[10:12] <tkamppeter> I have uploaded ghostscript 9.06rc1 to saucy-proposed and it did not pass on to saucy. As I chose a bad version number (9.08~rc1~dfsg is considered newer than 9.08~dfsg) can this package get removed and I upload the final instead?
[10:12] <tkamppeter> s/9.06/9.08/
[10:13] <xnox> Can saucy-adt-beets be re-run please? it's not reproducible here with run-autopackage-test.
[10:14] <xnox> tumbleweed: ^
[10:14] <tumbleweed> xnox: thanks
[10:38] <cjwatson> tkamppeter: Surely you could just upload the final as 9.08+dfsg, which would be more conventional anyway
[10:43] <tkamppeter> cjwatson, OK.
[11:31] <Laney> cjwatson: updating your firefox force-badtest version
[11:43] <tkamppeter> cjwatson, new ghostscript uploaded.
[13:31] <cjwatson> Laney: thanks
[13:31] <Laney> sure
[13:31] <Laney> the failure there is weird btw; stgraber is investigating it
[13:31] <Laney> (so that it can then fail for real...)
[13:32] <stgraber> ;)
[13:32] <cjwatson> Can somebody accept grub2 in saucy unapproved?
[13:32] <stgraber> the current failure looks like a ENOSPACE on jenkins and a ENOINODE (well, ENOSPACE but caused by not enough inodes) on my machine
[13:32] <stgraber> cjwatson: I'll do it
[13:32] <cjwatson> ta
[13:33] <stgraber> cjwatson: didn't feel like passing -v to debuild? :)
[13:33]  * cjwatson -> idiot
[13:34] <cjwatson> or even <-
[13:34] <cjwatson> er, wait, no I'm not.  I did
[13:34] <cjwatson> but that's a binary .changes and it probably doesn't preserve that
[13:34] <stgraber> ah, that'd explain that. Not really a problem as I've got the bzr branch on my machine anyway :)
[13:38] <stgraber> cjwatson: there you go ^
[13:38] <cjwatson> thanks
[15:02] <plars> cjohnston, infinity: When would we expect to start seeing release candidates for 12.04.3?
[15:02] <plars> cjwatson: ^ :)
[15:03] <plars> cjohnston probably thinks (and he may be right) that I do that on purpose just to annoy him now
[15:06] <cjwatson> plars: -> infinity - I'm not running it and am at DebConf this week and vacation next week
[15:07] <stgraber> plars: slangasek is running it (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SaucySalamander/ReleaseTaskSignup). Usually the first ones appear on Monday or Tuesday of the milestone week.
[15:08] <plars> stgraber: ah, I lost that link, thanks
[15:09] <plars> slangasek: I figured probably on monday, but just wanted to double-check as I think in the past we usually shoot for end of previous week
[15:09] <plars> slangasek: just trying to plan for the next week or so worth of priorities :)
[15:37] <knome> umh... *cougs* i know we're a bit late, but we have bug 1207493
[15:37] <ubot2`> Launchpad bug 1207493 in xubuntu-docs (Ubuntu) "[SRU] Documentation does not match shipped system version (11.10 shipped with 12.04)" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1207493
[15:38] <knome> is there any possibility to make sure it's in 12.04.3 if we uploaded it today?
[15:38] <smartboyhw> stgraber, knome (or Release Team Member): Can you add upgrade tests for UbuntuKylin?
[16:31] <tkamppeter> Someone knows why the ghostscript package is still in -proposed?
[16:36] <ogra_> tkamppeter, Missing build dependencies: libopenjpeg-dev
[16:36] <ogra_> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ghostscript/9.08+dfsg-0ubuntu1/+build/4880097
[16:36] <ogra_> and according to http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html on all arches
[16:39] <tkamppeter> ogra_, so a MIR for openjpeg is needed?
[16:40] <ogra_> yeah, looks like
[16:42] <tkamppeter> ogra_, the MIR is already there: bug 711061.
[16:42] <ubot2`> Launchpad bug 711061 in openjpeg (Ubuntu) "[MIR] libopenjpeg2" [Wishlist,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/711061
[16:43] <ogra_> so someone from the MIR team needs to approve and an archive admin needs to promote it
[16:54] <infinity> That old MIR didn't go well the last couple of times people looked at it.  You'll want to bounce that back to jdstrand and see if his concerns were addressed.
[16:55] <infinity> jdstrand: ^^
[16:56] <jdstrand> ack
[17:06] <tkamppeter> jdstrand, the CVEs mentioned in the last comments seem to be fixed in our package, as there are patches with that names.
[18:41] <mdeslaur> can someone explain to me what this means:
[18:41] <mdeslaur> skipped: libav (36 <- 51)
[18:41] <mdeslaur>     got: 92+0: i-92
[18:45] <infinity> It's the next line that's important.
[18:45] <mdeslaur> * i386: devede, dvd-slideshow, ffdiaporama, kmediafactory, mythexport, ubuntustudio-video
[18:45] <infinity> Which is telling you that if libav were updated, those packages become uninstallable.
[18:46] <infinity> That said, we should start the libav 9.x transition, IMO.
[18:47] <mdeslaur> ah! ok, libav-extra never got uploaded
[18:47] <mdeslaur> I see
[18:47] <mdeslaur> infinity: thanks for the explanation...I got hung up on the magic numbers
[18:47] <mdeslaur> infinity: just for kicks...what do they mean?
[18:48] <mdeslaur> I assumed "36" was the number of days since infinity slept
[18:48] <mdeslaur> but I couldn't figure out the others
[18:48] <infinity> They're just internal counters.  Likely not meaningful unless you're hacking on britney.
[18:48] <infinity> Arguably have no place in user-facing output.
[18:48] <mdeslaur> infinity: ah, ok
[20:05] <flugxu> hi! There's an inconsistency for the release date of 12.04.3 - on this page it says August 22nd (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PrecisePangolin/ReleaseSchedule) and on this page it says today (https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+milestone/ubuntu-12.04.3)
[20:20] <infinity> flugxu: The LP milestone one is wrong, thanks for pointing it out.
[20:21] <flugxu> infinity, no problem - pity, I was hoping for some sweet loving today
[20:21] <infinity> flugxu: Fixed.
[20:21] <infinity> flugxu: To be fair, unless you really need an ISO, most of what will be 12.04.3 is in precise already.  Milestone releases are pretty uneventful things. :)
[20:22] <flugxu> infinity, I was under the impression that we'd get a huge compiz update (pulled from 13.04), while right now 0.9.7 is in precise's repos
[20:23] <flugxu> and compiz is something that could use an update, having previously spent a lot of time on it before
[20:23] <flugxu> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/LTSEnablementStack
[20:24] <tumbleweed> win 14
[20:24] <tumbleweed> bleh
[20:25] <infinity> flugxu: I'm not sure where you got the impression that compiz was getting a "huge" update...
[20:25] <flugxu> infinity, if it's using the raring stack, that is a huge update
[20:25] <infinity> flugxu: The "HWE stack" is just hardware support, it's not a new compiz, unity, etc.
[20:26] <infinity> flugxu: Just a new libdrm, mesa, X11, and kernel.
[20:27] <flugxu> infinity, hm, you're right, dunno where I got that into my head.
[20:27] <infinity> flugxu: And you can get that today on precise with "apt-get install linux-generic-lts-raring xserver-xorg-lts-raring"
[20:28] <flugxu> infinity, ah, thanks! This is the first LTS I've actually stayed on for this long (since 8.04 was really awful and 10.10 was better than 10.04), so I wasn't aware of those metapackages