| didrocks | hey Mirv! | 05:33 |
|---|---|---|
| Mirv | hey didrocks as well! | 05:41 |
| didrocks | Mirv: how are you? seems like the sky is back to being blue here :) | 05:42 |
| didrocks | but with 10°C less… what I won't complain at all :) | 05:42 |
| Mirv | here's back to grey, but ok as well as slightly cooler makes it easier to be without a/c | 05:46 |
| didrocks | oh, you do have a/c at home? | 05:46 |
| Mirv | no, that''s why yesterday's hot and humid was a bit uncomfortable.. | 05:48 |
| Mirv | now seems good | 05:49 |
| didrocks | ah ok ;) | 05:49 |
| didrocks | Mirv: do you need me for the stack publications? The results sounds promising :) | 05:50 |
| didrocks | Mirv: then, if we can publish what we can ASAP, it will help jibel and I experiencing with the 3h-dailies today | 05:50 |
| didrocks | (to put in prod starting Monday) | 05:50 |
| Mirv | some acks for packaging changes, but yes seems quite good.. | 05:52 |
| Mirv | just a second | 05:52 |
| didrocks | sure ;) | 05:53 |
| Mirv | didrocks: multi-arch http://localhost:8080/view/cu2d/view/Head/view/Settings/job/cu2d-settings-head-3.0publish/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/packaging_changes_ubuntu-system-settings-online-accounts_0.2~+13.10.20130808.3-0ubuntu1.diff | 05:53 |
| Mirv | 10.97.0.1, that is | 05:53 |
| Mirv | ie http://10.97.0.1:8080/view/cu2d/view/Head/view/Settings/job/cu2d-settings-head-3.0publish/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/packaging_changes_ubuntu-system-settings-online-accounts_0.2~+13.10.20130808.3-0ubuntu1.diff | 05:54 |
| didrocks | thanks ;) | 05:54 |
| didrocks | +1 | 05:54 |
| Mirv | unity8 cross-building with - hmm are those ok? http://localhost:8080/view/cu2d/view/Head/view/Unity8/job/cu2d-unity8-head-3.0publish/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/packaging_changes_unity8_7.81.3+13.10.20130809-0ubuntu1.diff | 05:55 |
| didrocks | Mirv: hum, it seems similar to the issue we saw yesterday, right? | 05:57 |
| didrocks | like the :any not working for installing Qt? | 05:57 |
| Mirv | yeah, that's why it made me doubt | 05:57 |
| didrocks | Mirv: mind putting a note and check with Saviq later on? I would prefer we play the coward-side for that ;) | 05:57 |
| Mirv | here's the MP https://code.launchpad.net/~saviq/unity8/prepare-cross-build/+merge/179250 | 05:57 |
| Mirv | yeah, I'll check with saviq and test installing from daily-build PPA | 05:58 |
| didrocks | Mirv: thanks! do not hesitate to note that on the spreadsheet :) | 05:59 |
| Mirv | noted in the sheet for now | 05:59 |
| didrocks | \o/ | 05:59 |
| Mirv | telepathy-ofono has started depending on.. something on armhf http://10.97.0.1:8080/view/cu2d/view/Head/view/Network/job/cu2d-network-head-3.0publish/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/packaging_changes_telepathy-ofono_0.2+13.10.20130809-0ubuntu1.diff | 05:59 |
| Mirv | funny that the changelog is empty | 06:00 |
| Mirv | it's about supporting audioflinger and speaker mode, https://code.launchpad.net/~tiagosh/telepathy-ofono/audioflinger-speakermode/+merge/178873 | 06:00 |
| Mirv | didrocks: any idea why the changelog doesn't mention the commit? | 06:01 |
| didrocks | Mirv: I'm looking at the commit | 06:01 |
| didrocks | Mirv: interesting, I'll put on "things to look at", there is no good reason | 06:02 |
| didrocks | Mirv: on the packaging change, +1 | 06:02 |
| didrocks | nothing strike in my eyes why there is no commit message collected | 06:02 |
| Mirv | yes seems normal. next up, mir has ABI bump http://10.97.0.1:8080/view/cu2d/view/Head/view/Mir/job/cu2d-mir-head-3.0publish/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/packaging_changes_mir_0.0.8+13.10.20130809-0ubuntu1.diff | 06:03 |
| didrocks | Mirv: hum, don't they miss a Replaces: | 06:04 |
| didrocks | libmirserver1 replaces libmirserver0 | 06:04 |
| didrocks | for | 06:04 |
| didrocks | +usr/lib/*/libmirplatform.so | 06:04 |
