| xequence | First day of debconf | 06:17 |
|---|---|---|
| knome | :) | 06:25 |
| knome | shouldn't your nick be debuence? | 06:25 |
| xequence | knome: maybe next year :). This year I feel more like a tourist. | 06:31 |
| smartboyhw | zequence, yeah | 06:39 |
| smartboyhw | xequence, ^ | 06:41 |
| smartboyhw | knome, it should be dequence rather | 06:42 |
| === Noskcaj10 is now known as Noskcaj | ||
| smartboyhw | Hey xequence | 07:42 |
| smartboyhw | How's Debconf? | 07:42 |
| xequence | smartboyhw: Great weather. Introduction just started. | 07:57 |
| xequence | Met some Canonical folks just now | 07:57 |
| xequence | cjwatson and stgraber among others | 07:58 |
| smartboyhw | xequence, great | 07:59 |
| smartboyhw | xequence, (or zequence) When will you send out the e-mail to call for testcase writing? | 13:09 |
| xequence | smartboyhw: As soon as I've established a structure for how and by whom the the test should be written | 14:48 |
| smartboyhw | xequence, by whom? ... | 14:49 |
| smartboyhw | How is easier than "by whom" I think | 14:49 |
| smartboyhw | The community writes testcases:) | 14:49 |
| smartboyhw | *more difficult actually;P | 14:49 |
| smartboyhw | How: Propose merge | 14:49 |
| xequence | http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/whom | 14:49 |
| smartboyhw | xequence, I know, but how = propose merge and whom = community | 14:50 |
| xequence | That much is clear, yes | 14:50 |
| smartboyhw | How can that be difficult:P | 14:50 |
| xequence | smartboyhw: Nothing is difficult | 14:50 |
| xequence | it's just a matter of doing, and doing well | 14:51 |
| smartboyhw | xequence, I know, but I don't think the "structure" is different from what we are using in main QA team | 14:51 |
| xequence | smartboyhw: What would you look for when writing a test for ardour? | 14:51 |
| smartboyhw | xequence, quality, typos, formatting | 14:52 |
| smartboyhw | And of course, testing:) | 14:52 |
| xequence | I don have time to chat right now. bbl | 14:52 |
| xequence | smartboyhw: your missing the point | 14:52 |
| smartboyhw | xequence, ... | 14:52 |
| xequence | to be able to write a test for ardour, you need to be an ardour user | 14:52 |
| xequence | many of these applications are quite different from other kinds of applications | 14:53 |
| xequence | you dont simply look for typos | 14:53 |
| xequence | in that case we can skip testing all together | 14:54 |
| smartboyhw | xequence, uh huh... But of course you have to be an Ardour user to write the test... | 14:54 |
| xequence | the tests should be written for long term use | 14:55 |
| xequence | and we need documentation for this stuff | 14:55 |
| smartboyhw | xequence, yes (as in the others) | 14:55 |
| smartboyhw | xequence, what do you mean by "documentation"? | 14:56 |
| xequence | smartboyhw: Since you seem to know how this is done, why don you prepare a proposal for me? | 14:56 |
| smartboyhw | xequence, I just don't understand what you are meaning by "documentation"?!? | 14:56 |
| xequence | I'll happily accept one within the week | 14:56 |
| xequence | smartboyhw: Do you think you will have time for it? | 14:57 |
| smartboyhw | xequence, answer me first... | 14:57 |
| smartboyhw | If you want "HOWTO write", you can just refer to all the QATeam wiki | 14:57 |
| smartboyhw | If you want how to test, again, the QATeam wiki | 14:58 |
| xequence | smartboyhw: I don't need your advice in this matter smartboyhw. And I'm done wasting my time right now | 14:58 |
| xequence | either you do it, or I do it | 14:58 |
| * smartboyhw still can't understand why a proposal is needed, sorry | 14:58 | |
| xequence | then I do it | 14:59 |
| smartboyhw | xequence, sure | 14:59 |
| smartboyhw | OvenWerks, what do you think about this? ^ | 15:00 |
| === Noskcaj10 is now known as Noskcaj | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!