| micahg | skellat: -release isn't a good venue to ask for sponsorship, the patch pilot in -devel would be a good place | 01:28 |
|---|---|---|
| === iulian is now known as Guest74995 | ||
| === seb128_ is now known as seb128 | ||
| tumbleweed | grumble. I can't reproduce this failure https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/saucy-adt-beets/. Ideas? | 08:45 |
| xnox | tumbleweed: i have seen in the past jenkins mirror be behind, such that it'd test new .dsc againt out-of-date .deb. And the logs don't spell out clearly which version of package under test got installed =( | 08:51 |
| tumbleweed | I wish there was an easy way to make ADT run tests without building from source | 08:52 |
| xnox | tumbleweed: you are using lp:auto-package-testing scripts right? (they download ubuntu cloud image & run tests in there against a package from archive/ppa/bzr/local) | 09:02 |
| tumbleweed | xnox: no, adt | 09:05 |
| tumbleweed | ok, let me try that. but maybe not here at debconf... | 09:07 |
| xnox | tumbleweed: so two scripts in auto-package-testing under bin/ is exactly the same way the tests are running in the lab. one is setup test-bed to create one and the other one is run-adt-test to run a test on a snapshot of the test bed under qemu. | 09:07 |
| xnox | tumbleweed: right. Well i'll arrive on sunday and we can poke it then and there =) i can easily run adt tests on my remote server for you. | 09:08 |
| === Guest74995 is now known as iulian | ||
| * cjwatson starts deploying the phased-updater | 11:46 | |
| cjwatson | Seems to take a long time to start up without doing very much, although it has got past the point of logging into Launchpad | 11:51 |
| cjwatson | Ah, just as I say that it starts sending mail | 11:51 |
| cjwatson | 2013-08-07 11:51:47,417 - INFO - [u'ps-jenkins@lists.canonical.com'] mailed about [raring/nux] Possible Regression | 11:52 |
| cjwatson | 2013-08-07 11:51:48,174 - INFO - [u'ps-jenkins@lists.canonical.com'] mailed about [raring/compiz] Possible Regression | 11:52 |
| cjwatson | that might not get much attention ... | 11:52 |
| cjwatson | All SRU team members: please update your ubuntu-archive-tools checkouts to at least r764 | 11:55 |
| * yofel just got a bunch of mail with that topic, so it seems to work ^^ | 12:04 | |
| cjwatson | I hope it's useful. If it's wrong, though, complain to bdmurray, I'm just playing sysadmin here :-) | 12:11 |
| mdeslaur | cjwatson: how do I check the phased update status of a package? | 12:20 |
| mdeslaur | cjwatson: I just got a bunch of emails for security updates that say the phased update has been stopped | 12:20 |
| cjwatson | mdeslaur: Like I say, I'm just operating this, but I think it only actually decreases the phased update percentage if there was already one (other than "everyone") set | 12:21 |
| mdeslaur | cjwatson: ok, I'll wait for bdmurray then, thanks | 12:21 |
| cjwatson | So the e-mails are probably wrong in that detail, but right about there being a regression to look at | 12:21 |
| cjwatson | mdeslaur: You can see the phased update percentage on https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/<series>/<arch>/<binarypackage> | 12:22 |
| cjwatson | (Which is bloody hard to find by navigation so I suggest memorising the pattern) | 12:22 |
| cjwatson | It should normally be the same for all binaries in a source | 12:22 |
| mdeslaur | there's...nothing in the column | 12:23 |
| mdeslaur | https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/raring/amd64/libdns95 | 12:24 |
| cjwatson | Yes, that means "everyone" | 12:24 |
| cjwatson | My understanding is that this is a transitional period, because the things that have been published to -updates haven't had a PUP set | 12:25 |
| cjwatson | But that was why I was asking SRU team members to update to ubuntu-archive-tools r764 | 12:25 |
| cjwatson | I recall we talked about what to do with security updates at the client sprint but I don't remember what we agreed | 12:26 |
| mdeslaur | I don't recall the exact outcome either...I believe we discussed a maximum time for security updates and having the urgency field work to bypass it or something | 12:28 |
| cjwatson | At any rate I'm reasonably sure that at the moment security updates just won't have phasing applied | 12:31 |
| cjwatson | But hopefully Brian can clarify | 12:31 |
| bdmurray | mdeslaur: I'm still investigating but the email notifications were in errors, as cjwatson indicated the phasing has not been stopped. | 14:24 |
| mdeslaur | bdmurray: ok, so I can disregard for now? | 14:25 |
| bdmurray | mdeslaur: Yes, for now | 14:26 |
| mdeslaur | bdmurray: thanks | 14:27 |
| seb128 | bdmurray, it would be nice to send an email to ubuntu-devel@ about what's going on maybe? | 14:32 |
| bdmurray | seb128: yes, I'll be doing that today. Nothing was supposed to happen yet as no packages in -updates have a phased update percentage set. | 14:33 |
| cjwatson | ubuntu-archive-tools> make that r765 | 14:44 |
| bdmurray | cjwatson: one more phased-updater change https://code.launchpad.net/~brian-murray/ubuntu-archive-tools/pu-no-email/+merge/179013 | 16:28 |
| cjwatson | bdmurray: done | 17:03 |
| bdmurray | thanks | 17:05 |
| Ampelbein | Can someone accept the libpar2 binary packages in saucy NEW? Or do they need to get reviewed first? | 19:48 |
| ScottK | They need to get reviewed. | 19:51 |
| Ampelbein | Ah, ok. Thought that was only for new source packages. Learn something new every day ;-) | 19:52 |
| ScottK | No, new binary packages too. | 19:57 |
| === rsalveti_ is now known as rsalveti | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!