| === JZTech101 is now known as JZ|Zzz | ||
| ikepanhc | @pilot in | 04:34 |
|---|---|---|
| === udevbot changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Ubuntu 13.04 released | Archive: open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support or app devel) | build failures -> http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of lucid -> raring | #ubuntu-app-devel for app development on Ubuntu http://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment | See #ubuntu-bugs for http://bit.ly/lv8soi | Patch Pilots: ikepanhc | ||
| === olli_ is now known as olli | ||
| dholbach | good morning | 06:50 |
| === smb` is now known as smb | ||
| === dholbach_ is now known as dholbach | ||
| Laney | jamespage: Can I ask you about golang in saucy? ;-) | 08:58 |
| jamespage | Laney, yep | 08:58 |
| Laney | jamespage: OK, one second... | 08:59 |
| Laney | jamespage: Right then, compile and run this please: http://paste.ubuntu.com/5992017/ | 08:59 |
| Laney | it's broken on saucy but if I rebuild the Debian package without the Ubuntu changes then it works | 09:00 |
| jamespage | Laney, oh - you'll love this one | 09:00 |
| jamespage | Laney, http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=719611 | 09:00 |
| ubottu | Debian bug 719611 in golang "golang: os/user not usable without cgo" [Normal,Open] | 09:00 |
| Laney | yes I found something like this while googling | 09:01 |
| jamespage | and https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/golang/+bug/1211749 | 09:01 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1211749 in golang (Ubuntu Saucy) "Packge os/users incorrectly built on amd64 arch" [Critical,Triaged] | 09:01 |
| jamespage | Laney, when you build it locally I suspect you are building on amd64 right? | 09:01 |
| Laney | so it's some buildd problem | 09:02 |
| Laney | yes | 09:02 |
| jamespage | Laney, this is due to the cross-compilation stuff that got introduced in saucy | 09:02 |
| Laney | oh they're arch:all packages | 09:02 |
| Laney | aaaaaaaaaaa | 09:02 |
| jamespage | in launchpad the i386 build produces the amd64 cross compile package | 09:02 |
| jamespage | but its broken because if can't cross compile the CGO bits | 09:02 |
| jamespage | if you tried that on i386 it would work | 09:03 |
| Laney | so I guess the debian maintainer built on amd64 hence it works there | 09:03 |
| jamespage | Laney, maybe | 09:04 |
| jamespage | Laney, its really awkward to fix without breaking the cross-compile feature as well | 09:04 |
| jamespage | as you really want os/user built on the native arch build | 09:05 |
| jamespage | but you might also want to use that for cross compile.... | 09:05 |
| jamespage | bah | 09:05 |
| rbasak | stokachu: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/5992058/ - is this what you're seeing, or do you see more test failures? I think it might be an artefact of the schroot, so I'll try again inside LXC instead. | 09:05 |
| rbasak | ^^ was with http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/5992058/ | 09:06 |
| rbasak | err, 5.5.31-0ubuntu1. Wrong paste buffer. | 09:06 |
| Laney | jamespage: yeah :/ | 09:07 |
| Noskcaj | jodh, Can you merge libnih? It's got no conflicts, just needs merging | 09:26 |
| === gusch is now known as gusch|lunch | ||
| === tkamppeter_ is now known as tkamppeter | ||
| Laney | http://162.213.35.4:28080/search?weighted=1&q="Hello,+world" | 09:52 |
| Laney | it's alive! (sort of) | 09:53 |
| sil2100 | ikepanhc: hi! Would you be able to sponsor a new package into universe for us? ;) https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1212993 | 10:05 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1212993 in Ubuntu "[needs-packaging] Mediascanner" [Undecided,New] | 10:05 |
| sil2100 | ikepanhc: it's something that will be used by a new unity scope and music app | 10:05 |
| ikepanhc | sil2100: hmm, I am not MOTU. let me talk to someone and see if he can do that | 10:06 |
| sil2100 | ikepanhc: thanks ;) | 10:07 |
| ikepanhc | no problem | 10:08 |
| sil2100 | ikepanhc: I already poked around for some people in #ubuntu-motu, but the usual people that do this for us are away today | 10:08 |
| sil2100 | ikepanhc: while we want to get things in as soon as possible since FF is near | 10:08 |
| ikepanhc | yes, aug-29th | 10:10 |