| didrocks | +usr/lib/*/libmirplatformgraphics.so | 06:04 |
| didrocks | which are common? | 06:04 |
| didrocks | RAOF: ahah, just in time! ^ | 06:05 |
| Mirv | yes they are | 06:05 |
| Mirv | it'll fail to upgrade | 06:05 |
| didrocks | Mirv: so RAOF proposes https://code.launchpad.net/~raof/mir/fix-mir_connection_get_display_info/+merge/179316 | 06:05 |
| didrocks | which is great, but still needs Replaces: libmirserver0 ;) | 06:06 |
| didrocks | in libmirplatform | 06:06 |
| RAOF | ... | 06:06 |
| RAOF | quite tru. | 06:06 |
| RAOF | true. | 06:06 |
| didrocks | RAOF: just "quite"? :p | 06:06 |
| didrocks | RAOF: can you fix that? I'll approve | 06:06 |
| didrocks | Mirv: let's wait for Mir then | 06:06 |
| didrocks | Mirv: it will be relaunched as part of jibel and I experimentations :) | 06:06 |
| Mirv | yep, added this as a blocker to the spreadsheet | 06:07 |
| RAOF | didrocks: Pused. | 06:07 |
| didrocks | Mirv: thanks ;) | 06:07 |
| Mirv | didrocks: then indicators stack has nothing otherwise but there are the three new packages indicator-network-prompt, libqtdbusmock and libqtdbustest which would need manual approval to get into NEW | 06:08 |
| didrocks | RAOF: approved | 06:08 |
| Mirv | didrocks: were they preNEWed? | 06:08 |
| didrocks | Mirv: yeah, they were, I just want to check one thing in indicator-network-prompt | 06:08 |
| didrocks | and pull as part of the whitelist | 06:08 |
| Mirv | ok | 06:08 |
| didrocks | (one sec) | 06:08 |
| didrocks | Mirv: all 3 are still on the indicator stack? :/ | 06:09 |
| Mirv | didrocks: yes.. | 06:10 |
| didrocks | argh, I asked robru to put indicator-network-prompt in the indicator stack and libqtdbusmock+libqtdbustest in the QA one. | 06:10 |
| Saviq | didrocks, Mirv, is :any an incorrect syntax? I cross-built a package with that and installed on the device and it worked | 06:10 |
| didrocks | it seems they are in the config, it wasn't just deployed | 06:10 |
| didrocks | Saviq: all issues yesterday with Qt was due to the :any thing | 06:10 |
| Saviq | didrocks, riht | 06:10 |
| didrocks | Saviq: I'm not an expert on that though, so maybe it works when something is multiarched | 06:11 |
| didrocks | I just want to have the infos to not reblock on this :) | 06:11 |
| didrocks | Mirv: so pulled the withelist, +1 for now, I'll redeploy the stack and kill the job for next run | 06:11 |
| didrocks | (the last change in indicator-network-prompt is fine) | 06:12 |
| Saviq | didrocks, can I help verifying that somehow? | 06:12 |
| Mirv | didrocks: ok so this one time all through the indicators stack? | 06:12 |
| didrocks | Mirv: yep ;) | 06:12 |
| Mirv | Saviq: upgrade unity8 on desktop from current archive version to the daily-build PPA version | 06:12 |
| didrocks | yeah, that will help :) | 06:12 |
| Saviq | Mirv, doing | 06:12 |
| Mirv | didrocks: then one more thing that app stack now has the dependency on webapps and has stopped because the unity-webapps-qml problem hasn't still been sorted out | 06:14 |
| didrocks | Mirv: yeah, pat told me yesterday to not block app and publish it | 06:15 |
| didrocks | Mirv: he will come today with a solution (maybe webbrowser being part of the webapps stack and remove the dep between apps and webapps) | 06:15 |
| didrocks | he asked as well vrruiz to fix it | 06:15 |
| didrocks | so forcing the publication for apps is fine | 06:15 |
| Mirv | didrocks: ok, so publishing apps. vrruiz has also progressed with the issue to a dbus problem. | 06:15 |
| Mirv | Saviq: unity8 upgraded fine here | 06:16 |
| didrocks | Mirv: ah great! :) | 06:16 |
| Mirv | didrocks: the unity8's :any dependencies are in build dependencies however, while Qt had those as part of a binary package dependency | 06:19 |
| didrocks | oh oh | 06:19 |
| didrocks | yeah good point | 06:19 |
| didrocks | excellent point even! | 06:19 |
| didrocks | maybe it's some trick in the build deps | 06:19 |
| didrocks | and it makes sense for multiarching | 06:20 |
