[11:39] Goodmorning [11:39] morning [11:40] I have no scientific basis for this theory, but I think my computer video runs faster over HDMI [11:41] It just feels snappier today [11:41] vs vga? [11:41] dvi [11:42] I also attribute this to a phenominon I noticed whenever listening to remastered audio [11:42] I'd suddenly hear things, and think " wow, this remaster is really making things pop" [11:42] only to listen to the old version and realize it was there all along, I was just listening more carefully [11:42] phantom-awesome. [11:44] could be the card as well not having to do something or other [11:46] Again, nothing in reality to base this assertion [13:34] I <3 crashes related to video drivers. [13:35] Making me think twice about the AMD card. [13:35] how does one know that it's related to the video card? [13:35] Intel or DIAF [13:35] One sees segfaults in chrome, X server, compiz, etc. [13:35] Intel can DIAF [13:36] heh, intel or bust on laptops [13:36] but I'm enjoying my 3 monitor hookup on my nvidia on the desktop [13:36] Yeah, Intel is great if you don't care about graphics [13:36] but care about battery life and crashing :P [13:37] Yep [13:37] I have a beta driver installed now [13:37] Price I pay for a newer card [13:37] Didn't have as much problem with the 5450, but it's a slow-mo-fo [13:37] 7750 is proving crashy [13:38] 660ti works no problems :) [13:38] But that said, I'm overall pretty pleased [13:38] Yeah, I'll bet. If I spent as much on my video card as I did on my past 3 computers I'd be happy too. ;) [13:39] Actually 660ti is not as expensive as I thought [13:39] you buy $70 computers [13:39] ? [13:39] Well, I did buy two RasPis [13:39] ;) [13:39] oh now that's cheating and you know it [13:39] heh [13:40] I thought it was a more expensive card [13:40] damn model numbers [13:40] yea, I mean I didn't shoot the moon on graphics, just the rest of it [13:41] though it does appear to be 2x the ati one. Figured it'd be closer [13:43] http://www.microcenter.com/product/406092/HD7750-DCSL-1GD5_AMD_Radeon_HD_7750_DirectCU_Silent_1024MB_GDDR5_PCIe_30_x16_Video_Card [13:43] That's the one that I have [13:43] gotcha [13:43] Wanted something without a fan on it [13:45] Not like the rest of the computer is silent or anything, but for some reason I have this thumb-sucking idea that I needed a silent video card. :) [13:53] Got a survey call from the "HP Mirosoft Team". I totally destroyed their scripted questions [13:54] at least it wasn't the HP Microsoft Oracle team :P [13:58] I love questions about my datacenter. It's 2 dell server towers and a Synology NAS [13:59] And my network infrastructure is a single 48 port 100mbps switch [14:02] lol [14:09] My database infrastructure is Access97 and Postgres [15:19] gentlemen! start your linters! http://www.logilab.org/blogentry/163292 [18:13] Interesting listening to a song about the 1990s gulf war twenty years later [18:14] (Hexx - Fire Mushrooms in case anyone is wondering) [18:35] snap-l: always interesting to hear those old songs saying things people didn't want to believe were true, and now we know they are [18:35] * greg-g doesn't know that song [18:35] but in general [18:42] is that anything like listening ot songs about the 92 riots 21yrs later? [18:42] LA92!!!! [18:43] jrwren: nice [18:51] Damn this celery queue on Windows is annoying to set up. I need celery which needs rabbitmq which needs erlang [18:51] celery works with redis, or a database even [18:51] redis has some unsupported windows port [18:51] I just got through changing the bookie celery use from db to redis which is what I'm working on landing soon [18:51] For database I'm stuck with sqlite or I have to install a real DB [18:51] right now, bmark.us uses postgresql for it [18:52] but it can use sqlite (single worker though :/) or mysql [18:52] It seems like a lot of work for a queue [18:52] and the celery back end can be on a different machine [18:52] brousch: it can also use amazon's SQS, though there was a bug when I tried it a couple of years ago [18:53] shoot, there are redis as a service places [18:53] I'm going for more compact, not more spread out [18:53] you can host it on linux somewhere else and talk to it from windows [18:53] I want something I can install and run localhost [18:53] postgres has a nice windows install these days? [18:54] or keep having fun trying to get erlang/rabbitmq on windows [18:54] feels a bit "damn I can't get this hemi to fit into my go-kart" to me :P [18:54] The instructions aren't bad, but it's a lot of stuff to keep track of between dev and prod [18:55] brousch: i hate to suggest mysql [18:55] maybe i should put rabbit/redis on a linux vm [18:55] but it really is easy to run out of process, but still uninstalled on windows. [19:01] i ran redis on windows a while back, seemed fairly painless [19:02] Same amount of pain as rabbitmq on Windows, but less supported [19:02] even had c# code talking to it [19:02] oh, well i don't know about the support, but it was trivial to connect to it and start storing data [19:02] this was for local development, and maybe ~20 concurrent users [19:03] so not a seriously hammered app [19:03] I won't have more than 20 users in this [19:06] Actually I can only use 1 worker for this, so sqlite might be good enough [19:07] oh god: https://github.com/kennethreitz/autoenv [19:07] greg-g: yea, that came up at pyohio [19:07] If it's not enough, I'll set up rabbit on linux [19:08] rick_h: in a "never ever ever do this" kind of way? [19:08] greg-g: as in some guy was "I love this autoenv thing, I just wish it would do XX" and Kenneth was there going "I've thought about that" [19:08] Followed by "...you wrote it?" [19:08] haha [19:09] gotta love conferences [19:09] :) yep [19:09] That was funny [19:09] but yea, it's not my cup of tea [19:09] Jace got all wide-eyed [19:09] I came across it via http://richardhartmann.de/blog/posts/2013/08/06-High_security/ [19:09] I'm pretty much anti-magic [19:09] hah [19:10] yea, I think Jace had a good time at the conference. [19:10] was fun to hang out with a first-timer [19:16] He had a lot of good questions [20:40] Using Django with Python3.3 in my newest application [20:59] any particular reason for this? :) [21:01] Because I am awesome [21:01] I need this to stick around for a few years without having to re-write it for PYthon3 [21:10] Be careful what you wish for. :)