| brendand | why is it so hard to find decent documentation for debian rules files? | 10:13 |
| rbasak | brendand: what are you after? Debian policy defines the targets, and then the documentation for the contents usually depends on the build system and/or helper you're using (eg. debhelper). | 10:14 |
| brendand | rbasak, well it's a qt based project - so i guess it's supported by debhelper? | 10:16 |
| rbasak | brendand: you're trying to write a new one? | 10:17 |
| brendand | rbasak, what do you mean? | 10:17 |
| rbasak | brendand: I don't understand what you're looking for. | 10:17 |
| brendand | rbasak, i'm trying to write a rules file which builds my project | 10:18 |
| ikepanhc | sil2100: freeflying told me if you have a package ready he can ack for you. please contact him at #ubuntu-motu | 10:19 |
| brendand | rbasak, i guess i should read debhelper documentation | 10:20 |
| rbasak | brendand: ah, OK. I'm not sure about qt specifically, but in general debhelper does the right thing automatically, so you might start off with a minimal debhelper-based rules file and see if that works. There might be some qt-specific runes you need, but they should be minimal. I'd look at an existing package to see. | 10:20 |
| brendand | rbasak, i think the main issue is that my .pro file is not at the root of the source so i may need to override something | 10:21 |
| rbasak | brendand: https://wiki.debian.org/IntroDebianPackaging#Step_3:_Add_the_Debian_packaging_files and scroll down a bit to see what a minimal debhelper rules file looks like. | 10:21 |
| ikepanhc | @pilot out | 10:22 |
| === udevbot changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Ubuntu 13.04 released | Archive: open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support or app devel) | build failures -> http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of lucid -> raring | #ubuntu-app-devel for app development on Ubuntu http://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment | See #ubuntu-bugs for http://bit.ly/lv8soi | Patch Pilots: | ||
| sil2100 | ikepanhc: thanks! Will do :) | 10:30 |
| ikepanhc | :D | 10:31 |
| === MacSlow is now known as MacSlow|lunch | ||
| caribou | 5 | 10:55 |
| sil2100 | tseliot: ah ha! Hi Alberto! | 11:46 |
| sil2100 | tseliot: can I 'use' you for some small task ;)? | 11:46 |
| sil2100 | tseliot: since you see, we need a core-dev to ACK packaging changes before we can daily-release it into Ubuntu, and we have one here | 11:47 |
| sil2100 | tseliot: it's a small packaging change but still, someone needs to say if the packaging changes aren't harmful or anything | 11:47 |
| sil2100 | tseliot: https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/view/cu2d/view/Head/view/WebApps/job/cu2d-webapp-head-3.0publish/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/packaging_changes_unity-webapps-qml_0.1+13.10.20130816.1-0ubuntu1.diff <- there's not much here besides 2 lines | 11:47 |
| sil2100 | tseliot: (diff only shows packaging changes) | 11:48 |
| ogra_ | sil2100, no mention of the dependency change in the changelog ... | 11:49 |
| ogra_ | apart from that it looks fine | 11:49 |
| sil2100 | ogra_: yeah, sometimes those get missed, as the changelog is being updated automatically - is that a blocker, or can we publish anyway? | 11:50 |
| ogra_ | sil2100, well, can you make sure this happens in the future ... if someone greps the changelog for such stuff when debugging he should be able to find anything | 11:52 |
| ogra_ | beyond that, happy upload | 11:52 |
| sil2100 | ogra_: we'll let upstreams know that they should include info about such things in the commit messages so that it happens less frequently :) | 11:53 |
| mdeslaur | @pilot in | 11:53 |
| === udevbot changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Ubuntu 13.04 released | Archive: open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support or app devel) | build failures -> http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of lucid -> raring | #ubuntu-app-devel for app development on Ubuntu http://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment | See #ubuntu-bugs for http://bit.ly/lv8soi | Patch Pilots: mdeslaur | ||
| ogra_ | sil2100, great | 11:54 |
| tseliot | sil2100: +1 from me too | 11:58 |
| sil2100 | tseliot, ogra_: thanks guys | 12:01 |