| didrocks | and… obviously, it built :) | 06:20 |
| didrocks | Mirv: +1 then, I'll need to fetch some doc on that though :) | 06:20 |
| didrocks | Saviq: FYI ^ | 06:20 |
| Mirv | yes, it built.. ok | 06:21 |
| Mirv | all done now, except for mir (pending fix), unity (not yet build, let's see how autopilot will do once again..) and webapps | 06:21 |
| didrocks | nice work Mirv ;) let's wait for a month like that, and I think we can start asking for upload rights to you (still few things like catching the replaces and so on ;)) | 06:21 |
| Saviq | Mirv, didrocks yeah, it doesn't really make sense for :any in runtime, does it... | 06:21 |
| didrocks | Saviq: exactly! | 06:21 |
| didrocks | maybe on some -dev though | 06:22 |
| didrocks | if they are multiarch | 06:22 |
| didrocks | anyway, sorted out for that one :) | 06:22 |
| Mirv | didrocks: hehe, yeah. the Replaces catching should happen more instictively indeed. | 06:23 |
| didrocks | Mirv: no worry, this will come with time ;) | 06:23 |
| Saviq | Mirv, didrocks yeah, upgraded fine on both maguro and manta | 06:23 |
| didrocks | excellent | 06:23 |
| didrocks | dpm: hey! | 06:23 |
| Mirv | Saviq: thanks for confirming | 06:24 |
| didrocks | dpm: how are you? | 06:24 |
| dpm | morning didrocks, very well, thanks :) How are you today? | 06:34 |
| didrocks | dpm: I'm good thanks! | 06:34 |
| didrocks | dpm: so, I looked this morning at qreactor | 06:34 |
| didrocks | dpm: I noticed some things that needs to be changed in a followup upload: http://paste.ubuntu.com/5965135/ | 06:34 |
| dpm | ah, thanks, looking... | 06:35 |
| didrocks | dpm: I'm just unsure on python-qrencode dependency missing | 06:35 |
| didrocks | dpm: did you upload your version to a ppa? as debian/rules clean fails before creating the source package, I don't know if it's needed in the builder | 06:35 |
| didrocks | (but it should be in the build-deps anyway on the long term) | 06:35 |
| dpm | didrocks, I built that same version of the package here: https://launchpad.net/~qreator-hackers/+archive/qreator-stable | 06:37 |
| didrocks | dpm: ok, I'm happy to NEW it then, just please fix those small issues on a followup upload :) | 06:39 |
| didrocks | dpm: I override manually the priority to optional until your next upload fix it as well | 06:39 |
| dpm | didrocks, perfect, I've got a new release coming up, so I'll make sure I include them in the new upload | 06:39 |
| didrocks | thanks! | 06:40 |
| didrocks | qreactor source NEW, will binary NEW once built | 06:40 |
| dpm | \o/ | 06:41 |
| dpm | didrocks, is there any other step I need to follow to get qreator into the archive or will it now all happen automatically? | 06:44 |
| didrocks | dpm: I have to NEW the binary packages, I'll do it, so no more steps for you | 06:45 |
| dpm | excellent, thanks! | 06:45 |
| didrocks | yw ;) | 06:47 |
| didrocks | dpm: built and NEWed, it's in proposed now | 06:52 |
| dpm | \m/ | 06:52 |
| jibel | good morning | 07:26 |
| didrocks | good morning jibel! | 07:27 |
| jibel | morning didrocks | 07:27 |
| sil2100 | Morning! | 07:35 |
| sil2100 | Is it normal that when doing a standard apt-get update and dist-upgrade today, apt wanted to remove ubuntu-desktop and unity ;) ? | 07:36 |
| Mirv | sil2100: morning! maybe some PPA? I don't have such a problem with pure saucy (just retested) | 07:38 |
| sil2100 | I wonder! | 07:43 |
| sil2100 | Although by the looks of update I don't see any PPA being used, hm | 07:43 |
| sil2100 | Mirv: how's it going this week anyway? | 07:46 |
| Mirv | sil2100: some hurdles, overcoming those, getting loads of new work, the usual :) currently fine except that there's a lot of stuff in todo lists | 07:47 |
| Mirv | ie the important part, daily releases, is fine now again | 07:48 |
| sil2100 | Good to know :) | 07:48 |
| Mirv | sil2100: I hope your week has been more relaxing, and will continue to be for three more days :) | 07:48 |
