=== dark_ is now known as DarkPlayer
[03:10] <jamesh> anyone around who could help me out in renaming a project?
[03:11] <StevenK> jamesh: Which project?
[03:11] <jamesh> StevenK: https://launchpad.net/unuty-scope-hollywood to unity-scope-mediascanner
[03:11] <jamesh> unity-scope-hollywood, even
[03:12] <StevenK> jamesh: Did you need an alias?
[03:12] <jamesh> Nope
[03:12] <StevenK> jamesh: All done
[03:12] <jamesh> thank you
=== tasdomas_afk is now known as tasdomas
[07:40] <xnox> maxb: smoser: not reading the whole backlog. but yeah, importer seems to be missing permissions.
[07:41] <maxb> xnox: I think this is probably fallout from attempts to define API access permissions in terms of 'can upload'
[07:42] <xnox> maxb: i remember laney or someone from membership board was giving package-importer team membership, after it expired from somewhere.
[07:43] <maxb> I don't think this is a team issue, I think it is more likely that either the code was changed, or the status of old distroseries was
[07:43] <xnox> ok. yeah, teams look fine.
[07:44] <maxb> I think the problem is that the permissions system now formally acknowledges that core-dev are not allowed to upload to maverick-proposed, but that doesn't mean they shouldn't be able to call SourcePackage.setBranch for it
[08:38] <czajkowski> xnox: boo
[08:39] <xnox> czajkowski: =)
[12:55] <Mez> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xdebug/+bug/1096464 <-- want to set won't fix for this, but can't select it ?
[12:55] <ubot5> Launchpad bug 1096464 in xdebug (Ubuntu) "xdebug does not display errors by default" [Undecided,New]
[13:08] <czajkowski> Mez: that'd be someone on the bug squad I think
[13:11] <Mez> czajkowski: I worked it out - my ubuntu dev team access had expired, revoking my inherited membership to bug control
[13:11] <Mez> so, working as expected.
[13:12] <czajkowski> cool
[15:38] <mordred> 9
=== tasdomas is now known as tasdomas_afk
[18:15] <smoser> maxb, so what options do i have at this point. if i want to have lp:ubuntu/cloud-init functional again ?
[18:15] <smoser> wrt
[18:15] <smoser> https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/234047
[18:16] <maxb> Well, ideally we'd get the permissions fixed
[18:16] <maxb> But we could hack the importer code to omit the setBranch API call for selected distroseries
[18:18] <micahg> maxb: there was a temporary loss of privs a while back, maybe just retry the branch?
[18:19] <maxb> No, This has already been done, it is not transient
[18:19] <micahg> ok
[20:26] <thomi> LP build recipies will should build dependencies from the PPA they're building into, right?
[21:00] <dobey> thomi: it will pull deps from the PPA if the version of the dep in the PPA is newer than that of the dep in the main Ubuntu archives, yes.
[21:01] <dobey> thomi: the deps have to be successfully built *and* published, before they'll get pulled, though.
[21:02] <thomi> hmm, something odd is happening then :-/