| === MacSlow|lunch is now known as MacSlow | ||
| ogra_ | np | 12:02 |
| === steveire_ is now known as steveire | ||
| === dholbach_ is now known as dholbach | ||
| === _salem is now known as salem_ | ||
| === JZ|Zzz is now known as JZTech101 | ||
| === ema_ is now known as ema | ||
| caribou | mdeslaur: I need your patchpilot attention on a couple of SRU (one that you've already looked at) | 13:33 |
| mdeslaur | caribou: sure, which ones? | 13:33 |
| caribou | mdeslaur: LP: #1005901 is the one you commented on | 13:33 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1005901 in duplicity (Ubuntu Precise) "cannot change temp dir" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1005901 | 13:33 |
| mdeslaur | caribou: I just uploaded that one literally 30 seconds ago :) | 13:34 |
| caribou | mdeslaur: :D | 13:34 |
| caribou | mdeslaur: the other one is LP: #816153 | 13:34 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 816153 in dante (Ubuntu Precise) "dante-server using the wrong libc.so" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/816153 | 13:34 |
| caribou | infinity and cjwatson have both helped me with this one a while ago | 13:34 |
| mdeslaur | caribou: ok, let me take a look | 13:35 |
| caribou | mdeslaur: for this last one, the proper way would have been to change configure.ac, but the debian packaging is badly broken | 13:36 |
| caribou | mdeslaur: so I followed cjwatson's advice | 13:36 |
| sil2100 | Can any core-dev give us a green light for a daily-release packaging change? | 13:40 |
| sil2100 | https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/view/cu2d/view/Head/view/Unity/job/cu2d-unity-head-3.0publish/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/packaging_changes_libunity_7.0.11+13.10.20130816.2-0ubuntu1.diff <- | 13:40 |
| sil2100 | We need to release this ASAP | 13:40 |
| sil2100 | Thanks in advance! | 13:41 |
| sil2100 | mdeslaur: maybe you could help? :) | 13:41 |
| sil2100 | Scratch that, ogra_ performed the ACK | 13:43 |
| mdeslaur | sil2100: cool | 13:44 |
| mdeslaur | caribou: do you have a few minutes to fix a few small details in your dante debdiffs? | 13:48 |
| caribou | mdeslaur: sure | 13:49 |
| roaksoax | xnox: howdy!! so I've been trying to re-enable clvm (for corosync only) against the newer dlm (which is still in universe), however, it FTBFS. The funny thing is that If I configure it locally, it does not fail: http://paste.ubuntu.com/5992776/ http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/5992774/ | 13:50 |
| === dholbach_ is now known as dholbach | ||
| mdeslaur | caribou: ok, commented in bug | 14:00 |
| caribou | mdeslaur: ok looking | 14:00 |
| caribou | mdeslaur: about point #4, I had noticed the case on my system as well, but concluded that it would not be an issue in a build environment | 14:03 |
| mdeslaur | caribou: ok, can you please add a not to that effect in the patch header? | 14:03 |
| mdeslaur | note | 14:03 |
| caribou | mdeslaur: ok, will do. I'll fix the other minor issues | 14:04 |
| mdeslaur | caribou: cool, let me know when you're done, and I'll upload them | 14:09 |
| arges | is there a 'best-practice' way to use something like a control.in file to generate a control file? I've seen many packages just use sed, but am wondering if there is a better way. thanks | 14:20 |
| jtaylor | having a control.in is not considered best practice, why do you need it? | 14:29 |
| jtaylor | cdbs provides some tools to use it I think | 14:29 |
| caribou | mdeslaur: just uploaded new debdiffs to the dante bug | 14:43 |
| mdeslaur | caribou: thanks | 14:43 |
| caribou | mdeslaur: as discussed, I didn't change the logic for point #4 but added a note to the patch header | 14:44 |
| mdeslaur | caribou: ok | 14:44 |
| stokachu | rbasak: thats exactly what i saw | 15:00 |
| stokachu | rbasak: re mysql build | 15:00 |
| tseliot | slangasek: are you around? | 15:02 |
| mdeslaur | caribou: uploaded dante to saucy and proposed. thanks! | 15:03 |
| caribou | mdeslaur: saucy & precise ? np | 15:04 |
| caribou | mdeslaur: thank you | 15:04 |
| mdeslaur | whoops, yes, precise | 15:04 |
| smoser | slangasek, ping. | 15:29 |
| smoser | jodh, maybe. | 15:29 |
| smoser | lxc has clone via overlayfs now (example at https://gist.github.com/smoser/6199772). | 15:29 |