| sil2100 | hm, I still see the SRU team didn't comment on the XIM SRU bug :< | 07:48 |
| sil2100 | It was fun, although the temperatures here in Poland were a bit extreme | 07:49 |
| sil2100 | It's hard to feel good when there's 39 degrees celsius in the shadows | 07:49 |
| Mirv | yeah it's been near 30 in Finland as well, although now today finally cooler | 07:52 |
| Mirv | yesterday was the worst, 26 + humidity near 100 | 07:52 |
| sil2100 | Terrible! | 07:52 |
| Mirv | felt quite tropical | 07:52 |
| sil2100 | I guess it's much better now everywhere | 07:52 |
| sil2100 | I mean, in Europe | 07:52 |
| Mirv | yeah, "everywhere" ;) | 07:52 |
| Mirv | in our small blob | 07:53 |
| seb128 | hey sil2100 Mirv | 08:02 |
| Mirv | didrocks: do you have time today at some point to check the qt3d from the spreadsheet? | 08:02 |
| seb128 | good morning desktopers | 08:02 |
| Mirv | morning seb128 | 08:02 |
| seb128 | sil2100, what bug is the XIM one? | 08:02 |
| didrocks | Mirv: sure, I'll :) | 08:03 |
| sil2100 | seb128: hi! | 08:03 |
| seb128 | didrocks, lut | 08:03 |
| sil2100 | seb128: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/1043627 | 08:03 |
| ubot2` | Ubuntu bug 1043627 in nux (Ubuntu Raring) "[SRU] Add XIM Support to Nux" [Undecided,Confirmed] | 08:03 |
| Mirv | forwarding the e-mail from sil2100 to seb128 | 08:03 |
| sil2100 | seb128: we need the SRU guys to take a look and know if they agree to SRU it, as it's more like a 'feature' | 08:03 |
| sil2100 | Mirv: thanks! | 08:04 |
| didrocks | salut seb128! | 08:04 |
| seb128 | sil2100, Mirv: try pinging infinity or slangasek on IRC about it? | 08:05 |
| seb128 | oh, you emailed them, and nobody replied? | 08:05 |
| seb128 | I guess everyone is over busy :/ | 08:05 |
| sil2100 | This time no... I guess they're busy indeed | 08:05 |
| Mirv | let's ping Monday when sil2100 is also back | 08:07 |
| Mirv | /kick sil2100 three more days | 08:07 |
| seb128 | Mirv, do you have a qtsystems upload planned for soon? | 08:08 |
| Mirv | seb128: no plans that I know of. are you planning, or would it be in need of update? | 08:08 |
| seb128 | Mirv, I'm going to do one if that's ok with you, adding "upower" to the CONFIG in debian/rules | 08:09 |
| seb128 | Mirv, I figured out that we build without upower user, that's why getting battery informations is broken (I'm working on the battery system settings) | 08:09 |
| Mirv | seb128: that's perfectly ok, thanks | 08:09 |
| seb128 | Mirv, yw ;-) | 08:09 |
| sil2100 | ;) | 08:13 |
| sil2100 | Mirv, didrocks, seb128: see you on Monday! | 08:13 |
| didrocks | sil2100: enjoy your week-end! | 08:13 |
| didrocks | fail :p | 08:13 |
| seb128 | too slow (me as well, I was typing and just deleted it :p) | 08:13 |
| seb128 | Mirv, https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/saucy/+source/qtsystems-opensource-src/5.0~git20130712-0ubuntu2 | 08:44 |
| seb128 | Mirv, I commited to the packaging vcs as well | 08:45 |
| seb128 | Mirv, I added a small patch: http://paste.ubuntu.com/5965634/ ... can you upstream it for me (or I will do it next week, I need to look at the qt bug tracker/create an account but I've already quite some stuff on my plates for today) | 08:46 |
| Mirv | seb128: thanks. making a note that it should be upstreamed. not sure about today either, but I'm always happy to add more people to the Canonical group in Qt tracker anyway | 08:51 |
| seb128 | Mirv, ok, let's talk about that monday if that works for you | 08:51 |
| Mirv | yes | 08:51 |
| seb128 | thanks | 08:51 |
| === jibel_ is now known as jibel | ||
| === MacSlow is now known as MacSlow|lunch | ||
| === greyback is now known as greyback|lunch | ||
| === greyback|lunch is now known as greyback | ||
| === MacSlow|lunch is now known as MacSlow | ||
| === dednick is now known as dednick|lunch | ||
| cyphermox | fginther: agree, seems like the right thing; I'll file a merge | 13:26 |
| tedg | didrocks, hey, so I have a dep on a package that is Universe but has it's MIR fix committed. | 13:37 |
