[10:12] I have uploaded ghostscript 9.06rc1 to saucy-proposed and it did not pass on to saucy. As I chose a bad version number (9.08~rc1~dfsg is considered newer than 9.08~dfsg) can this package get removed and I upload the final instead? [10:12] s/9.06/9.08/ [10:13] Can saucy-adt-beets be re-run please? it's not reproducible here with run-autopackage-test. [10:14] tumbleweed: ^ [10:14] xnox: thanks [10:38] tkamppeter: Surely you could just upload the final as 9.08+dfsg, which would be more conventional anyway [10:43] cjwatson, OK. [11:31] cjwatson: updating your firefox force-badtest version [11:43] cjwatson, new ghostscript uploaded. [13:31] Laney: thanks [13:31] sure [13:31] the failure there is weird btw; stgraber is investigating it [13:31] (so that it can then fail for real...) [13:32] ;) [13:32] Can somebody accept grub2 in saucy unapproved? [13:32] the current failure looks like a ENOSPACE on jenkins and a ENOINODE (well, ENOSPACE but caused by not enough inodes) on my machine [13:32] cjwatson: I'll do it [13:32] ta [13:33] cjwatson: didn't feel like passing -v to debuild? :) [13:33] * cjwatson -> idiot [13:34] or even <- [13:34] er, wait, no I'm not. I did [13:34] but that's a binary .changes and it probably doesn't preserve that [13:34] ah, that'd explain that. Not really a problem as I've got the bzr branch on my machine anyway :) [13:38] cjwatson: there you go ^ [13:38] thanks [15:02] cjohnston, infinity: When would we expect to start seeing release candidates for 12.04.3? [15:02] cjwatson: ^ :) [15:03] cjohnston probably thinks (and he may be right) that I do that on purpose just to annoy him now [15:06] plars: -> infinity - I'm not running it and am at DebConf this week and vacation next week [15:07] plars: slangasek is running it (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SaucySalamander/ReleaseTaskSignup). Usually the first ones appear on Monday or Tuesday of the milestone week. [15:08] stgraber: ah, I lost that link, thanks [15:09] slangasek: I figured probably on monday, but just wanted to double-check as I think in the past we usually shoot for end of previous week [15:09] slangasek: just trying to plan for the next week or so worth of priorities :) [15:37] umh... *cougs* i know we're a bit late, but we have bug 1207493 [15:37] Launchpad bug 1207493 in xubuntu-docs (Ubuntu) "[SRU] Documentation does not match shipped system version (11.10 shipped with 12.04)" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1207493 [15:38] is there any possibility to make sure it's in 12.04.3 if we uploaded it today? [15:38] stgraber, knome (or Release Team Member): Can you add upgrade tests for UbuntuKylin? [16:31] Someone knows why the ghostscript package is still in -proposed? [16:36] tkamppeter, Missing build dependencies: libopenjpeg-dev [16:36] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ghostscript/9.08+dfsg-0ubuntu1/+build/4880097 [16:36] and according to http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html on all arches [16:39] ogra_, so a MIR for openjpeg is needed? [16:40] yeah, looks like [16:42] ogra_, the MIR is already there: bug 711061. [16:42] Launchpad bug 711061 in openjpeg (Ubuntu) "[MIR] libopenjpeg2" [Wishlist,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/711061 [16:43] so someone from the MIR team needs to approve and an archive admin needs to promote it [16:54] That old MIR didn't go well the last couple of times people looked at it. You'll want to bounce that back to jdstrand and see if his concerns were addressed. [16:55] jdstrand: ^^ [16:56] ack [17:06] jdstrand, the CVEs mentioned in the last comments seem to be fixed in our package, as there are patches with that names. [18:41] can someone explain to me what this means: [18:41] skipped: libav (36 <- 51) [18:41] got: 92+0: i-92 [18:45] It's the next line that's important. [18:45] * i386: devede, dvd-slideshow, ffdiaporama, kmediafactory, mythexport, ubuntustudio-video [18:45] Which is telling you that if libav were updated, those packages become uninstallable. [18:46] That said, we should start the libav 9.x transition, IMO. [18:47] ah! ok, libav-extra never got uploaded [18:47] I see [18:47] infinity: thanks for the explanation...I got hung up on the magic numbers [18:47] infinity: just for kicks...what do they mean? [18:48] I assumed "36" was the number of days since infinity slept [18:48] but I couldn't figure out the others [18:48] They're just internal counters. Likely not meaningful unless you're hacking on britney. [18:48] Arguably have no place in user-facing output. [18:48] infinity: ah, ok [20:05] hi! There's an inconsistency for the release date of 12.04.3 - on this page it says August 22nd (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PrecisePangolin/ReleaseSchedule) and on this page it says today (https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+milestone/ubuntu-12.04.3) [20:20] flugxu: The LP milestone one is wrong, thanks for pointing it out. [20:21] infinity, no problem - pity, I was hoping for some sweet loving today [20:21] flugxu: Fixed. [20:21] flugxu: To be fair, unless you really need an ISO, most of what will be 12.04.3 is in precise already. Milestone releases are pretty uneventful things. :) [20:22] infinity, I was under the impression that we'd get a huge compiz update (pulled from 13.04), while right now 0.9.7 is in precise's repos [20:23] and compiz is something that could use an update, having previously spent a lot of time on it before [20:23] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/LTSEnablementStack [20:24] win 14 [20:24] bleh [20:25] flugxu: I'm not sure where you got the impression that compiz was getting a "huge" update... [20:25] infinity, if it's using the raring stack, that is a huge update [20:25] flugxu: The "HWE stack" is just hardware support, it's not a new compiz, unity, etc. [20:26] flugxu: Just a new libdrm, mesa, X11, and kernel. [20:27] infinity, hm, you're right, dunno where I got that into my head. [20:27] flugxu: And you can get that today on precise with "apt-get install linux-generic-lts-raring xserver-xorg-lts-raring" [20:28] infinity, ah, thanks! This is the first LTS I've actually stayed on for this long (since 8.04 was really awful and 10.10 was better than 10.04), so I wasn't aware of those metapackages