| tkamppeter | I have uploaded ghostscript 9.06rc1 to saucy-proposed and it did not pass on to saucy. As I chose a bad version number (9.08~rc1~dfsg is considered newer than 9.08~dfsg) can this package get removed and I upload the final instead? | 10:12 |
|---|---|---|
| tkamppeter | s/9.06/9.08/ | 10:12 |
| xnox | Can saucy-adt-beets be re-run please? it's not reproducible here with run-autopackage-test. | 10:13 |
| xnox | tumbleweed: ^ | 10:14 |
| tumbleweed | xnox: thanks | 10:14 |
| cjwatson | tkamppeter: Surely you could just upload the final as 9.08+dfsg, which would be more conventional anyway | 10:38 |
| tkamppeter | cjwatson, OK. | 10:43 |
| Laney | cjwatson: updating your firefox force-badtest version | 11:31 |
| tkamppeter | cjwatson, new ghostscript uploaded. | 11:43 |
| cjwatson | Laney: thanks | 13:31 |
| Laney | sure | 13:31 |
| Laney | the failure there is weird btw; stgraber is investigating it | 13:31 |
| Laney | (so that it can then fail for real...) | 13:31 |
| stgraber | ;) | 13:32 |
| cjwatson | Can somebody accept grub2 in saucy unapproved? | 13:32 |
| stgraber | the current failure looks like a ENOSPACE on jenkins and a ENOINODE (well, ENOSPACE but caused by not enough inodes) on my machine | 13:32 |
| stgraber | cjwatson: I'll do it | 13:32 |
| cjwatson | ta | 13:32 |
| stgraber | cjwatson: didn't feel like passing -v to debuild? :) | 13:33 |
| * cjwatson -> idiot | 13:33 | |
| cjwatson | or even <- | 13:34 |
| cjwatson | er, wait, no I'm not. I did | 13:34 |
| cjwatson | but that's a binary .changes and it probably doesn't preserve that | 13:34 |
| stgraber | ah, that'd explain that. Not really a problem as I've got the bzr branch on my machine anyway :) | 13:34 |
| stgraber | cjwatson: there you go ^ | 13:38 |
| cjwatson | thanks | 13:38 |
| plars | cjohnston, infinity: When would we expect to start seeing release candidates for 12.04.3? | 15:02 |
| plars | cjwatson: ^ :) | 15:02 |
| plars | cjohnston probably thinks (and he may be right) that I do that on purpose just to annoy him now | 15:03 |
| cjwatson | plars: -> infinity - I'm not running it and am at DebConf this week and vacation next week | 15:06 |
| stgraber | plars: slangasek is running it (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SaucySalamander/ReleaseTaskSignup). Usually the first ones appear on Monday or Tuesday of the milestone week. | 15:07 |
| plars | stgraber: ah, I lost that link, thanks | 15:08 |
| plars | slangasek: I figured probably on monday, but just wanted to double-check as I think in the past we usually shoot for end of previous week | 15:09 |
| plars | slangasek: just trying to plan for the next week or so worth of priorities :) | 15:09 |
| knome | umh... *cougs* i know we're a bit late, but we have bug 1207493 | 15:37 |
| ubot2` | Launchpad bug 1207493 in xubuntu-docs (Ubuntu) "[SRU] Documentation does not match shipped system version (11.10 shipped with 12.04)" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1207493 | 15:37 |
| knome | is there any possibility to make sure it's in 12.04.3 if we uploaded it today? | 15:38 |
| smartboyhw | stgraber, knome (or Release Team Member): Can you add upgrade tests for UbuntuKylin? | 15:38 |
| tkamppeter | Someone knows why the ghostscript package is still in -proposed? | 16:31 |
| ogra_ | tkamppeter, Missing build dependencies: libopenjpeg-dev | 16:36 |
| ogra_ | https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ghostscript/9.08+dfsg-0ubuntu1/+build/4880097 | 16:36 |
| ogra_ | and according to http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html on all arches | 16:36 |
| tkamppeter | ogra_, so a MIR for openjpeg is needed? | 16:39 |
| ogra_ | yeah, looks like | 16:40 |
| tkamppeter | ogra_, the MIR is already there: bug 711061. | 16:42 |