| tedg | didrocks, Now I'd like to land the branch so that it gets pulled into main. | 13:37 |
| tedg | didrocks, How do I tell Jenkins that "I really want this, and it's okay" | 13:38 |
| seb128 | fginther, ^ | 13:38 |
| didrocks | tedg: is it a build-dep or just a runtime dep? | 13:39 |
| tedg | didrocks, build | 13:40 |
| tedg | Specifically click-dev | 13:41 |
| didrocks | tedg: ok, we just need to track that manually, but nothing should block | 13:41 |
| didrocks | (at least not daily releases, and I don't think the upstream merger should) | 13:41 |
| tedg | didrocks, Yeah, it does. It doesn't set up the sources to include universe, so it can't find the package. | 13:41 |
| tedg | (which is a sane default) | 13:42 |
| didrocks | tedg: I think it's indeed fginther for that part :) | 13:42 |
| didrocks | tedg: still, I can promote it, but before it's in distro, people tends to move it back to universe | 13:42 |
| tedg | didrocks, Oh? So it's a timing thing. I thought that was all automatic | 13:43 |
| didrocks | tedg: promoting to Main? absolutely not! :) | 13:43 |
| didrocks | (unfortunately) | 13:43 |
| seb128 | the usually way is that archive admin notice things on component mismatch | 13:43 |
| didrocks | tedg: do you have the MIR bug #? I'll promote it once it's in distro :) | 13:43 |
| didrocks | right | 13:43 |
| seb128 | and go promote (or demote) them | 13:43 |
| seb128 | that's why didrocks said it's going to be likely demoted | 13:44 |
| seb128 | usually we go the other way around | 13:44 |
| seb128 | things get promoted after something start depending on them | 13:44 |
| fginther | seb128, didrocks, one moment | 13:44 |
| seb128 | but that doesn't work well with the jenkins checks | 13:44 |
| fginther | tedg, I thought we fixed the universe issue. What MP is this? | 13:45 |
| tedg | Yup, and to be clear, I think it is a good default. | 13:45 |
| tedg | fginther, No, we didn't. But now click has had its MIR review. So we need to drop adding universe, but yet still get it into archive so that it gets pulled into main. | 13:46 |
| fginther | tedg, do we need to land a merge proposal first to do that? | 13:49 |
| fginther | tedg, err do we need to *commit* a merge proposal first to do that? | 13:50 |
| tedg | fginther, Well, that's kinda what we were asking. But, this is the first MR that needs it: https://code.launchpad.net/~ted/upstart-app-launch/click-hook/+merge/176525 | 13:50 |
| fginther | tedg, ahh. this looks like click-dev is needed outside of the pbuilder chroot | 13:53 |
| robru | didrocks, ping about row 4 of our little spreadsheet. have you made any progress on that topic? my work on lp:ubuntu-settings-components is mildly blocked by that, just wondering if I should apply the same (hacky) solution as from webbrowser-app or if I should wait for you on that. | 14:15 |
| didrocks | robru: please follow the same hacky solution | 14:15 |
| didrocks | for now | 14:15 |
| robru | ok | 14:15 |
| didrocks | robru: did you get any news on the webapps AP issue? | 14:16 |
| didrocks | will be nice to push/get that fixed :) | 14:16 |
| robru | didrocks, yeah, vrruiz sent out a detailed mail about it. want me to forward it to you? pat got it already. | 14:16 |
| didrocks | robru: as long as you follow and it's getting fixed for Monday, I'm fine :) | 14:16 |
| robru | didrocks, actually I dunno, vrruiz mentions lots of hard problems. dunno what his ETA is on fixing it. should we maybe temporarily disable that project so it stops breaking the stack? | 14:17 |
| didrocks | robru: can you check with Pat? I would say yes | 14:18 |
| robru | ok | 14:18 |
| didrocks | robru: if it's not getting fix, no need to run the tests and building that project | 14:18 |
| * didrocks forces unity to publish | 14:33 | |
| robru | didrocks, EOD yet? you should review this hot mess I just made. | 16:05 |
| didrocks | robru: urgh, noooo :/ | 16:05 |
| robru | didrocks, just kidding, it's not that bad ;-) | 16:05 |
