[06:17] First day of debconf [06:25] :) [06:25] shouldn't your nick be debuence? [06:31] knome: maybe next year :). This year I feel more like a tourist. [06:39] zequence, yeah [06:41] xequence, ^ [06:42] knome, it should be dequence rather === Noskcaj10 is now known as Noskcaj [07:42] Hey xequence [07:42] How's Debconf? [07:57] smartboyhw: Great weather. Introduction just started. [07:57] Met some Canonical folks just now [07:58] cjwatson and stgraber among others [07:59] xequence, great [13:09] xequence, (or zequence) When will you send out the e-mail to call for testcase writing? [14:48] smartboyhw: As soon as I've established a structure for how and by whom the the test should be written [14:49] xequence, by whom? ... [14:49] How is easier than "by whom" I think [14:49] The community writes testcases:) [14:49] *more difficult actually;P [14:49] How: Propose merge [14:49] http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/whom [14:50] xequence, I know, but how = propose merge and whom = community [14:50] That much is clear, yes [14:50] How can that be difficult:P [14:50] smartboyhw: Nothing is difficult [14:51] it's just a matter of doing, and doing well [14:51] xequence, I know, but I don't think the "structure" is different from what we are using in main QA team [14:51] smartboyhw: What would you look for when writing a test for ardour? [14:52] xequence, quality, typos, formatting [14:52] And of course, testing:) [14:52] I don have time to chat right now. bbl [14:52] smartboyhw: your missing the point [14:52] xequence, ... [14:52] to be able to write a test for ardour, you need to be an ardour user [14:53] many of these applications are quite different from other kinds of applications [14:53] you dont simply look for typos [14:54] in that case we can skip testing all together [14:54] xequence, uh huh... But of course you have to be an Ardour user to write the test... [14:55] the tests should be written for long term use [14:55] and we need documentation for this stuff [14:55] xequence, yes (as in the others) [14:56] xequence, what do you mean by "documentation"? [14:56] smartboyhw: Since you seem to know how this is done, why don you prepare a proposal for me? [14:56] xequence, I just don't understand what you are meaning by "documentation"?!? [14:56] I'll happily accept one within the week [14:57] smartboyhw: Do you think you will have time for it? [14:57] xequence, answer me first... [14:57] If you want "HOWTO write", you can just refer to all the QATeam wiki [14:58] If you want how to test, again, the QATeam wiki [14:58] smartboyhw: I don't need your advice in this matter smartboyhw. And I'm done wasting my time right now [14:58] either you do it, or I do it [14:58] * smartboyhw still can't understand why a proposal is needed, sorry [14:59] then I do it [14:59] xequence, sure [15:00] OvenWerks, what do you think about this? ^ === Noskcaj10 is now known as Noskcaj