| ppisati | moin | 05:46 |
|---|---|---|
| === smb` is now known as smb | ||
| smb | hallyn, It seems to be the extension gcc uses for a clone function (according to http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/84045/ this seems to involve parial inlining) | 06:55 |
| smb | ppisati, morning | 06:55 |
| === fmasi_afk is now known as fmasi | ||
| === fmasi is now known as fmasi_afk | ||
| === fmasi_afk is now known as fmasi | ||
| spanner3003 | hi I'm having a problem compiling, I'm trying to port cm10.1 to my padfone 2(A68) and i get this error http://pastebin.com/LNmKyFF1 | 10:04 |
| amitk | smb: I see you're going to be at LPC :) | 10:16 |
| smb | amitk, Yeah, I got lucky and drew the long straw. :) | 10:16 |
| amitk | hehe | 10:17 |
| smb | jodh, Hows your 3.11 experience doing? | 11:05 |
| === fmasi is now known as fmasi_lunch | ||
| jodh | smb: 3.11 + nested=Y everywhere does seem to solve the problem. I've just updated the bug. | 12:06 |
| smb | jodh, Ok, I have not been able to cause the testcase from comment #3 to fail on saucy64-saucy64(with or without nesting) and at least quantal64-saucy64(up to now only with nesting) | 12:10 |
| smb | jodh, saucy even with latest 3.10 kernel but I was not sure whether the host may actually be required to be something else (like Precise) | 12:11 |
| jodh | smb: don't think so - my local crash scenario was 32-bit saucy for all 3 environments. | 12:12 |
| spanner3003 | hi I'm having a problem compiling, I'm trying to port cm10.1 to my padfone 2(A68) and i get this error http://pastebin.com/LNmKyFF1 | 12:14 |
| smb | jodh, Ah ok. I am "only" following Otherjames instructions from comment #3 so that may be a different issue. Did you test 3.11 without nesting enabled in the 1rst level guest as well? | 12:16 |
| smb | jodh, So we could entirely blame it on 3.10... | 12:16 |
| jodh | smb: no, haven't tested the nesting=N scenario. My code now forces nesting=Y so assuming that's legal, I'm happy to leave my code setting nesting=Y for all environments. | 12:18 |
| smb | jodh, We probably can go that path just feels a little incomplete. Though I begin to doubt whether nested setting in the 1rst level actually makes much difference (though y being what you actually want). My memory is a sieve, did you ever say whether the kvm module could be loaded in the second level guest? | 12:27 |
| smb | jodh, Because thinking about it, nested=n in the 1rst level should only mean that none of the 2nd level guests can use the virt extensions. Which, as long as you don't try to do a 3rd level , should not matter. | 12:29 |
| * henrix -> lunch | 12:30 | |
| jodh | smb: yes, you can modprobe kvm_intel nested=1 in 1st and 2nd level np. | 12:30 |
| smb | jodh, Now yes, I meant when the 1rst level was showing N in sysfs and then starting a 2nd level | 12:31 |
| hallyn | smb: thanks! | 12:35 |
| smb | hallyn, What did I do? :-P Too many things done to be sure what that was for. :) | 12:36 |
| hallyn | smb: finding the .isra cause | 12:37 |
| smb | hallyn, Oh that. Welcome. Completely forgot that already. :) | 12:38 |
| hallyn | smb: so that makes it sound like the nested-kvm/kernel bug going on right now might even be a libc bug | 12:52 |
| smb | hallyn, Oh, beacuse of the number.isra? Only did see that after you pointing now | 12:54 |
| smb | Usually I just silently drop that extension when it shows up | 12:55 |
| smb | But then again number.isra seems only to be part of printing the fault... | 12:59 |
| === fmasi_lunch is now known as fmasi | ||
| === fmasi is now known as fmasi_afk | ||
| === fmasi_afk is now known as fmasi | ||
| === fmasi is now known as fmasi_afk | ||
| === fmasi_afk is now known as fmasi | ||
| === fmasi is now known as fmasi_afk | ||
| === fmasi_afk is now known as fmasi | ||
| === fmasi is now known as fmasi_afk | ||
| === Guest93721 is now known as cpaasch | ||
| cpaasch | hello, I have a problem with linux-crashdump on ubuntu 13.04. The crash-kernel does not get loaded... I tried out to remove the arguments as described in https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/CrashdumpRecipe#Troubleshooting, but it does not help... | 19:37 |
| xnox | I have two questions: | 23:13 |
| xnox | 1) is it possible to build i386 ubuntu-saucy.git kernel on amd64, using gcc-multilib toolchain? At the moment i am getting "/bin/sh: 1: i686-linux-gnu-gcc: not found" since well gcc -m32 should be used. | 23:14 |
| xnox | 2) config-check fails with two errors, yet exists with 0, after running "editconfigs" target. is that ok? http://paste.ubuntu.com/5964326/ | 23:17 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!