=== dark_ is now known as DarkPlayer | ||
jamesh | anyone around who could help me out in renaming a project? | 03:10 |
---|---|---|
StevenK | jamesh: Which project? | 03:11 |
jamesh | StevenK: https://launchpad.net/unuty-scope-hollywood to unity-scope-mediascanner | 03:11 |
jamesh | unity-scope-hollywood, even | 03:11 |
StevenK | jamesh: Did you need an alias? | 03:12 |
jamesh | Nope | 03:12 |
StevenK | jamesh: All done | 03:12 |
jamesh | thank you | 03:12 |
=== tasdomas_afk is now known as tasdomas | ||
xnox | maxb: smoser: not reading the whole backlog. but yeah, importer seems to be missing permissions. | 07:40 |
maxb | xnox: I think this is probably fallout from attempts to define API access permissions in terms of 'can upload' | 07:41 |
xnox | maxb: i remember laney or someone from membership board was giving package-importer team membership, after it expired from somewhere. | 07:42 |
maxb | I don't think this is a team issue, I think it is more likely that either the code was changed, or the status of old distroseries was | 07:43 |
xnox | ok. yeah, teams look fine. | 07:43 |
maxb | I think the problem is that the permissions system now formally acknowledges that core-dev are not allowed to upload to maverick-proposed, but that doesn't mean they shouldn't be able to call SourcePackage.setBranch for it | 07:44 |
czajkowski | xnox: boo | 08:38 |
xnox | czajkowski: =) | 08:39 |
Mez | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xdebug/+bug/1096464 <-- want to set won't fix for this, but can't select it ? | 12:55 |
ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1096464 in xdebug (Ubuntu) "xdebug does not display errors by default" [Undecided,New] | 12:55 |
czajkowski | Mez: that'd be someone on the bug squad I think | 13:08 |
Mez | czajkowski: I worked it out - my ubuntu dev team access had expired, revoking my inherited membership to bug control | 13:11 |
Mez | so, working as expected. | 13:11 |
czajkowski | cool | 13:12 |
mordred | 9 | 15:38 |
=== tasdomas is now known as tasdomas_afk | ||
smoser | maxb, so what options do i have at this point. if i want to have lp:ubuntu/cloud-init functional again ? | 18:15 |
smoser | wrt | 18:15 |
smoser | https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/234047 | 18:15 |
maxb | Well, ideally we'd get the permissions fixed | 18:16 |
maxb | But we could hack the importer code to omit the setBranch API call for selected distroseries | 18:16 |
micahg | maxb: there was a temporary loss of privs a while back, maybe just retry the branch? | 18:18 |
maxb | No, This has already been done, it is not transient | 18:19 |
micahg | ok | 18:19 |
thomi | LP build recipies will should build dependencies from the PPA they're building into, right? | 20:26 |
dobey | thomi: it will pull deps from the PPA if the version of the dep in the PPA is newer than that of the dep in the main Ubuntu archives, yes. | 21:00 |
dobey | thomi: the deps have to be successfully built *and* published, before they'll get pulled, though. | 21:01 |
thomi | hmm, something odd is happening then :-/ | 21:02 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!