| smoser | thats *really* nice. except for the whole inotify/reload-configuration thing. | 15:30 |
| smoser | for upstart in > saucy, its sufficient to write a job and then run 'initctl reload-configuration'. that sucks, but oh well. | 15:30 |
| smoser | but in precise, with overlayfs below the container, 'apt-get install some-service' results in 'some-service' not running by default as you'd expect (because it puts the job in /etc/init, runs 'start job', but upstart says "what job?") | 15:31 |
| smoser | i'm looking for a generic way to solve the 'apt-get install' path. | 15:32 |
| jodh | smoser: I'd rather not put hacks into Upstart to work around kernel bugs. However, maybe an option is to tweak invoke-rc.d to detect if /etc/init is on overlayfs and force a reload. | 15:41 |
| smoser | jodh, right. thats the kind of thing i was thinking. | 15:42 |
| smoser | diverting 'start' and doing it there might also be an option. | 15:42 |
| hallyn_ | jodh: is un-implemented inotify in an fs really a "kernel bug" though? | 15:42 |
| smoser | kernel , upstart, FIGHT! | 15:42 |
| hallyn_ | i'd deposit a quarter to see that | 15:43 |
| jodh | hallyn_: I thought the problem was that it (partially?) claims to support inotify but actually lies? | 15:43 |
| hallyn_ | jodh: oh, if so then that's a bug :) how does it claim that though? inotify syscalls succeeding? | 15:43 |
| smoser | jodh, does upstart do anything if it was told the truth and there was no support ? | 15:43 |
| smoser | hallyn_, its possible that the intofiy *does* work. | 15:43 |
| smoser | and goes through to someone monitoring the underlay | 15:43 |
| smoser | i dont know. | 15:44 |
| sil2100 | kenvandine: ping! | 15:44 |
| hallyn_ | smoser: me neither :) | 15:44 |
| hallyn_ | and in either case i wouldn't want hacks saying "if this is overlayfs" in upstart - rather just "if /etc doesn't support inotify" | 15:44 |
| kenvandine | sil2100, pong | 15:47 |
| sil2100 | kenvandine: do you know if maybe you could upload my new package to the archive ;) ? | 15:48 |
| sil2100 | kenvandine: since dholbach seems to be AFK | 15:48 |
| sil2100 | kenvandine: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1212993 | 15:48 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1212993 in Ubuntu "[needs-packaging] Mediascanner" [Undecided,New] | 15:48 |
| kenvandine | sure | 15:48 |
| mdeslaur | @pilot out | 15:49 |
| === udevbot changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Ubuntu 13.04 released | Archive: open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support or app devel) | build failures -> http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of lucid -> raring | #ubuntu-app-devel for app development on Ubuntu http://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment | See #ubuntu-bugs for http://bit.ly/lv8soi | Patch Pilots: | ||
| sil2100 | kenvandine: thank you! :D | 15:55 |
| sil2100 | kenvandine: I was trying to release it for like 7 hours now :D | 15:55 |
| sil2100 | dholbach found some small issues we fixed, there's also some hardening question there, but upstream will deal with that in next versions if there indeed is a problem | 15:56 |
| kenvandine | sil2100, uploaded | 15:56 |
| sil2100 | kenvandine: WOHA | 15:57 |
| sil2100 | :D | 15:57 |
| sil2100 | kenvandine: I think I owe you another beer! | 15:57 |
| kenvandine | :) | 15:57 |
| * kenvandine likes beer! | 15:57 | |
| === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha | ||
| === Nisstyre-laptop is now known as Nisstyre | ||
| rickspencer3 | e | 18:37 |
| === JZ|Zzz is now known as JZTech101 | ||
| asomething | anyone around that might be able to help me figure out why a package isn't migrating? | 20:12 |
| asomething | update_excuses says the autopkgtest for bzr is marked failing, but the most recent run on jenkins is successful | 20:12 |
| asomething | ^^ maybe cjwatson ? | 20:38 |
| infinity | asomething: The root of the problem needs looking at, but I've nudged bzr to migrate. | 20:39 |
| asomething | infinity, thanks. I just wasn't sure if I was missing something. update_output.txt didn't mention bzr at all | 20:40 |
| infinity | asomething: Right, it won't be in output if it fails in the excuses stage. | 20:41 |
| === bschaefer_ is now known as bschaefer | ||
| === salem_ is now known as _salem | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!