| tseliot | any archive admins around? | 08:34 |
|---|---|---|
| stgraber | tseliot: I'm sort of here (at a conference) | 08:35 |
| tseliot | stgraber: I have some packages approved for an SRU but the binaries are stuck in NEW (precise-proposed) | 08:36 |
| stgraber | tseliot: ah, ok, I'll take a quick look then | 08:36 |
| tseliot | stgraber: nvidia-prime, fglrx-pxpress, nvidia-graphics-drivers-319, nvidia-graphics-drivers-319-updates, nvidia-graphics-drivers-304, nvidia-graphics-drivers-304-updates, nvidia-graphics-drivers-173-updates, nvidia-settings-319, nvidia-settings-319-updates, nvidia-settings-304, nvidia-settings-304-updates, nvidia-persistenced, fglrx-installer-updates, fglrx-installer-experimental-13 | 08:37 |
| tseliot | stgraber: nvidia-prime and fglrx-pxpress belong in main, the nvdia and fglrx drivers in restricted, nvidia-settings* in main (same as nvidia-persistenced) | 08:38 |
| stgraber | tseliot: hmm, fglrx-pxpress is in universe in saucy | 08:41 |
| tseliot | stgraber: I have a MIR for that, let me find the bug report... | 08:42 |
| stgraber | tseliot: hmm, I'm not fond of the idea of promoting this in the LTS before it's done in the dev release... | 08:43 |
| tseliot | stgraber: I guess the MIR hasn't been approved yet. Using universe should be ok for now, I'll have the packages moved as soon as the MIR is approved | 08:44 |
| stgraber | ok, accepting to universe for now then | 08:44 |
| tseliot | thanks | 08:46 |
| tseliot | didrocks: please have a look at bug #1204820 when you can | 08:46 |
| ubot2` | Launchpad bug 1204820 in nvidia-prime (Ubuntu) "[MIR] nvidia-prime & fglrx-pxpress" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1204820 | 08:46 |
| stgraber | tseliot: all done | 08:48 |
| tseliot | stgraber: excellent, thanks! | 08:48 |
| stgraber | (restarting queuebot as it didn't notice) | 08:49 |
| didrocks | tseliot: looks both good. is anything build-dep on them or will you add them to the support seed? | 08:55 |
| tseliot | didrocks: nothing really depends on them now | 08:56 |
| didrocks | tseliot: ok, please add them to the support seed then | 08:56 |
| didrocks | then, once pushed, I'll promote them | 08:56 |
| tseliot | didrocks: I'm not sure how to do that or why | 08:58 |
| didrocks | tseliot: if we don't do that, nothing will pin them in main | 08:58 |
| didrocks | and so someone will demote them | 08:58 |
| tseliot | didrocks: ok, so maybe either supported-hardware-common or supported-hardware-desktop? | 09:00 |
| didrocks | tseliot: oh, I don't know those, I'm sued to "supported" in bzr+ssh://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-dev/ubuntu-seeds/ubuntu.saucy/, but if there is anything else | 09:01 |
| didrocks | tseliot: just push to the one which makes sense and give me a sign so that I do the promotion | 09:01 |
| tseliot | didrocks: ok, shall I do that for precise too? (the packages are also in precise-proposed) | 09:02 |
| didrocks | tseliot: yeah | 09:02 |
| tseliot | didrocks: ok, good | 09:02 |
| didrocks | tseliot: but wait for it to be out of proposed to remember me to promote it there as well | 09:03 |
| didrocks | (the override is lost between proposed and update if it's the same than proposed -> release) | 09:03 |
| tseliot | didrocks: ok | 09:03 |
| tseliot | didrocks: ok, I've just committed revision 2152 for saucy, so the two packages should be pinned | 09:14 |
| didrocks | tseliot: thanks! promoting | 09:14 |
| tseliot | didrocks: great, thanks! | 09:15 |
| didrocks | tseliot: yw, done :) | 09:16 |
