[00:58] <Rhonda> mapreri: Well, it's not clear from your changelog which of the changes arctually are the ones related to the closes line.  The closes line should be next to the specific changelog entry.
[00:58] <Rhonda> mapreri: That's actually the main reason why the closes: is expected in brackets, because it's meant to be written next to the corresponding changelog entry. :)
[01:00] <Unit193> http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.html#upload-bugfix
[04:34] <mfisch> Noskcaj: I commented on your i7z merge
[05:58] <Noskcaj> mfisch, I've uploaded a fixed version. The RC bug is not reported in ubuntu, but is shown in the debian part of the changelog
[06:22] <xequence> Hi. Could someone please help review this LP: #1209414
[07:15] <dholbach> good morning
[07:16] <iulian> Morning dholbach.
[07:16] <smartboyhw> iulian, any time to help us review Bug #1209414?
[07:17] <dholbach> hi iulian
[07:18] <smartboyhw> Or maybe dholbach can do it:P
[11:27] <mapreri> Rhonda: I hacked the changelog a bit before uploading, putting it in brackets: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tuxpaint/1:0.9.21-1.1ubuntu1 In this way is much clearer
[11:51] <Rhonda> mapreri: So that makes it clear that the bug closes the merge request.  Thanks. :)
[11:57] <mapreri> Rhonda: Now I would like update the debian package too, the pts is quite a shame.... :\ I'm wondering why the maintainer doesn't take care of such a simple thing
[11:58] <Rhonda> There might be multiple reasons, you have no insight into private issues of people.
[12:25] <Munksgaard> Hi, I'm trying to create a package for my ppa, but I'm unsure what I should put in the Section part of the control file. If I just leave it out, launchpad rejects my dput.
[12:31] <geser> see the list at http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#s-subsections for possible values and pick the one which matches the software you package
[12:35] <Munksgaard> geser: So this is a compiler/interpreter, so I guess It'd just go in devel ?
[12:39] <geser> yes, devel seems to be correct
[13:39] <micahg> coolbhavi: you have time to look as a second reviewer on a package for upload to saucy quickly?   it's for Ubuntu Studio
[13:40] <coolbhavi> yes micahg
[13:40] <coolbhavi> link pls
[13:41] <micahg> Bug #1209414
[13:42] <coolbhavi> sure thanks ll have a look
[13:42] <micahg> thanks
[13:43] <coolbhavi> nm
[14:45] <coolbhavi> micahg, just had a look everything seems fine test build in progress
[14:46] <micahg> coolbhavi: I noticed after  I gave it to you it seems to be missing a policy file
[14:46] <coolbhavi> d/changelog needs target change to saucy
[14:46] <coolbhavi> policy file?
[14:47] <micahg> yeah, it uses pkexec, so it needs a policy file to decide when to allow that and how
[14:47] <coolbhavi> ah I dint build it wait
[14:57] <coolbhavi> yes
[15:54] <mfisch> micahg: sorry I missed seeing that change upsteram
[15:54] <micahg> mfisch: it happens :)
[16:30] <micahg> coolbhavi: ok, just spoke with OvenWerks, policy file isn't an issue, how did the package work out for you?
[16:34] <coolbhavi> micahg, package is fine except that
[16:44] <ChogyDan> general question, is there a need for more packagers?
[21:34] <Noskcaj> slangasek, I've just got autoconf merged from debian. do you have to to upload it to the archive?
[21:45] <micahg> Noskcaj: are you asking the person who touched something last before merging things?
[21:50] <Noskcaj> micahg, that's what i just did.
[21:52] <micahg> Noskcaj: no, that's asking after you merge something
[21:52] <Noskcaj> micahg, i meant i've done the work, i've not uploaded or anything
[21:53] <micahg> Noskcaj: yes, I understand, you're supposed to ask before you do the work to prevent duplication of work and/or wastes of time
[21:53] <Noskcaj> micahg, ok
[21:55] <micahg> Noskcaj: don't worry, there's plenty of work to go around :)
[21:55] <Noskcaj> :)