwatson> Well, not for ownership at any rate
[16:58] <elfy> this is one of the last bits of the forum saga ...
[16:58] <elfy> which I will be pleased to see the back off
[17:37] <elfy> cjwatson: thank you - all done :)
[17:42] <Uni> so,/2
[17:42]  * Uni sighs
[17:42] <Uni> irc is hard