| robru | https://code.launchpad.net/~robru/ubuntu-settings-components/packaging/+merge/178964 | 16:05 |
| didrocks | robru: ok, so some kind of pre-NEWING? :) | 16:06 |
| robru | the funny thing is that I noticed the whole package was arch-indep, so I changed arch to "all", but QML insists on having it's files in an arch-specific dir, so i have one package that provides one symlink in /usr/lib, and another package that provides qml files under /usr/share | 16:06 |
| didrocks | interesting | 16:07 |
| robru | didrocks, no, not prenewing, need you to confirm that this packaging work is sane. I managed to get all lintian warnings gone ;-) | 16:07 |
| didrocks | robru: no bootstrap commit, so we'll get tons of commits message collecting? (it's fine ;)) | 16:07 |
| didrocks | ah ok | 16:07 |
| robru | didrocks, make sure you look at the diff of just the most recent commit, that's where the magic happens. | 16:08 |
| didrocks | robru: shouldn't ubuntu-settings-components deps on the same version of ubuntu-settings-components-assets then? | 16:08 |
| robru | oh, yep. | 16:08 |
| didrocks | robru: the qml are importing Ubuntu components | 16:09 |
| robru | bah | 16:09 |
| robru | do you know what packages provide what I'm missing? | 16:09 |
| didrocks | so I think they should dep on qtdeclarative5-ubuntu-ui-toolkit-plugin | 16:09 |
| didrocks | robru: I was looking for it :p | 16:09 |
| didrocks | robru: I think ubuntu-settings-components should follow that syntax as well ^ | 16:10 |
| didrocks | so qtdeclarative5-… | 16:10 |
| didrocks | (as a package binary name) | 16:10 |
| robru | ah | 16:10 |
| robru | can I leave the source name / changelog alone? | 16:10 |
| didrocks | oh sure | 16:11 |
| robru | ok | 16:11 |
| didrocks | robru: where is the symlink magic? | 16:11 |
| didrocks | in Cmake? | 16:11 |
| * didrocks looks | 16:11 | |
| didrocks | ah indeed :) | 16:11 |
| robru | didrocks, yes, in this case I was able to do it in Cmake, perhaps I should go back to webbrowser-app and see if I can push the symlink logic from debian/rules to cmake as well. I remember not being able to figure that out at the time and being unhappy with it. | 16:12 |
| didrocks | robru: I wonder about the destdir thing though | 16:13 |
| didrocks | let me look :) | 16:13 |
| didrocks | ah dh_links fixes it | 16:14 |
| robru | didrocks, destdir was necessary, without it, it tries to make the symlink in the host system, and fails due to permissions. adding destdir makes the symlink appear inside the package instead. | 16:14 |
| didrocks | sweet! | 16:14 |
| didrocks | sweetness of sweetness even :) | 16:14 |
| didrocks | robru: looks perfect to me! (just change the binary package name + add the dep), everything is great, nice mess^W^W^W^Wwork | 16:15 |
| didrocks | ;) | 16:15 |
| didrocks | you want to push that as part of the same MP? | 16:15 |
| robru | didrocks, ha, thanks. ok, will fix and push in a moment | 16:15 |
| robru | yeah | 16:15 |
| didrocks | ok ;) | 16:15 |
| robru | didrocks, oh, can you top-approve it? I cant' | 16:20 |
| didrocks | robru: I can't as well, I think they should fix the team so that ~ubuntu-unity can push to it (or we will have an issue when deploying the stack) | 16:21 |
| robru | who should I ping about that? | 16:21 |
| didrocks | robru: btw, you didn't deploy the qa move for the dbusqt* test/mock, I did it FYI | 16:21 |
| didrocks | robru: someone in the Ubuntu Settings Components Team | 16:21 |
| robru | didrocks, oh, I thought I did, I must have deployed it just before that change. | 16:21 |
| didrocks | robru: let me look the last 2 commits ;) | 16:21 |
| didrocks | robru: I see there are tests, are they ran during the build? | 16:22 |
| robru | didrocks, for what? settings components? no... there is no build really, these are all qml files. they just get copied into place. | 16:22 |
| didrocks | robru: can we get the tests either as AP tests or tests that we run during the build? | 16:23 |
