[07:17] <cub> OvenWerks, I studied some of the copyright files on https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntustudio-dev . But I'm not quite sure how to handle the old ones. I figure I might give one a go, send it to you and/or smartboyhw to check?
[07:17] <smartboyhw> cub, sure, send it to me and OvenWerks for checking will be good
[07:18] <cub> The ones that have old or outdated GPL license texts, should we change those the newer ones?
[07:19] <smartboyhw> cub, if it's GPL-2 it is still OK.
[07:19] <cub> for instance one I was looking at specified "GPL 2.1" and it said "2.1" in the LIcense text several times, but when comparing to the new one OvenWerks did it just states "GPL 2+"
[07:19] <cub> Ok, so I don't need to amend that.
[07:20] <smartboyhw> cub, no no no wait (in this case)
[07:20] <smartboyhw> Show me one example of it
[07:20] <cub> lp:~ubuntustudio-dev/ubuntustudio/ubuntustudio-installer and lp:~ubuntustudio-dev/ubuntustudio-artwork/ubuntustudio-lightdm-theme
[07:21] <cub> the installer OvenWerks updated, the lighted-theme is older and made by falkTX
[07:21] <smartboyhw> cub, show me one file that has GPL 2.1.
[07:22] <smartboyhw> busy packaging here, so give me a link to one specific file plz
[07:22] <cub> http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntustudio-dev/ubuntustudio-artwork/ubuntustudio-lightdm-theme/view/head:/debian/copyright
[07:23] <cub> no hurry, I should start up my work-apps. :P
[07:24] <smartboyhw> cub, um that's LGPL-2.1+
[07:25] <smartboyhw> That's what you are supposed to use when writing the copyright file...
[07:26] <cub> Ah true.
[07:26] <cub> I haven't had my coffee yet.
[07:27] <smartboyhw> Hmm, the packaging shouldn't have been LGPL though, weird
[07:31] <cub> Isn't that up to the author?
[07:33] <smartboyhw> cub, well yes, but it is just weird
[07:33] <smartboyhw> Packaging should not be LGPL, should be GPL, I will have to talk to falktx it seems
[07:33] <cub> perhaps I should start with another package. :P
[07:33] <smartboyhw> cub, LOL
[07:34] <smartboyhw> cub, don't get distressed:P
[07:34] <cub> JHas anyone heard anything more about his plans to port to Debian?
[07:36] <smartboyhw> Not from me
[07:48] <zequence> cub: smartboyhw: If it's GPL 2.1, then it's 2.1
[07:49] <zequence> especially if we are not the authors, it is not our job to upgrade to a newer license
[07:49] <zequence> better respect the initial intention
[09:45] <smartboyhw> zequence, it's LGPL, not GPL:P
[09:50] <zequence> smartboyhw: The point was not what license it is
[09:51] <smartboyhw> zequence, yeah
[09:51] <smartboyhw> I know it is not our responsiblity
[09:51] <smartboyhw> But, he should use GPL more:(
[12:02] <cub> OvenWerks, seems someone already have made a test run with Ubuntu Studio on Xmir: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2165595 check the second post
[12:31] <smartboyhw> cub, :O
[12:33] <cub> I don't know, grahammechanical in the thread might be someone in here since I don't know everyone here.
[12:35] <smartboyhw> cub, no...
[12:35] <smartboyhw> Not anybody here I suspect
[12:44] <cub> I ran the xubuntu xmir test iso on my two laptops and it worked. So if it's stable and use less or the same amount of resources as it does today I don't really care what runs
[12:45] <smartboyhw> We can probably add mir then
[12:45] <smartboyhw> But, Xubuntu's decision will be the key to it.
[13:15] <smartboyhw> cub, how's your current status on the packages?
[13:25] <cub> quite slow. At the moment I only have an hour or two in late evenings if my daughter falls asleep fast….which she seem to prefer not to do.
[13:25] <smartboyhw> cub, LOL
[13:25] <cub> right now I*m at work
[13:25] <smartboyhw> Sure, take your time;) 
[13:26] <cub> yeah if everything's already done when I've read everything on how to fix them, at least I've learned something new
[13:27] <smartboyhw> cub, good.
[13:28] <cub> It's busy times here when everyone comes back from vacations, both at work and at home.
[13:28] <smartboyhw> cub, ha, I'm still in vacation:P
[14:07] <OvenWerks> cub: the lightdm package seems to be a slightly modified "mythbuntu-artwork lightdm theme" I suspect that falktx stuck with the original lic. so there would not be two lic. to list.
[14:08] <OvenWerks> The packaged by line seems to be non-standard and really adds no new information.
[14:10] <OvenWerks> If the package content is mostly from mythbuntu, then it may be a good idea to check if the copyright should include those authors as well.
[14:18] <OvenWerks> Hmm, mythbuntu-artwork is gpl-2+  The package is "abandoned"
[14:19] <OvenWerks> There is no lightdm theme in this package. It was last updated aug 2007 (maybe before lightdm?)