[05:46] <ppisati> moin
[06:55] <smb> hallyn, It seems to be the extension gcc uses for a clone function (according to http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/84045/ this seems to involve parial inlining)
[06:55] <smb> ppisati, morning
[10:04] <spanner3003> hi I'm having  a problem compiling, I'm trying to port cm10.1 to my padfone 2(A68) and i get this error http://pastebin.com/LNmKyFF1
[10:16] <amitk> smb: I see you're going to be at LPC :)
[10:16] <smb> amitk, Yeah, I got lucky and drew the long straw. :)
[10:17] <amitk> hehe
[11:05] <smb> jodh, Hows your 3.11 experience doing?
[12:06] <jodh> smb: 3.11 + nested=Y everywhere does seem to solve the problem. I've just updated the bug.
[12:10] <smb> jodh, Ok, I have not been able to cause the testcase from comment #3 to fail on saucy64-saucy64(with or without nesting) and at least quantal64-saucy64(up to now only with nesting)
[12:11] <smb> jodh, saucy even with latest 3.10 kernel but I was not sure whether the host may actually be required to be something else (like Precise)
[12:12] <jodh> smb: don't think so - my local crash scenario was 32-bit saucy for all 3 environments.
[12:14] <spanner3003> hi I'm having  a problem compiling, I'm trying to port cm10.1 to my padfone 2(A68) and i get this error http://pastebin.com/LNmKyFF1
[12:16] <smb> jodh, Ah ok. I am "only" following Otherjames instructions from comment #3 so that may be a different issue. Did you test 3.11 without nesting enabled in the 1rst level guest as well?
[12:16] <smb> jodh, So we could entirely blame it on 3.10...
[12:18] <jodh> smb: no, haven't tested the nesting=N scenario. My code now forces nesting=Y so assuming that's legal, I'm happy to leave my code setting nesting=Y for all environments.
[12:27] <smb> jodh, We probably can go that path just feels a little incomplete. Though I begin to doubt whether nested setting in the 1rst level actually makes much difference (though y being what you actually want). My memory is a sieve, did you ever say whether the kvm module could be loaded in the second level guest?
[12:29] <smb> jodh, Because thinking about it, nested=n in the 1rst level should only mean that none of the 2nd level guests can use the virt extensions. Which, as long as you don't try to do a 3rd level , should not matter.
[12:30]  * henrix -> lunch
[12:30] <jodh> smb: yes, you can modprobe kvm_intel nested=1 in 1st and 2nd level np.
[12:31] <smb> jodh, Now yes, I meant when the 1rst level was showing N in sysfs and then starting a 2nd level
[12:35] <hallyn> smb: thanks!
[12:36] <smb> hallyn, What did I do? :-P Too many things done to be sure what that was for. :)
[12:37] <hallyn> smb: finding the .isra cause
[12:38] <smb> hallyn, Oh that. Welcome. Completely forgot that already. :)
[12:52] <hallyn> smb: so that makes it sound like the nested-kvm/kernel bug going on right now might even be a libc bug
[12:54] <smb> hallyn, Oh, beacuse of the number.isra? Only did see that after you pointing now
[12:55] <smb> Usually I just silently drop that extension when it shows up
[12:59] <smb> But then again number.isra seems only to be part of printing the fault...
[19:37] <cpaasch> hello, I have a problem with linux-crashdump on ubuntu 13.04. The crash-kernel does not get loaded... I tried out to remove the arguments as described in https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/CrashdumpRecipe#Troubleshooting, but it does not help...
[23:13] <xnox> I have two questions:
[23:14] <xnox> 1) is it possible to build i386 ubuntu-saucy.git kernel on amd64, using gcc-multilib toolchain? At the moment i am getting "/bin/sh: 1: i686-linux-gnu-gcc: not found" since well gcc -m32 should be used.
[23:17] <xnox> 2) config-check fails with two errors, yet exists with 0, after running "editconfigs" target. is that ok? http://paste.ubuntu.com/5964326/