| tseliot | :) | 09:17 |
| stgraber | tseliot: ok, I'll promote it in precise too then | 09:24 |
| tseliot | stgraber: ok, thanks | 09:25 |
| stgraber | tseliot: done | 09:27 |
| tseliot | stgraber: great, thanks again :) | 09:27 |
| tseliot | stgraber: BTW, is nvidia-persistenced in saucy? | 09:35 |
| stgraber | tseliot: doesn't look like it | 09:35 |
| tseliot | stgraber: it was reviewed by cjwatson, then I applied his changes, reuploaded but it was never reviewed or approved again | 09:36 |
| rtg | infinity, are you ready to promote linux 3.11 ? | 12:06 |
| tseliot | stgraber: still around? | 12:53 |
| stgraber | tseliot: yeah | 12:55 |
| tseliot | stgraber: I don't see fglrx-installer-experimental-13 in precise-proposed | 12:55 |
| tseliot | (same bug report) | 12:56 |
| tseliot | i.e. 1198942 | 12:56 |
| stgraber | tseliot: I only processed the new binaries this morning, not new sources. fglrx-installer-experimental-13 is a new source pending review in precise-proposed | 12:57 |
| stgraber | (so is nvidia-persistenced apparently) | 12:57 |
| tseliot | stgraber: oh, so they haven't been approved yet | 12:57 |
| stgraber | right | 12:57 |
| tseliot | ok, I should probably ask slangasek about that then | 12:58 |
| stgraber | tseliot: is fglrx-installer-experimental-13 mostly an identical copy from saucy? if so, I can confirm that part and let it in based on that, otherwise I don't think I've got the time to do a full New review of it | 12:58 |
| tseliot | stgraber: fglrx-installer-experimental-13 is the same as fglrx and fglrx-updates in saucy | 12:59 |
| stgraber | tseliot: note that cjwatson, doko, slangasek and I are all at Debconf this week, so it may be difficult for us to find enough time in a row to do a full New review | 12:59 |
| tseliot | oh | 13:00 |
| stgraber | tseliot: ok, I'll grab the saucy source and do a diff, if they seem sufficiently identical (just obvious packaging changes), I'll let it in and then let its binaries in too | 13:00 |
| tseliot | stgraber: thanks a lot | 13:00 |
| === barry` is now known as barry_ | ||
| === barry_ is now known as barry | ||
| stgraber | ae8f805e52508dd2fde55be3dc7dffd1 fglrx-installer-updates_13.101.orig.tar.gz | 13:16 |
| stgraber | 12ae4dc15542382eb0c119729af6fd70 ../precise/fglrx-installer-experimental-13_13.101.orig.tar.gz | 13:16 |
| stgraber | tseliot: ^ | 13:16 |
| stgraber | ok, they're actually identical except for the precise one being shifted one level (no top level fglrx-installer in that tarball) | 13:18 |
| stgraber | -PATCH_MATCH[0]="^3.[10-11]" | 13:21 |
| stgraber | +PATCH_MATCH[0]="^3.[10]" | 13:21 |
| stgraber | tseliot: ^ is that going to be a problem once we backport the saucy kernel to precise? | 13:21 |
| stgraber | tseliot: debian/pxpress also indicates some code that's in precise but not in saucy (_find_process function and code to call dpkg --configure -a) | 13:23 |
| slangasek | tseliot: is fglrx-installer-experimental-13 already in saucy? | 13:24 |
| stgraber | besides that the rest seems mostly identical to saucy's | 13:24 |
| slangasek | ah, so it is | 13:24 |
| slangasek | stgraber: thanks for tending :) | 13:24 |
| stgraber | slangasek: as fglrx-installer-updates, yes | 13:24 |
| === medberry is now known as med_ | ||
| tseliot | stgraber: that would be a problem for 12.04.4, it shouldn't be for 12.04.3 (Which won't ship 3.11) | 13:48 |
| tseliot | stgraber: that part of code (debian/pxpress) is only used when called from jockey and there's no jockey in saucy | 13:48 |