| didrocks | robru: not linked to that MP, but before we put under dailies :) | 16:23 |
| robru | didrocks, oh wait, actually they do get run during the build ;-) I just didn't see them | 16:23 |
| didrocks | hum, I think it will fail then if qt5declaractiveblablabla isn't a build-dep, won't it? | 16:23 |
| tedg | fginther, Okay, I'm confused. click is definitely in main now, but I'm still getting build failures. | 16:23 |
| robru | didrocks, well, I had that installed already, so it was fine. but it's added as a dep now, so should be good. | 16:24 |
| didrocks | robru: not a build-dep, so not during the build? | 16:24 |
| robru | hmmm | 16:24 |
| robru | didrocks, let me pbuilder it and we'll find out | 16:24 |
| didrocks | yep ;) | 16:24 |
| tedg | Also if someone could do this MR then we'll get a daily tonight. https://code.launchpad.net/~ted/cupstream2distro-config/click-in-main/+merge/179444 | 16:24 |
| didrocks | tedg: is it reviewed for NEWing already? is there any test? :) | 16:25 |
| didrocks | tedg: sorry, but we are asked for 3 new components to land everyday, there is a ticketting system :p | 16:25 |
| tedg | didrocks, ? It was already there. We just turned it off because click wasn't in main. | 16:25 |
| fginther | tedg, the dependency appears to be needed outside of the pbuilder chroot environment | 16:25 |
| tedg | didrocks, It's not new in that regard | 16:26 |
| didrocks | tedg: oh sure, if robru has the time to look at it and deploy (need to check the run is fine) | 16:26 |
| tedg | fginther, ? Why would a package build-dep be needed out of the pbuilder chroot? | 16:26 |
| didrocks | tedg: but if the upstream merger failed, I'm a little bit worried we'll push without the merge back branch merging | 16:26 |
| tedg | didrocks, Sure, we're fixing that right now (tm) | 16:27 |
| fginther | tedg, I don't have a good explanation... | 16:27 |
| tedg | fginther, Hmm, perhaps the universe hook is messing something up? | 16:28 |
| fginther | tedg, it's not even getting that far | 16:28 |
| fginther | the pbuilder never starts | 16:28 |
| fginther | well, sort of | 16:28 |
| didrocks | tedg: see, everything is against you, they don't want your code it seems :p | 16:28 |
| fginther | the gods must be crazy | 16:28 |
| fginther | didrocks, can you make sense of this? debhelper needs some click.pm: | 16:29 |
| fginther | https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/upstart-app-launch-saucy-amd64-ci/45/console | 16:29 |
| didrocks | $ dlocate click.pm | 16:30 |
| didrocks | click-dev: /usr/share/perl5/Debian/Debhelper/Sequence/click.pm | 16:30 |
| robru | didrocks, having a pretty big derp moment over here, turns out I'm missing a lot of deps (didn't check in pbuilder previously) | 16:30 |
| didrocks | so you need to have click-dev installed where you run your debian/rules clean | 16:30 |
| didrocks | robru: ahah, so not approving yet :) | 16:30 |
| tedg | didrocks, So is clean being run too early? | 16:31 |
| didrocks | tedg: if the code didn't change since my team, it's run on the machine, not in a chroot | 16:32 |
| didrocks | tedg: to prepare the source package | 16:32 |
| didrocks | and then the source package is built on pbuilder | 16:32 |
| tedg | didrocks, That sounds like a bad idea ;-) | 16:32 |
| didrocks | that's the reason why for dailies, I'm preparing the source package in a chroot | 16:32 |
| didrocks | after installing all build-deps by hand | 16:32 |
| tedg | How do we add deps for clean? | 16:32 |
| didrocks | and so I don't have python, or any debhelper helper on the host | 16:33 |
| fginther | tedg, didrocks, upstream builds on a raring host | 16:33 |
| didrocks | tedg: they need to install the build-dep on the host :/ | 16:33 |
| didrocks | (hence some builds pass even missing the python deps) | 16:33 |
| tedg | Sounds like we need a chroot chroot | 16:33 |
| didrocks | exactly! ;) | 16:33 |
