=== tasdomas_afk is now known as tasdomas === mpt_ is now known as mpt [08:51] hi guys. how you can report spam comments on launchpad? i just saw https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdm/+bug/577477/comments/26 [08:51] Ubuntu bug 577477 in gdm (Ubuntu) "gdm fails to start sitting on plymouth boot" [Low,Fix released] [08:58] bencer: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad [09:12] hi, I'm getting a OOPS when copying packages [09:13] OOPS-ac31afe79c02a3124719003e2e838590 [09:13] https://oops.canonical.com/?oopsid=OOPS-ac31afe79c02a3124719003e2e838590 === tasdomas is now known as tasdomas_afk [09:13] copying the "homerun-kickstarter" source from https://launchpad.net/~blue-shell/+archive/homerun to https://launchpad.net/~netrunner-os/+archive/enigma-1306-updates/+packages [09:17] wgrant: ^^ [09:29] There was a previous PackageDiff for that pair of SPRs, with requester==None. I wonder how that happened ... [09:32] cjwatson: PackageDiff.requester used to always be SPR.creator, but that became dangerous when it started being used as Job.requester, which can get emailed on failure [09:33] So now it can be None when there is no obvious person to blame for the diff [09:33] I thought StevenK checked that nothing actually used requester, but apparently somewhere was missed.. [09:34] It's odd that that case had no requester, though. === tasdomas_afk is now known as tasdomas [11:00] I'm going to need to make the test runner unset the OS_* openstack environment variables so tests don't attempt to connect to random Swift servers if they happen to be set. [11:00] I'll probably need the same change to 'make run' [11:01] Any other problems I'm going to hit? Or should I not use the standard OS_* environment for Swift configuration and move it somewhere else? [11:01] Dealing with secrets, so best not launchpad.conf I think [11:02] I can put in a flag in the launchpad.conf (or a featureflag if you prefer) to not use Swift at all. [11:05] stub: so the OS_* variables are really suited for command line tool usage; most libraries don't use them (because in part of the above, also because setting environment variables on daemon start up is a little icky) [11:05] stub: also, ECHANNEL, perhaps #launchpad-dev ? :) [11:14] ECHANNEL [12:09] wgrant: should I file a bug on launchpad regarding that issue? [12:13] shadeslayer: It's fixed in trunk. Let me just QA and deploy it. [12:13] ack, would be super nice to have it deployed :) [12:37] how long does it take before a package appears in launchpad when I uploaded a package to my ppa? minutes?hours? [12:40] toabctl: minutes. You'll get an email when it's processed. [12:40] Ampelbein: I'm not sure if I can receive the mail. is there any other method to get the possible reason why an upload fails? [12:41] toabctl: That I do not know. Is your pgp key imported to launchpad? correct distribution set in debian/changelog? Correct signatures on the source package? [12:42] Ampelbein: yes [12:46] toabctl: Why can't you receive an email? [12:47] toabctl: But you should receive an email within 5 minutes if you signed the package properly. [12:49] I'm not seeing any successul or failed uploads to your PPA today. [12:49] wgrant: fix deployed? [12:50] shadeslayer: Waiting for the deployment to be kicked off. [12:50] ah okay [12:53] wgrant: my ppa? [12:53] toabctl: Yes [12:55] wgrant: I uploaded to the ~telekomcloud ppa [12:55] wgrant: the ppa is called testing [12:55] toabctl: 'Signing key C870D1F099D654756D227716767142C5A7C75548 not registered in launchpad.' [12:58] wgrant: ~telekomcloud is a team. can a team register a key? [12:59] wgrant: forget it. I have to validate the key. missed to validation mail. [12:59] toabctl: Only people have keys, not teams. So you'd associate it with your personal account. [13:00] wgrant: and the mails for the failure go to my primary email address? [13:00] wgrant: or to the address mentioned in debian/changelog? [13:01] * czajkowski peers at wgrant [13:01] toabctl: They'll go to the primary email address of the Launchpad account to which the signing key is registered. [13:02] But only if the signing key is known to Launchpad. [13:03] wgrant: ah.ok. so without a known signing key, the user doesn't get an email. [13:03] Right. [13:03] We can't trust Maintainer or Changed-By [13:03] So we can't safely email anyone if the signature can't be verified. [13:06] wgrant: do you see an upload now? [13:08] toabctl: You have mail. [13:08] You need to build with debuild -S -sa, not just debuild -S [13:11] wgrant: what is -sa for? [13:13] toabctl: It includes the orig.tar.gz [13:13] In the changes file [13:14] wgrant: ok. thanks! === tasdomas is now known as tasdomas_afk [14:19] Hi, I don't have any access to my proprietary project: https://launchpad.net/iller : the commercial subscription has expired. I bought a new subscription, but can't link it to the project. Could you help me ? Thanks. [14:26] jf_: if you look under https://launchpad.net/~/+vouchers [14:26] you'll see your voucher so you can apply it [14:26] if your project has expired [14:26] you';ll need an admin to make it unexpired in order to apply the voucher [14:26] czajkowski, and where can I find an admin ? [14:28] jf_: maybe not around at this hour of the day, you'll need to file a answer on lp - https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+addquestion [14:28] czajkowski, ok I'll try, thanks. [14:30] jf_: I've revived the project. [14:30] You should be able to apply the voucher now. [14:31] shadeslayer: That copy should work now. [14:31] Launchpad encountered an internal error during the following operation: copying a package. It was logged with id OOPS-89b73987b42084f729cac479dfd3eb62. Sorry for the inconvenience. [14:31] though I used a script to do it [14:32] wgrant, it works, many thanks. [14:32] wgrant: thanks :) [14:32] https://oops.canonical.com/?oopsid=OOPS-89b73987b42084f729cac479dfd3eb62 [14:34] wgrant: same thing from the webui [14:34] OOPS-df5803a99f82e519a2d75b6cbc5f28a8 from webui [14:34] https://oops.canonical.com/?oopsid=OOPS-df5803a99f82e519a2d75b6cbc5f28a8 [14:34] shadeslayer: Missed something. Can you try again now? [14:35] Running... [14:35] Or another job is :) [14:35] It worked. [14:35] yay [14:35] yep :) [14:35] thanks wgrant [14:35] np, sorry about the glitch [14:38] wgrant: did that affect all repos? [14:39] shadeslayer: It only affected certain packages for which we couldn't determine the uploader when generating the diff. It's a rare situation, and I don't yet know why it affected that particular package. [14:39] I worked it out half way through that last sentence, though. [14:39] recipe builds? [14:40] Yup [14:40] yeah thought so :) [14:40] I am pretty certain I have copied recipe builds before [14:40] It only broke last week [14:41] And recipe builds are copied infrequently enough that it's only shown up a few times since then. [14:41] ah that probably explains why :) [15:01] how can i get an mbox or maildir or something of a mailing list archive on lp? [15:02] IIRC you create a team [15:02] and then you get a mailing list for free? [15:03] oh [15:03] you want an archive of old posts [15:03] https://lists.launchpad.net/team_name/ ? [15:03] yeah, i don't want more mailing lists [15:04] yes i can see the archive. i don't want to read it on the web. i want to import it into evolution so i can reply to stuff properly [15:05] typical mailman setups have a "download a tarball of this month" or "download an mbox of this message" thing. lp seems to not expose that [15:05] ahhh nope, not that I know of [15:10] dobey: nope cant be done, there can be a once off dump if needed [15:11] can i do it, or does someone with more duck powers than i, have to do it? [15:13] dobey: you'd need to file a lp Q and webops do it for you === tasdomas_afk is now known as tasdomas [16:54] is there anyone about that could guide me in part of creating a team page - in particular how I can make a NEW team page be owned by this teamhttps://launchpad.net/~forum-council [16:55] I need to create a team page similar to https://launchpad.net/~ubuntuforums-staff but for a slightly different group of people [16:55] or do I need to get the communiyt council to do it and make the FC admins [16:55] thanks [16:56] Creating a team is done here: https://launchpad.net/people/+newteam [16:56] elfy: I can't guide you here, but I think you have to create a team page from the Launchpad home page with either Moderated or Restricted permissions, and request to be considered as a subteam of the forum-council team [16:57] cjwatson: yea I know that - there doesn't appear to be anywhere to specify an owner though [16:57] If you own the team you can go to "Change details" on the team page, then "Change owner" [16:57] cjwatson: aaah - ok :) [16:57] (or https://launchpad.net/~TEAM/+reassign) [16:58] Permissions don't matter [16:58] so just forge ahead and build it with restricted and then reassign - thanks :) [16:58] Well, not for ownership at any rate [16:58] this is one of the last bits of the forum saga ... [16:58] which I will be pleased to see the back off === andreas__ is now known as ahasenack [17:37] cjwatson: thank you - all done :) [17:42] so,/2 [17:42] * Uni sighs [17:42] irc is hard === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk === tasdomas is now known as tasdomas_afk === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha === tasdomas_afk is now known as tasdomas === tasdomas is now known as tasdomas_afk === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha === Guest82298 is now known as nesthib