| ubot2` | Launchpad bug 711061 in openjpeg (Ubuntu) "[MIR] libopenjpeg2" [Wishlist,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/711061 | 16:42 |
| ogra_ | so someone from the MIR team needs to approve and an archive admin needs to promote it | 16:43 |
| infinity | That old MIR didn't go well the last couple of times people looked at it. You'll want to bounce that back to jdstrand and see if his concerns were addressed. | 16:54 |
| infinity | jdstrand: ^^ | 16:55 |
| jdstrand | ack | 16:56 |
| tkamppeter | jdstrand, the CVEs mentioned in the last comments seem to be fixed in our package, as there are patches with that names. | 17:06 |
| mdeslaur | can someone explain to me what this means: | 18:41 |
| mdeslaur | skipped: libav (36 <- 51) | 18:41 |
| mdeslaur | got: 92+0: i-92 | 18:41 |
| infinity | It's the next line that's important. | 18:45 |
| mdeslaur | * i386: devede, dvd-slideshow, ffdiaporama, kmediafactory, mythexport, ubuntustudio-video | 18:45 |
| infinity | Which is telling you that if libav were updated, those packages become uninstallable. | 18:45 |
| infinity | That said, we should start the libav 9.x transition, IMO. | 18:46 |
| mdeslaur | ah! ok, libav-extra never got uploaded | 18:47 |
| mdeslaur | I see | 18:47 |
| mdeslaur | infinity: thanks for the explanation...I got hung up on the magic numbers | 18:47 |
| mdeslaur | infinity: just for kicks...what do they mean? | 18:47 |
| mdeslaur | I assumed "36" was the number of days since infinity slept | 18:48 |
| mdeslaur | but I couldn't figure out the others | 18:48 |
| infinity | They're just internal counters. Likely not meaningful unless you're hacking on britney. | 18:48 |
| infinity | Arguably have no place in user-facing output. | 18:48 |
| mdeslaur | infinity: ah, ok | 18:48 |
| flugxu | hi! There's an inconsistency for the release date of 12.04.3 - on this page it says August 22nd (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PrecisePangolin/ReleaseSchedule) and on this page it says today (https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+milestone/ubuntu-12.04.3) | 20:05 |
| infinity | flugxu: The LP milestone one is wrong, thanks for pointing it out. | 20:20 |
| flugxu | infinity, no problem - pity, I was hoping for some sweet loving today | 20:21 |
| infinity | flugxu: Fixed. | 20:21 |
| infinity | flugxu: To be fair, unless you really need an ISO, most of what will be 12.04.3 is in precise already. Milestone releases are pretty uneventful things. :) | 20:21 |
| flugxu | infinity, I was under the impression that we'd get a huge compiz update (pulled from 13.04), while right now 0.9.7 is in precise's repos | 20:22 |
| flugxu | and compiz is something that could use an update, having previously spent a lot of time on it before | 20:23 |
| flugxu | https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/LTSEnablementStack | 20:23 |
| tumbleweed | win 14 | 20:24 |
| tumbleweed | bleh | 20:24 |
| infinity | flugxu: I'm not sure where you got the impression that compiz was getting a "huge" update... | 20:25 |
| flugxu | infinity, if it's using the raring stack, that is a huge update | 20:25 |
| infinity | flugxu: The "HWE stack" is just hardware support, it's not a new compiz, unity, etc. | 20:25 |
| infinity | flugxu: Just a new libdrm, mesa, X11, and kernel. | 20:26 |
| flugxu | infinity, hm, you're right, dunno where I got that into my head. | 20:27 |
| infinity | flugxu: And you can get that today on precise with "apt-get install linux-generic-lts-raring xserver-xorg-lts-raring" | 20:27 |
| flugxu | infinity, ah, thanks! This is the first LTS I've actually stayed on for this long (since 8.04 was really awful and 10.10 was better than 10.04), so I wasn't aware of those metapackages | 20:28 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!