| fginther | didrocks, get started on that :-) | 16:33 |
| tedg | fginther, Can you install click-dev on the builders? | 16:34 |
| fginther | tedg, it can be done, but might need to build a raring version to get the latest | 16:34 |
| tedg | fginther, Does that have to be in archive or can we just build one? | 16:35 |
| fginther | we can just build one | 16:35 |
| tedg | Okay, click is pretty simple. I'm pretty sure it'll be fine on raring. | 16:36 |
| fginther | tedg, can you point me to the source branch? | 16:36 |
| tedg | fginther, Is that something you'll do? Or do you need me to do something here? | 16:37 |
| fginther | duh: https://launchpad.net/click | 16:37 |
| tedg | fginther, https://launchpad.net/click | 16:37 |
| robru | didrocks, ok, luckily only two deps were missing. It's building in pbuilder now. | 16:37 |
| didrocks | robru: and tests are ran? | 16:37 |
| robru | didrocks, yeah | 16:37 |
| didrocks | \o/ | 16:37 |
| fginther | tedg, I'm going to try to push it to a ppa for building. if it all works we're in good shape | 16:37 |
| robru | didrocks, please approve the MP now ;-) | 16:37 |
| tedg | fginther, Cool, apparently it doesn't build on Precise :-) https://bugs.launchpad.net/click/+bug/1200670 | 16:38 |
| ubot2` | Ubuntu bug 1200670 in click (Ubuntu) "The click project does not build on Precise" [Medium,Fix released] | 16:38 |
| didrocks | robru: I wonder how the tests can pass without the ubuntu components | 16:38 |
| didrocks | robru: can you get Cimi on that, to ensure the tests are effectively… testing? :p | 16:38 |
| tedg | Or didn't. | 16:38 |
| robru | didrocks, not sure. I didn't look at the nature of the tests, it just says they're running. | 16:38 |
| didrocks | robru: mind inverstigating? I'm approving that one anyway | 16:39 |
| didrocks | robru: just can't top-approve, we'll need to get the team membership fixed | 16:39 |
| robru | didrocks, is it urgent? I'm EODing soon | 16:39 |
| didrocks | robru: on not as long as it's not daily-releasing :) | 16:39 |
| didrocks | so can wait on Monday | 16:39 |
| didrocks | btw, have a nice trip robru! | 16:39 |
| robru | didrocks, great, will check it out on monday then. | 16:39 |
| didrocks | safe flight back home :) | 16:39 |
| robru | didrocks, thanks! | 16:39 |
| fginther | tedg, it's building, should have it in the next 30-60 minutes | 16:40 |
| robru | didrocks, looks like cimi added unity team, but it's "pending", can you approve that? | 16:41 |
| tedg | fginther, Cool, thanks. Going to grab lunch, hopefully about the same timeframe :-) | 16:41 |
| robru | didrocks, https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-settings-components-team/+members#active | 16:42 |
| didrocks | robru: done | 16:42 |
| robru | sweeeeet | 16:42 |
| robru | didrocks, oh, we don't have CI on this branch. should I just manually merge it? | 16:42 |
| didrocks | robru: maybe wait for the CI to be setup? | 16:43 |
| fginther | robru, I can set that up quick | 16:43 |
| didrocks | there is no urgency :) | 16:43 |
| didrocks | fginther: daily_release: False for now please | 16:43 |
| robru | didrocks, I just want it to merge before it bitrots ;-) | 16:43 |
| fginther | didrocks, ack | 16:43 |
| robru | fginther, oh, great, thanks | 16:43 |
| didrocks | fginther: sdk stack | 16:43 |
| robru | fginther, we're talking about lp:ubuntu-settings-components, not sure how long you've been following our discussion ;-) | 16:44 |
| fginther | robru, yep | 16:44 |
| fginther | robru, done | 16:47 |
| robru | fginther, you rock | 16:47 |
| * fginther goes to lunch | 16:48 | |
| === m_conley_away is now known as m_conley | ||
| fginther | tedg, it builds: https://code.launchpad.net/~ted/upstart-app-launch/click-hook/+merge/176525 | 18:09 |
| tedg | fginther, \o/ | 18:09 |
| tedg | fginther, Thank you! | 18:09 |
| fginther | tedg, no problem, glad it's working now | 18:09 |
| === m_conley is now known as m_conley_away | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!