| tseliot | slangasek: no, but the same driver is in fglrx and fglrx-updates (it only has a different name) | 13:49 |
| stgraber | tseliot: ok, thanks for the answers. I'll let it in now (the rest indeed is a copy + rename) | 13:55 |
| tseliot | stgraber: right, thanks | 13:55 |
| rtg | stgraber, do you have time to promote Saucy linux from -proposed ? | 14:01 |
| cjwatson | That isn't a manual task | 14:02 |
| cjwatson | Except in that it needs some problem resolved | 14:02 |
| stgraber | let me check what we're missing, is that just d-i? | 14:02 |
| rtg | stgraber, it might be, but I'm not sure. | 14:02 |
| cjwatson | d-i's missing (Adam was going to do it today, I thought), and I think it's also mysteriously hung up on an autopkgtest | 14:03 |
| * cjwatson fires up the VPN | 14:03 | |
| stgraber | hmm, indeed, stuck on autopkgtest | 14:03 |
| cjwatson | Spuriously - I think I'll force it | 14:03 |
| rtg | cjwatson, it is a major transition from 3.10 to 3.11 | 14:03 |
| cjwatson | I know | 14:04 |
| cjwatson | But proposed-migration doesn't care about that :) | 14:04 |
| cjwatson | I'll sort out d-i | 14:05 |
| stgraber | cjwatson: will you also do the seed changes? | 14:07 |
| cjwatson | Yes | 14:08 |
| ScottK | It looks like there's a mess around linphone/sipwitch that needs ucommon ported to a newer GNUtls (not done upstream yet). | 14:08 |
| ScottK | Way beyond me to sort out. | 14:08 |
| jbicha | we can clear up the linphone situation by removing ucommon 6 from Debian since it may take a while for the Debian maintainer to get around to fixing http://bugs.debian.org/716855 | 14:16 |
| ubot2` | Debian bug 716855 in libucommon-dev "libucomon-dev: Dependency on libgnutls28-dev makes sflphone unbuildable" [Important,Open] | 14:16 |
| jbicha | *remove ucommon from -proposed and then rebuild sipwitch | 14:16 |
| ScottK | Except ucommon doesn't build with libgnutls-dev | 14:16 |
| ScottK | Oh. | 14:17 |
| * ScottK tries. | 14:17 | |
| jbicha | I've so far been unsuccessful at convincing the Debian maintainer that it's a big problem | 14:18 |
| ScottK | Lovely. | 14:19 |
| ScottK | jbicha: The current sipwitch in proposed doesn't build with the older ucommon. So I think both have to go. Trying that now. | 14:29 |
| ScottK | Nope. That fails on the newer libexosip. | 14:30 |
| jbicha | ScottK: oh :( | 14:32 |
| ScottK | I think the whole lot needs to go. | 14:32 |
| jbicha | if we cared enough, we could add a ucommon5 source package... | 14:33 |
| ScottK | No, I don't think that would do it. | 14:37 |
| ScottK | sipwitch depends ucommon >= 6 | 14:38 |
| jbicha | ScottK: I mean have both ucommon and ucommon5 so that packages could build with whichever one they need...but I didn't test that either | 14:48 |
| ScottK | Cleared out. | 15:26 |
| ScottK | Doesn't seem to have made anything worse. | 15:54 |
| === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha | ||
| infinity | rtg: Yeahp, I'll get it shoved along after my morning meeting. | 16:01 |
| rtg | infinity, too late, cjwatson already gave it the nudge it needed | 16:02 |
| infinity | rtg: Oh. So he did. | 16:03 |
| rtg | infinity, he updated d-i, and I just received emails that all have been promoted | 16:04 |
| * infinity nods. | 16:05 | |
| rtg | now, I'm gonna upload -rc5. | 16:05 |
| infinity | I just twiddled the seeds to match, since I didn't get to mucking with making that all work automagically over the weekend. | 16:05 |
| cjwatson | ta, I had it uncommitted for when it landed | 16:11 |
| === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!